Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent
JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent
JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent
| chanrobles.com™
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2016 > June 2016 Decisions > A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016
JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent.:
Search
A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L.
PAMATONG, Respondent.
ChanRobles OnLine Bar Review
EN BANC
A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016
JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent.
D E C I S I O N
CAGUIOA, J:
The practice of law is a privilege burdened with conditions and is reserved only for those who meet the
twin standards of legal proficiency and morality.1 It is so delicately imbued with public interest that it is
both a power and a duty of this Court to control and regulate it in order to protect and promote the
public welfare.2 In this regard, this Court will not hesitate to hold its officers accountable for misconduct
and the violation of the duty to respect the courts.
The facts culled from the records follow.
During the time period material to this case, complainant Judge Gregorio D. Pantanosas, Jr.
(Pantanosas) was the presiding judge of the Regional Trial Court of Cagayan de Oro City, Branch 20
(RTC).3 Respondent Atty. Elly L. Pamatong (Pamatong) was the counsel of plaintiffs in Civil Case No.
2006176, entitled Nick Otero, et al. v. Sheriff of the MTCC Branch 3, Cagayan de Oro City, et al. for
injunction with damages, which was then pending before the RTC.4 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
DebtKollect Company, Inc. On September 8, 2006, during the hearing of an application for the issuance of a temporary restraining
order (TRO) in Civil Case No. 2006176, respondent Pamatong was allegedly asked by complainant
Pantanosas to remove his copia (a hat worn by Muslims) in open court.5 Respondent Pamatong
requested to be exempted allegedly due to religious grounds and embarrassment towards his "bald
pate".6 Complainant Pantanosas thereafter obliged with a caveat that at the next hearing, he would no
longer tolerate the wearing of the copia inside the courtroom.7 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Three (3) days after, or on September 11, 2006, respondent Pamatong filed an Extremely Urgent
Motion/Demand for Inhibition or Recusal in Civil Case No. 2006176 (Motion for Inhibition), which
contained the following remarks: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
6. Finally, in my thirty (30) years of law practice, I never encountered a Judge who
appears to be as corrupt as you are, thereby giving me the impression that you are a
disgrace to the Judicial System of this land who does not deserved (sic) to be a member
of the Philippine Bar at all.8 cralawred
On the same day, complainant Pantanosas issued an Order refuting all allegations of abusive language
and corruption and denying the Motion for Inhibition for lack of basis while ordering respondent
Pamatong to show cause why he should not be cited in contempt of court.9 In compliance with the
directive of the RTC, respondent Pamatong filed his Answer to the Order to Show Cause and Motion for
ChanRobles Intellectual Property Reconsideration.10
Division
ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
On September 18, 2006, complainant Pantanosas filed a Complaint for Disbarment dated September 15,
2006 (Disbarment Complaint)11 before this Court against respondent Pamatong on the following
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 1/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
grounds: (i) violation of Canon 8 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR)12 for the language
employed by respondent Pamatong in the Motion for Inhibition, and (ii) violation of Canons 113 and 1114
of the CPR for engaging in dishonest and deceitful conduct by supposedly causing the publication of an
alleged bribe in a local newspaper and maliciously imputing motives to complainant Pantanosas, thereby
casting dishonor to and distrust in the judicial system.15 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
On October 25, 2006, this Court issued a Resolution, requiring respondent Pamatong to file his comment
to the Disbarment Complaint within ten (10) days from receipt of notice thereof.16 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
On December 28, 2006, respondent Pamatong timely filed his Comment on the Complaint for
Disbarment and CounterComplaint (Comment).17 Following the September 8, 2006 incident,
respondent Pamatong alleged in his Comment that he filed a complaint against complainant Pantanosas
with the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) on September 12, 2006, which was docketed as A.M.
OCA IPI No. 072541RTJ.18 Notably, said complaint with the OCA was eventually dismissed through a
Resolution dated February 28, 2007 issued by this Court.19 Respondent Pamatong also alleged in his
Comment that he caused the filing of two (2) separate complaints with two (2) separate offices, namely
the Commission on Human Rights20 and the Office of the Ombudsman21.
