Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 64

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ANTIPOLO
District II-B
LORES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Name of Employee: CRIZALYN D. BILLONES Name of Rater: DR. MARY JANE G. HALILI
Position: TEACHER II Position: PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ANTIPOLO Date of Review: APRIL 22, 2019
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
Very Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable Showed
Education Knowledge and of content within and to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was knowledge of 4 5 4.5
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown content and its
integration within
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across
and across and across and across and subject areas as
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject shown
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in inMOV1witha
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 6
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted at


4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV acceptable least 4 lessons
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence was using MOV 1 and
supported by any
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
1 of the other
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other given MOV
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable Showed
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was knowledge of
4 4 4
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown content and its
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within integration
literacy and and across and across and across and within and
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in areas as
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a shown
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4 inMOV1witha
rating of 6

Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was using different
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown teaching
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote strategies that
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing promote
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills and/or numeracy reading, writing
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV skills as shown in and/or
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a numeracy skills
7 6 5 rating of 4 as shown in
MOV 1 with a
rating of 6

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different
Education teaching strategies to to March teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was teaching
4 4 4
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 4 of 6
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was lessons as
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any shown evidenced by
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by any MOV supported by
any1ofthe other any1 of the other 1of the other any1 of the
given MOV given MOV given MOV other given
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable Used
classroom
4 5 4.5
Education Environment classroom to March management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity structure to engage 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown management
strategies that
of Learners learners, engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
engage
individually or in in in in in learners in
groups, in activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
meaningful as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
exploration, MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a MOV1witha
discovery and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 6
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at
environments.
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was least 4 lessons
supported by
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown MOV 1 and any
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the 1 of the other
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied
teacher
5 2 3.50
Education learner behavior to March management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of shown management
strategies of
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
learner
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote behavior that
discipline to ensure positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and promote
learning- focused non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent positive and
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as non-violent
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV discipline as
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a shown in MOV
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4 submitted with
a rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted


least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the of the given evidence was any 1
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as shown of the given
as observed in as observed in as observed in observed in only strategies as
at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons 1 lesson observed in
lessons only 1 lesson

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable Applied 4 5 4.5
Education differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
Services developmentally 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching shown teaching
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner address
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as learner
address learners’ shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV diversity as
gender, needs, 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating shown in
strengths, interests of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 MOV 1 with a
and experiences. rating of 6
strengths, interests
and experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted at


least 4 differentiated differentiated at least 4 lessons evidence was least 4
differentiated teaching teaching as observed in 3 shown differentiated
lessons as
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2 teaching
observed in 2
strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as lessons observed strategies in
least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by in only 1 lesson at least 2
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and differentiated lessons as
MOV 1 and supported by supported by teaching strategy evidenced by
supported by any1ofthe other any1ofthe other in only 1 lesson MOV 1 and
any 1 of the acceptable acceptable as evidently supported by
other MOV MOV shown in any 1 of any 1 of the
acceptable the acceptable other
MOV
MOV acceptable
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and
4 5 4.5
Education and Planning and implemented to March implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
Services developmentally 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentall
sequenced teaching y sequenced
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
and learning teaching and
processes to meet teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and learning
curriculum learning learning learning learning process as
requirements and process as process as process as process as shown in MOV
varied teaching shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 with a rating
contexts. 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating of 6
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at


least 4
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning learning process
as evidently
learning process as process as process as
shown in MOV 1
process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown and supported by
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the any 1 of the other
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by given MOV given MOV
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable Frequently
participated in 4 5 4.5
Education collegial to March participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was LACs/FGDs/
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ shown meetings to
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to discuss
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss teacher/learner
feedback to
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
enrich instruction
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to as shown in the
enrich enrich enrich enrich MOV submitted
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated


at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ in evidence was in at least 4
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as any 1 of the shown LACs/FGDs/
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown given MOV meetings as
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the evidently
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV shown in any
given MOV 1 of the given
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and
used varied 5 5 5
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was teaching and
Services organized and 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown learning
used appropriate learning learning learning learning resources,
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources, including ICT, to
address learning
learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
goals as shown
including ICT, to address address address address in MOV1witha
address learning learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals rating of 7
goals. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable Submitted at


