Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uypitching V Quiamco
Uypitching V Quiamco
*
G.R. No. 146322. December 6, 2006.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
173
CORONA, J.:
_______________
174
175
_______________
176
_______________
13 The modification was based on the principle that moral and
exemplary damages are not imposed to enrich a party.
14 In fact, malice is presumed from a defamatory imputation.
177
15
“precipitate act.” Petitioners were bent on portraying
respondent as a thief. In this connection, we quote with
approval the following findings of the RTC, as adopted by
the CA:
_______________
178
_______________
18 Filinvest Credit Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 115902, 27
September 1995, 248 SCRA 549.
179
“Art. 19. Every person must in the exercise of his rights and in the
performance of his duties, act with justice, give every one his due,
and observe honesty and good faith.”
_______________
180
——o0o——
_______________
181
© Copyright 2017 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.