Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper Manesh-1-PB PDF
Paper Manesh-1-PB PDF
national Journal
J of Phytom
medicine 7 (2015) 459-467
4
httpp://www.arjoournals.org/inndex.php/ijpm
m/index
dried for two weeks at room temperature. The sample was finely entire agar surface and allowed to dry for 5 minutes. 80μl
powdered in a blender, weighed and stored in dry polythene bags (500mg/ml) of various extracts dissolved in DMSO were loaded
at 4◦C prior to antibacterial and antioxidant analysis. into the wells. Streptomycin (0.125mg/ml) was taken as positive
control.Plates were incubated at 370C for 24 hrs. For each
Extract preparation bacterial strain, pure solvent was used as control. At the end of the
incubation period, inhibition zones formed around the well were
The dry powdered material was subjected to successive organic measured.
solvent extraction by refluxing in the soxhlet apparatus each for 12
hours. The solvents used were non polar to polar consisting of
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
hexane, n-butanol, methanol and water. Each fraction was
collected when no further elution of compounds was observed. The Determination of the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of
collected extracts were subject to distillation and drying in incubator antibacterial activities of selected extracts were done using by
.The dried extracts were stored in sterile containers in the micro dilution broth method based on National Committee for
refrigerator till further analysis. Clinical Laboratory Standards (2012) [16].Mueller Hinton broth was
used for the preparation ofa series of dilutions of extract at final
Phytochemical analysis concentrations ranging from 0.312 μg/ml to 40mg/ml. The inoculum
of microorganisms was prepared from 24 hours cultures and
Standard methods used for identification of a mixture of suspensions were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard
phytochemicals were followed by qualitative chemical test to obtain suspensions. The tubes were distributed into 1000 μL with different
information regarding the nature of constituents present in crude concentrations of extract and 100øL inoculum. The control tubes
extract.The various extracts of different parts of A.wightiiwere contained only NB and inoculum suspensions.The inoculated tubes
analyzed for the presence of carbohydrates, alkaloids, phenols and were incubated at 370 C for 24 hours. The MIC was calculated
tannins, flavonoids,saponins, steroids, triterpenoids and where in no visible growth of tested microorganism appeared, and
coumarins[14]. were expressed in μg/ml. The tests were conducted in triplicate.
The least concentration of each extract showing a clear zone of
Microorganisms inhibition was taken as the MIC.
The bacterial cultures used were obtained from the Collections of
clinical isolates maintained at Department of Biotechnology, Determination of the Minimal Bactericidal Concentration
University of Kerala and plant pathogens collected from Central (MBC)
Tuber Crops Research Institute (CTCRI)Thiruvanathapuram ,
The minimal bactericidal concentration of the plant extract on the
Kerala, India. The clinical isolates consisted of Shigellasp.
clinical isolates was done according to the method highlighted in
Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginoisa, Escherichia National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards(2000)[17].
coli, Klebsiellasp,Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi. Briefly 5μL was pipetted from the microbe mixture obtained in the
Stock cultures were maintained at 40C on slopes of nutrient agar. A
determination of MIC stage was streaked out on the nutrient agar
pure single colony grown on an agar plate was
at 370 C for 24 hours. The least concentration of the extract with no
transferred to 5ml of peptone water and incubated for 2 hours at
visible growth was taken as the Minimal Bactericidal Concentration.
370C. The fungal strains such as Penicilliummarneffei,
Cryptococussp, Candida
sp,Curvlariasp,Pencilliumsp,Epidermoshytonsp,Microsporumsp,Fur Antifungal activity
ariumsp,Aspergillusflavus, Aspergilluniger, Rhizopussp., and Preparation of the media for fungal culture: Sabouraud Dextrose
Aspergillusfumigatus from among human pathogens and Agar (SDA) was used as the media for human pathogens and
Sclerotiarolfrii, Phytopthorapalmivora, Phytopthoracolocaceae, Carrot agar media for plant pathogen testing. The media were
Collectotriumsp plant pathogens were used to test the inhibition sterilized in an autoclave and poured in sterile culture tubes, 1ml in
activity of the extracts. Stock cultures were maintained at 40C on each tube. The slants were kept for sterility check before use.
slopes of Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (S.D.A). Control tubes were treated with solvents only. Fungal culture were
inoculated on SDA and Carrot agar slopes and incubated at room
Antibacterial activity temperature (30-320C). Results were analyzed after a period of
one week. The results were compared with Imidazole 100øg/ml of
The well diffusion method was used to evaluate the antimicrobial
SDA [18].
activity [15]. Nutrient agar (Hi-Media -Mumbai) plates were
prepared and wells of 8mm diameter were cut using a sterile borer.