In the main, respondent Pamatong averred in his Comment that the actual courtroom demeanor of
complainant Pantanosas during the September 8, 2006 hearing was overbearing, arrogant and
derogatory, while also maintaining the truth of the bribery allegations launched against complainant
Pantanosas.22 By way of countercomplaint, respondent Pamatong claimed that the alleged
discriminatory conduct of complainant Pantanosas violated Canons 1,23 2,24 and 325 of the Code of
Judicial Conduct. Respondent Pamatong alleged that in a meeting with complainant Pantanosas in his
chambers two (2) days before the September 8, 2006 hearing, the latter allegedly solicited from him
One Million Pesos (P1,000,000.00) in exchange for the issuance of a TRO in Civil Case No. 2006176.26
Respondent Pamatong countered that during the TRO hearing on September 8, 2006, he was initially
asked by the complainantjudge to approach the bench in order to inquire about the alleged bribe.27
Upon disclosing that he was unable to secure the money, respondent Pamatong claimed that he was
subjected to antiIslamic comments and humiliating conduct by complainant Pantanosas.28 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
On February 5, 2007, this Court issued a Resolution referring the Disbarment Complaint to the
Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for investigation, report and recommendation or decision.29 The
case was initially set for mandatory conference on July 23, 2007.30 After due proceedings, the
mandatory conference was terminated and both parties were required to file their respective position
papers by the investigating commissioner, Commissioner Manuel M. Maramba.31 Accordingly, both
parties filed their position papers dated January 5, 200932 and January 16, 2009,33 respectively.
On April 19, 2010, this Court issued a Resolution, requiring the IBP to inform the Court of the status of
the case.34 In compliance with this Court's directive, the IBP, through Commissioner Albert R. Sordan
(Sordan), filed its Compliance dated June 25, 2010,35 informing this Court that the case was among
those reassigned to Commissioner Sordan for investigation, report and recommendation, which was
duly noted by this Court in its Resolution dated September 8, 2010.36 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Thus, on August 6, 2010, Commissioner Sordan rendered a Report and Recommendation, the dispositive
portion of which reads:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, it is recommended that for violation of the lawyer's oath and breach of
ethics of the legal profession as embodied in the Code of Professional Responsibility, Atty.
Elly V. Pamatong be SUSPENDED from the practice of law for ONE (1) YEAR, with a
STERN WARNING that a repetition of the same or similar acts will be dealt with more
severely.37
cralawred
On December 15, 2012, in a Resolution of even date, the IBP Board of Governors resolved to adopt and
approve, with modification the Report and Recommendation dated August 6, 2010:
June-2016 Jurisprudence chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
RESOLVED to ADOPT and APPROVE, as it is hereby unanimously ADOPTED and
G.R. No. 175085, June 01, 2016 TAN SIOK1 KUAN APPROVED, with modification, the Report and Recommendation of the Investigating
AND PUTE CHING, Petitioners, v. FELICISIMO "BOY" Commissioner in the aboveentitled case, herein made part of this Resolution as Annex
HO, RODOLFO C. RETURTA, VICENTE M. SALAS, AND "A", and finding the recommendation fully supported by the evidence on record and the
LOLITA MALONZO, Respondents. applicable laws and rules, and considering Respondent's violation of the Lawyer's Oath
and breach of ethics of the legal profession, Atty. Elly V. Pamatong is hereby
G.R. No. 211672, June 14, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. JOHN HAPPY SUSPENDED from the practice of law for three (3) years with a stern Warning that a
DOMINGO Y CARAG, AccusedAppellant. repetition of a similar act shall be dealt with more severely.38 cralawred
Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 2/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
It is with this exacting standard that we measure respondent Pamatong, and find him wanting.
G.R. No. 200180, June 06, 2016 BENJAMIN H.