least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was least 4 varied
teaching and and learning and learning learning shown teaching and
learning
learning resources, resources, resource,
resources,
resources, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of shown in MOV
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported the acceptable 1 and
1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV supported by
by any 1 of the acceptable acceptable any 1 of the
acceptable MOV MOV acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable Designed,
selected, 3 3 3
Education Assessment selected, to March selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was organized and
Services and Reporting organized and 2019 organized and organized and organized and organized and shown used diagnostic,
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, formative and
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and summative
assessment
summative summative summative summative summative
strategies
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment consistent with
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies curriculum
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with requirements as
shown in MOV 1
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
with a rating of 5
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 2


least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool evidence was varied
assessment assessment assessment as evidently shown assessment
tools as tools as tools as shown in any of tools as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable evidently
inany1ofthe inany1ofthe in any1ofthe MOV shown in
acceptable acceptable acceptable any1ofthe
MOV MOV MOV acceptable
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable Frequently
monitored and 4 5 2 3.67
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence was evaluated learner
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated shown progress and
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress achievement
learner attainment and and and and using learner
attainment data
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement as shown in the
using learner using learner using learner using learner MOV submitted
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at
combination of combination of combination of acceptable evidence was least 4 of the
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV shown acceptable MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted
were distributed were distributed were distributed of the given evidence was any 1 of the
across 4 across 3 across 2 MOV shown given MOV
quarters quarters quarters

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Occasionally
showed prompt 3 4 2 3
Education promptly and to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and evidence was and clear
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear shown communication of
needs, progress communication communication communication communication the learners’
and achievement of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ needs, progress
and achievement
to key needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress to key
stakeholders, and and and and stakeholders,
including achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to including parents/
parents/guardians. key key key key guardians as
shown in the
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
MOV submitted
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted a


combination of combination of combination of of the given evidence was combination
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV shown of 3 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted any 1 Submitted
were distributed were distributed were distributed of the given any 1
across 4 across 3 across 2 MOV of the given
quarters quarters quarters MOV

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable Frequently
performed 4 5 4.5
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed evidence was various related
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related shown work/activities
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities that contribute to
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute the teaching
learning process
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
as shown in the
learning learning learning learning MOV submitted
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted at


least 4 different
least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the evidence was kinds of
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

MAYBEL C. OBULA/OSANNA R. RAVIZ CRIZALYN D. BILLONES DR. MARY JANE G. HALILI


Rater Ratee Approving Authority
G. HALILI

URING EVALUATION

Score

0.337
Score

0.300

Score

0.300
Score

0.337

Score
0.262

Score

0.337
Score

0.337
Score

0.337

Score
0.375

Score
0.225

Score

0.274
Score

0.225

Score
0.450

4.096
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Your School Here
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about knowledge of content within
and across curriculum teaching areas

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed


highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas

1. Applied knowledge of
content within and across 3. Instructional materials highlighting
curriculum teaching areas. mastery of content and its integration in
other subject areas

4. Performance tasks/test material(s)


highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas

5. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teaching strategies that
enhance learner achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


teaching highlighting learner-centered
2. Used a range of teaching strategies that promote literacy and/or
strategies that enhance numeracy skills
learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills. 3. Instructional materials highlighting
learner-centered strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
in teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as
other higher-order thinking skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


3. Applied a range of teaching highlighting different teaching
teaching strategies to strategies that develop critical and
develop critical and creative creative thinking and/or other HOTS
thinking, as well as other
higher- order thinking skills. 3. Instructional materials highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
in demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


4. Managed classroom sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
structure to engage learners, form about managing classroom structure
individually or in groups, in that engages learners in various activities
meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
physical learning various classroom management strategies
environments. that engage learners in activities/tasks in
different physical learning environments
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teacher management of
learner behavior using the following
strategies:
1. Providing motivation d provide
annotations)

5. Managed learner behavior


constructively by applying
positive and non-violent
2. Praising the learners/Giving
5. Managed learner behavior positive feedback
constructively by applying
positive and non-violent 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
discipline to ensure learning- 4. Ensuring learners’ active
focused environments. participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using differentiated,
developmentally appropriate learning
experiences

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed


6. Used differentiated, highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
developmentally appropriate others according to learners’ gender,
learning experiences to needs, strengths, interests and
address learners’ gender, experiences
needs, strengths, interests
and experiences.
3. Instructional materials developed
highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
others according to learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests and
experiences

