Bibliography

Moral Nihilism. (n.d.). Retrieved from

https://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_moral_nihilism.html
This article is about the basics of moral nihilism and the sub genres within it. It covers the
definition of the word and uses relevant examples to help the reader grasp it. It also expands on
the Error Theory and its contributions to nihilism.

Davis, L. C. (2015, October 9). Would You Pull the Trolley Switch? Does it Matter? Retrieved
from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/trolley-problem-history-
psychology-morality-driverless-cars/409732/
This covers the different versions of the trolley problem and its interpretations globally. It also
talks about the basic philosophical knowledge behind this issue and what created the ethical
dilemma. It also covers the two different concepts of morality and how they would apply.

Murphy, M. (2019, June 4). Theological Voluntarism. Retrieved from

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/voluntarism-theological/

This talks about the definitions of divine command theory and all of it’s intricate sub genres

including theological virtues and how it differs from the essential general theory of divine

command. It discusses the differences between normative voluntarism and meta-ethical

voluntarism. In this article it shows how god is connected to good automatically and what about

god is inherently good.

(n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/util-a-r/

This talks about the different branches of consequentialism including that of utilitarianism. It

also discusses the different types of utilitarianism and its creators. Including, the self-interest

moral that is often forgotten in the common theory.

Pearce, J. M. S. (2016, September 5). 16 Problems with Divine Command Theory. Retrieved

from https://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/2016/09/04/16-problems-with-divine-command-

theory/

This article discusses the sixteen different flaws within the divine command theory. Specifically

Abritatrianism which was used within the essay of humans can not rationalize god's nature. It

also talks about the definitions of each branch of divine command theory and how they apply.