Song2011 PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Method Study of Calculating and Controlling Work-In-Process

Xiao-yan SONG1ˈLang WU2


1
Department of Industrial Engineering, GAA (H.K) Ltd, Dong Guan, China
2
Department of Industrial Engineering, GAA (H.K) Ltd, Dong Guan, China
(xiao.ni@163.com)

Abstract - The focus of this paper is to study two two methods to help people to calculate how many WIP
methods of calculating the work-in-process as applied to are flowed in our manufacturing system.
manufacturing system. A teamwork chart is given to figure
out the composing and related quantity of work-in-process A. Teamwork Chart
when we focus on comparatively simple process or parts of a
complex process. But when we focus on more complex
production process, an I-O curve is introduced instead of
There is the production flow which involves in four
teamwork for more easily studying the quantity of work-in– stations and each station has different cycle time (see
process. Moreover, the paper discusses the main factors Table I). All of products flow through four stations for
which affect the quantity of the work-in-process and being produced or transferred (station A and station C are
illustrates how to better control and monitor them. used to transfer products), and then they are put out. In
addition, all of products will be assembled in a certain
Keywords - Cycle Time, Lead Time, Teamwork Chart, cycle time (the time required to perform one complete
I-O Curve, Work-In-Process sequence of job activities [3]) on the special flow-fixture,
and this special fixture will be cycled after the product
passes the full flow. Now we need to define a reasonable
I. INTRODUCTION quantity of flow-fixture to keep this production flow
smooth and continuous.
WIP is the abbreviation of Work-in-process, which is
a main waste in manufacturing system, especially in high- TABLE I
volume production. Blinder and Mac-cini (1991) show FLOW CHART
that the variances of investment in work-in-process and Flow
raw materials are both larger than that of finished goods Flow Chart
investment[1,2]. As far as we know, WIP means that Station A B C D
products in various stages of completion through the plant Cycle Time
including raw material that has been released for initial A B C D
(Second / 1 5 3 4
processing and completely processed material awaiting Piece)
final inspection and acceptance as finished product; Many
accounting systems also include semi-finished stock and From above description, we can know the quantity of
components in this category [3]. For example, some WIP flowed fixture is equal to the quantity of WIP. So, if we
are being produced; some are being transferred; some want to know how many fixtures are being flowed on line,
WIP are waiting because machine is busy with other WIP; we must calculate how many WIP are on line, that is, how
some WIP are waiting because other parts necessary for many WIP are in the four stations simultaneity. We can
assembly are missing [4]; and some are being used for use a teamwork chart to get it (see Fig. 1).
buffer. The teamwork chart is composed by three parts. One
Obviously, it is necessary to keep a certain quantity of part can be called the chart title such as teamwork chart
WIP in order to make the production system smooth and and other information including measure unit, name of the
continuous. But how to understand “a certain quantity” or process or the station in top of the chart. Other part can be
how to define a reasonable quantity of WIP is very called summary at the bottom of the chart. And the other
important. Too little WIP may be interrupt the normal part can be divided into three sides. The left side which
manufacturing, but too many may result in a waste. includes many of equaled rows shows that the production
process is observed and recorded in seconds. The middle
side which involves in four columns shows the exact time
II. METHODS of CACULATING WIP relationship among working cycle of the four stations
Most of time, people can easily separate the category (WIP in each station is marked in different colors.). And
of WIP, but be always difficult to know how many WIP the right side shows the quantity of WIP in every second.
exist in our manufacturing system and why we need so According to above chart, the WIP quantity is figured
many WIP. If people can’t know or understand “how out. It is also easy to understand the WIP quantity and
may”, they also couldn’t control WIP before defining a composing by the intuitionistic teamwork chart.
reasonable quantity for the target. This paper will share
___________________________________
978-1-61284-449-7/11/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE


