Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exercise 4 - Seeing The Invisible - The Use of Microscope
Exercise 4 - Seeing The Invisible - The Use of Microscope
SEEING THE
INVISIBLE: USE OF
MICROSCOPE
ALMOITE, BILLONES, LODIA, TAPE
Introduction
Since microbes are very small, we need a
01 microscope to see them.
Place a drop of
Lactophenol Blue Carefully Mix
1 2 3 4
5 6 7
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
True motility
Motility
True Motility
Observation of
Rhizopus culture
Observations
Stolons
Sporangia
Sporangiopores
Rhizopus stolonifer under low power Photo courtesy of: Group 3 (Salvacion,
objective (100X) Carbonilla, Royeca)
Sporangium Sporangiopore
Sporangiospores Hyphae
Rhizopus stolonifer under high power Photo courtesy of: Group 3 (Salvacion,
objective (400X) Carbonilla, Royeca)
Counting of yeast
cells
White cells Viable
Blue cells Non-viable
AVERAGE 1.3x108
Working formula:
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑
Viable cell count (live cells per mL) = x DF x CF
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑
Chamber 1: 5,732
Viable cell count (live cells per mL) = 4
x 10 x 10,000 = 1.4x108
Chamber 2: 4,500
Viable cell count (live cells per mL) = x 10 x 10,000 = 1.1x108
4
Table 3. Number of non-viable yeast cells per ml
Large corner square Non-viable
Chamber
1 2 3 4 Total cell count/ml
AVERAGE 1.8x107
Working formula:
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑
Non-viable cell count (Dead cells per mL) = x DF x CF
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑
Chamber 1: 240
Non-Viable cell count (Dead cells per mL) = x 10 x 10,000 = 6.1x106
4
Chamber 2:
1,200
Non-Viable cell count (Dead cells per mL) = x 10 x 10,000 = 3.0x107
4
Table 4. Percentage viability of yeast culture
Total number of viable Total number of yeast
Chamber %viability
cells cells
AVERAGE 87.5%
5,732
Percentage viability (chamber 1) = 5,972 x 100 = 96%
4,500
Percentage viability (chamber 2) = 5,700 x 100 = 79%
Review Question
7. Enumerate the advantages and disadvantages of direct cell count in estimating
the number of microbial cells.
Advantages Disadvantages
• Direct counting methods are used to determine bacterial • are often slower than other methods.
concentration without the need for advanced equipment. • need to be heavily diluted prior to plating.
• Direct counting methods are easy to perform • inaccurate since it is only an estimation of bacterial count
in a certain amount of volume.