Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

TUGAS MATA KULIAH METODOLOGI PENELITIAN

Anggota Kelompok :
BEATRICX L.M. TANJUNG (L2C007019)
DOMINIKUS ANDOKO (L2C007035)
LISTI ARDHANNARI (L2C007060)
VITO MANDALA ( L2C007091)
FAISAL (21030110151002)
URAY IRZANDI (21030110151004)
YONAS (21030110151003)

19. Two different configurations for a solar energy collector were tested with the
following result. The measured quantity was power (in watts)
Configuration Configuration
A B
1,8 1,9
1,9 2,1
1,1 1,5
1,4 1,5

F-Test Two-Sample for Variances

Configuration A Configuration B
Mean 1,55 1,75
Variance 0,136666667 0,09
Observations 4 4
Df 3 3
F 1,518518519
P(F<=f) one-tail 0,369863149
F Critical one-tail 9,276628154

Anova: Single
Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Varianc
e
Configuration 0,13666
A 4 6,2 1,55 7
Configuration B 4 7 1,75 0,09

ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS Df MS F P-value F crit
Between 0,70588 0,43301
Groups 0,08 1 0,08 2 1 5,98737758
0,11333
Within Groups 0,68 6 3

Total 0,76 7        

Kesimpulan :
F tabel=5,9873775842126
F hitungan = 0,705882
F tabel lebih besar dari F hitungan Ho diterima
dari hal tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa perbedaan bentuk konfigurasi untuk
solar energy memberikan pengaruh terhadap Power.

20. in a cathode interference resistance experiments, with the filament voltage at


6,9, the plate current was measured on seven twin triodes.
Tube
plate current readings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
A 1,176 1,23 1,146 1,672 0,954 1,079 1,204
B 1,279 1 1,146 1,176 0,699 1,114 1,114

Anova: Single
Factor

SUMMARY
Varianc
Groups Count Sum Average e
4,66666
tube 7 28 4 7
1,20871 0,05030
a 7 8,461 4 3
1,07542 0,03448
b 7 7,528 9 3

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
38,1783 19,0891 12,0526 0,00047
Between Groups 7 2 9 4 7 3,554557
28,5087 1,58381
Within Groups 2 18 8

66,6870
Total 9 20        

Kesimpulan :
F tabel = 3,554557
F Hitungan = 12,05264
F hitungan lebih besar dari F tabel tolak Ho
Dapat disimpulkan bahwa plate A dan B tidak berpengaruh pada resistensi tube.

21. An agricultural engineer obtained the following data on two methods of


drying corn
Drying rate
with
preheater without preheater
16 20
12 10
22 21
14 10
19 12

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Coun Averag Varianc
Groups t Sum e e
with preheater 5 83 16,6 15,8
without preheater 5 73 14,6 29,8

ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
0,43859 0,52641
Between Groups 10 1 10 6 5 5,317655
Within Groups 182,4 8 22,8

Total 192,4 9        

Kesimpulan :
F tabel = 5,317655
F hitungan = 0,438596
F tabel lebih besar dari F hitungan  Ho diterima
Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penggunaan preheater dan tanpa preheater berpengaruh
pada kecepatan pengeringan.

You might also like