CABAÑEZ, Petitioner, v. MARIE JOSEPHINE CORDERO It is not disputed that the Motion for Inhibition filed by respondent Pamatong contained blatant
SOLANO A.K.A. MA. JOSEPHINE S. CABAÑEZ, accusations of corruption against complainant Pantanosas., and then some. As counsel for the plaintiffs
Respondent.
in Civil Case No. 2006176, it was incumbent upon respondent Pamatong to observe and maintain
G.R. No. 207811, June 01, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE respect towards the judicial office then being occupied by complainant Pantanosas.46 Instead of insisting
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. DELIA MOLINA Y on similar conduct from his clients, respondent Pamatong was the first to cast doubt on the impartiality
CABRAL, AccusedAppellants. and independence of the court. Worth repeating below are the invectives directed by respondent
Pamatong against complainant Pantanosas:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
G.R. No. 212493, June 01, 2016 GABRIEL YAP, SR.
DULY REPRESENTED BY GILBERT YAP AND ALSO IN 6. Finally, in my thirty (30) years of law practice, I never encountered a Judge who
HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY, GABRIEL YAP, JR., AND appears to be as corrupt as you are, thereby giving me the impression that you are a
HYMAN YAP, Petitioners, v. LETECIA SIAO, LYNEL disgrace to the Judicial System of this land who does not deserved (sic) to be a
SIAO, JANELYN SIAO, ELEANOR FAYE SIAO, SHELETT member of the Philippine Bar at all.47 (Emphasis supplied)
SIAO AND HONEYLET SIAO, Respondents.; G.R. No.
cralawred
AccusedAppellant.
Here, respondent Pamatong had no reason to divulge his grievances before the public as he had already
G.R. No. 202047, June 08, 2016 LIGHT RAIL lodged a complaint against complainant Pantanosas with the OCA on September 12, 2006.50
TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. NOEL B. PILI, Accordingly, owing to the baseless and impulsive charges filed by respondent Pamatong, the OCA
MEDEL I. LIRIO, RODERICK B. JAMON, VICTORINO A. disposed of the complaint using the following language: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
G.R. No. 211026, June 27, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE As regards the recommended penalty of the IBP of suspension from the practice of law for three (3)
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. RENATO B. years, we note that, in similar situations, we had imposed a suspension of less than three (3) years.
SUEDAD, AccusedAppellant.
In Judge Lacurom v. Atty. Jacoba, which involved similar facts to the case at bench, this Court
G.R. No. 204441, June 08, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE suspended the respondent from the practice of law for two (2) years for using offensive language
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL KURT JOHN directed towards the complainant judge in a motion filed before the court: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
BULAWAN Y ANDALES, Respondent.
No doubt, the language contained in the 30 July 2001 motion greatly exceeded
G.R. No. 201834, June 01, 2016 ANDRES L. the vigor required of Jacoba to defend ably his client's cause. We recall his use
DIZON, Petitioner, v. NAESS SHIPPING PHILIPPINES, of the following words and phrases: abhorrent nullity, legal monstrosity,
INC. AND DOLE UK (LTD.), Respondents.
horrendous mistake, horrible error, boner, and an insult to the judiciary and an
anachronism in the judicial process. Even VelascoJacoba acknowledged that the
G.R. No. 196962, June 08, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. JOAN SONJACO Y words created "a cacophonic picture of total and utter disrespect."
STA. ANA, AccusedAppellant.
Respondents nonetheless try to exculpate themselves by saying that every remark in the
G.R. No. 191936, June 01, 2016 VIRGINIA D. 30 July 2001 motion was warranted. We disagree.
CALIMAG, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF SILVESTRA N.
MACAPAZ, REPRESENTED BY ANASTACIO P. MACAPAZ, Wellrecognized is the right of a lawyer, both as an officer of the court and as a citizen, to
JR., Respondents. criticize in properly respectful terms and through legitimate channels the acts of courts
and judges. However, even the most hardened judge would be scarred by the scurrilous
G.R. No. 193374, June 08, 2016 HEIRS OF THE attack made by the 30 July 2001 motion on Judge Lacurom's Resolution. On its face, the
LATE GERRY* ECARMA, NAMELY: AVELINA SUIZA Resolution presented the facts correctly and decided the case according to supporting law
ECARMA, DENNIS ECARMA, JERRY LYN ECARMA PENA, and jurisprudence. Though a lawyer's language may be forceful and emphatic, it should
ANTONIO ECARMA AND NATALIA ECARMA SANGALANG,
always be dignified and respectful, befitting the dignity of the legal profession. The use
Petitioners, v. COURT OF APPEALS AND RENATO A.
