Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regional Policy: From Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
Regional Policy: From Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
Although the European Union is one of the richest parts of the world, there are large internal
disparities of income and opportunity between its regions. The May 2004 Enlargement,
followed by accession of Bulgaria and Romania in January 2007 has widened these gaps.
Regional policy transfers resources from richer to poorer regions.
The argument for regional policy is that it is both an instrument of financial solidarity and a
powerful force for economic integration.
New roads, irrigation projects and developments in infrastructure were built in an area where
local communities who had suffered seriously from poverty, de-population and high levels of
emigration. Tourism projects attempted to exploit Calabria’s beaches.
Assisted Areas were established, within which companies could acquire grants or capital
allowances - know as Regional Selective Assistance - in return for protecting jobs.
The overall pattern of policy changed little in the next forty years. Despite criticism by a
1970s Royal Commission that it was "Empiricism run mad; a game of hit and miss played
with more enthusiasm than success", governments of both parties maintained Assisted Areas.
It was not until the 1980s Thatcher government that regional policy was significantly rolled
back, with Assisted Areas substantially reduced in size.
Increasingly UK policy must operate within the EU regional policy framework, with its
strong injunctions against unfair competition (generally meaning state aid).
The post-1997 Labour administration reorganised regional policy, with RSA replaced by
Selective Finance for Investment in England Scotland
The article is about the geographic sense of the term. For other uses, including Regions and
Regional, see Region (disambiguation)
Region is most commonly a geographical term that is used in various ways among the
different branches of geography. In general, a region may be seen as a collection of smaller
units (as in "the New England states") or as one part of a larger whole (as in "the New
England region of the United States"). Regions can be defined by physical characteristics,
human characteristics, and functional characteristics. As a way of describing spatial areas, the
concept of regions is important and widely used among the many branches of geography,
each of which can describe areas in regional terms. For example, ecoregion is a term used in
environmental geography, cultural region in cultural geography, bioregion in biogeography,
and so on. The field of geography that studies regions themselves is called regional
geography.
Contents
[hide]
Other examples of historical regions include Iroquoia, Ohio Country, Illinois Country, and
Rupert's Land.
Some of the more famous tourism regions based on historical or current administrative
regions include Tuscany[2] in Italy and Yucatán[3] in Mexico. Famous examples of regions
created by a government or tourism bureau include the United Kingdom's Lake District[4] and
California's Wine Country.[5] great plains region
Within some religions there are clearly defined regions. The Roman Catholic Church, the
Church of England, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and others, define ecclesiastical regions
with names such as diocese, eparchy, ecclesiastical provinces, and parish.
For example, the United States is divided into 32 Roman Catholic ecclesiastical provinces.
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod is organized into 33 geographic "districts", which are
subdivided into "circuits" (the Atlantic District (LCMS), for example). The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints uses regions similar to dioceses and parishes, but uses terms like
ward and stake.
There are many relatively small regions based on local government agencies such as districts,
agencies, or regions. In general, they are all regions in the general sense of being bounded
spatial units. Examples include electoral districts such as Washington's 6th congressional
district and Tennessee's 1st congressional district; school districts such as Granite School
District and Los Angeles Unified School District; economic districts such as the Reedy Creek
Improvement District; metropolitan areas such as the Seattle metropolitan area, and
metropolitan districts such as the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater
Chicago, the Las Vegas-Clark County Library District, the Metropolitan Police Service of
Greater London, as well as other local districts like the York Rural Sanitary District, the
Delaware River Port Authority, the Nassau County Soil and Water Conservation District, and
C-TRAN.
