Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DMGS AUN 9977.edited
DMGS AUN 9977.edited
Demographic Distribution
The number of respondents is categorized with the age groups between 20 to 40
years. The survey has been taken from the random sample. The people with online shopping
methods have conducted a survey taken within two weeks. There are a high number of
respondents which have been analyzed through online shopping websites. SEM mainly uses
the model to link between the variables and the indicators for the specific structural studies
generated through a theoretical model.
Sex
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
1 52 61.9 61.9 61.9
Valid 2 32 38.1 38.1 100.0
Total 84 100.0 100.0
Age
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
1 20 23.8 24.4 24.4
2 24 28.6 29.3 53.7
Valid
3 38 45.2 46.3 100.0
Total 82 97.6 100.0
Missing System 2 2.4
Total 84 100.0
Use of internet
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
1 62 73.8 75.6 75.6
Valid 2 20 23.8 24.4 100.0
Total 82 97.6 100.0
Missing System 2 2.4
Total 84 100.0
onlinewebsites
Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent
1 60 71.4 73.2 73.2
Valid 2 22 26.2 26.8 100.0
Total 82 97.6 100.0
Missing System 2 2.4
Total 84 100.0
Table 1: Frequency
(Source: SPSS)
The variables of demographic factors have been accessed by the data view for entering the
data view. The use of online websites by the respondents has a frequency from 60 to 82.
The valid percentile is to be used with 73.2 per cent. The cumulative per cent is 73.2 and for
second frequency are 26.8. The use of the internet by the respondents is 75.6 for the valid
percentile. The user can access the data by entering the values of each variable. The
cumulative frequency for the age respondents is 53.7. The Cumulative percentile for the
three frequencies is a total of 100. The second frequency is 20, for which percentile results
in 45.2.
Table 2: Mean
(Source: SPSS)
There is a dependent list which contains the continuous numeric variables which are to be
analyzed. The mean calculation of online shopping per cent is 97.6%. The traditional shop's
per cent estimates to be 2.4%. The online shopping products also estimate to be 97.6%
details taken from the respondents. The independent lists are also present in the calculation
of the mean. All the independent variables are likely to depend on these dependent
variables for mean calculation. The trustworthy percentile depends on the 82 respondents,
which has a per cent of 97.6%. The mean calculations are used to compare with various
layers of production that are used in the Split File Technique. This procedure is mainly used
in Descriptive statistics.
Variables Entered/Removeda
Mode Variables Variables Method
l Entered Removed
trustworthy,
onlineservice
1 s, . Enter
Shoppingreli
ableb
a. Dependent Variable: Productprices
b. All requested variables entered.
Model Summary
Mode R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of
l Square the Estimate
1 .894a .799 .790 .207
a. Predictors: (Constant), trustworthy, onlineservices,
Shoppingreliable
ANOVAa
Model Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 11.544 3 3.848 90.209 .000b
1 Residual 2.901 68 .043
Total 14.444 71
a. Dependent Variable: Productprices
b. Predictors: (Constant), trustworthy, onlineservices, Shoppingreliable
Table 3: Regression
(Source: SPSS)
The study is based on the multiple regressions which are based on the performance of
attendance and gender category. The Annova Test is conducted to carry out the multiple
regression process. The interpretation of results is estimated to be reported by several
results. The variations in the total exam performance can be explained with several types of
relative contribution, which is explained by the variance process. The Sum of Squares for the
regression is 11.544, and the mean square is 3.848. Here the dependent variable taken is
product prices and other variables like trustworthy and online services are independent
variables.
