Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Orange Economy Study On The Behavior of PDF
Orange Economy Study On The Behavior of PDF
Volume 10, Issue 12, December 2019, pp. 160-173, Article ID: IJMET_10_12_017
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=12
ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359
© IAEME Publication
ABSTRACT
The Orange Economy in Colombia is a government bet to direct the economic
policy, where the primary resource is in creativity, art, culture and entrepreneurship.
The objective of this research is to analyze the behavior of the Colombian Cultural
and Creative Industries during the period 2014-2018, and how the selection and
inclusion of activities related to this type of industries considerably affects the
statistics presented by the Culture and Orange Economy Satellite Account of the
Administrative Department of National Statistics DANE.
Keywords: Economy and Culture, Orange Economy, Creative Economy, Cultural and
Creative Industries
Cite this Article: Luz A. Gaviria Roa, Harvey Gómez Castillo and Holman Montiel
Ariza, Orange Economy: Study on the Behavior of Cultural and Creative Industries in
Colombia. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 10(12),
2019, pp. 160-173.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=12
1. INTRODUCTION
With the advent of the 21st century, the cultural and creative industries have received
attention from the UN, UNDP and UNESCO, based on the research carried out in the United
Kingdom by John Howkins in his iconic work on the "creative economy" [1], a term that has
been gradually incorporated to account for those sectors in which the value of their goods and
services revolve around intellectual property. The resizing of these companies and their
inclusion within the productive sector of each country makes it possible to identify them as
industries that contribute to economic growth, to the diversification of economies, as sources
of employment generation, and even as a powerful vector of economic, social and cultural
development [2].
In the case of Latin America, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), from 2013
onwards, promotes the denomination of "Orange Economy", to account for a set of
intertwined activities that are transformed into goods and services, the value is determined by
the content of intellectual property (copyright), where the cultural economy, creative
industries, conventional cultural industries, and areas of creativity are part of this type of
economy [3]. For Buitrago and Duque, coordinated support activities, in creativity, design,
new media, software, arts and heritage, make it possible to establish a creative value chain,
based on "creativity, art and culture" as the essential raw material, together with innovation
and entrepreneurship, constitute mechanisms to establish an orange economy [3]. For IDB
experts, the orange economy encompasses the creative, cultural economy and its associated
industries [4].
In Colombia the correlate of "creative economy" is the orange economy, although it is true
that the cultural industry has a long trajectory, in fields such as: scenic arts, architecture,
visual arts, discographies, editorials, press, cinema, advertising, radio and television, crafts,
fashion, festivals, among others, it is only in the last decade that the institutionalization of
these sectors by the Colombian State has begun to become evident. Examples include
document CONPES 3659 which establishes the national policy for the promotion of cultural
industries in Colombia [5]; the 2011 law on shows, for the regulation, formalization, and
promotion of the public performing arts industry [6]. However, the arrival of the orange
economy in Colombia is evidenced by Law 1834 of 2017, the orange law [7] for the incentive
development and promotion of creative industries, which also establishes the guidelines for
the integral policy of the creative economy, guidelines that become part of the National
Development Plan 2018-2022. Beyond the normative and planning framework, the orange
economy is under the direction of the Ministry of Culture, in charge of developing five
policies (Training, articulation, research, knowledge, circulation) of entrepreneurship and
cultural industries. Likewise, the "National Council of Orange Economy" was created to
develop functions ranging from the establishment of new sources of creative economy,
sources of financing, strengthening of entrepreneurial capacities and enterprises of the sector,
as well as the expansion of economic measurement [8].