In the U.S. State of Connecticut the roles of county governments are d by regional
governments not abiding to the present county borders. Ever since the dissolution of county
government in Connecticut in 1960, the roles of regional services once provided by the
county are now provided by regional agencies of towns. Counties still are used in
Connecticut as geographical entities and in some counties they are still used to organize
judicial districts, also counties are still used to organize the state marshal system in
Connecticut. Counties were also used to organize the sheriff's department of each
Connecticut county until 2000, when county sheriff's were eliminated due to mismanagement
as was the reason for abolishing the county governments. An example of one former county
sheriff's department is the Fairfield County Sheriff's Department which served Fairfield
County in Connecticut. All sheriff's departments in Connecticut were not eliminated, only at
the county level. Several towns and cities in Connecticut still maintain a sheriff's department
such as Shelton with the Shelton Sheriff's Department.
The word "region" is taken from the Latin regio, and a number of countries have borrowed
the term as the formal name for a type of subnational entity (e.g., the región, used in Chile).
In English, the word is also used as the conventional translation for equivalent terms in other
languages (e.g., the область (oblast), used in Russia alongside with a broader term регион).
The following countries use the term "region" (or its cognate) as the name of a type of
subnational administrative unit:
Belgium (in French, région; in German, Region; the Dutch term gewest is often translated as
"region")
Chad (région, effective from 2002)
Chile (región)
Congo (région)
Côte d'Ivoire (région)
Denmark (effective from 2007)
England (not the United Kingdom as a whole)
Eritrea
France (région)
Ghana
Guinea (région)
Guinea-Bissau (região)
Guyana
Hungary (régió)
Italy (regione)
Madagascar (région)
Mali (région)
Namibia
New Zealand
Peru (región)
Philippines (rehiyon)
Senegal (région)
Tanzania
Togo (région)
Trinidad and Tobago (Regional Corporation)
The Canadian province of Québec also uses the "administrative region" (région
administrative).
In Spain the official name of the autonomous community of Murcia is Región de Murcia.
Also, some single-province autonomous communities such as Madrid use the term región
interchangeably with comunidad autónoma.
Two län (counties) in Sweden are officially called 'regions': Skåne and Västra Götaland, and
there is currently a controversial proposal to divide the rest of Sweden into large regions,
replacing the current counties.
The government of the Philippines uses the term "region" (in Filipino, rehiyon) when it's
necessary to group provinces, the primary administrative subdivision of the country. This is
also the case in Brazil which groups its primary administrative divisions (estados; "states")
into grandes regiões (greater regions) for statistical purposes, while Russia uses
экономические районы (economic regions) in a similar way, as does Romania and
Venezuela.
The government of Singapore makes use of the term "region" for its own administrative
purposes.
China has five 自治区 (zìzhìqū) and two 特別行政區 (or 特别行政区; tèbiéxíngzhèngqū)
which are translated as "autonomous region" and "special administrative region",
respectively.
The traditional territorial divisions of some countries are also commonly rendered in English
as "regions". These informal divisions do not form the basis of the modern administrative
divisions of these countries, but still define and delimit local regional identity and sense of
belonging. Examples include:
Finland
Japan
Korea
Norway (landsdeler)
Romania
Slovakia
Geographical regions can be found within a country (e.g., the Midlands, in England), or
transnationally (e.g., the Middle East).
Similarly, the United Nations Statistics Division has devised a scheme for classifying
macrogeographic regions (continents), continental subregions, and selected socioeconomic
groupings.
Chain of Command
Unit Soldiers Commander
Fireteam 4 NCO
In military usage a region is shorthand for the name of a military formation larger than an
Army Group and smaller than an Army Theater or simply Theater. The full name of the
military formation is Army Region. The size of an Army Region can vary widely but is
generally somewhere between about 1 million and 3 million soldiers. Two or more Army
Regions could make up an Army Theater. An Army Region would typically be commanded
by a full General (US four stars), a Field Marshal or General of the Army (US five stars), or
Generalissimo (Soviet Union). Due to the large size of this formation, its use is rarely
employed. Some of the very few examples of an Army Region would be each of the Eastern,
Western, and southern (mostly in Italy) fronts in Europe during World War II. The military
map unit symbol for this echelon of formation (see Military organization and APP-6A)
consists of six Xs.
Regional development
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Regional development is the provision of aid and other assistance to regions which are less
economically developed. Regional development may be domestic or international in nature.
