J336-ST-DOC-RPT-001 - Analysis of CSC Tank Frame - Rev 0

CINQ JOB NO: J336
Rev 0
Doc No: J336-ST-DOC-RPT-001
CLIENT
PROJECT
CSC TANK FRAME ANALYSIS
DOCUMENT TITLE:
ANALYSIS OF CSC TANK FRAME
00 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL TMS 05/09/2019 GK 05/09/2019 NP 05/09/2019
ISSUE OR REVISION ORIG CHKD APPD

REV DATE DATE DATE
DESCRIPTION BY BY BY
Report Number: J336-ST-DOC-RPT-001_Rev 0
Report Title: Analysis of CSC Tank Frame
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 3
1.1 Scope .................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Units .................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Description of the Structure .................................................................................. 3
2 RULES AND REGULATIONS .................................................................... 4
2.1 Codes & Standards .............................................................................................. 4
3 DESIGN DATA ........................................................................................... 5
3.1 Material Properties ............................................................................................... 5
4 DESIGN LOADS ........................................................................................ 6
4.1 Operating Weight .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
4.2 Seismic Load ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
4.3 Wind Load............................................................................................................ 6
4.4 Factor of Safety .................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
5 STRUCTURAL ANALYSES ....................................................................... 8
5.1 Allowable Stress Criteria ...................................................................................... 8
5.2 Computer Model .................................................................................................. 8
6 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................... 9
6.1 Results Plot........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
7 CHECK FOR BOLTS ............................................................................... 10
8 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 12
APPENDIX A – ANALYSIS REPORT FROM ANSYS....................................... 13
Page ii
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope
The report provides the information on the analysis methodology, assumptions, structural
analysis and results of the frame structure placed to support P75 tank on top of a 400 TTS
CSC tank.
1.2 Units
SI units will be used to describe and analyze the design. Other units that will be used are:
 metric ton (t) 1000 kg
1.3 Description of the Structure

The frame structure is given below.
Figure 1.1 – Isometric View of frame structure
Page 3
2 RULES AND REGULATIONS
2.1 Codes & Standards

The structure will be designed as per the requirements laid out in the following codes and
standards
 ASME Section VIII Division 1 (2007)
 AISC ASD, 9th Edition
Page 4
3 DESIGN DATA
3.1 Material Properties

The steel material used for all profiles shall be 275JR with minimum yield strength as 275
MPa.
3.2 Section Properties

The sections plot for the structure is given below.
Figure 3.1 – Sections Plot for the Frame Structure
Page 5
4 DESIGN LOADS
4.1 Self-Weight
Self-weight of the frame structure is calculated by the software itself from density and section
input.
4.2 Operating Weight of P75 Tank

As per client input, the operating weight of the P75 tank shall be a maximum of 80 tonnes.
This load is applied as pointed load at 4 corners of the frame. The assumption is made that the
P75 tank structure will be stiff enough to pass these loads equally to all 4 corners.
Figure 4.1 – Application of Operating Weight of P75 Tank
4.3 Wind Load

Wind Load is applied as shown in below figure. Wind velocity of 40 m/s is considered for the
analysis.
Page 6
Figure 4.2 – Application of Wind Loads
Page 7
5 STRUCTURAL ANALYSES
5.1 Allowable Stress Criteria

The structure is analysed as per the relevant codes and standards as listed in Section 2.1
5.2 Computer Model

The platform structure is modelled in SESAM GeniE software. The model plot is given below.
Figure 5.1 – ANSYS Model of the Tank Frame
5.2.1 Boundary Conditions

Fixed boundary conditions are assumed at 4 corners as shown in figure 5.1
Page 8
6 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
6.1 Code – Check Results

