Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nanohybrid Dental Composite Using Silica From Biomass Waste
Nanohybrid Dental Composite Using Silica From Biomass Waste
Powder Technology
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The application of nanohybrid silica from rice husk as fillers for dental composites has been explored. Spherical
Received 31 August 2015 nanohybrid silica with morphology ideal for use as fillers in dental composites having a low specific surface
Received in revised form 1 March 2016 area of 30 m2/g was extracted from rice husk by a simple precipitation method using non-toxic chemicals. Exper-
Accepted 20 May 2016
imental dental composites with two different filler/matrix ratios (Composite A: 40/60 and Composite B: 50/50)
Available online 20 May 2016
were fabricated, followed by their mechanical properties and surface roughness testing. Dental composite B
Keywords:
showed a flexural strength of 107 MPa, flexural modulus of 6.2 GPa, compressive strength of 191 MPa, Vickers'
Nanocomposites hardness of 39 HV1 and surface roughness of 0.057 Ra. The results indicate that rice husk is an inexpensive source
Resins of silica for as fillers in nanohybrid dental composites.
Mechanical properties © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.05.035
0032-5910/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
20 M. Noushad et al. / Powder Technology 299 (2016) 19–25
husk was prepared in less than 10 h by precipitation at pH 3.2 [18]. treated silica particles were dried in a hot air oven at 80 °C for 24 h
Using polyethylene glycol as a template, porous silica with high specific and characterized using FTIR and NMR spectroscopy.
surface area (936 m2/g) was also produced from rice husk ash, by pre-
cipitation with ortho-phosphoric acid [19]. Our study aimed at 2.4. Preparation of dental composite
obtaining silica with a low specific surface area in order to assess its fea-
sibility for use as fillers in dental composites. The silica was modified to The surface treated silica particles were used as fillers for the prepa-
attain a morphology ideal for use as fillers in dental nanocomposites, i.e., ration of the experimental dental composites. Camphorquinone and
nanohybrid silica particles that are spherical in shape with a low specific DMAEMA used as the photo-initiator system, were dissolved in the ma-
surface area. It has been shown that filler loading increases as a conse- trix resin (Bis-GMA/TEGDMA, 60/40 wt.%.) under sub-ambient light.
quence of a lower surface area to volume ratio, thereby improving me- The silanized fillers were then incorporated incrementally into the ma-
chanical properties [2]. The lower surface area to volume ratio has also trix and thoroughly mixed to obtain a homogenous paste. A filler to ma-
been shown to decrease water uptake [5]. In the current study, silica trix ratio of 40/60 (Composite A) and 50:50 (Composite B) was used in
fillers with a low surface were used so as to improve the mechanical the current study. Silica was the only filler used. Z250 was used as the
properties of the experimental dental composites. The dental compos- comparative commercial dental composite.
ites prepared using this silica were tested for mechanical properties
and surface roughness. The effect of filler loading was also explored 2.5. Characterization of the silica from rice husk
using two different filler loads.
In our study, we chose Filtek™ Z250 as the comparative commercial The silica particle morphology was characterized using a transmis-
dental composite due to the hybrid nature of its filler particles and due sion electron microscope (Philips Electron Optics, Eindhoven, Nether-
to the inclusion of nanoparticles in its filler system. To the best of knowl- lands). Image analysis was done using Olympus ‘Cellsens’ software
edge of the authors, there has not been any study on dental composites (Soft Imaging Solution GmbH, Munster, Germany). Fourier transform
prepared using silica from rice husk as fillers. infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were carried out using a Perkin
