Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ELISA2
ELISA2
Indirect ELISA
Alice V. Lin
Abstract
The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a simple and rapid technique for detecting and quan-
titating antibodies or antigens attached to a solid surface. Being one of the most sensitive immunoassays,
ELISA offers commercial value in laboratory research, diagnostic of disease biomarkers, and quality con-
trol in various industries. This technique utilizes an enzyme-linked antibody binding to a surface-attached
antigen. Subsequently, a substrate is added to produce either a color change or light signal correlating to
the amount of the antigen present in the original sample. This chapter provides the procedures required
for carrying out indirect ELISA, one of the many forms of ELISA, to detect polystyrene-immobilized
antigen. Methodological approaches to optimize this assay technique are also described, a prerequisite for
automation and multiplexing.
1 Introduction
Robert Hnasko (ed.), ELISA: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1318,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2742-5_5, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
51
52 Alice V. Lin
Secondary antibody
Primary antibody
Antigen
2 Materials
1. Buffers.
(a) Binding solution: 0.2 M carbonate-bicarbonate, pH 9.4
(Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
(b) Blocking solution: 10 % nonfat dry milk in TBST.
(c) Wash solution: Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.4) with 0.1 %
(v/v) Tween 20 (TBST).
(d) Dilution buffer: 1 % nonfat dry milk in TBST.
iELISA 53
3 Methods
3.2 Blocking 1. Add 200 μl of blocking solution into each well and incubate at
room temperature for 30 min to overnight (see Note 5).
2. Aspirate off the blocking solution. It is not necessary to wash
the plate at this point.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A 50000 50000 50000 48000 48000 46000 46000 22000 10000 5000 3000 5000
B 50000 50000 50000 45000 40000 40000 35000 20000 10000 5000 3000 5000
C 48000 46000 46000 40000 40000 35000 30000 20000 10000 5000 3000 3000
D 45000 45000 40000 40000 40000 25000 15000 10000 5000 2500 2000 3000
E 45000 45000 45000 40000 35000 25000 15000 7000 4000 3000 3000 3000
F 20000 20000 15000 15000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
G 5000 5000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
H 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
Fig. 3 This illustrates a sample outcome of chessboard titration. Columns 1–4 are boxed indicating the titration
of antigen does not significantly affect the output signal. The optimal antigen concentration is 12.5 μg/ml for
partially purified protein sample and 1.25 μg/ml for purified peptides. This is the minimal amount of antigen
required to generate the maximum signal in this assay. The primary antibody gives the greatest range of titra-
tion when used at 0.06–0.125 μg/ml as shown in rows D and E. This is the optimal primary antibody concen-
tration in this assay
3.7.2 Titration of HRP- 1. Fill rows B–H with 100 μl of dilution buffer.
Conjugated Secondary 2. Dilute the HRP-conjugated antibody in dilution buffer into a
Antibody final concentration fourfold higher than recommended by the
manufacturer or 1:2,500 of 1 mg/ml stock solution.
3. Add 200 μl of diluted antibody into all 12 wells of row A.
4. Aspirate off 100 μl of diluted secondary antibody from row A
and transfer to row B. Gently pipette up and down three times
to mix the content of the well.
5. Repeat step 4 and titrate secondary antibody from row B to
row G. Leave row H with dilution buffer only.
58 Alice V. Lin
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A 35000 35000 35000 30000 25000 10000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
B 35000 35000 35000 30000 25000 10000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
C 35000 46000 46000 40000 20000 10000 5000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
D 30000 40000 35000 35000 12000 5000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
E 15000 7500 5000 5000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
F 5000 5000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
G 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
H 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
Fig. 4 Based on the result from Fig. 3, 12.5 μg/ml of partially purified protein sample or 1.25 μg/ml of purified
peptides is used to coat the plate. Primary antibody is titrated from rows 1–11, and no significant difference
in relative light unit is observed from rows 1–4. This indicates the primary antibody can be diluted down to
0.125 μg/ml without much loss in signal, consistent with the result from Fig. 3. Row C is highlighted to indicate
the optimal concentration of the secondary antibody, the minimal amount required without loss in signal. This
reflects 1× of manufacturer’s suggested dilution or 1:10 K of 1 mg/ml stock solution
4 Notes
References
1. Engvall E, Perlmann P (1971) Enzyme-linked 6. Hornbeck P (2001) Enzyme-linked immuno-
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative sorbent assays. Curr Protoc Immunol Chapter
assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 2: Unit 2.1. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.
8:871–874 im0201s01
2. Stevens PW, Hansberry MR, Kelso DM (1995) 7. Natarajan S, Remick DG (2008) The ELISA
Assessment of adsorption and adhesion of pro- standard save: calculation of sample concentra-
teins to polystyrene microwells by sequential tions in assays with a failed standard curve.
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis. J Immunol Methods 336:242–245
Anal Biochem 225:197–205 8. Underwood PA, Steele JG (1991) Practical
3. Desmet C, Blum LJ, Marquette CA (2013) limitations of estimation of protein adsorption
Multiplex microarray ELISA versus classical to polymer surfaces. J Immunol Methods
ELISA, a comparison study of pollutant sens- 142:83–94
ing for environmental analysis. Environ Sci 9. Hnasko R, Lin A, McGarvey JA et al (2011) A
Process Impacts 10:1876–1882 rapid method to improve protein detection by
4. Fan A, Cao Z, Li H et al (2009) Chemilumi- indirect ELISA. Biochem Biophys Res
nescence platforms in immunoassay and DNA Commun 410:726–731
analyses. Anal Sci 25:5875–5897 10. Vos Q, Klasen EA, Haaijman JJ (1987) The
5. Gan SD, Patel KR (2013) Enzyme immunoas- effect of divalent and univalent binding on
say and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. antibody titration curves in solid-phase
J Invest Dermatol 133:e12 ELISA. J Immunol Methods 103:47–54