Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crab Antics The Social Anthropology of English Speaking Caribbean-1974-American - Anthropologist
Crab Antics The Social Anthropology of English Speaking Caribbean-1974-American - Anthropologist
Crab Antics The Social Anthropology of English Speaking Caribbean-1974-American - Anthropologist
What I find most lacking about the book proposal of an “emic” model for under-
is any recognition of alternate careers avail- standing Caribbean social organization. This
able for self- and family-betterment. We find model rests on the key terms “respecta-
nothing here about the tremendous impor- bility” and “reputation,” two complemen-
tance of the male system of reputation-seek- tary value complexes on Providence.
ing, which runs counter to the respectability “Respectability,” based on the inequality of
route surrounding sensible continence, the islanders, involves the valuing of wealth,
abstinence, and more education. Thus, the education, color, and a “respectable life
“rudies” (“rude-boys,” or hipsters) are not style.” “Reputation,” based on equality,
discussed as operational models for the encompasses the valuing of strength, virility,
emulation of young men. Nor do we find and a good name. Taken together, these two
any discussion of native, community-based opposing value complexes explain how the
modes of education that, in some ways, were same individual can struggle to climb the
drawn upon by the national educational social ladder and yet spurn others who show
system. signs of upward mobility. So the behavior of
In the introduction by Raymond Smith, islanders is analogous to the “antics” of
Foner’s mentor, he notes the Jamaican crabs in a basket, each attempting to climb
peasant tends to rate himself as “poor” and out, but clawing and pulling at others who
that this betrays a low self-evaluation, which have climbed ahead of them.
he attributes t o the heritage of colonialism. The reader’s major obstacle t o under-
Few would want to argue that imperialism standing this thesis is Wilson’s imprecise use
left much good in its wake, but this low of key theoretical terms. He vacillates
self-definition is not demonstrably such a between describing “respectability” and
residue. In fact, a good deal of recent “reputation” as value complexes (p. 222)
research in other similar West Indian com- and as values (pp. 165, 221), when, in fact,
munities has demonstrated the ambivalence they can only be value complexes. Moreover,
inherent in a negative self-image, for appear- they entitle two sets of values that serve as
ing t o be low, poor, or bad often provides different standards for achieving the single
individuals with rhetorical strategies other- goal of social prestige. This relationship of
wise unavailable uis 6 uis those t o whom they these value complexes to social prestige is
make such admissions. Coming on “poor” t o missing in Wilson’s model. Second, Wilson
a white researcher asking questions with uses the terms “equality” and “inequality”
notebook in hand can hardly be regarded as inconsistently, sometimes meaning value
low anything without relating such behavior premises (p. 145), other times meaning
t o the role- and interactional-systems of the values (p. 184) and even “ideal(s),” sup-
community. We are given very little such ported by “reputation” and “respectability”
information in this study, and it is the (p. 9). “Equality” cannot univocally mean
poorer for it. both a value premise, i.e., a principle
supporting a system of values, and also an
ideal supported by a value. Though he,
himself, may be aware of these distinctions,
Wilson has failed to define these key words
Crab Antics: The Social Anthropology of properly and use them consistently.
English-Speaking Negro Societies of the
The core of Wilson’s thesis is that
Caribbean. PETER J. WILSON. New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.xvii + “respectability,” being a foreign value com-
plex, and “reputation,”
258 pp., figures, tables, appendix, bibliog- complex, are dialectically an authentic value
raphy, index, notes. $10.00 (cloth). opposed in
Providence, as well as in other West Indian
Reviewed by WILLIAM WASHABAUGH societies. Wilson might be correct in offering
Wayne State University this analysis for West Indian “plural soci-
eties” (pp. 188-214), where Englishmen
Cmb Antics is at once an ethnographic came t o live temporarily and formed exclu-
description of Providence Island society in sive Anglo-aristocracies, but Providence
the western Caribbean, and a well-integrated Island is historically unlike the West Indies.
628 AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST [ 76,19741