ECARMA, Respondents.
of unnecessary language is proscribed if we are to promote high esteem in the
courts and trust in judicial administration.
G.R. No. 175592, June 14, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. EDISON C. In maintaining the respect due to the courts, a lawyer is not merely enjoined to
MAGBITANG, AccusedAppellant. use dignified language but also to pursue the client's cause through fair and
honest means.53 (Emphasis supplied) cralawred
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 3/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
ALIAS "LALAKS," Appellant. Meanwhile, in Re: Suspension of Atty. Rogelio Z. Bagabuyo,55 this Court imposed the penalty of
suspension for one (1) year for the respondent's act of resorting to the press instead of availing himself
G.R. No. 200081, June 08, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE
only of judicial remedies in airing out his grievances:
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. EDGARDO T. CRUZ,
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
AccusedAppellant.
Lawyers are licensed officers of the courts who are empowered to appear, prosecute and
defend; and upon whom peculiar duties, responsibilities and liabilities are devolved by law
G.R. No. 194605, June 14, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. MARIANO as a consequence. Membership in the bar imposes upon them certain obligations. Canon
OANDASAN, JR., AccusedAppellant. 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility mandates a lawyer to "observe and maintain
the respect due to the courts and to judicial officers and [he] should insist on similar
G.R. No. 214440, June 15, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE conduct by others." Rule 11.05 of Canon 11 states that a lawyer "shall submit grievances
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. ALEX MENDEZ against a judge to the proper authorities only."
RAFOLS, AccusedAppellant.
Respondent violated Rule 11.05 of Canon 11 when he admittedly caused the
G.R. No. 217732, June 15, 2016 EMILIO S. holding of a press conference where he made statements against the Order
AGCOLICOL, JR., Petitioner, v. JERWIN CASIÑO, dated November 12, 2002 allowing the accused in Crim. Case No. 5144 to be
Respondent. released on bail.
G.R. No. 172352, June 08, 2016 LAND BANK OF
Respondent also violated Canon 11 when he indirectly stated that Judge Tan was
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. ALFREDO HABABAG,
SR., SUBSTITUTED BY HIS WIFE, CONSOLACION, AND
displaying judicial arrogance in the article entitled, Senior prosecutor lambasts
CHILDREN, NAMELY: MANUEL, SALVADOR, WILSON, Surigao judge for allowing murder suspect to bail out, which appeared in the
JIMMY, ALFREDO, JR., AND JUDITH, ALL SURNAMED August 18, 2003 issue of the Mindanao Gold Star Daily. Respondent's statements in
HABABAG, Respondents.; G.R. NOS. 17238788 the article, which were made while Crim. Case No. 5144 was still pending in court, also
ALFREDO HABABAG, SR., SUBSTITUTED BY HIS WIFE, violated Rule 13.02 of Canon 13, which states that "a lawyer shall not make public
CONSOLACION, AND CHILDREN, NAMELY: MANUEL, statements in the media regarding a pending case tending to arouse public opinion for or
SALVADOR, WILSON, JIMMY, ALFREDO, JR., AND against a party." (Emphasis supplied) cralawred
G.R. No. 215994, June 06, 2016 OFFICE OF THE In closing, we find it befitting to reiterate that lawyers have the right, both as an officer of the court and
OMBUDSMAN AND FIELD INVESTIGATION OFFICE, as a citizen, to criticize in properly respectful terms and through legitimate channels the acts of courts
Petitioner, v. ROLANDO B. FALLER, Respondent.
and judges.56 However, closely linked to such rule is the cardinal condition that criticisms, no matter
A.C. No. 11069, June 08, 2016 RONALDO C. how truthful, shall not spill over the walls of decency and propriety.57 To that end, the duty of a lawyer
FACTURAN, Complainant, v. PROSECUTOR ALFREDO L. to his client's success is wholly subordinate to the administration of justice.58 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
BARCELONA, JR., Respondent.
