Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cosmetics Industry
Cosmetics Industry
Cosmetics Industry
Today, there is a vast scope of cosmetic products sold to women and men around the
world. Cosmetic products sold to women include those associated with skin (such as
creams, lotions and skin lightening products), hair (shampoos, conditioners, mousse,
hair spray, hair dyes, permanent wave solutions, and hair straightening products), nails
(nail polish and artificial nails), bathing (bath oils and bubble baths), in addition to the
variety of face paints and powders known as “makeup” (lipstick, eyeliner, mascara,
concealer, foundation, face powder, blush, and eye shadow). Cosmetic products sold
to men (which also have women's versions) have until recently been limited to hair
products, fragrances, deodorants, shaving products, mouthwashes, and sunscreens.
However, with changing conceptions of masculinity in the 2000s (such as the rise of the
“metrosexual” man in urban North America and Europe who takes great care with his
appearance) products sold to men today include eye gel, exfoliating facial scrubs, and
even face paints and powders such as brow and eyelash gel, eye shadow, eyeliner, lip
gloss, and concealer. To avoid unduly blurring prevailing conceptions of gender
difference (and the reduced appeal to many male consumers such blurring might
entail), these products are usually marketed as “skin care” or “grooming products”
rather than cosmetics or makeup. Although some of the above products for women and
men are used for bodily cleanliness, soap itself is not considered a cosmetic. In
addition to selling more products to men, the cosmetics industry has expanded in
recent years by offering an increasingly wide scope of products dubbed
“cosmeceuticals.”
The use of cosmetics has a long history, and with advent of mass marketing, a set of
diverse cultural practices became a global industry. The history of the use of cosmetics
dates back 40,000 years, that is, for as long as people have adorned their faces and
By the 1920s, marketing techniques for cosmetics were developed that continue to be
used today: namely, appealing to women's feelings of insecurity (about their bodies,
financial situation and relationship or marital status), utilizing popular actresses to sell
products, and equating cosmetics with women's liberation (originally through the image
of the liberated flapper). Advertising cosmetic products, including skin-lightening
cream, as a form of female empowerment is done more often than not today. Critics
would understand such marketing as serving to diffuse well-known feminist critiques of
the beauty industry, such as that of the author Naomi Wolf. The industry contends
marketers are merely keeping up with the changing roles of women in contemporary
society.
The use of cosmeceuticals has a short history that does not predate the marketers of
modern multinational corporations. The development and marketing of products that
obscure the differences between cosmetics and pharmaceuticals are a result of
mergers and acquisitions across the previously separate biotechnology, cosmetics,
and pharmaceutical industries. Before the advent of cosmeceuticals, cosmetic
products were understood to involve temporary changes to one's appearance (such as
covering liver spots on the skin), while more permanent changes (such as removing
these spots entirely) would be classified as a drug. Cosmeceuticals create regulatory
difficulties for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States and similar
government agencies in other countries because it is unclear whether cosmeceuticals
are cosmetics or drugs. Although, the term cosmeceuticals was invented by marketers
in the industry, they continue to insist that cosmeceuticals are cosmetics, as cosmetics
are subject to less strenuous testing and regulation than pharmaceuticals. The
cosmetics industry has a vested interest in keeping cosmeceuticals subject to less
regulation. Today, the global market for thigh creams alone, the effectiveness of which
is questionable, is worth $90 million.
For example, the United States Congress only began to regulate the cosmetics industry
in 1938 after several cases of deaths, disfigurations, and blindness that were directly
attributed to cosmetics. Today, most cosmetics are fairly safe for people without
allergies (with some exceptions, including skin-lightening creams containing mercury).
Most cosmetics have far too little biologically active ingredients to be harmful, but at the
same time, many have far too little to be effective. “Angel dusting” is a common
contemporary form of hucksterism. This practice involves including a tiny amount of an
active ingredient so the cosmetic can be marketed as containing that ingredient;
Racist constructions of beauty that privilege whiteness and “European” facial features
date back to European colonialism, and continue to be profitable for the cosmetics
industry today. British colonialists in India believed there to be different “races” of
Indians and thought those with lighter-colored skin were evolutionarily superior and
more beautiful. Similarly, American cartoons during and after slavery portrayed
exaggerated characteristics of African Americans to promote white supremacy.
The impact of colonialism can be seen in cosmetic products designed to help women
of color strive for a white European ideal. These products include skin bleaching and
lightening products and hair straightening products. For example, in the United States
from the late 1900s to the 1950s, skin bleaching and hair straighteners were advertised
with names such as No Kink, Imperial Whitener, Mme. Turner's Mystic Face Bleach,
and Black Skin Remover. Although these products have been severely criticized, they
are not a thing of the past in the United States or elsewhere (including Mexico, Peru,
Bolivia, Venezuela, Nigeria, Mali, Zimbabwe, South Africa, India, the Philippines,
Japan, China, and Korea). The global market for skin-lightening products has exploded
in the 21st century, and constitutes a multibillion-dollar industry. Although, some of these
products are sold by smaller regional corporations, most are sold by multinational
corporations. As such, skin-lightening products are not only a legacy of colonialism but
also a consequence of the expansion of multinational corporations and Western
consumer culture.
In a similar manner to the white face paints of the ancients and the early modern
Europeans, many modern skin-lightening products contain toxic ingredients including
mercury. Many of the products containing mercury sold in Africa are manufactured in the
European Union, with the most production happening in Ireland and Italy. It is legal to
produce such products as long as they are not sold in the European Union (although
many African shops in Dublin and other European cities carry them). Similarly, Mexican
-manufactured products containing mercury have caused outbreaks of mercury
poisoning in American states (where mercury products are illegal) including Texas,
New Mexico, Arizona, and California.
The cosmetics industry offers two responses to critiques of racism. First, they point to
the many cosmetic products made for women of color are not designed to lighten skin
or straighten hair. In fact, African American beauty products have provided
opportunities for African American entrepreneurs, many of whom are women, and many
of whom have refused to sell these products. Second, those in the industry that do sell
these products tend to use the language of choice and aesthetic preference. Whether
or not such language obscures the issue that what women do with their bodies is highly
informed by a culture that values youth and the slender body and devalues bodies of
color continues to be a matter of debate.
• cosmetics
Further Readings
Berry, Bonnie Beauty Bias: Discrimination and Social Power. Westport, CT: Praeger,
2007.
Glenn, E. N. “Yearning for Lightness: Transnational Circuits in the Marketing and
Consumption of Skin Lighteners.” Gender & Society v.22/3 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243208316089
Riordan, Teresa Inventing Beauty. New York: Broadway Books, 2004.
Wolf, Naomi The Beauty Myth. New York: Vintage, 1997.