India's Mobile Providers: Competing For Calls at The Bottom of The Pyramid

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

India's Mobile Providers: Competing for Calls at the Bottom of the Pyramid

Six months ago, Chunnilal Menaria's wife grumbled about her husband spending
US$45 on a mobile phone. They lived in a one-room stone house, with no toilets or
running water, only eight hours of electricity a day and earned US$60 a month with
which
they fed their family of five. The monsoon seasons, from which India derives much
of its annual rainfall, have been poor over the past couple years and forced Menaria
to take up carpentry to supplement his dwindling income from farming. Each day,
he walked about eight miles around his village in Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, in search
of work. With luck, he made US$2 a day. Yet, for Menaria, the Micromax X1i phone
is the best investment he has ever made. "It literally changed my life," he says.
"Now that everyone has access to a phone, I don't waste time walking around
anymore. We just call each other. My monthly income has increased to US$100."

Reaching Menaria and other customers in India's rural areas is expected to be the
next frontier for expanding the country's mobile phone market. Both locally grown
brands and multinational corporations are trying to build customer awareness and
market share in India's hinterland, offering devices at lower price points and with
features that address the specific challenges facing those living outside India's
cities. Emerging as the victor in this race, however, will depend on innovation at
every level of the process --
from product development to after-sale customer service, experts say.
With 10 million to 12 million subscribers being added every month, India's 100
million unit (shipped in 2009, according to IDC India) handset market is among the
fastest-growing in the world.

According to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), market penetration


for wireless phones in the country is at 49.6% with approximately 584 million users
as of March 2010, up from only about 2% in 1995. "We estimate that overall mobile
teledensity in the country will [reach] approximately 95% by 2014," notes Naveen
Mishra, lead analyst, telecoms research, at IDC India. "And with penetration in rural
areas being much lower than [in] urban [areas], the next phase of growth will
undoubtedly come from there."

The expected growth provides some of the explanation for the plethora of
homegrown mobile handset vendors -- including Karbonn, Spice, Lava, and even
domestic consumer electronics giant Videocon -- that have inundated the Indian
market. Some started as regional vendors, but have developed into pan-India
players. The government's ban on cheaper gray market phones with no identifying
International
Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) number may have been primarily responsible for
the sudden spawning of local vendors. But IDC's numbers suggest a deeper shift in
industry dynamics. The number of local players grew to 28 and registered a
combined market share of 12.3% in 2009, up from five players with less than 1%
combined share in 2008.
In fact, two-year-old, Gurgaon-based Micromax has replaced LG of Korea as India's
third-largest GSM handset vendor with a market share of 6%. Nokia is first with a
62% market share and Samsung is second at 8%. "When we entered this space, it
was a virgin market dominated by 'Tier A' brands.

We wanted to create and become leaders in a new vertical. Today, 70% of our sales
come from rural areas," states Vikas Jain, co-founder and business director of
Micromax. With mobile penetration in rural areas doubling to
20% in 2009, according to the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), it's not
surprising that most brands old and new report a substantial percentage of sales
from those regions.

Many emerging vendors are attracting rural customers like Menaria by keeping their
devices affordable, offering phones that are priced at no more than US$300. Pune
(Maharashtra)-based Byond Tech derives as much as 75% of its sales from rural
markets, numbers the company attributes to better pricing. "Earlier, established
players offered phones with the six key features -- FM radio, Bluetooth, camera,
MP3, video and expandable memory -- for US$75 to $100. Now new players are
offering similar products for US$25," says Shripal Gandhi, director of Byond Tech.
"More than 85% of handset sales in India are in the price range US$35-$75." For
instance, Gandhi's BY888 model, a low-end smartphone, costs about US$100
whereas "any of Nokia's E-series phones with similar features will cost more than
US$300".