The implications and scope of regional development may therefore vary in accordance with
the definition of a region, and how the region and its boundaries are perceived internally and
externally.
Regional science
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Economics
Economies by region [show]
General categories
Microeconomics · Macroeconomics
History of economic thought
Methodology · Heterodox approaches
Methods
Journals · Publications
Categories · Topics · Economists
Economic ideologies [show]
The economy: concept and history
Regional science is a field of the social sciences concerned with analytical approaches to
problems that are specifically urban, rural, or regional. Topics in regional science include, but
are not limited to location theory or spatial economics, location modeling, transportation,
migration analysis, land use and urban development, interindustry analysis, environmental
and ecological analysis, resource management, urban and regional policy analysis,
geographical information systems, and spatial data analysis. In the broadest sense, any social
science analysis that has a spatial dimension is embraced by regional scientists. For more
material on the foci of regional science, see, for example, the Web Book of Regional Science.
Contents
[hide]
1 Origins
o 1.1 Seminal publications
o 1.2 Core journals
o 1.3 Academic programs
2 Public policy impact
3 Developments after 1980
o 3.1 New economic geography
o 3.2 Criticisms
4 See also
5 References
6 Further reading
7 External links
o 7.1 Organizations
o 7.2 Journals
o 7.3 Other
[edit] Origins
Regional science was founded in the late 1940s when some economists began to become
dissatisfied with the low level of regional economic analysis and felt an urge to upgrade it.
But even in this early era, the founders of regional science expected to catch the interest of
people from a wide variety of disciplines. Regional science's formal roots date to the
aggressive campaigns by Walter Isard and his supporters to promote the "objective" and
"scientific" analysis of settlement, industrial location, and urban development. Isard targeted
key universities and campaigned tirelessly. Accordingly, the Regional Science Association
was founded in 1954, when the core group of scholars and practitioners held its first meetings
independent from those initially held as sessions of the annual meetings of the American
Economics Association.[1] A reason for meeting independently undoubtedly was the group's
desire to extend the new science beyond the rather restrictive world of economists and have
natural scientists, psychologists, anthropologists, lawyers, sociologists, political scientists,
planners, and geographers join the club.[2] Now called the Regional Science Association
International, it maintains subnational and international associations, journals, and a
conference circuit (notably in North America, continental Europe, Japan, and Korea).
Membership in the RSAI continues to grow.
Topically speaking, regional science took off in the wake of Walter Christaller's book Die
Zentralen Orte in Sűddeutschland (published in 1933), soon followed by Tord Palander's
(1935) Beiträge zur Standortstheorie; and Edgar M. Hoover's two books--Location Theory
and the Shoe and Leather Industry (1938) and The Location of Economic Activity (1948).
Other important early publications include: Edward H. Chamberlin's (1950) The Theory of
Monopolistic Competition ; François Perroux's (1950) Economic Spaces: Theory and
Application; Torsten Hägerstrand's (1953) Innovationsförloppet ur Korologisk Synpunkt;
Edgar S. Dunn's (1954)The Location of Agricultural Production ; August Lösch's (1954)The
Economics of Location ; Martin J. Beckmann, C.B McGuire, and Clifford B. Winston's
(1956) Studies in the Economics of Transportation; Melvin L. Greenhut's (1956) Plant
Location in Theory and Practice; Gunnar Myrdal's (1957) Economic Theory and
Underdeveloped Regions; Albert O. Hirschman's (1958) The Strategy of Economic
Development; and Claude Ponsard's (1958) Histoire des Théorie Économique Spatiales.
Nonetheless, Walter Isard's first book in 1956, Location and Space Economy, apparently
captured the imagination of many, and his third, Methods of Regional Analysis, published in
1960, only sealed his position as the father of the field.