100μl of each of the prepared culture of test bacteria was placed
Results and Discussion
on the nutrient agar. The inoculum was swabbed uniformly over the
PAGE | 460 |
Kunjumon et al. International Journal of Phytomedicine 7 (4) 459-467 [2015]
Antifungal activity No.4). The methanol extract showed inhibition of the growth of
selected 10 human pathogenic fungi and minimal growth in
The data pertaining to theantifungal potential of different extracts of Aspergillusfumigatus. It is notable that the methanol extract
A.wightti rhizome are presented in Table 3& 4. The n-Butanol, showed inhibition of Phytophthorapalmivora. The water extract
methanol and water extracts of A. wightii strongly inhibited the showed no inhibition of human and plant pathogenic fungi.The
growth of fungi including pathogenic strains of human and plant results obtained from these studies determine that various parts of
fungi. The n-butanol extract of rhizome showed inhibition against of plants contained bioactive compounds which possess antimicrobial
the growth of pathogenic fungus except Sclerotiarolfrii (Table properties in plants against external bacterial and fungal strains.
Table No.1 Preliminary screening for phytochemicals of rhizome extracts fromA, wightii
SL.No Name of the compound Name of the extracts
n-Hex n-But Met Wat
1 Carbohydrate + + + +
2 Protein & fat + + + -
3 Alkaloids - + + -
4 Phenolic Compounds - + + -
5 Terpenoid + + + -
6 Flavonoid + + + +
7 Coumarins - + + -
8 Steroids + + + +
PAGE | 462 |
Kunjumon et al. Innternational Joournal of Phyttomedicine 7 (4) 459-467 [2015]
Plate No.1Inhibition activity off rhizome extractts from A. wightitii.Schottagainst
A) Proteus sp, (B
(A B) Shigellasp (C) Salmonella para
ratyphi,(D) Pseud
udomonas aerugi
ginosa(E) Klebsieellasp, (F) Escheerichia Coli, (G) Salmonella
S typhhi,
H) Staphylococcuus aureus.
(H
20
0
18
8
Cont
16
6 DMSO
14
4 n‐Hex
ZONE OF INHIBITION (mm)
12
2 n‐But
10
0 Meth
Water
8
0
Proteus sp Shigella sp Sallmonella Pseudomonas Klebsiella sp E‐coli Sallmonella typhi Staphyylococcus
paaratyphi aerugino
osa. au
ureus
PAGE | 4633 |
Kunjumon et al. International Journal of Phytomedicine 7 (4) 459-467 [2015]
Table No.3 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of n-butanol and methanol extracts of rhizome from A. wightii.Schott.
Organism and Concentration (mg/ml)
Sl.No
solvent extract 40 20 10 5 2.5 1.25 0.625 0.312
n--Butanol Extract
1 Salmonella paratyphi - - - - - + + +
2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - - - - - - + +
3 Klebsiellasp - - - - - - + +
4 Staphylococcus aureus - - - - - - + +
Methanol extract
1 Salmonella paratyphi - - - - - - + +
2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - - - - - - + +
3 Klebsiellasp - - - - - - + +
4 Staphylococcus aureus - - - - - - + +
(-) Inhibition of organism, (+) Growth of organism
Table No.4Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of n-butanol and methanol extracts of rhizome from A. wightii.
Test Microorganism and Concentration (mg/ml)
SL.No
solvent extract 40 20 10 5 2.5 1.25 0.625 0.312
n--Butanol Extract
1 Salmonella paratyphi - - - - - + + +
2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - - - - - + + +
3 Klebsiellasp - - - - + + + +
4 Staphylococcus aureus - - - - - + + +
Methanol extract
1 Salmonella paratyphi - - - - - + + +
(-)
2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa - - - - - + + +
3 Klebsiellasp - - - - - + + +
4 Staphylococcus aureus - - - - + + + +
PAGE | 464 |
Kunjumon et al. International Journal of Phytomedicine 7 (4) 459-467 [2015]
Table No. 5 Activity of solvent crude extracts of rhizome fromA. wightii against fungal strains.
11 Aspergillusfumigatus - - - +
Table No.6Activity of solvent crude extracts from rhizome of A. wightii against plant pathogens.