The code check result plot is given below
Figure 6.1 – Code Check Results
6.2 Deflection
The deflection result plot is given below
Figure 6.2 – Deflection Plot (Maximum 8.7mm)
Page 9
6.3 Reactions
The reaction result plot is given below
Figure 6.2 – Reactions (Max. 28.18 tonnes)
Page 10
7 SUMMARY
The frame is analyzed for anticipated loads of operating weight of P75 tanks and
40m/s wind load.
The structure is found to be of adequate strength and max. UC is 0.5.
Maximum reaction observed is 28.2 tonnes.
Vertical deflection is under 2mm and lateral deflection is about 9mm in case of 40 m/s
wind speed.
Page 11
8 REFERENCES
This report is prepared in accordance with the following reference codes/standards, project
documents and drawings:
[1] Frame model received from client

[2] Load input given from client via emails
Page 12
APPENDIX A – SESAM OUTPUT
Page 13
1 Properties
1.1 Section Properties
Section Properties
- Sorted by Name (Ascending)
Name Type Diameter [m] Thickness [m] Height [m] Width [m] WebThick [m] FlaThick [m] Area [m^2] Use
Bottom_B1 Box Section 0.1 0.1 0.008 0.008 0.002944 0
RHS100x150x4 Box Section 0.15 0.1 0.004 0.004 0.001936 9
SHS100x100x4 Box Section 0.1 0.1 0.004 0.004 0.001536 32
1.2 Material Properties
Material Properties
Name Type YieldStr [Pa] Density [Kg/m^3] Young [Pa] Poisson ThermExp [delC^-1] Damping [N*s/m] AxialRed Use
Steel Linear Material 2.7e+008 7850 2e+011 0.3 1.17e-005 0 79
Steel2 Linear Material 2.7e+008 0 2e+011 0.3 1.17e-005 0 8
Steel3 Linear Material 2.7e+008 0 2e+009 0.3 1.17e-005 0 1
2 Loads
2.1 All loadcases
2.1.1 All loadcases : Load Case
All loadcases : Load Case
- Analysis : Analysis1
Name Description FEM SelfWeight RotStruMass EquipAsLoad EquipRep Acc-X Acc-Y Acc-Z RotField
LC [m/s^2] [m/s^2] [m/s^2]
LC1_Selfweight Reference to 1 true true true Line-Load 0 0 - false
LoadCase 9.80665
LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating Reference to 2 false true true Line-Load 0 0 - false
LoadCase 9.80665
LC3 Reference to 4
LoadCombination
Wind_Load Reference to 3 false true true Line-Load 0 0 - false
LoadCase 9.80665
16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 1 of 8

2.1.2 All loadcases : Load Summary
All loadcases : Load Summary
- Sorted by LoadCase (Ascending)
- Note : Total FEM Loads and FEM Reactions are read from the SIN file (after FEM analysis)
Wave FEM loads are included in Total Conceptual or Total Applied Loads (after FEM analysis)
LoadCase FEM LoadType FX [N] FY [N] FZ [N] MX [N*m] MY [N*m] MZ [N*m] Count
LC
LC1_Selfweight 1 Total 0 0 -250202 -304997 1.52196e+006 0 84
Conceptual
... 1 Total Applied 0 0 -250202 -304997 1.52196e+006 0 84
... 1 Total FEM Load 2.84217e- 3.55271e- -250202 -304997 1.52196e+006 4.8513e-013 0
014 014
... 1 Total FEM -3.36968e- 5.11932e- 250202 304997 - -1.40153e- 0
Reaction 010 010 1.52196e+006 009
... 1 Total FEM -3.36939e- 5.11967e- 0 0 0 -1.40105e- 0
Difference 010 010 009
LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating 2 Total 0 0 -800000 -975200 4.8768e+006 0 4
Conceptual
... 2 Total Applied 0 0 -800000 -975200 4.8768e+006 0 4
... 2 Total FEM Load 0 0 -800000 -975200 4.8768e+006 0 0
... 2 Total FEM 1.66665e- 1.10595e- 800000 975200 -4.8768e+006 -1.40317e- 0
Reaction 009 009 008
... 2 Total FEM 1.66665e- 1.10595e- 0 0 0 -1.40317e- 0
Difference 009 009 008
LC3 4 Total 0 50861.3 - - 6.39876e+006 310051 90
Conceptual 1.0502e+006 1.39387e+006
... 4 Total Applied 0 50861.3 - - 6.39876e+006 310051 90
1.0502e+006 1.39387e+006
... 4 Total FEM Load 2.84217e- 50861.3 - - 6.39876e+006 310051 0
014 1.0502e+006 1.39387e+006
... 4 Total FEM 9.45647e- -50861.3 1.0502e+006 1.39387e+006 - -310051 0
Reaction 010 6.39876e+006
... 4 Total FEM 9.45676e- 1.61526e- 1.62981e- 0 1.86265e-009 -1.5425e- 0
Difference 010 009 009 008
Wind_Load 3 Total 0 50861.3 0 -113677 0 310051 2
Conceptual
... 3 Total Applied 0 50861.3 0 -113677 0 310051 2
... 3 Total FEM Load 0 50861.3 0 -113677 0 310051 0
... 3 Total FEM -3.84034e- -50861.3 1.70621e- 113677 1.57161e-009 -310051 0
Reaction 010 009
... 3 Total FEM -3.84034e- 0 1.70621e- 0 1.57161e-009 0 0
Difference 010 009