Elmer (Spectrum 100 Optica) FTIR spectrometer (USA) by employing
2. Materials and methods the KBr pellet method. The specific surface area of the silica samples
was measured by N2 adsorption at 77 K using the Brunauer Emmett
2.1. Materials Teller (BET) method (Quantachrome Instruments v2.02, USA).
Rice husk was obtained from a local rice mill in Pak Badol, Kelantan, 2.6. Flexural strength and flexural modulus testing
Malaysia. Anaylytical grade hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide
(NaOH), and alcohol were obtained from Merck KGaA, Germany. HCl Ten specimens with a size of (25 ± 2) × (2 ± 0.1) × (2 ± 0.1) mm
was used in diluted form to remove the metallic impurities from the were made from each formulation of the experimental dental compos-
rice husk. Camphorquinone (CQ), N-N-dimethyl aminoethyl methacry- ites and Z250, according to ISO 4049 [20]. The dental composites were
late (DMAEMA) and 3-(Trimethoxysilyl) Propyl Methacrylate (γ-MPS) inserted in a split stainless steel mould (25 × 2 × 2 mm), covered
were purchased from Merck, Germany, and bisphenol A glycidyl meth- with a Mylar strip and a glass microscope slide, then light-cured using
acrylate (BisGMA) and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) the light curing unit (Elipar™ Freelight 2 LED, 3 M ESPE). The curing
were purchased from ESSTECH, USA. All other chemicals were used was done for 30 s in increments from each side of the mould. After
without further purification. Deionized water was used wherever 24 h storage in deionized water at 37 °C in the dark, the specimens
applicable. were removed and the dimensions measured using a digital micrometer
to correspond to ISO standards. For flexural strength and flexural mod-
2.2. Extraction of silica from rice husk ulus testing, a three-point bending test with a span of 20 mm was used
to fracture the specimens at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min on a uni-
Rice husk was washed thoroughly with water to remove the soluble versal testing machine (UTM) (Model 3366, Instron). The flexural
particles and dried overnight in an oven at 110 °C. The dried rice husk strength and flexural modulus were calculated based on the following
was heated in an acidic solution (1 M solution of HCl in a hot water equation:
bath) at 75 °C for 90 min to remove metallic impurities and thoroughly
2
washed several times with deionized water. The wet solid was subse- Flexural strength ¼ 3PL=2bt ð1Þ
quently dried overnight in an oven at 110 °C. The rice husk was further
3
treated in a 10% solution of NaOH at 90 °C for 1 h and filtered to obtain Flexural modulus ¼ L3 m=4bt ð2Þ
sodium silicate solution (SSS). The filtrate was used as the source for the
nanohybrid silica. The nanohybrid silica was obtained by precipitating where P is the maximum force applied, L is the span length, b the
SSS with an edible organic acid solution with constant stirring until width, t is the thickness and m is the slope of initial straight line deflec-
the pH dropped to 8. Prior to precipitation, 40 ml of alcohol was tion curve.
added to the SSS. As the pH dropped to 8, the precipitation was stopped
and the gel further stirred for another 45 min. The gel was washed sev- 2.7. Compressive strength testing
eral times and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min with each wash in
order to obtain an acid free white precipitate. The white precipitate Compressive strength tests were carried out according to ISO 9917
was calcined at 500 °C for 30 min in a muffle furnace to obtain pure [21] on nine cylindrical specimens, 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm in
white silica powder. height prepared in a split stainless steel mould. The specimens were
light cured from each side for 30 s and stored in deionized water for
2.3. Surface modification of silica particles 24 h. Compressive strength was tested on the universal testing machine
at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. The compressive strength was
The surface treatment solution was prepared by adding 6 wt.% γ- calculated based on the following equation.
MPS relative to silica to a 70/30 ethanol/water solution. The silica parti-
2
cles were added to the treatment solution and stirred for approximately Compressive strength ¼ 4P=πd ð3Þ
1 h using an overhead stirrer (model ST0707V2 Germany). The mixture
was filtered and washed with ethanol to remove excess γ-MPS. The where P is the maximum force applied and d is the sample diameter.
M. Noushad et al. / Powder Technology 299 (2016) 19–25 21
Way ANOVA. Post hoc Scheffe tests were performed with the level of
significance at 0.05. between the two phases [23,24]. The intense peak at 1721 cm−1 is sug-
gestive of the hydrogen bonding between silanol groups of γ-MPS (Fig.
3. Results 3). The band at 2947 cm−1 can be assigned to the symmetric and asym-
metric stretching vibrations −CH3 and −CH2 groups of γ-MPS [25]. In
3.1. Characteristics of silica nanoparticles the NMR analysis, chemisorptions of silane and effectiveness of modifi-
cation have been confirmed by the detection of the T1, T2 and T3 struc-
TEM images of the silica (Fig. 1) shows the spherical shape of the tures characteristic of the condensation of one, two and three alkoxy
particles. The particle size distribution of the silica particles was calcu- groups, respectively of γ-MPS with the silica matrix (T1, − 50 ppm,
lated from the TEM images using the imaging software CellSens (Olym- T2, −59 ppm and T3, −64 ppm) as shown in Fig. 4 [26,27].
pus, USA). The particles ranged from 48 to 534 nm in diameter, with a
mean diameter of 261 nm. TEM images confirm the presence of clearly 3.3. Mechanical properties of the composites
spherical silica nanohybrid particles of varying sizes.
The FTIR result confirms that the nanohybrid particles extracted The mechanical tests conducted were flexural strength, flexural
from rice husk are indeed silica particles [22]. The BET surface area of modulus, compressive strength, hardness and surface roughness tests.
the silica particles was found to be 30 m2/g, whereas the average pore The tests were carried out according to ISO standards. One-way
diameter was found to be 5.6 nm. Fig. 2 shows the isotherm curves of ANOVA (Fig. 5) revealed that there was no significant difference be-
the silica sample obtained from rice husk. Based on the IUPAC classifica- tween the flexural and compressive strengths of Composites A and B,
tion, the BET graphs suggest that it belongs to the type II category, with but, there was significant difference between both Composites A and
H3 hysteresis loop. Type II isotherm represents unrestricted monolay- B, and Z250. The statistical analysis results for flexural modulus showed
er–multilayer adsorption. that there was significant different between all the composites tested
(Fig. 6). The results of all the three tests (Figs. 5, 6) revealed that an in-
3.2. Surface modification of silica particles crease in the filler loading resulted in an increase in the flexural
strength, flexural modulus as well as compressive strength values. Al-
Silane coupling agents provide a crucial link between the filler and though composite B contains only 50 wt.% of fillers as compared to
the matrix that significantly enhances the mechanical properties of den- Z250 which contains 82 wt.% fillers [28], composite B exhibited a flexur-
tal composites by two possible mechanisms, namely, by enhancing dis- al strength of more than 100 MPa. In the compressive strength and flex-
persion of the filler in the matrix and by promoting a chemical bond ural modulus tests also, composite B showed promising results (Figs. 5,
6).