At the level of the Colombian economy, the city of Bogotá-Cundinamarca region is
characterized by being the largest market in the country, contributing 31% of GDP and
accounting for 29% of the country's registered companies. By 2018, the city-region had
590,000 companies, of which 499,050 are in Bogotá, with an increase of 75,836 new
companies compared to 2017 [9]. It is also the largest labor market in Colombia, with 4.3
million employees, where 78% of employment is in services, 15% in industry and 6% in
construction [9]. Bogota has consolidated in recent years as the most attractive city for foreign
investment in Colombia, in the last decade doubled the number of companies with foreign
capital, went from 677 companies to 1500, at the level of Latin America, Bogota is ranked as
the fifth city for business and the fourth most attractive to invest [9]. In this economic
scenario, the "Bogotá-Creative Region" [10] is being promoted as a productive bet. The
Bogota Chamber of Commerce (CCB) highlights the number of companies belonging to the
creative economy that by 2017 was made up of 74,513 companies, equivalent to 17% of the
total number of companies in the region, 3 technological development centers, 264 research
groups, 118 postgraduate programs, 92 university training institutions and 859 pre-graduate
training programs [10].
importantly in economic terms, to develop the capacity to create and circulate intellectual
capital with the potential to generate income, jobs and exports [18].
No matter how complex and changing the concept of Creative Economy (CE) may seem,
a series of features can be established that allow a theoretical approach, where the historical
link, cultural creativity as an economic factor, the location in cities, the protection of
intellectual property and the CCIs Cultural and Creative Industries can determine the
characteristic features. The CE could not be understood without taking into account that its
main input comes from historical links and cultural traditions [14], anchored in the
idiosyncrasy of peoples and communities whose manifestations are expressed through cultural
ways of doing, expressions and products, but which are energized through creativity.
Creativity becomes the fundamental economic factor of CE, the complexity of the system, and
the economic value depends on this primary resource [19], however, creativity that is typified
goes beyond traditional artistic creativity, that which involves imagination and the capacity to
generate original and novel ideas [16], incorporates aspects of what is considered economic
creativity as dynamic processes oriented to innovation, commercial practices and marketing
[16], this redimensioning of creativity, will place CE in cities, its place par excellence.
Creative activity will be associated with urban economic development and city planning,
constituting the so-called creative cities [20], cities where cultural activities are the
fundamental economic component, with solid social and cultural infrastructures, consolidating
networks to foster cultural experiences, where the center of cultural activity is linked to
creativity. These factors, together with the ability to attract foreign investment, are evidence
of an active economic life in the city [16]. The organizational culture that promotes creativity
based on cultural diversity [21] allows for the creation of creative communities and
entrepreneurs, whose dynamics must respond quickly and just in time to the demands [22].
Cities can be built into creatives from art and cultural infrastructure, because they are related
to the creative economy, because they possess a strong creative class, or because they foster a
culture of creativity [16].
Intellectual property (IP), and the pursuit of international agreements for the protection of
creations of the mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, as well as symbols, names and
images used in commerce" [23], is another feature of the CE. Beyond protection, IP must
enable the identification of the source of value of the goods and services sectors, as well as
enable individual creators and creative communities to benefit, and enhance the local
development of culture [14]. In addition, it must be the driving force that allows the passage
from creative activity to the creative industry, constituting the cornerstone of the Creative
Economy [18]. The adoption of CE leads to the strengthening of intellectual property rights
systems, the search for new ways of managing, and rigorously controlling intellectual
property, and with it the very heart of the CE creative industries [16].
Beyond being able to determine distinctive features of the orange economy relative to the
creative economy, in this part of the Western Hemisphere, indiscriminate use is made of the
two terms to mean the same thing: "Chained activities that allow ideas to be transformed into
cultural goods and services, value based on intellectual property"[24]; or sometimes the term
creative economy is used to "encompass all references to the cultural sector from the
economic dimension, cultural and creative industries, cultural industries, creative industries
and orange economy"[25]. Thus, the orange economy from the conceptual point of view is no
more than the tropicalization of the creative economy, but from the use of the term it forms
more of a political strategy promoted by the IDB, for some Latin American countries
including Colombia than to achieve deep differences with respect to the creative economy,
what it causes is orange confusion.
2.3. Methodology
The macroeconomic statistical information of the Culture and Orange Economy Satellite
Account (COESA) comes from two sources called by DANE "other economic sources" and
"Micro-businesses". The first, provides data at the level of each area, segment and sub-
segment that make up the culture and orange economy; the second, quantifies and
characterizes the economic units with up to 10 people employed in the economic activities of
the culture and orange economy, this source provides information at the level of the three
study areas [26], but does not disaggregate the information, presenting consolidated by year,
for this reason for the statistical analysis of the behavior of both segments and sub-segments
(activities), only makes use of data provided by "other economic sources".
