Group 3

Abarca, William L.
Cueto-Molar, Sophia Nena
Moran, Rodelo
Pardilla, Marites

1. QUESTION:

M died intestate by his wife, C and their five (5) minor children. He left a parcel of
land. C then in her own behalf and as natural guardian of the minor children,
executed a deed of Extrajudicial Partition and sale of the property through which
the property was sold to Spouses G. Sometime thereafter, B (M’s Sister) was able to
obtain guardianship over the minor children. B caused the minor children to file a
complaint for annulment of the Deed of Extrajudicial Partition and Sale contending
that it is a voidable contract pursuant to Article 1390 of the Civil Code. Is the Deed
a voidable contract?

2. QUESTION:

X Co. is a domestic corporation, whose controlling interest is owned by the A family

Y Co., in the other hand, is also a domestic corporation, allegedly owned by B. X Co.
allegedly sold its share of common stock in C Bank to Y Co. The shares of common
stock in C Bank are part of the sequestered properties that were allegedly illegally
amassed by B during the twenty-year reign of former President Ferdinand Marcos.
According to X Co., the shares were mere dummies of Marcos. Such being the case,
their acquisition is either voidable or void or unenforceable. Is the acquisition void,
voidable or unenforceable?

3. QUESTION:

In two separate documents signed by him, Juan

Valentino “obligated” himself each to Maria and to Perla, thus – ‘To Maria, my
true love, I obligate myself to give you my one and only horse when I feel like It.” –
and – ‘To Perla, my true sweetheart, I obligate myself to pay you the P500.00 I owe
you when I feel like
it.” Months passed but Juan never bothered to make good his promises. Maria and
Perla came to consult you on whether they could recover on the basis of the
foregoing settings. What would your legal advice be?

4. QUESTION:

The sugar cane planters of Batangas entered into a long- term milling contract with
the Central Azucarera de Don Pedro Inc. Ten years later, the Central assigned its
rights to the said milling contract to a Taiwanese group which would take over the
operations of the sugar mill. The planters filed an action to annul the said
assignment on the ground that the Taiwanese group was not registered with the
Board of Investments. Will the action prosper or not? Explain briefly.

5. QUESTION:

TX filed a suit for ejectment against BD for non-payment of condominium rentals

amounting to P150,000. During the pendency of the case, BD offered and TX
accepted the full amount due as rentals from BD, who then filed a motion to dismiss
the ejectment suit on the ground that the action is already extinguished. Is BD’s
contention correct? Why or why not? Reason.