The Vickers' hardness was also shown to be proportional to the
amount of filler loading, with the hardness increasing with an increase
in filler loading. One way ANOVA revealed that the Vickers' Hardness
and surface roughness were significantly different between all the den-
tal composites tested (Fig. 7). Z250 exhibited the highest hardness
values, followed by composite A and then composite B. In the surface
roughness testing, the roughness was found to be inversely proportion-
al to the filler loading. Z250 exhibited the lowest surface roughness
value, followed by composite A and then composite B (Fig. 8).
4. Discussion
Fig. 3. FTIR spectra of pure silica and modified silica (a) γ-MPS (b) pure silica and (c) modified silica using ethanol as solvent.
Fig. 4. 29Si CP/MAS solid NMR of surface modified silica particles. (A) plain silica and (B) using using ethanol as the solvent.
M. Noushad et al. / Powder Technology 299 (2016) 19–25 23
Fig. 7. Hardness values of the two experimental dental composites and Z250.
Fig. 6. Flexural modulus of the two experimental dental composites and Z250. Fig. 8. Surface roughness values of the two experimental dental composites and Z250.
24 M. Noushad et al. / Powder Technology 299 (2016) 19–25
Table 1
Flexural strength, flexural modulus, compressive strength, Vickers' hardness and surface roughness results of the experimental dental composites and Z250.
Experimental dental composite [filler/matrix ratio (wt.%)] Flexural strength Flexural modulus Compressive strength Vickers' hardness Surface roughness
(MPa) (GPa) (MPa) (HV1) [Ra(μm)]
40/60 92.4 ± 10.8 4.5 ± 0.44 181.4 ± 12.9 33.44 ± 1.26 0.07 ± 0.00
50/50 106.6 ± 15.2 6.2 ± 0.82 190.6 ± 21.7 38.66 ± 0.70 0.057 ± 0.00
Z250 131.5 ± 19.1 10.1 ± 0.93 269.6 ± 22.9 78.46 ± 0.93 0.031 ± 0.00
[28] H.N. Al-Nahedh, W.Y. Awliya, The effectiveness of four methods for stain removal [36] D.B. Boyer, Y. Chaklley, K.C. Chan, Correlation between strength of bonding to enam-
from direct resin-based composite restorative materials, SDJ. 25 (2013) 61–67. el and mechanical properties of dental composites, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16 (1982)
[29] U. Kalapathy, A. Proctor, J. Shultz, Silicate thermal insulation material from rice hull 775–783.
ash, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (2003) 46–49. [37] A.U. Yap, X. Wang, X. Wu, S.M. Chung, Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-
[30] V. Bansal, A. Ahmad, M. Sastry, Fungus-mediated biotransformation of amorphous colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study, Biomaterials 25
silica in rice husk to nanocrystalline silica, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) (2004) 2179–2185.
14059–14066. [38] J.T. Blackham, K.S. Vandewalle, W. Lien, Properties of hybrid resin composite sys-
[31] J.P. Nayak, S. Kumar, J. Bera, Sol–gel synthesis of bioglass-ceramics using rice husk tems containing prepolymerized filler particles, Oper. Dent. 34 (2009) 697–702.
ash as a source for silica and its characterization, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 356 (2010) [39] G. Willems, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, M. Vuylsteke-Wauters, G. Vanherle, The sur-
1447–1451. face roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic
[32] S. Beun, T. Glorieux, J. Devaux, J. Vreven, G. Leloup, Characterization of nanofilled roughness of dental resin composites, J. Dent. Res. 70 (1991) 1299–1305.
compared to universal and microfilled composites, Dent. Mater. 23 (2007) 51–59. [40] C.M.L. Bollenl, P. Lambrechts, M. Quirynen, Comparison of surface roughness or oral
[33] K. Masouras, N. Silikas, D.C. Watts, Correlation of filler content and elastic properties hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a
of resin-composites, Dent. Mater. 24 (2008) 932–939. review of the literature, Dent. Mater. 13 (1997) 258–269.
[34] I. Ikejima, R. Nomoto, J.F. McCabe, Shear punch strength and flexural strength of [41] K.H. Kim, J.L. Ong, O. Okuno, The effect of filler loading and morphology on the me-
model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation, chanical properties of contemporary composites, J. Prosthet. Dent. 87 (2002)
Dent. Mater. 19 (2003) 206–211. 642–649.
[35] U.V. Hambire, V.K. Tripathi, Optimisation of compressive strength in zirconia
nanoclusters of the Bis-GMA & TEGDMA based dental composites, Proc Eng. 51
(2013) 494–500.