But the big boys aren't too far behind. Samsung's Guru series, which accounts for
approximately 35% of its sales in India, caters specifically to the price-conscious
segment with phones that cost as little as US$35. Nokia recently launched a smart
phone priced below US$130 (with plans to go even lower) and Vodafone intends to
begin selling a handset for US$16. The increase in India's value-added tax has
compelled players to further cut prices in some states. However, "between the
established players and the new ones there is still a 30% gap in the price on a
feature-to-feature comparison. That's a big gap. So even if the big players lower
their prices, they will feel the pinch," notes Sunil Dutt, president of HP India's
personal systems group.

But price is exactly the kind of differentiation that Micromax's Jain tries hard to
avoid. "If a price war was my approach, I would address the 35% of the market
segment where Nokia adds most of its customers with lower-priced handsets," he
states. "There have been some Indian brands that function purely on a price play,
but we want to draw the customer by highlighting the product, not the price."
Jagmohan Singh Raju, a professor of marketing at Wharton, points out that brands
will not win additional market share purely based on the cost of their products.
"Prices of phones fall quite rapidly anyway. Broadening your product line is not a
price war. The fact that [multinational corporations] can offer cheaper models
doesn't mean they are going to lower the prices of their other phones," he says.
"The real challenge here will be the innovation."

Solar Power, Mosquito Repellants and Other Value-Adds


Industry observers believe value-added services might be the tipping point for
attracting new handset customers in rural areas. Micromax, for example, offers a
lower-priced device priced for non-urban markets that can also be used as a
universal remote or a gaming device, and is developing phones that also function as
mosquito repellants. Additionally, the company is planning to bundle insurance
services with handsets. "We are developing a concept where, once a person buys a
handset, he can get insurance for the handset and for himself," Jain states. "In rural
areas, people are not inclined to insure themselves, but if it is available free of cost,
they are very interested." Large sales volumes make it easier to negotiate with
insurance providers, he adds. Samsung has launched the world's first solar-powered
phone, which also includes a "mobile prayer" feature that provides hymns and
wallpapers for different religions. Nokia's Life Tools gives farmers crop prices and
weather predictions for a nominal monthly fee.
The Indian market has been a unique learning ground for vendors of all sizes.
Companies developed their product lines knowing that the phones would be used
for a lot more than just talking, with features that would combat some of the
barriers to bringing technology to consumers in rural areas and those at the bottom
of the economic pyramid. Mobile devices came equipped with long battery life (as
much as 30
days); built-in flashlights (a lifesaver during frequent power outages); loud audio
and video players (because of noisy environments); larger displays, and expandable
memory. Other features include multiple address books (for shared users), dust and
dirt-resistant keypads, regional language interfaces and pictorially clear icons to
simplify use for consumers who can't read or write well.

The intense competition among service providers has resulted in increasingly lower
call rates and, unlike in the United States, mobile service providers in India do not
offer handsets as part of calling plans. Those two factors have made phones that
can hold two subscriber identity module (SIM) cards -- which allow the use of two
services in the same device -- a major volume-generator for emerging vendors. "Our
entire
[product line], barring one, contains only dual-SIM phones," notes Sudhir Kumar,
national sales manager for telecommunications at Intex Technologies. "Customers
keep the SIM for incoming calls constant [because in India they are not charged for
those calls] and keep changing to the second SIM [for outgoing calls, based on]
lowering call rates. And with Nokia not having dual-SIM models, there is not much
competition there from them."