The DANE expresses the production of CCIs with results at current prices and linked
volume series with reference year 2015, for three types of data production, intermediate
consumption and gross value added. In this respect, the statistical data presented in the
chained series of volume, with reference year 2015, are taken, this selection is due to several
reasons: because they are closer to the "true value" than a fixed base index [27], the growths
do not depend on the year taken as base (the base year is not fixed), and the values are
expressed from the previous year, thus, the growth of the aggregates is not deflated, and the
statistical data on supply and demand of the aggregates are more exact and more updated [28].
It is also understood that the use of the chained series methodology by DANE results in the
emergence of "statistical discrepancy" and "economic discrepancy", the effect of which is
manifested when the sum of supply sectors and demand aggregates do not coincide with the
value of GDP, because this methodology is not additive [27-28].
The Gross Added Value GAV is also taken, since it expresses the total value created by
the sector minus indirect taxes and intermediate consumption, thus avoiding duplications. In
short, this magnitude expresses the final value of the production (output) minus the value used
to produce it (inputs) and makes it possible to determine with greater precision the annual
variation rates.
For the analysis of the behavior of the CCIs, in the period 2014-2018, use is made of the
annual variation rate with base year 2014, and it is carried out from the calculation of the
relative variation, expressed by the equation (1) [29]:
(1)
Table 2 Aggregate value and annual variation rate in areas of culture and orange economy 2014-2018
Arts and Heritage Cultural Industries Functional creations
YEAR Gross Value Variation Gross Value Variation Gross Value Variation
Added rate Added rate Added rate
2014 2.587.227 0 5.282.713 0 3.163.539 0
2015 2.633.940 1,81% 5.084.074 -3,76% 3.113.758 -1,57%
2016 2.702.653 4,46% 5.224.862 -1,10% 3.073.739 -2,84%
2017 2.659.388 2,79% 4.964.920 -6,02% 3.073.836 -2,84%
2018 2.573.112 -0,55% 4.869.436 -7,82% 3.024.279 -4,40%
Source: Gross value added in millions of pesos [31-32]
Arts and Heritage Area: The performance of the four segments that make up this area is
characterized by the large participation of cultural and creative education ECC, with 78% of
the total, followed by Performing Arts 13%, Material Heritage 6% and Visual Arts 3%. About
CCP, cultural activities in basic and secondary education account for 55% of the total area,
followed by higher education with 16%, and cultural activities for work and human
development, with 7% of the total being located among Performing Arts and slightly above
material heritage (see Table 3). Likewise, the Performing Arts are configured as the best
performing segment with a variation rate of 30%.
Table 3 Aggregate value and annual variation rate - segments area Arts and Heritage 2014-2018
ECC Basic and ECC Higher ECC Education
Performing arts Visual Arts Tangible heritage
Middle Education education for Work
GVA
YEAR Vr GVA Vr GVA Vr GVA Vr GVA Vr GVA Vr
However, when reviewing the specific activities that make up the Performing Arts
segment, it is found that during the period 2014-2018, Theatrical creation contributes 3% of
GVA, with a variation rate of 10%; Theatrical activities, participate with 20%, but present a
notable decrease (-29%); The activities of live musical shows, contribute 67% of GVA, with
an increase of 54%; Other activities of live shows, contribute the remaining 10%, with a
variation rate of 123% (see Table 4). In this sense, it can be established that the activities that
provide dynamics and volume are related to live musical, cultural, recreational and sports
shows.