4. Others (Please specify and provide annota

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning process
7. Planned, managed and
implemented 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developmentally sequenced highlighting developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning instruction that meet curriculum goals and
processes to meet varied teaching contexts
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.
implemented
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
processes to meet
curriculum requirements and 3. Instructional materials used to
varied teaching contexts. implement developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process to meet
curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Personal notes of teachers on


LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of
attendance
8. Participated in collegial
discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
enrich teaching practice. teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice with proof of attendance

3. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using appropriate teaching
and learning resources, including ICT
Examples:
 Activity sheets/task
sheets/work sheets
9. Selected, developed,  PowerPoint presentations
organized and used
 Video clips
appropriate teaching and
learning resources, including  Module
ICT, to address learning
goals.  SIMs-Strategic Intervention
Materials

 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended

3. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using diagnostic, formative
and summative assessment strategies
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies

10. Designed, selected,


3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
10. Designed, selected, superior;
organized and used (b) with sample accomplished
diagnostic, formative and questionnaire/answer sheets
summative assessment
strategies consistent with 4. Developed summative tests:
curriculum requirements. (a) with TOS reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance tasks:
(a) with rubrics reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
rubrics

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Compilation of a learner’s written work


with summary of results and with
signature of parents

2. Formative/summative assessment tools


11. Monitored and evaluated with TOS and frequency of errors with
learner progress and identified least mastered skills
achievement using learner
attainment data. 3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing
index of mastery
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. At least 3 samples of corrected test


papers of the same 3 learners in the same
learning area with parents’ or guardians’
signature and date of receipt

2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-


Teacher conferences in all quarters with
12. Communicated promptly proof of parents’/guardians’ attendance
and clearly the learners’
needs, progress and 3. Report cards with parent’s or guardian’s
achievement to key signature in all quarters supported by
stakeholders, including minutes of meeting
parents/guardians. 4. Communication with parents/
guardians using various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per
quarter
6. Other documents showing learners’
needs, progress and achievement
submitted to other stakeholders
1. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation

2. Certificate of Training

3. Certificate of Speakership

4. Committee involvement

13. Performed various 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities


related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching- 6. Book or Journal Authorship/
learning process. Coauthorship/Contributorship

7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip

8. Coaching and mentoring learners in


competitions

9. Mentoring pre-service/inservice
teachers

10. Others (Please specify and provide anno


ines Appendix M
tion

arat
Here
Kudarat

EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A
Division of QUEZON
Your School Here
Your District Here

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Very Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable
Education Knowledge and application of content to March application of application of application of application of evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and 2019 content content content content shown
across curriculum knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within knowledge within
teaching areas. and across and across and across and across
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as teaching areas as
shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1 shown in MOV1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No


4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as acceptable
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from shown
supported by any colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and
1 of the other supported by any supported by any supported by any
given MOV 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
4 4 4 4 0.3
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of action research colleagues.
research to enrich with colleagues.
knowledge of content
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the given of the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV MOV shown

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Education applied effective to March effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
4 4 4 0.3
Services teaching strategies to 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical promote critical promote critical promote critical
creative thinking, as and creative and creative and creative and creative
well as other higher- thinking as well as thinking as well as thinking as well as thinking as well as
order thinking skills. other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 or No acceptable


more lessons as lessons as lessons as more lessons as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Work with June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education Environment colleagues to to March shared effective shared effective shared effective shared effective evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 classroom classroom classroom classroom shown
of Learners effective management management management management
techniques in the strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
management of the engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
classroom in in in in
structure to engage activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
learners, done in different done in different done in different done in different
individually or in physical physical physical physical
groups, in learning learning learning learning
meaningful environments environments environments environments
exploration, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
hands-on activities rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
within a range of
physical learning
environments. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited Exibited Exibited Exibited No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and constructive to March effective and effective and effective and effective and evidence was
Services behavior 2019 constructive constructive constructive constructive shown
management skills behavior behavior behavior behavior
by applying management management management management
positive and non- skills by skills by skills by skills by
violent discipline to applying applying applying applying
ensure learning- positive and positive and positive and positive and
focused non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning- ensure learning-
focused focused focused focused
environments. environments. environments. environments.
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of with a rating of
8 7 6 5
Efficiency Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast Applied atleast No acceptable
7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given 7 of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Worked with June 2018 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues to to March colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues but evidence was
Services share 2019 atleast in the atleast in the atleast in the no evidence of shown
differentiated, district/cluster school level to department/gra sharing with
developmentally level to share share lesson de level to others
appropriate lesson share lesson
learning
experiences to Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
address learners’ least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson evidence was
gender, needs, as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced by shown
strengths, interests shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV either MOV 2 or
and experiences. 1 and supported 1 and supported 1 and supported 3 but no
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the evidence of
other other other sharing with
acceptable acceptable acceptable others
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Develop and June 2018 7.50% Quality Develop and Develop and Develop and Develop and No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education and Planning applied effective to March applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the shown
planning and planning and planning and planning and planning and
management of management management management management
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning processes learning learning learning learning
to meet curriculum process as process as process as process as
requirements and shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
varied teaching 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
contexts. of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No acceptable