Solvent extracts (500mg/ml)
SI .No Name of the fungus n-Hex N-But Meth Wat
1 Sclerotiarolfrii - - - +
2 Phytopthorapalmivora + + + +
3 Phytopthoracolocaceae - - - +
4 Collectotriumsp - - + +
(-) Inhibition of organism, (+) Growth of organism
Conclusion Acknowledgement
From this study we concluded that this plant has a wide range of
The authors are thankful to the Central Tuber Crops Research
medicinal-antimicrobial activity. It has also been demonstrated that
Institute (CTCRI)Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India for providing
herbal medicine can be effective to combat
the plant pathogens.
pathogenicmicroorganisms. Using different purification methods,
these antimicrobial compounds can be further purified and studied.
PAGE | 465 |
Kunjumon et al. International Journal of Phytomedicine 7 (4) 459-467 [2015]
References
[10]. RajagopalPL, SreejithKR, KironSSand Wayne, Philadelphia: National
[1]. Ahmad I, Mehmood Z, Mohammad F.
NarayanaSwami VB.Anti-inflammatory Committee for Clinical
Screening of some Indian medicinal
activity of the rhizomes of LaboratoryStandards; 2000.
plants for their antimicrobial properties.
Anaphyllumwightii Schott. American
J Ethnopharmacol.1998; 62,183-193. [18]. Pandey BP. Fungi,
Journal of Pharmacy & Health
S.Chand&Company, New Delhi,1994;
[2]. Murray M. The Healing power of herbs. Research. 2013; 1(6),76-80.
p.416
Prima Publishing, CA, 1995; 162-171
[11]. Dharsana JN. Molly Mathew.
[19]. Dominic VJ and ManjuMadhavan.
[3]. Nayar, MP. Key works to the taxonomy Premkumar N. Diljit S Kuttoor.
Pharmacognostic and preliminary
of flowering plants of India. Botanical Preliminary screening of
phytochemical Screening of the
Survey of India (1984) anaphyllumwightiischott tubers for anti-
rhizome of anaphyllumwightiischott, an
inflammatory and antioxidant
[4]. Dominic VJ. Biosystematic studies in endemic and threatened genus of the
activity.Am. J. PharmTech Res. 2014;
the genus Anaphyllum Schott Western Ghats. Journal of Herbal
4(4), 88-97.
(Araceae) of Western ghats. Int. J. Medicine and Toxicology. 2012; 6 (2),
LifeSc. Bt& Pharm. Res. 2012; 3, 161- [12]. Rajagopal PL, Sreejith KR, Kiron SS 55 60.
170 and Narayana Swami VB PL.
[20]. ThankamaniV,JamesJ,Dev L.
Antidiabetic activity (invitro) of the
[5]. ArunVijayan, Liju VB, Reena Johan JV, Phytochemical screening and
rhizomes of anaphyllumwightii.schott.
Parthipan B and Reenuka C. antibacterial activity of
International journal of research in
Traditional remedies of Kani Tribes of Alstoniascholaries flower. In.J.Pharm
pharmacy and chemistry. 2013, 3(4).
Kottoor reserve forest, development. 2011; 3(4), 172-178.
790-792.
Agasthyavanam, Kerala. Indian Journal
[21]. Shirly K Thomas, Roshin Elizabeth
of Traditional Knowledge. 2007; 6 [13]. Molly Mathew, dharsana JN, Soumya K
George, ManeshKunjumon,
(4),589-594. Vijayan, Premkumar N. Anti-diabetic
ThankamaniV.In vitro antibacterial
activity of anaphyllumwightiischott in
[6]. Udayan PS, Satheesh George KV profile of Alstoniavenenata r. Br- a
alloxan induced diabetic rats. Asian
Tushar and Indira comparative study. Int J Curr Pharm
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical
Balachandran.Ethanomedicine of Res. 2014; 6(4), 58-60
Research. 2013; 6(1), 68-69.
Malapandaram tribes of Achankovil
[22]. Cowan. MM, „Plant products as
forest of Kollam district, Kerala. Journal [14]. HarborneJB. Phytochemical methods.
antimicrobial agents,‰ Clinical
of Traditional Knowledge. 2007; 6(4), 2nd ed. London New York: Chapman
microbiology reviews. 1999; 12, p.
569-573. and Hall, 1984.p.(5th ed. Bangalore,
564‐82.
India: Prism Books (Pvt.) Ltd.; 1994; p.