However, with the changing demographics of the market for mobile phones,
innovation cannot be restricted simply to the product. Companies also must alter
their traditional marketing methods. Many brands are adopting regional language
advertising and using below-the-line (BTL) sales promotions to break through
advertising clutter and reach populations with little or no access to television or
newspapers.
With the increased focus on regional and smaller markets, Samsung India will this
year spend more than half its total marketing budget on BTL activities -- an 8-10%
increase in spending over last year, according to Ranjit Yadav, the company's
director of IT and telecommunications. Emerging vendors are also discovering that
BTL promotions -- including traveling road shows that offer phone demonstrations,
performances by local singers and opportunities for face-to-face interaction with
potential customers -- are
the most effective way to raise brand awareness and build equity.
"Nokia's USP [unique selling point] is simply that it has been in the market for the
past 10 years. It has more awareness and customer trust and that is primarily why
Nokia sells," states Deepesh Gupta, managing director of Zen Mobile. Some
companies are using famous faces to help build that kind of visibility. Menaria, for
example, could not specifically identify Micromax as his cell phone brand; for him
the new brands are all "China ka" (from China). But he could differentiate the device
from others based
on the company's popular television commercial featuring leading Hindi film actor
Akshay Kumar. Videocon features prominent cricket players in its advertisements.
Micromax and Karbonn advertised heavily during the recently concluded Indian
Premier cricket league, where 10-second advertising spots cost as much as
US$11,000-16,000.
Building awareness requires deep pockets, however. Marketing budgets for the
current year are at US$20 million at Micromax, US$10 million at Byond Tech and
US$7 million at Zen Mobile. For companies that did not exist two years ago, these
sums represent a significant investment. Dutt notes that the companies can afford
to invest heavily in marketing because "at this point, the new players are enjoying
healthy gross margins not only because of their volumes but because of their
sourcing benefits, lower costs
involved and healthy inventory turns and returns on capital."

Margins Still Comfortable


But distribution is perhaps the most consequential variable in a fiercely competitive
market. While most companies are using conventional models to bring their phones
to the market, there is also a significant amount of experimentation within that
framework. Micromax has 55,000 outlets and is already selling more than a million
units a month. Jain says his firm bills its main distributors every three days, enabling
them to replenish their inventory twice a week. "This means [the distributor] can
rotate his [or her] capital
many times each month," he explains. Commissions vary from 2% to 10%. But Dutt
believes that, instead of focusing on the percentage of gross margin paid to
distributors, "the brands need to focus on the return on investment they are
ensuring them. That's a bigger game changer."
Even established players are rethinking their strategy, whether it's Nokia's sales
vans that drive through rural towns or Samsung's e-kiosk sales outlets. But back-
end support, including after-sale customer service, is also a critical part of
distribution. Even a smaller player like Intex, with sales of 150,000 units a month,
has 425 service centers and invests continually to maintain healthy sales to service
center ratios.
"Good service is how [companies] can build their brand," Wharton's Raju notes.
"When people are buying their second phone, they shouldn't [want to] switch to
Nokia, they should upgrade to the next version of the same brand."

Customer retention, however, will also involve greater customization, emphasis on


research and development, and leaner supply chains. In addition, most brands are
currently launching at least two new models each month. Against that backdrop,
experts say it makes sense for new vendors to establish their own manufacturing
centers. Many companies plan to set up their own plants by the end of this year. But
Zen's Gupta warns that "such claims are easy to make. These people are not
actually going to be
manufacturing. It will be more of assembling as a way of getting certain tax
advantages. The volumes don't make it viable to manufacture here." With
increasing competition and thinning margins, volumes will be crucial for mobile
handset manufacturers to survive. But company officials downplay any pressure
they face in this area. "First, it's not like we're selling at a loss; second, our volumes
have increased, and third, when the portfolio is as balanced as ours, your overall
figures are comfortable enough for you to move forward," notes Samsung's Yadav.
Even Jain defends Micromax's healthy margins, citing private equity firm TA
Associates' recent purchase of a 20% stake in his company. "Margins are not being
squeezed," he stresses. "We work on a margin of about 10%."

Observers say the longer-term outlook for India's handset industry in India however
is intense competition and further consolidation. Videocon D2H CEO Anil Khera
envisions only a few Indian players emerging as strong brands, yet "garnering a
cumulative market share of 50% in a year." It will be interesting but certainly not
easy. As Intex's Kumar says, "The boys are playing these days; the men have yet to
come."

You might also like