least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as evidence was
as evidence by evidence by evidence by evidence by shown
MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 MOV 1 and 2 any 1 of the
and supported and supported and supported acceptable
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
acceptable other other
MOV acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education colleagues, to March collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of reviews of reviews of reviews of shown
learner feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
plan, facilitate and feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
enrich teaching evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
practice. the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of shown
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the
supported by supported by supported by acceptable
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, the selection, the selection, the selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development
use of appropriate development development development and appropriate
teaching and and appropriate and appropriate and appropriate use of teaching
learning resources, use of teaching use of teaching use of teaching and learning
including ICT, to and learning and learning and learning resources as
address specific resources as resources as resources as shown in the
learning goals. shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


least 4 teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
and learning learning learning learning shown
resources as resources as resources as resource as
evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by at evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education Assessment collaboratively with to March reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services and Reporting colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y assessment shown
review the design, assessment assessment assessment tools with
selection, tools with tools with tools with colleagues as
organization and colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as shown in the
use of a range of shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
effective MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
diagnostic,
formative and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
summative least 4 assessment assessment assessment tool evidence was
assessment assessment tools as tools as as evidently shown
strategies tools as evidently shown evidently shown shown in any of
consistent with evidently shown in any of the in any of the the acceptable
curriculum in any of the acceptable acceptable MOV
requirements. acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4 0.3
Education collaboratively to March collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues with colleagues shown
evaluation in the in the in the in the
strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment assessment assessment assessment
support learner data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
progress and in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
achievement. submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 2 different least 3 of the least 2 of the of the MOV evidence was
types of MOV same kind of same kind of shown
MOV MO
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 12. Applied skills in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
Education the effective to March applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in skills in the evidence was
Services communication of 2019 the effective the effective the effective effective shown
learner needs, communication communicatio n communicatio n communicatio n
progress and of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs of learner needs
achievement to key and progress to and progress to and progress to and progress to
stakeholders, parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
including guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
parents/guardians. shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 of Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable


the acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Score
per KRA Results
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor Score
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5
Education various to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services related 2019 special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks shown
works/activities and/or and/or and/or and/or
that contribute to assignments assignments assignments assignments
the as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
teaching-learning the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
process. submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only Submitted only Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 4 3 different kinds 2 different kinds of the evidence was
different kinds of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
of acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.8
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 -5.000 Outstanding


3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Rater Ratee Approving Authority


Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Your School Here
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about effective applications of content

knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas

3. Instructional materials developed


1. Modeled effective highlighting effective application of content
application of content knowledge within and across subject areas
knowledge within and
across curriculum 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
teaching areas. in demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas

5. Results of assessment used in


demonstration teaching highlighting mastery
of lessons learned

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Copy of the research proposal focused on


enriching knowledge of content and
pedagogy

2. Proof of participation and/or contribution


to a collaborative research (e.g. e-mail,
actual output submitted, terms of reference,
etc.)
2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct
and application of
2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct 3. Certified completed collaborative research
and application of focused on enriching knowledge of content
and pedagogy
research to enrich
knowledge of content and
pedagogy. 4. Proof of dissemination of research
findings with colleagues

5. Proof of utilization of research findings

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using effective teaching strategies to
promote critical and creative teaching, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in


demonstration teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
3. Developed and applied critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
effective teaching
strategies to promote
critical and creative 3. Instructional materials highlighting
thinking, as well as other different teaching strategies that develop
higher- order thinking critical and creative thinking, and/or other
skills. HOTS

4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used


in demonstration teaching

5. Results of assessment used in the


demonstration teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about sharing effective techniques in the
management of classroom structure
4. Work with colleagues
to model and share
effective techniques in the
management of the
classroom structure to
4. Work with colleagues
to model and share
effective techniques in the 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
management of the demonstration teaching highlighting
effective classroom management strategies
classroom structure to that engage learners in activities/tasks in
engage learners, different physical learning environments
individually or in groups,
in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing
activities within a range of on effective classroom management
physical learning techniques
environments.
4. Instructional materials used in
demonstration teaching

5. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about effective teacher management of
learner behavior using the following
strategies:

1. Providing motivation

2. Praising the learners/Giving


positive feedback
5. Exibited effective and
constructive behavior
management skills by 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
applying positive and
non-violent discipline to
ensure learning- focused 4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
environments.
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions

6. Giving equal opportunities to


learners

7. Encouraging learners to ask


questions

8. Others (Please specify and


provide annotations)
1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting
one’s sharing of strategies on differentiated
and developmentally appropriate
opportunities to address learners’
differences

6. Worked with
colleagues to share 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
developmentally to address learners’ differences
appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and 3. Corresponding instructional materials
experiences. showing differentiated and developmentally-

appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences

4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from


colleagues of the lessons/insights gained
from the Master Teacher's sharing)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating


sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using effective strategies in
implementing developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process

2. Results of learners’ assessment during


7. Develop and applied the actual teaching
effective strategies in the
planning and 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
management of demonstration teaching highlighting
developmentally developmentally sequenced teaching-
learning process
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum
4. Instructional materials showing effective
requirements and varied strategies in developmentally sequenced
teaching contexts. teaching and learning process

5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in


demonstration teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan
8. Review with
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
learner feedback to plan, teacher and learner feedback to enrich
facilitate and enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
teaching practice.
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Teaching and learning resources


developed by colleagues and critiqued on
their alignment to learning goals
9. Advised and guided
colleagues in the
selection, organization, 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in
development and use of terms of the alignment of the teaching and
appropriate teaching and ✘ learning resources to the indicated learning
goals and appropriateness to the target
learning resources, learners
including ICT, to address
specific learning goals.
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Any proof of collaborative review if the


test is designed based on its purpose (e.g.
diagnostic, formative and summative)

2. Any proof of collaborative review of the


10. Worked alignment of the test with the curriculum
collaboratively with
colleagues to review the
design, selection,
organization and use of a 2.1. formative test attached to a
range of effective lesson plan
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with 2.2. summative assessment with
curriculum requirements. TOS

2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS

3. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
1. Collaborative interpretation of the index
of mastery obtained from 1 class
11. Interpreted
collaboratively monitoring
and evaluation strategies
of attainment data to
support learner progress
11. Interpreted 2. Collaborative interpretation of item
collaboratively monitoring analysis of quarterly examinations
and evaluation strategies
of attainment data to 3. Collaborative interpretation of results of
support learner progress performance assessment
and achievement.
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Sample agreement for learners at risk


signed by parents and corresponding
evidence of improvement

2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher


conferences and corresponding evidence of
improvement

3. Anecdotal record communicated to and


signed by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement

4. Sample of learners' test results signed by


parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
12. Applied skills in the
effective communication
of learner needs, 5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
progress and performance task and corresponding
evidence of improvement
achievement to key
stakeholders, including
parents/guardians. 6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-
teacher conference

7. Signed report cards of students at risk


with corresponding evidence of
improvement

8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communication using other modalities
(e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement

9. Learners’ performance record

10. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)

1. Served as reliever of classes in the


absence of teachers
2. Served as OIC in the absence of the
principal

3. Represented the principal in meetings and


conferences

4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III

5. Assisted the school selection committee in


the evaluation of credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers

6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation

7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement

10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities

11. Book or Journal


Authorship/Coauthorship/Contributorship

12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship

13. Coaching and mentoring learners in


competitions

14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service


teachers

15. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
ppines Appendix M
cation

udarat
Here
an Kudarat

EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
RegionIV-A CALABARZON
City Schools Division Office of Antipolo
District II-B

LORES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF THE IPCRF (IPCRF-DP)


Action Plan (Recommended Developmental
Strengths Development Needs Timeline
Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies (PPST)

B. Core Behavioral Competencies (DepEd)

Feedback:

RATEE RATER
Resources Needed

APPROVING AUTHORITY
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
City Schools Division Office of Antipolo
District II-B

LORES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM


DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN
RATEE RATER
SIGNATURE
(RATER/RATEE)
APPROVING AUTHORITY
Showed
knowledge of
content and its
integration
within and
across subject
areas as shown
inMOV1witha
rating of 6

You might also like