2.2 LC1_Selfweight
Name LC1_Selfweight
Description Reference to LoadCase
FEM LC 1
SelfWeight true
RotStruMass true
EquipAsLoad true
EquipRep Line-Load
Acc-X [m/s^2] 0
Acc-Y [m/s^2] 0
Acc-Z [m/s^2] -9.80665
RotField false
2.2.1 LC1_Selfweight : Load Combination
Empty table - no objects of this type
2.3 LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating
Name LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating
FEM LC 2
SelfWeight false
RotStruMass true
EquipAsLoad true
EquipRep Line-Load
Acc-X [m/s^2] 0
Acc-Y [m/s^2] 0
Acc-Z [m/s^2] -9.80665
RotField false
2.3.1 LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating : Load Combination
2.4 LC3
Name LC3
Description Reference to LoadCombination
FEM LC 4
2.4.1 LC3 : Load Combination
LC3 : Load Combination
- Sorted by BasicLC (Ascending)
BasicLC Factor Phase [deg]

LC1_Selfweight 1 0
LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating 1 0
Wind_Load 1 0

2.5 Wind_Load
Name Wind_Load
FEM LC 3
SelfWeight false
RotStruMass true
EquipAsLoad true
EquipRep Line-Load
Acc-X [m/s^2] 0
Acc-Y [m/s^2] 0
Acc-Z [m/s^2] -9.80665
RotField false
2.5.1 Wind_Load : Load Combination

3 Cc3 : Frame Code Check
Description : Capacity Manager
3.1 Cc3.run(1) : Frame Code Check

Description : AISC Allowable Stress Design 2005
General options
Code AISC
TensionFactor 1.67
CompressionFactor 1.67
BendingFactor 1.67
ShearFactor 1.67
TorsionFactor 1.67
Use Chapter F12.1 false
Exclude torsion false
Purge position results false
3.1.1 Cc3.run(1) : Summary Results
Cc3.run(1) : Summary Results
- Sorted by Set (Ascending)
- Run : Cc3.run(1)
- Worst LoadCase per Capacity Model (Member or Joint)
- Worst SubCheck per Capacity Model (Member or Joint)
- Worst Position along Member / Worst Brace Member of Joint
- Worst 3 Members / Joints per Set
Set Count UfTot > UfTot > UfTot > UfTot > UfTot > Below CapModel LoadCase Position Status UfTot Run
1.33 1.00 0.80 0.50 0.01
Total 104 0 0 0 0 98 6 Bm22 LC3 0.00 OK 0.48 Cc3.run(1)
Total Bm103 LC3 0.00 OK 0.44 Cc3.run(1)
Total Bm21 LC3 0.00 OK 0.43 Cc3.run(1)
Frame 100 0 0 0 0 95 5 Bm22 LC3 0.00 OK 0.48 Cc3.run(1)
Frame Bm103 LC3 0.00 OK 0.44 Cc3.run(1)
Frame Bm21 LC3 0.00 OK 0.43 Cc3.run(1)