True, lawyers must always remain vigilant against unscrupulous officers of the law. However, the
G.R. No. 208475, June 08, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE purification of our justice system from venal elements must not come at the expense of decency, and
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. MANUEL REBANUEL
worse, the discrediting of the very system that it seeks to protect.
Y NADERA, AccusedAppellant.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 4/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
20 Id. at 2426, Complaint for Violation of Human Rights and Related Offenses Pursuant to
A.C. No. 11246, June 14, 2016 ARNOLD PACAO, the Applicable Provisions of the Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human
Complainant, v. ATTY. SINAMAR LIMOS, Respondent.
Rights dated September 14, 2006.
G.R. No. 181353, June 06, 2016 HGL
21 Id. at 3236, Rev. Sultan Elly Velez Lao Pamatong, Esquire's Sworn Statement on (A)
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT, HENRY G. LIM, Petitioner, v. HON. RAFAEL the Illegal Demolition of Two Parcels of Land Covered by Case No. 4 OCT. 1310 and (B)
O. PENUELA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ACTING PRESIDING Case No. 2006176 Pending with the RTC ofCagayan De Oro City Wherein Judge Gregorio
JUDGE OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, 6TH JUDICIAL D. Pantanosas Asked for a OneMillionPeso Bribe Money dated September 11, 2006.
REGION, BRANCH 13, CULASI, ANTIQUE AND
SEMIRARA COAL CORPORATION (NOW SEMIRARA 22 Id. at 1718.
MINING CORPORATION), Respondents.
23 Rule 1.01 A judge should be the embodiment of competence, integrity and
G.R. No. 217575, June 15, 2016 SOUTH COTABATO
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND GAUVAIN J. independence.
BENZONAN, Petitioners, v. HON. PATRICIA STO.
TOMAS, SECRETARY OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, 24 Rule 2.01 A judge should so behave at all times as to promote public confidence in
ROLANDO FABRIGAR, MERLYN VELARDE, VINCE the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. chanrobleslaw
G.R. No. 208586, June 22, 2016 HEIRS OF DATU 37 Id. at 86.
MAMALINDING MAGAYOONG, REPRESENTED BY DR.
MAIMONA MAGAYOONGPANGARUNGAN WITH HER
38 Id. at 78.
SPOUSE DATU SA MARAWI RASID PANGARUNGAN, AND
DR. ANISHA* MAGAYOONGMACABATO WITH HER
SPOUSE DATU KHALIQUZZAMAN MACABATO, 39 Id. at 8999.
Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF CATAMANAN MAMA,
REPRESENTED BY HASAN MAMA, Respondents. 40 Id. at 237.
G.R. No. 189516, June 08, 2016 EDNA MABUGAY
41 Id. at 250.
OTAMIAS, JEFFREN M. OTAMIAS AND MINOR JEMWEL
M. OTAMIAS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER EDNA
MABUGAYOTAMIAS, Petitioners, v. REPUBLIC OF THE 42 Id. at 78.
PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY COL. VIRGILIO O.
DOMINGO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE COMMANDING 43Pobre v. DefensorSantiago, 613 Phil. 352, 363 (2009).
OFFICER OF THE PENSION AND GRATUITY
MANAGEMENT CENTER (PGMC) OF THE ARMED FORCES
44 Lawyer's Oath.
OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.
G.R. No. 214122, June 08, 2016 AUTOZENTRUM 45Pobre v. DefensorSantiago, supra note 43, at 364, citing Surigao Mineral Reservation
ALABANG, INC., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES MIAMAR A. Board v. Cloribel, 142 Phil. 1, 1516 (1970).
BERNARDO AND GENARO F. BERNARDO, JR.,
DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY, ASIAN 46 Canon 11, Code of Professional Responsibility.
CARMAKERS CORPORATION, AND BAYERISHE
MOTOREN WERKE (BMW) A.G., Respondents.
