Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eric Choi - PHL-211 - Questions - Schopenhauer
Eric Choi - PHL-211 - Questions - Schopenhauer
Eric Choi - PHL-211 - Questions - Schopenhauer
2. What are the two aspects of the world that we experience according to Schopenhauer?
Phenomenon of representations and the noumenal world (ding an sich).
5. What is the human condition according to Schopenhauer? Do you agree with him?
The human condition is an apparently bleak one, in which life is a temporary condition from
nothingness. I personally agree despite some granular pantheistic exception, but hope that
scientific innovation may ensure a sense of continuity for one’s will.
6. How may we find liberation from the suffering and meaninglessness of existence?
Schopenhauer finds the will to be the cause of suffering, due to its insatiable nature. However, by
subsuming the will to the cosmic will, one may attain a lasting departure from suffering. A
lesser, temporary solution is by aesthetic contemplation.
Ego-less resignation.
8. Examine Schopenhauer’s closing statement (of his book): “What remains after the
complete abolition of the will is, for all who are still full of the will, assuredly nothing.
But also conversely, to those in whom the will has turned and denied itself, this very real
world of ours with all its suns and galaxies, is—nothing.” What does he mean?
The solution to suffering is to disavow one’s egoistic will and surrender entirely to the cosmic
will.
Eric Choi PHL-211
9. What is the meaning of Joseph Campbell’s illustration of the policeman risking his life
for the man who attempted suicide?
10. Discuss Schopenhauer’s ethics. What are its strengths and weaknesses?
Its strength is that it is idealistically true. Its weakness is the slight health risk with a
misapplication of the sexual impulse for those who may over-apply Schopenhauer’s lesser
solution to suffering.
11. Assess Schopenhauer’s philosophy. How plausible is it? Discuss the problems with his
system. What are its strengths and weaknesses?
Entirely plausible, as its metaphysical foundation rest on Kant’s Copernican Revolution. Some
problems may be that if misinterpreted, it may represent a ‘philosophical Prozac’ for some. Its
strength is its plausibility, and its weakness is the danger of real-world misapplication by the
overzealous.