TEAMWO RK CHART
UNIT PRO CESS AND STATIO N VALUE TABLE II
A B C D DATA of THE SAMPLE FOR EXPLAINNING I-O CURVE
SECO ND WIP
1 5 3 4
1 1 5 3
Process Batch: Normal Standard
Allowance
1 4 3 Item Station Time Tray Time Time
1 3 3
1 5 2 a b c=a/b d e=cu(1+d)
1 2 1 A 40.6 2 20.3 5.0% 21.3
1 1 3
4 2 B 19.5 1 19.5 5.0% 20.5
1 3
1 3 3 3 C 27.3 1 27.3 3.0% 28.1
1 5 2
1 2 4 D 19.4 1 19.4 3.0% 19.9
1 1 3
1
4
3 5 E 10.7 1 10.7 5.0% 11.2
1 3 3 6 F 35.0 2 17.5 3.0% 18.0
1 5 2
1 2 7 G 15.3 1 15.3 3.0% 15.7
1 1 3 8 H 18.0 1 18.0 3.0% 18.5
4
1 3
1 3 3 9 I 18.4 1 18.4 5.0% 19.3
1 5 2
1 2 10 J 19.0 1 19.0 7.0% 20.3
1 1 3
4
1 3
1 3 3 From above chart, we can get that station A is an entry
1 5 2
1 2 for input and station J is an exit for output. The bottle-
1 1 3
1
4
3 neck of the process is station c and its standard time is
1 3 3 28.1 seconds. The lead time (the total time required to
1 5 2
1 2 manufacture an item. included are order, preparation,
1 1 3 queue, set-up, run, move time, inspection, and put away
4
1 3
1 3 3 times [5]) of the process, summation of station’s cycle
1 5
1 times, is 223.1 seconds.
1 The function of input can be calculated by the
1 … … … … …
SUMMARY MAX VALUE 3 following equation:

Fig. 1. Teamwork chart Y1 = (1 /28.1)u X + 2 (2)

B. I-O Curve Here, Y1 means the quantity of WIP passing station


“A”; X means the observation time.
However teamwork chart is easy to be understood, it The function of output can be calculated by the
is difficult to be figured out when we deal with more following equation:
complex process. Here, an “I-O curve” chart not only can
figure out the WIP quantity but also watch quantity Y2 =1/ 28.1uX – 195/28.1 (3)
variety of WIP from moment to moment.
What is I-O chart? Any process can be separated into Here, Y1 means the quantity of WIP passing station
three parts including “input”, “in process” and “output” “J” (195 = lead time – cycle time =223.1-28.1=195).
(see Fig.2). So, the quantity of WIP can be calculated by referring
to “(1)”:

Input In Process Output WIP quantity = Input – Output =9 Tray (see Fig. 3)

Fig. 2. I-O explanation


Y (Tray)

If people can get the function or rule of “input” and


Input Curve
“output”, the quantity of WIP is calculated by the Y1=1/28.1 (X)+ 2
following equation: Output Curve

WIP quantity = Input - Output (1) Y2=1/28.1 (X)- 195/28.1


8.9
9 Tray

There is an example to explain “I-O” chart in detail. 1


There is a full assembly process which involves in ten
stations, each station will separately finish different task
195 X(Seconds)
with different cycle time and product batch. The process
time of each station include set-up and move time (see
Table II). Fig. 3. I-O chart


III. WIP CONTROL
Input Curve
In order to better control and monitor WIP, we must
know which factors are related to the WIP quantity and
how they affect WIP quantity and variety. And at the
Output Curve
same, we need to define a reasonable WIP as the target.
There is an example to simulate and explain how to
control and monitor WIP by using I-O chart and VSM WIP Quantity

chart.
The following is a full flow chart (see Fig.4) in which
B and C process is for checking, other processes are used
to process product. Moreover, the simulation assumption Fig.6. I-O Curve by simulation
is given that 40 percent of products need pass C process
for checking, 100 percent of products need pass B process As shown in above chart, the equation of calculating
for checking and all processes ignore line utilization and WIP can be figured out. In order to analyze which factors
yield. are related to the WIP, we can use a simple equation if the
running time is long enough.
40%
C

Pas
WIP = (Total running time / Cycle time of material input)

 A  B

 D  E  D  E s Inventory
– ((Total running time – Lead time) / Takt time) (4)