As is typically the case, the above works were built on the shoulders of giants. Much of this
predecessor work is documented well in Walter Isard's Location and Space Economy[3] as
well as Claude Ponsard's Histoire des Théorie Économique Spatiales.[4] Particularly important
was the contribution by 19th century German economists to location theory. The early
German hegemony more or less starts with Johann Heinrich von Thünen and runs through
both Wilhelm Launhardt and Alfred Weber to Walter Christaller and August Lösch.
[edit] Core journals
If an academic discipline is identified by its journals, then technically regional science began
in 1955 with the publication of the first volume of the Papers and Proceedings, Regional
Science Association (now Papers in Regional Science published by Springer Verlag). In
1958, the Journal of Regional Science followed.
Most recently the journal Spatial Economic Analysis has been published by the RSAi
British and Irish Section with the Regional Studies Association. The latter is a separate and
growing organisation invloving economists, planners, geographers, policy makers and
practitioners.[5]
Walter Isard's efforts culminated in the creation of a few academic departments and several
university-wide programs in regional science. At Walter Isard's suggestion, the University of
Pennsylvania started the Regional Science Department in 1956. It featured as its first
graduate William Alonso and was looked upon by many to be the international academic
leader for the field. Another important graduate and faculty member of the department is
Masahisa Fujita. The core curriculum of this department was microeconomics, input-output
analysis, location theory, and statistics. Faculty also taught courses in mathematical
programming, transportation economics, labor economics, energy and ecological policy
modeling, spatial statistics, spatial interaction theory and models, benefit/cost analysis, urban
and regional analysis, and economic development theory, among others. But the department's
unusual multidisciplinary orientation undoubtedly encouraged its demise, and it lost its
department status in 1993.[6]
With a few exceptions, such as Cornell University, which awards graduate degrees in
Regional Science,[7] most practitioners hold positions in departments such as economics,
geography, civil engineering, agricultural economics, rural sociology, urban planning, public
policy, or demography. The diversity of disciplines participating in regional science have
helped make it one of the most interesting and fruitful fields of academic specialization, but it
has also made it difficult to fit the many perspectives into a curriculum for an academic
major. It is even difficult for authors to write regional science textbooks, since what is
elementary knowledge for one discipline might be entirely novel for another.[8]
The "determinants of industrial location (both within the nation and within the
region)."
The "regional economic impact of the arrival or departure of a firm."
The "determinants of internal migration patterns and land use change."
"Regional specialization and exchange."
"Environmental impacts of social and economic change."
"Geographic association of economic and social conditions."
In 1991, Paul Krugman, as a highly regarded international trade theorist, put out a call for
economists to pay more attention to economic geography in a book entitled Geography and
Trade, focussing largely on the core regional science concept of agglomeration economies.
Krugman's call renewed interest by economists in regional science and, perhaps more
importantly, founded what some term "the new economic geography," which enjoys much
common ground with regional science. Broadly-trained "new" economic geographers
combine quantitative work with other research techniques, for example at the London School
of Economics. The unification of Europe and the increased internationalization of the world's
economic, social, and political realms has further induced interest in the study of regional, as
opposed to national, phenomena. In 2008, Paul Krugman won the Nobel Prize in Economics.
His Prize Lecture [10] has references both to work in regional science's location theory as well
as economic's trade theory.
[edit] Criticisms
Today there are dwindling numbers of regional scientists from academic planning programs
and mainstream geography departments. Attacks on regional science's practitioners by radical
critics began as early as the 1970s, notably David Harvey who believed it lacked social and
political commitment. Regional science's founder, Walter Isard, never envisioned regional
scientists would be political or planning activitists. In fact, he suggested that they will seek to
be sitting in front of a computer and surrounded by research assistants. Trevor Barnes
suggests the decline of regional science practice among planners and geographers in North
America could have been avoided. He says "It is unreflective, and consequently inured to
change, because of a commitment to a God’s eye view. It is so convinced of its own
rightness, of its Archimedean position, that it remained aloof and invariant, rather than being
sensitive to its changing local context." [11]
[edit] See also
Regional development
Rural economics
Urban economics
Economic geography