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimu Maximu Mean Std.
m m Deviation
online
82 1 2 1.29 .458
shopping
traditionalshop
82 1 2 1.15 .356
s
productdelivery 82 1 2 1.12 .329
Shoppingreliabl
82 1 4 1.82 1.008
e
onlioneshoppin
82 1 4 1.82 1.008
g
Valid N
82
(listwise)
Table 4: Descriptive
(Source: SPSS)
The sample of the respondents has taken for N=82. This will be created to compare the
means with two specific layers of the averages of factors described above. The maximum
mean value is 1.82, and the standard deviation is 1.008. The reliable shopping strength is 82
and a minimum deviation value estimated to be 0.329. The other factors generated for the
82 respondents are product delivery factors and online shopping factors. The dependent
variable is mainly measured on the specific ordinal variables, which also includes Likert
items. The ranking of these kinds of categories is also explained by liking and disliking of the
products and services.
7.0 Conclusion
The study report of this research has explained the matter of online shopping and its
utility factors. The research analysis is based on a survey report which has been conducted
among people who use online shopping usually. Survey method is a part of this research
that is conducted to evaluate the consumer opinion regarding the fact of online shopping. In
the survey method, a questionnaire has been followed to understand the requirement of
consumers regarding online shopping better. It is very important in this research to find out
the objectives that are made earlier in this research report. The analysis has been made
based on this survey report, and the details are described according to the opinion of the
consumers. Various types of questioning are made to consumers who use online shopping
and are reported in the research. The whole research is based on the property method. That
means the data and information is collected directly from the consumer needs. Vast analysis
has been made in their research to conduct the whole procedure. No other secondary or
journal data has been used in this research to continue the report. The study's main motive
is to find out the objectives that are made at the beginning of the report. Finding all the
objectives of this research study will make a proper outcome through the whole Metric.
Survey procedure is also a part of this research that describes the source of information.
The motivational factors are described in this report that is directly affecting the consumers
to buy products through online shopping sites. The motivational factors are also
encouraging the online companies to serve the best concept to the consumers, about the
products. In detail, it had been described in the research report that how the colonies scan
better performs through consumer needs. Various technology implementations have been
mentioned that is related to the improvement of online shopping. Requirements of
products are easier these days as using the programming features in online websites.
The output of this respect has described the usage of online shopping. In the research
output, it has been detailed how much people trust in the services of online shopping. Many
more factors have been described regarding online services through people's opinion.
Graphical analysis has been made for a better understanding of the requirement of products
through online sites. The factors that are making a positive vibe in consumers have been
described well in the report outcome. All the data and information that is analyzed here in
this report has been done on the basis of the survey research report. Every age of people
has been used in this research so that the use of online shopping can be identified better.
This report analysis can be used in further research wherever it is required. In some
situations and cases, this report outcome can be used to improve the online service of
companies. Consumer analysis for requirements and products need has been down in this
research. The data and information theory graphical presentation, in this research, is an
important analysis which can be sued in various future research requirements.
Bibliography
Abayi, M., & Khoshtinat, B. (2016). Study of the impact of advertising on online shopping
tendency for airline tickets by considering motivational factors and emotional
factors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36(1), 532-539. Retrieved from:
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82649131.pdf [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Zamzuri, N. H., Kassim, E. S., Shahrom, M., & Humaidi, N. (2018). Entertainment
Gratification, Informative Gratification, Web Irritation and Self-Efficacy as Motivational
Factors to Online Shopping Intention. Management and Accounting Review (MAR), 17(3),
95-108. Retrieved from:
https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_ylo=2016&q=Motivation+factors+in+online+shoppi
ng+Online+shopping&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Pauzi, S. F. F. B., Chin, T. A., Choon, T. L., & Sulaiman, Z. (2017). Motivational Factors for
Online Grocery Shopping. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 9140-9144. Retrieved from:
https://people.utm.my/tlchoon/files/2019/07/52-Motivational-Factors-for-Online-Grocery-
Shopping.pdf [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Sung, J., Son, J., & Choi, Y. (2017). Relationship between motivational factors of online sport