Fig.4. Flow chart Form above formula, we can see that there are at least
three factors can affect the quantity of WIP, cycle time of
The following is Process and Line Allocation (see material input, lead time (most of times, huge inventory
Table III): of final product because of the product was not pulled by
the market or lost it’s value because of too long lead time
TABLE III
[6]) and takt time (takt time, or R value, is determined on
SIMULATION DATA
the basis of the periodic production requirements and the
Flow A B C D E amount of operating time during the period [7]). In order
Standard time to control WIP, the cycle time of material input should
5.8 4.6 52 0.10/0.16 5.1
(Seconds/Piece) near the takt time. Because the takt time is near cycle time
Line Quantity
63 50 252 1/1 56
(bottle-neck) of the full process, it’s better to take the
( Sets) cycle time of material input, takt time and cycle time of
Input Capacity the full process as the main compared and monitored
(KPieces/ 821 821 366 1210 830
21Hours)
indexes for controlling the WIP (see Fig.7).

Based on above simulation assumption and related Quantity


data, we can design a simulation model (see Fig.5).
Input (manufacturing)
Output
A B 356 Sec C D E C
68 Sec 138 Sec 168 Sec 156Sec
63Cell 50Cell 2cell 252 Cell 55Cell 2cell
95 operators/shift
10080 ea
50 operators/shift
8000 ea
4 operator/shift 3360ea 126 Operator/shift 5040ea 110 Operators
8800ea
4 operator/shift
shipment (customer)
C/T = 5.8 sec/ea C/T = 4.6 sec/ea C/T = 0.10Sec/ea C/T = 52 Sec/ ea C/T = 5.1 Sec/ ea C/T = 0.10 Sec/ 12 ea
P/T= 241 sec/ea P/T= 70 Sec/ea P/T= 1950sec/12ea P/T= 520sec/ea P/T= 131 sec/ea P/T= 1950 Sec/ea
UTI=85% UTI=95% UTI=95% UTI=95% UTI=95% UTI=95%
Yield=99.8% Yield=98% Yield=99% Yield=99% Yield=99% Yield=99%
2shift 2shift 2shift 2shift 2shift 2shift
64260 Sec/Avail.Day 71820 Sec/Avail.Day 71820 Sec/Avail.Day 71820 Sec/Avail.Day 71820 Sec/Avail.Day 71820 Sec/Avail.Day cycle time of Input
938 1046 138 Sec 688 Sec 921 Sec cycle time of bottle-neck
S
     
Takt time

Time

Fig.7 monitored index (sample)

In addition, another key factor is lead time. By using


VSM chart, we can find out and cancel no value-added
Fig.5 VSM and Simulation Model actions such as transferring, idle for waiting, and connect
the break points of logistic in order to reduce lead time for
Then, I-O curve is got by using simulation model (see better controlling the WIP.
Fig.6).


IV. CONCLUSION

In the paper, two comparatively practical methods for


WIP control and calculation have been addressed as
applied to manufacturing system. In order to reduce the
economic losses resulted from work-in -process, we need
to define a reasonable quantity of WIP as a target, and
construct an index system for our manufacturing system
to monitor and control variety of work-in-process from
moment moment.

REFERENCES

[1] Blinder, Alan S. and Louis J. Maccini. "Taking Stock: A


Critical Assessment of Recent Research on Inventories."
Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1991): 73-96.
[2] David Bivin, “A model of the production Lag and work –in –
process Inventories,” Diploma thesis, Indiana University-
Purdue University, Indiana, 1999.
[3] Jin Kate, “Development of a process for continuous
creation of lean value in product development
organizations,” Diploma thesis, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Tokyo of university, Japan.2005.
[4] Industrial Engineering Terminology, ANSI Standard Z94.0-
1989.
[5] Industrial Engineering Terminology, ANSI Standard Z94.0-
1982.
[6] Goldratt, Eliyahu M. and Jeff Cox (1984), “The Goal,” The
North River Press, Great Barrington, MA.
[7] Fred E. Meyers and Matthew P. Stephens, “Manufacturing
Facilities Design and Material Handing”, Upper Saddle
River, New Jersey, 2003, ch.1, pp. 19.



You might also like