Table 4 Added value and variation rate - Activities segment Performing Arts 2014-2018
2015-2018
Performing Arts-Activities
Gross Value Variation
Segment Participation
Added rate
Theatrical Creation 55.532 3% 10%
Theatrical activities 363.964 20% -29%
Live music show activities 1.182.710 67% 54%
Other live entertainment activities 175.383 10% 123%
TOTAL 1.777.589 100% 40%
Area of Cultural Industries: it is made up of four segments, which during the same
analysis period behaved as follows: the audiovisual industry contributed 66.6%, followed by
the publishing industry with 26.7%, news agencies and other information services 3.8% and
the phonographic industry with only 2.8% participation. The audiovisual industry requires a
special analysis, since the activities defined by the DANE refer on the one hand to the
production, post-production, distribution of cinematographic films, videos, programs,
commercials and television commercials; on the other hand, to the activities of exhibition of
films and videos. Broadcasting services activities concerning programming and transmission,
the same as those selected for television; it includes additionally subscription television and
finally Audiovisual creation. In this segment, subscription television contributed 44.26%,
television programming and transmission 26.38%, film and video exhibition 14.28%,
production, post-production, distribution of cinematographic films, videos, programs,
commercials and television commercials with 5.85%, and finally audiovisual creation with a
participation of 0.41% (see Table 5).
Among the fastest growing sub-segments are musical creation (67.40%), literary creation
(62.43%), distribution of motion pictures, videos, programs, commercials and television
commercials (59.89%); exhibition of motion pictures and videos (55.01%); audiovisual
creation (38.41%); and the most significant activity in the area of cultural industries,
subscription television, increased by 18.55%, and became one of the most significant
activities in the culture and orange economy satellite account with a total of 7,523,406.35
million pesos.
Area of Functional Creations: it is subdivided into three segments, which behave as
follows: the segment with the greatest participation has to do with activities related to
advertising with 86.53% being configured in the activity with the greatest contribution of the
three areas; Design provides (10.16%), digital media and content software (3.31%). (see
Table 6) The most dynamic activities have to do with the manufacture of musical instruments
with an average growth of (171.48%), and the edition of computer programs (software) with
140.37%. Manufacture of games, toys and puzzles, although it does not have a dynamic as
strong as the two activities mentioned above, if it presents a gradual growth year after year,
2015 (-0.96%), 2016 (7.21%), 2017 (27.43%), 2018 (20.41%). The remaining segments show
a downward trend, Advertising, 2015 (-3.29%), 2016 (-5.34%), 2017 (-6.71%), 2018 (-
8.06%); specialized design activities, increase in the first two years, 2015 (9.46%), 2016
(27.48%), with a resounding downward trend in the following two years 2017 (-29.43%),
2018 (-47.88%).
The activities of the Orange Economy (CE) that contributed the most during the five-year
period were advertising with 24.74%; cultural and creative education with 18.86%, and
subscription television with 13.93%. Three activities out of 32 defined as total inclusion in the
CI account for 57.53% of the total. Placing these activities in the light of three of the most
important measurement models, such as the Convenio Andrés Bello CAB-2015 model, the
UNESCO Framework for Cultural Statistics MEC-2009, and the European Statistical System
Network on Culture ESSnet-2012 [33], is important in determining whether they are typified
as cultural and creative activities. The case of advertising can be found in the design sector, in
CAB-2015 and UNESCO-2009. With regard to cultural and creative education, just as
advertising is found in two measurement models, in the CAB-2015 in the education sector, in
the group of activities called cultural education, but as non-formal cultural training, primary
and secondary artistic training, and artistic training at university; it is also found in UNESCO-
2009 with the same previous denominations, but in the group of activities education and
training. Subscription television is a separate case, since it is not even taken into account in
the first Orange Economy report of 2019, nor in the 32 total inclusion activities, nor in the 69
activities defined as partial inclusion [30], but if it is found in the statistical information taken
into account for the preparation of this report by DANE [31], it does not appear in any of the
three measurement models.