47Rollo, p. 8.
G.R. No. 195382, June 15, 2016 ORION WATER
DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, 48 Rules 8.01 & 11.03, Code of Professional Responsibility.
CRISPIN Q. TRIA, ET AL., Petitioner, v. THE
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM (GSIS), 49 Rule 11.04, Code of Professional Responsibility.
Respondent.
G.R. No. 201584, June 15, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE 50Rollo, pp. 2731, Solicitation of OneMillionPeso Bribe Money, Violation of Rule 137 of
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. APOLONIO the Rules of Court & Gross Violation of Canon 1, Canon 2, & Canon 3 of the Code of
"TOTONG" AVILA Y ALECANTE, AccusedAppellant. Judicial Conduct and Judicial Assault Against Freedom of Religion dated September 11,
2006.
G.R. No. 210936, June 28, 2016 TEODORO B.
CRUZ, JR., MELCHOR M. ALONZO, AND WILFREDO P. 51 Id. at 224.
ALDAY, Petitioners, v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT,
Respondents.
52 Rule 11.05, Code of Professional Responsibility.
G.R. No. 196329, June 01, 2016 PABLO B. ROMAN,
JR., AND ATTY. MATIAS V. DEFENSOR, AS OFFICERS OF 53Judge Lacurom v. Atty. Jacoba, 519 Phil. 195, 209210 (2006).
THE CAPITOL HILLS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, INC.,
Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 54Judge Baculi v. Atty. Battung, 614 Phil. 1, 8 (2011).
COMMISSION, ATTY. FRANKLIN I. CUETO, ATTY.
EMMANUEL Y. ARTIZA AND MANUEL C. BALDEO, AS
55Re: Suspension of Atty. Rogelio Z. Bagabuyo, Former Senior State Prosecutor, 561 Phil.
MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE; JUSTINA
F. CALLANGAN, AS DIRECTOR OF THE CORPORATION 325, 339340 (2007).
FINANCE DEPARTMENT; ATTY. NARCISO T. ATIENZA,
EUSEBIO A. ABAQUIN, ATTY. CLODUALDO C. DE JESUS, 56Habawel v. Court of Tax Appeals, 672 Phil. 582, 595 (2011).
SR., ATTY. CLODUALDO ANTONIO R. DE JESUS, JR.,
ATTY. IRENEO T. AGUIRRE, JR., SUNDAY O. PINEDA, 57 Id. at 596.
PORFIRIO M. FLORES, AND ATTY. ZOSIMO PADRO, JR.,
Respondents.
58Areola v. Mendoza, 724 Phil. 155, 164 (2014).
A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 JUDGE GREGORIO D.
PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L.
PAMATONG, Respondent.
Ads by Google Law Attorney Law and Lawyer Court Record
G.R. No. 211604, June 08, 2016 PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. DARYL POLONIO Y Ads by Google Law and Lawyer Insurance Law Law Law
TUANGCAY, AccusedAppellant. Ads by Google Law and Lawyer Case Lawyer Case Law
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 5/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
G.R. No. 190876, June 15, 2016 YELLOW BUS LINE
EMPLOYEES UNION (YBLEU), Petitioner, v. YELLOW
BUS LINE, INC. (YBLI), Respondent.
G.R. No. 189851, June 22, 2016 INTEC CEBU INC.,
AKIHIKO KAMBAYASHI AND WATARU SATO,
Petitioners, v. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, ROWENA
REYES, ROWENA ODIONG, HYDEE AYUDA, TERESITA
BERIDO, CRISTINA LABAPIZ, GEMMA JUMAOAS,
SIGMARINGA BAROLO, LIGAYA B. ANADON, DONALINE
DELA TORRE, JOY P. LOMOD, JACQUELINE A. FLORES,
SUSAN T. ALIÑO, ANALYN P. ABALLE, CAROLINE A.
LABATOS, LENITH F. ROMANO, LEONILA B. FLORES,
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 6/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
CECILIA G. PAPELLERO, AGNES C. CASIO, VIOLETA O.