3.1.2 Cc3.run(1) : Member Result Brief
Cc3.run(1) : Member Result Brief
- Sorted by UfTot (Descending)

- Then sorted by LoadCase (Ascending)
- Run : Cc3.run(1)
- Worst LoadCase per Member
- All SubChecks per Member
- Worst Position along Member
Member LoadCase Position Status UfTot Formula GeomCheck SubCheck Run

Bm22 LC3 0.00 OK 0.48 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)
Bm11, 11 LC3 1.00 OK 0.26 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)
Bm4 Wind_Load 0.00 OK 0.22 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)
Bm10, 10 Wind_Load 0.00 OK 0.15 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)
Bm11, 10 Wind_Load 1.00 OK 0.12 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)


Bm9 LC1_Selfweight 1.00 OK 0.00 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)
Bm3 LC1_Selfweight 1.00 OK 0.00 ufH1 Geom OK AISC member Cc3.run(1)

J336-ST-DOC-RPT-001 - Analysis of CSC Tank Frame - Rev 0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

J336-ST-DOC-RPT-001 - Analysis of CSC Tank Frame - Rev 0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CINQ JOB NO: J336

CSC TANK FRAME ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS OF CSC TANK FRAME

00 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL TMS 05/09/2019 GK 05/09/2019 NP 05/09/2019

ISSUE OR REVISION ORIG CHKD APPD

1.3 Description of the Structure

Figure 1.1 – Isometric View of frame structure

2 RULES AND REGULATIONS

2.1 Codes & Standards

3.1 Material Properties

3.2 Section Properties

Figure 3.1 – Sections Plot for the Frame Structure

4.2 Operating Weight of P75 Tank

Figure 4.1 – Application of Operating Weight of P75 Tank

4.3 Wind Load

Figure 4.2 – Application of Wind Loads

5.1 Allowable Stress Criteria

5.2 Computer Model

Figure 5.1 – ANSYS Model of the Tank Frame

5.2.1 Boundary Conditions

6 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

6.1 Code – Check Results

Figure 6.1 – Code Check Results

Figure 6.2 – Deflection Plot (Maximum 8.7mm)

Figure 6.2 – Reactions (Max. 28.18 tonnes)

The structure is found to be of adequate strength and max. UC is 0.5.

Maximum reaction observed is 28.2 tonnes.

[1] Frame model received from client

APPENDIX A – SESAM OUTPUT

1.1 Section Properties

- Sorted by Name (Ascending)

1.2 Material Properties

- Sorted by Name (Ascending)

2.1 All loadcases

2.1.1 All loadcases : Load Case

All loadcases : Load Case

- Sorted by Name (Ascending)

16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 1 of 8

All loadcases : Load Summary

- Sorted by LoadCase (Ascending)

16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 2 of 8

2.2.1 LC1_Selfweight : Load Combination

Empty table - no objects of this type

2.3.1 LC2_Tank_Weight_Operating : Load Combination

Empty table - no objects of this type

2.4.1 LC3 : Load Combination

LC3 : Load Combination

- Sorted by BasicLC (Ascending)

BasicLC Factor Phase [deg]

16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 3 of 8

2.5.1 Wind_Load : Load Combination

Empty table - no objects of this type

16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 4 of 8

3.1 Cc3.run(1) : Frame Code Check

3.1.1 Cc3.run(1) : Summary Results

Cc3.run(1) : Summary Results

- Sorted by Set (Ascending)

16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 5 of 8

Cc3.run(1) : Member Result Brief

- Sorted by UfTot (Descending)

Member LoadCase Position Status UfTot Formula GeomCheck SubCheck Run

16-Oct-2013 11:05:28 DNV Software Page 6 of 8