Among the nine (9) fastest growing activities of the orange economy (see Table 7), two
(2) have to do with live shows, musicals (54.42%), Other activities (122.86%); two (2) related
to services in the audiovisual industry, such as the distribution of cinematographic films,
videos, Tv shows, commercials and television commercials (59.89%), and the exhibition of
cinematographic films and videos (55.01%); two (2) activities directly linked to creativity,
musical creation (67.40%), literary creation (62.43%); One activity linked to cultural heritage,
operation of museums, conservation of buildings and historical sites (390.88%); two related to
design, manufacture of musical instruments (171.01%); two activities related to design,
manufacture of musical instruments (171.01%); one activity related to the operation of
museums, conservation of buildings and historical sites (390.88%); two activities related to
the production of musical instruments (171.01%); one activity related to the production of
musical instruments (171.01%); one activity related to the operation of museums, the
preservation of historical sites (390.88%); two activities related to the design, manufacture of
musical instruments (171.01%).48%) and software publishing 140.37%.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS
As the analysis aims to identify the behavior and participation of CCIs in the Colombian
orange economy, and to establish how decisions about the selection of activities and location
in the three areas defined in the satellite account, may affect the perception of the data
presented in government reports, and according to the findings the following
recommendations have been established in this direction:
Among the activities defined by Buitrago and Duque as areas that support creativity are
R+D+i activities (creative and cultural innovation), professional and technical creative
education, governance and property rights [3], when included in the Culture and Orange
Economy Satellite Account COESA as a measurable activity, the indicator triggers and with it
the behavior of the Arts and Heritage area because the 78% that cultural and creative
education provides, gives the impression that the whole area has a significant contribution to
the economy. Like creativity, which is divided into two areas, it must be understood that, if
education is incorporated under the cultural and creative denomination, it operates as a
transversal support area, therefore, it should be referenced in the three areas, and not classified
by level of training but by the specificity of the field of knowledge and its contribution to
cultural and creative activities in a specific way (artistic education, audiovisual, software
design, etc.). Subscription television should not be considered, as it is not recognized in the
main statistical methodologies as a cultural and creative activity.
The sectors of the Orange Economy, although they do not have a large share in GDP (1.9%)
and the findings identify a notable decrease (arts and heritage, 0.7%, cultural industries 0.17%,
functional creations 0%). The orientation of government policy should focus attention on
those activities that need to be really strengthened, which, although they do not provide a
significant volume, maintain a very good growth dynamic such as they are: In the cultural
industries, musical creation and literary creation; and in functional creations, the manufacture
of musical instruments and the publication of computer programs (software), which in the case
of the latter in the city region Bogotá-Cundinamarca has been driven by cluster initiatives
promoted by the Chamber of Commerce of Bogotá, even so, greater policy intervention is
required at the national and regional levels.
There is great concern about the concentration of income, as a result of the dynamics of
multinational cultural and creative industries, in the environments of countries in this part of
the hemisphere, activities such as live musical shows, other live shows, distribution of
cinematographic films and videos, completely linked to international commercialization
processes, important as activities of notable growth, generate an unequal distribution. In the
Colombian case regarding live shows, a large part of the usefulness goes to the shareholders of
companies such as OCESA, subsidiaries of the Mexican company CIE (Corporación
5. CONCLUSIONS
Finally, it can be demonstrated that the ways of selecting and grouping certain activities
considered creative have a direct impact on the result of the statistics presented by the official
reports, regarding the behavior of the so-called orange economy, and of the three areas
established by the COESA of the DANE, when activities with a large volume are included in
each area, Arts and Heritage-cultural and creative education, and cultural industries-
subscription television, generate a false perception of the dynamism of the CCIs.
The behavior of the audiovisual industries, which are catalogued as the strong of the
Orange economy, the trend in Colombia is subscription television, television programming
and transmission, the exhibition of films and videos. Those activities that could involve
creative work with a greater possibility of innovation, such as the production, post-
production, of cinematographic films, videos, programs, commercials and television
commercials; or individual creation, are neither a trend nor a significant contribution to the
Colombian economy.
If the creative economy at world level is oriented to sectors of society that consume a
certain level of cultural goods and services, it is understood why the growth of live shows and
musicals, but this tendency does not really contribute to the Colombian creative of culture,
since it tends to support companies that guarantee world quality shows, and in that sense the
bet will be of companies with world coverage, (not Colombian capital), and the transactions
in terms of show user are mediated by these companies.
REFERENCES
[1] Howkins, J. (2007). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas.