[7]. Ramachandran VS. Wild edible plants
844 6. [23]. Bonjar GHS, Nik AK and Aghighi S:
of the Anamalais, Coimbatore district,
Antibacterial and Antifungal survey in
Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu. In Indian [15]. John V. Bennett, Jean L Brodie,
plants used in indigenous herbal-
J. Traditional Knowledge. 2007; 6(1), Ernest J Benner, and William MM
medicine of south east regions of Iran.
173-176. Kirby. Simplified, accurate method for
J Biol Sci. 2004; 4: 405-412.
antibiotic assay of clinical specimens.
[8]. Jose Mathew and George KV.
Applied Microbiology, 1966; 14 (2).171 [24]. Nain P, SainiV,Sharma S In-vitro
Medicinal plants used by
-17 antibacterial and antioxidant activity of
malampadaramtribals in achankovil
Emblicaofficinalis leaves extract. Int J
forests of kerala to cure snake bite, [16]. National Committee for Clinical
Pharm PharmSci, 2012; 4(1), 385-389.
wound and bone fracture. Life Laboratory Standards, Methods for
Sciences Leaflets. 2013; 8, 50-54. Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility [25]. Marjorie C: Plant products as
Test for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Antimicrobial agents. Clinical
[9]. Rajagopala PL, RobinJoseaK,
Document M07-A8, 8th ed. Wayne, Microbiology Reviews 1999; 12: 564-
Premalethab KD, Kironc SS, DR.K.R,
Philadelphia: National Committee for 582.
Sreejithd , Aneeshiae S.Anthelmintic
Clinical LaboratoryStandards; 2012.
studies on the rhizomes of [26]. Hoult J.R.S and Paya M:
Anaphyllumwightiischott. Journal of [17]. National Committee for Clinical Pharmacological and biochemical
international academic research for Laboratory Standards. Methods for actions of simple coumarins: 1native
multidisciplinary. 2013; 1(11), 645-649. dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests products with therapeutic potential.
for bacteria that grow aerobically. Gen Pharmacol 1996; 27: 713-722.
Approved standard M7-A5, 5th ed.
PAGE | 466 |
Kunjumon et al. International Journal of Phytomedicine 7 (4) 459-467 [2015]
[27]. Doughari JH, Elmahmood AM, [31]. Tsuchiya H, Sato M, Miyazaki T, Biochemistry and
Manzara S. Studies on the antibacterial Fujiwara S, Tanigaki S, Ohyama M, Bioinformatics.IPCBEE 2012; 3(1): 64-
activity of root extracts of Carica Tanaka T.andLinuma M. Comparative 68.
papaya L. African Journal of study on the antibacterial activity of
[34]. Chanda S, Kaneria M. Indian
Microbiology Research 2007; 1(3), 37- phytochemical flavanones against
nutraceutical plant leaves as a potential
41. methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
source of natural antimicrobial agents,
aureus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1996.50,
[28]. Roy Saswati, DuttaChoudhuryM,and in: A. Mendez Vilas (Ed.), Science
27-34.
Paul SB. Antimicrobial activity of against Microbial Pathogens:
Araceae: an overview. IJRAP. [32]. Kim SJ, Cho A, Han J. Antioxidant and Communicating Current Research and
2013;4(1), 15-17. antimicrobial activity of leafygreen Technological Advances, Fomatex
vegetable extracts and their Research CenterPublication,
[29]. Rasooli.SA, Mirmostafa.
applications to meat product Spain,2011;1251 1259.
Antimicrobialactivityof thymus
preservation.Food Control. 2013; 29,
pubescens and T. Seyphyllum [35]. Chanda S, Dudhatra S, Kaneria M.
112 120.
essential oils. Fitoterapia, 2002; 73(3), Antioxidative and antibacterial effects
244 250. [33]. Purkayastha S, Dahiya P. of seeds and fruit rind of nutraceutical
Phytochemical analysis and plants belonging to the Fabaceae
[30]. Saleem M, Nazir M, Ali MS, Hussain H,
antibacterial efficacy of babchi oil family, Food. Funct. (2010);1 (3), 308
Lee Y S, Riaz N. Antimicrobial natural
(Psoraleacorylifolia) against multi-drug 315.
products: An update on future antibiotic
resistant clinical isolates. International
drug candidates. Natural Product
Conference on Bioscience,
Reports, et al. (2010) 238, 254
PAGE | 467 |