MATCHETE, CANDIDA I. CRUJIDO, CLAUDIA B.
CUTAMORA, ROSALIE R. POLICIOS, GENELYN C.
MUÑEZ, ALOME MIGUE, ELSIE ALCOS, LYDIALYN B.
GODINEZ AND MYRNA S. LOGAOS, Respondents.
G.R. No. 170966, June 22, 2016 REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE, Petitioner, v. ALBERTO LOOYUKO,
DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF
NOAH'S ARK SUGAR HOLDINGS AND WILSON T. GO,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 208393, June 15, 2016 CITY OF TAGUIG,
Petitioner, v. CITY OF MAKATI, Respondent.
G.R. No. 188829, June 13, 2016 REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, HON. RAUL S. GONZALEZ, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, HON. ALIPIO F. FERNANDEZ, JR., IN HIS
CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF
IMMIGRATION, HON. ARTHEL B. CAROÑONGAN, HON.
TEODORO B. DELARMENTE, HON. JOSE D. CABOCHAN,
AND HON. FRANKLIN Z. LITTAUA, IN THEIR CAPACITY
AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 7/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
THE BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, Petitioners, v.
DAVONN MAURICE C. HARP, Respondent.
G.R. No. 191087, June 29, 2016 DELIA L. BELITA,
SALVADOR ILARDE, JR., GENEVIEVE BELITA, MA.
CHERYL DAVA, BRAULIO LEDESMA, JR., FLORENCE B.
OLSEN, KATHY GERMENTIL, ROSITA ESTUART,
ARDELIZA LIM, ELSA RAFANAN, ERLINDA V. GAERLAN,
PERLA FERNANDEZ, DELBEN "NOY" BELITA AND
JOSEPH AVACILLA, Petitioners, v. ANTONIO S. SY,
ROBERTO CARONAN, WILFREDO CIRIACO, NORMA S.
WONG, SONIA C. BENERO, MARIA L. PINEDA AND
CRISTINA V. CARAMOL, Respondents.
G.R. No. 205544, June 29, 2016 MUNICIPALITY OF
CORDOVA, PROVINCE OF CEBU; THE SANGGUNIANG
BAYAN OF CORDOVA; AND THE MAYOR OF THE
MUNICIPALITY OF CORDOVA, Petitioners, v.
PATHFINDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND
TOPANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondents.
G.R. No. 210761, June 28, 2016 KILUSANG MAYO
UNO, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, ELMER
LABOG; NATIONAL FEDERATION OF LABOR UNIONS
KILUSANG MAYO UNO, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE
PRESIDENTS, REDEN ALCANTARA AND ARNOLD DELA
CRUZ, CENTER FOR TRADE UNION AND HUMAN RIGHTS
(CTUHR), REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DAISY ARAGO, VIRGINIA FLORES AND VIOLETA
ESPIRITU, Petitioners, v. HON. BENIGNO SIMEON C.
AQUINO III, AND PHILIPPINE HEALTH INSURANCE
CORPORATION (PHIC), Respondents; MIGRANTE
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 8/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
INTERNATIONAL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON
GARRY MARTINEZ, CONNIE BRAGASREGALADO,
PARALUMAN CATUIRA, UNITED FILIPINOS IN
HONGKONG (UNIFILHK), AND SOLEDAD PILLAS,
PetitionersinIntervention.
G.R. No. 211141, June 29, 2016 HILARIO DASCO,
REYMIR PARAFINA, RICHARD PARAFINA, EDILBERTO
ANIA, MICHAEL ADANO, JAIME BOLO, RUBEN E. GULA,
ANTONIO CUADERNO AND JOVITO CATANGUI,
Petitioners, v. PHILTRANCO SERVICE ENTERPRISES
INC/CENTURION SOLANO, MANAGER, Respondents.
G.R. No. 184666, June 27, 2016 REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. MEGA PACIFIC
ESOLUTIONS, INC., WILLY U. YU, BONNIE S. YU,
ENRIQUE T. TANSIPEK, ROSITA Y. TANSIPEK, PEDRO O.