consumption and future behavioral intentions among Korean college sport fans. Journal of
Physical Education and Sport, 17(1), 269. Retrieved from:
http://efsupit.ro/images/stories/1%20March%202017/Art%2040.pdf [Retrieved on:
01/01/2020]
Singh, M., & Matsui, Y. (2018). How long tail and trust affect online shopping behavior: An
extension to UTAUT2 framework. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information
Systems, 9(4). Retrieved from:
https://journal.ecrc.nsysu.edu.tw/index.php/pajais/article/download/435/205 [Retrieved
on: 01/01/2020]
Lissitsa, S., & Kol, O. (2016). Generation X vs. Generation Y–A decade of online
shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 304-312. Retrieved from:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/48198413/NUOVO_ICT_E_gen_coor_
theroy_Gen_X_vs_Gen_Y_final_1.pdf?response-content-
disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DGeneration_X_vs._Generation_Y_A_decade_o.pdf&
X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-
Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20200206%2Fus-east-
1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20200206T051622Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-
SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-
Signature=cb0fc3e097519b8d31e35d5da150e67510fcc3d20cc027b2db645f8c2a9a7bdb
[Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Wahab, Z., Shihab, M. S., Hanafi, A., & Mavilinda, H. F. (2018). The influence of online
shopping motivation and product browsing toward impulsive buying of fashion products on
a social commerce. Jurnal Manajemen Motivasi, 14(1), 32-40. Retrieved from:
http://openjurnal.unmuhpnk.ac.id/index.php/jm_motivasi/article/download/1030/836
[Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Hwang, Y., Lin, H., & Shin, D. (2018). Knowledge system commitment and knowledge sharing
intention: The role of personal information management motivation. International Journal
of Information Management, 39, 220-227. Retrieved from: http://entofa.net/wp-
content/uploads/2019/11/Knowledge-system-commitment-and-knowledge.pdf [Retrieved
on: 01/01/2020]
Bretschneider, U., & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers’
motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding. The Journal of Strategic
Information Systems, 26(4), 246-260. Retrieved from:
https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/250416/1/JML_643.pdf [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Noh, J., Lee, K. W., & Hwang, J. (2017). The effect of motivational factor for using SNSs on
tourist attitude. Tourism and hospitality management, 23(2), 185-194. Retrieved from:
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/278696 [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Quita, A. G., & Nugroho, S. S. (2019). The effect of online service quality and consumers’
motivation on willingness to participate in co-creation activities. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 23(2),
113-126. Retrieved from: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/article/download/12789/9792
[Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Yuan, D., Lin, Z., & Zhuo, R. (2016). What drives consumer knowledge sharing in online travel
communities?: Personal attributes or e-service factors?. Computers in Human Behavior, 63,
68-74. Retrieved from: http://dro.dur.ac.uk/23478/1/23478.pdf [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Maqhfiroh, L., & Prihandono, D. (2019). The Role of Time Availability in Moderating Hedonic
Shopping Motivation toward Impulse Buying of Consumer Online at Harbolnas's
Event. Management Analysis Journal, 8(2), 135-145. Retrieved from:
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/maj/article/download/26310/14412 [Retrieved
on: 01/01/2020]
Herawati, H., Prajanti, S. D. W., & Kardoyo, K. (2019). Predicted Purchasing Decisions from
Lifestyle, Product Quality and Price Through Purchase Motivation. Journal of Economic
Education, 8(1), 1-11. Retrieved from:
https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?start=90&q=Motivation+factors+in+online+shopping+
Online+shopping&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=2016 [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Muhammad, S. S., Dey, B. L., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Analysis of factors that influence
customers’ willingness to leave big data digital footprints on social media: A systematic
review of literature. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 559-576. Retrieved from:
https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10454/16595/Weerakkody_Information_
Systems_Frontiers.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
OECD(1997) Retrieved from:
https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/dismantlingthebarrierstoglobalelectroniccommerce.ht
m [Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]
Ramus, K. & Nielsen, N.A. (2005). Online grocery retailing: what do consumers think”,
International Research, 15(3), pp 335-352
Miyazaki, A. D., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks
for online shopping. The Journal of Consumer Affairs,
digitalcommons.uri.edu (2019), Online Shopping, Retrieved from:
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=tmd_major_pap
ers[Retrieved on: 01/01/2020]