London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press
[2] UNESCO (2014). Indicadores UNESCO De cultura para el desarrollo. París: UNESCO
[3] Buitrago, F. Duque, I. (2013). The orange economy. An infinite opportunity. Washington:
Inter-American Development Bank IDB
[4] Finlev, T. Maguire, R. Oppenheim, B. Skvirsky, S. (2017). Future Landscapes of the
Orange Economy: Creative Pathways for Improving Lives in Latin America and the
Caribbean. Institute for the Future IFTF- Inter-American Development Bank IDB
[5] Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social República de Colombia CONPES.
(2010). Política nacional para la promoción de las industrias culturales en Colombia
CONPES 3659.
http://udecradio.unicartagena.edu.co/images/blog/normatividad/IndustriasCulturalesConpe
s3659.pdf consulta junio 6 de 2019
[6] Congreso de Colombia. (2011). Ley 1493 del 26 de diciembre de 2011.
http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Normativa/Leyes/Documents/ley149326122011.pdf
[7] Congreso de Colombia. (2017). Ley 1834 del 23 de mayo de 2017. Por medio de la cual se
fomenta la economía creativa ley naranja.
https://dapre.presidencia.gov.co/normativa/normativa/LEY%201834%20DEL%2023%20
DE%20MAYO%20DE%202017.pdf
[8] Mincultura. (2017). ABC de la economía naranja.
http://www.mincultura.gov.co/prensa/noticias/SiteAssets/ABC%20DE%20LA%20ECON
OM%C3%8DA%20NARANJA.pdf consultado junio 01 2019
[9] Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2019). Balance de la economía de la región Bogotá-
Cundinamarca 2018. Bogotá: CCB
[10] Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2017). Memorias Consejo ampliado Clúster Industrias
creativas y de contenidos de Bogotá. CCB.
[11] Adorno, T. & Horkheimer, M. (1947). Dialektikde der Aufklärung: Philosophische
Fragmente. Amsterdam, Querido. English translation by John Cumming, Dialectic of
Enlightenment. London, Verso, 1979
[12] Luzardo, A. De Jesús, D. Pérez, M. (2017). Orange economy: Innovations you may not
know where from Latin American and the Caribbean. D.C.: Inter-American Development
Bank IDB.
[13] Luzardo, A. Gasca, L. (2018). Launching an orange. Fifteen questions forgetting to know
the creative entrepreneurs of Latin America and the Caribbean future. Washington D.C.:
Inter-American Development Bank IDB
[14] United Nations Development Program UNDP. (2013). Creative economy report 2013.
Special edition widening local development pathways. New York: United
Nations/UNDP/UNESCO.
[15] [15] Scott, A.J. (1999). The cultural economy: Geography and the creative field.
Media, Culture and Society, 21:807-817.
[16] UNCTAD. (2010). Economía creativa: una opción factible de desarrollo. New York,
UNCTAD/DITC/TAB
[17] UNCTAD. (2008). the Creative economy reports. Geneva/ New York, UNCTAD/UNDP
[18] Cunningham, S., Banks, J. and Potts, J. (2008). Cultural Economy: The Shape of the
Field. In the Cultural Economy. The Cultures and Globalization Series 2, Anheier, H and
Isar, Y.R. (eds). London: SAGE Publications, p.8
[19] Landry, C. (2001). The Creative City. London: Earthscan/Comedia
[20] Andari, R. Bakhshi, H. Hutton, W. O’Keefe, A. & Schneider, P. (2007). Staying
Ahead:the economic performance of the uK’s creative industries. London: The Work
Foundation.
[21] Oakley, K. Pratt. A. & Sperry, B. (2008). The Art of Innovation. London: NESTA.
[22] World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO. (2004). ¿qué es la propiedad intelectual?
Ginebra: WIPO. p.2.
[23] Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[24] UNESCO. (2010). Políticas para la creatividad. Guía para el desarrollo de las industrias
culturales y creativas. París: UNESCO, p.17.
[25] Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística DANE. (2019) Boletín técnico
Cuenta Satélite de Cultura y Economía Naranja (CSCEN) 2014-2018p.
https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/pib/sateli_cultura/2014-2018/boletin-
CSCEN-2014-2018.pdf consulta junio 15 2019