TAN, JOHNSON W. FONG, BERNARD I. FONG, AND
*LAURIANO A. BARRIOS, Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 9/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
HAGENIO PAUG AND EVELITA VIRTUDAZO, SPOUSES
MAXIMO BORREZ AND VILMA SALISE, SPOUSES
FELIMON V. SALVO, JR., EVA MACATOL AND RITA V.
SALVO, Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM ADJUDICATION BOARD REGION X
ADJUDICATOR ABETO SALCEDO, JR. AND RICARDO
GACULA, Respondents.
G.R. Nos. 18585758, June 29, 2016 TRIFONIA D.
GABUTAN, DECEASED, HEREIN REPRESENTED BY HER
HEIRS, NAMELY: ERLINDA LLAMES, ELISA ASOK,
PRIMITIVO GABUTAN, VALENTINA YANE; BUNA D.
ACTUB, FELISIA TROCIO, CRISANTA D. UBAUB, AND
TIRSO DALONDONAN, DECEASED, HEREIN
REPRESENTED BY HIS HEIRS, NAMELY: MADELYN D.
REPOSAR AND JERRY DALONDONAN, MARY JANE
GILIG, ALLAN UBAUB, AND SPOUSES NICOLAS &
EVELYN DAILO, Petitioners, v. DANTE D. NACALABAN,
HELEN N. MAANDIG, SUSAN N. SIAO, AND CAGAYAN
CAPITOL COLLEGE, Respondents.; G.R. NOS. 19431415
DANTE D. NACALABAN, HELEN N. MAANDIG, AND
SUSAN N. SIAO, AS HEIRS OF BALDOMERA D. VDA. DE
NACALABAN, Petitioners, v. TRIFONIA D. GABUTAN,
BUNA D. ACTUB, FELISIA D. TROCIO, CRISANTA D.
UBAUB, AND TIRSO DALONDONAN, DECEASED, HEREIN
REPRESENTED BY HIS HEIRS, NAMELY: MADELYN D.
REPOSAR AND JERRY DALONDONAN, MARY JANE
GILIG, ALLAN UBAUB, AND SPOUSES NICOLAS &
EVELYN DAILO, CAGAYAN CAPITOL COLLEGE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ATTY. CASIMIRO B.
SUAREZ, JR., PRIVATE Respondent; HON. LEONCIA R.
DIMAGIBA (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE), HON. PAUL L.
HERNANDO (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE), HON. NINA G.
ANTONIOVALENZUELA (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE), HON.
EDGARDO T. LLOREN (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE), HON.
MICHAEL P. ELBINIAS (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE), AND
HON. JANE AURORA C. LANTION (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE,
ACTING CHAIRMAN), COURT OF APPEALS, CAGAYAN DE
ORO CITY (FORMER SPECIAL TWENTYSECOND
DIVISION), PUBLIC Respondents.
G.R. No. 166890, June 28, 2016 REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. APOLONIO BAUTISTA, JR.,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 218240, June 28, 2016 ENGR. PABLITO S.
PALUCA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE GENERAL MANAGER
OF THE DIPOLOG CITY WATER DISTRICT, Petitioner, v.
COMMISSION ON AUDIT, Respondent.
G.R. No. 194065, June 20, 2016 PHILIPPINE BANK
OF COMMUNICATIONS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER
OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 10/11
3/10/2017 A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016 - JUDGE GREGORIO D. PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant, v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG, Respondent. : JUNE 2016 - PHIL…
G.R. No. 206528, June 28, 2016 PHILIPPINE
ASSET GROWTH TWO, INC. (SUCCESSORININTEREST
OF PLANTERS DEVELOPMENT BANK) AND PLANTERS
DEVELOPMENT BANK, Petitioners, v. FASTECH
SYNERGY PHILIPPINES, INC. (FORMERLY FIRST ASIA
SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, INC.), FASTECH
MICROASSEMBLY & TEST, INC., FASTECH
ELECTRONIQUE, INC., AND FASTECH PROPERTIES,
INC., Respondents.
Copyright © 1998 2017 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | Email Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=460 11/11