Club of Rome-26

https://infrakshun.wordpress.
com/2015/02/10/dark-green-vi-the-club-of-rome-and-limits-to-growth-1/
Dark Green VI: The Club of Rome and “World Problematique” (1) wordpress.com
“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”
– Edmund Burke
According to the Club of Rome’s (CoR) own website the global think-tank was founded in April 1968 by: “…
a small international group of professionals from the fields of diplomacy, industry, academia and civil
society met at a quiet villa in Rome.” This villa was none other than the Rockefeller brother’s estate in
Bellagio, with brainstorming sessions at the neighbouring Accademia dei Lincei.
The CoR describes itself as “a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of
humanity” who aim:
“… to identify the most crucial problems which will determine the future of humanity through
integrated and forward-looking analysis; to evaluate alternative scenarios for the future and to
assess risks, choices and opportunities; to develop and propose practical solutions to the
challenges identified; to communicate the new insights and knowledge derived from this
analysis to decision-makers in the public and private sectors and also to the general public and
to stimulate public debate and effective action to improve the prospects for the future.” [1]
From its website we can also read that they are now focusing on:
“…on the root causes of the systemic crisis by defining and communicating the need for, the
vision and the elements of a new economy, which produces real wealth and wellbeing; which
does not degrade our natural resources and provides meaningful jobs and sufficient income for
all people. The new programme will also address underlying values, beliefs and paradigms.”
The above sounds wonderfully inspiring until you look at the background of the CoR.
Although claiming to be a non-governmental, non-partisan organisation, this is not the

case. The organisation has numerous connections with both NATO and
government-related bodies and think-tanks: the Bilderberg Group, the UN, Trilateral
Commission, and the Royal Institute of International affairs all of whom feature heavily in
its networking memberships. A cross-fertilisation takes place drawn from what is
essentially the same mix of global government, population control and social engineering
outfits. An imposition of a singular type of International order is their remit – this time
through the hijacking of environmentalism and ecology.
logo_web_white
It would have been illuminating to be a fly-on-the-wall on that idyllic spring day. Members
sipping vino blanco and munching the odd olive or two, were Erich Jantsch, Hugo Thiemann, Lauro
Gomes-Filho, Jean Saint-Geours and Max Kohnstamm. They were met by their hosts the Italian
industrialist Aurelio Peccei and Scottish scientist Alexander King, who: “… came together to discuss the
dilemma of prevailing short-term thinking in international affairs and, in particular, the concerns regarding
unlimited resource consumption in an increasingly interdependent world.” [2] They decided that each
participant would do their best to influence world leaders and decision-makers with growing “global
interdependence” and the application of “systems-thinking” to light the road ahead. The “originality of their
approach” however, was not so much that it was innovative, rather it was bad science tailored to an
agenda.
Page 1 of 14 Peccei was an ardent supporter of a one world government and it becomes clear that
Mar 10, this
2016 was theMST
05:31:27AM
https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2015/02/10/dark-green-vi-the-club-of-rome-and-limits-to-growth-1/
agenda. Peccei was an ardent supporter of a one world government and it becomes clear that this was the
primary reason for his creation of the Club.
One of the flagship books to be commissioned by the CoR is The Limits to Growth (LtG) written in 1972 by
Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. The book served
up dire consequences for industrialised society and the world should the growth of the human population
continue on its present course. The associated issues of economics and the demand for finite resources
would ensure the inevitability of an ecological collapse within the next one-hundred years. Translated into
more than forty languages with sales at more than 30 million the book certainly tapped into the genuine
wish that lies within most responsible people that we must seek ways to reduce our ecological impact and
not continue to despoil our own backyard. Their lies its success. Take a genuine truth and then apply a
subtle bell curve towards the proposed model of your choosing.
Of course, can anyone really disagree with the logic that we do not live on a planet with infinite resources
and that we must work with Nature instead of against her?
An extract from the book gives the overall design of its message:
“If the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production,
and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached
sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden
and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.”
“It is possible to alter these growth trends and to establish a condition of ecological and
economic stability that is sustainable far into the future. The state of global equilibrium could be
designed so that the basic material needs of each person on earth are satisfied and each
person has an equal opportunity to realize his individual human potential.”
“The overwhelming growth in world population caused by the positive birth-rate loop is a recent
phenomenon, a result of mankind’s very successful reduction of worldwide mortality. The
controlling negative feedback loop has been weakened, allowing the positive loop to operate
virtually without constraint. There are only two ways to restore the resulting imbalance. Either
the birth rate must be brought down to equal the new, lower death rate, or the death rate must
rise again.”
“The result of stopping population growth in 1975 and industrial capital growth in 1985 with no
other changes is that population and capital reach constant values at a relatively high level of
food, industrial output and services per person. Eventually, however, resource shortages
reduce industrial output and the temporarily stable state degenerates.”
“Man possesses, for a small moment in his history, the most powerful combination of
knowledge, tools, and resources the world has ever known. He has all that is physically
necessary to create a totally new form of human society – one that would be built to last for
generations. The two missing ingredients are a realistic, long-term goal that can guide mankind
to the equilibrium society and the Human Will to achieve that goal.”
“Without such a goal and a commitment to it, short-term concerns will generate the exponential
growth that drives the world system toward the limits of the earth and ultimate collapse. With
that goal and that commitment, mankind would be ready now to begin a controlled, orderly
transition from growth to global equilibrium.” [3]
Now
Page 2 ofcome
14 along…there’s a good population, nice and controlled and orderly please….Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST
Now come along…there’s a good population, nice and controlled and orderly please….
At first glance, it’s difficult to argue with the above. But did you catch the emphasis on global growth and
global equilibrium? In this scenario population explosion is the cause rather than the multiplicity of factors
that actually show that population growth is not as relevant as we imagine. As we saw in a previous post,
while global population is slowly rising birth rates are falling across the globe. Today, women have only 2.7
children on average and sometimes as low as 1. In the 1970s women around the world had six children
each. The United Nations has marked 1.5 as the crisis point for population growth. For the first time on
record, birth rates in Southern and Eastern Europe have dropped below 1.3 – well below the 1.5 mark,
which means that population there will be cut in half in around 45 years if things continue on their present
course. In Italy, population growth has been steadily declining at 1.2 and 1 – the lowest birth rates in the
world. Italy, Spain, Greece and Germany are all losing 100,000 people a year while Russia, Romania and
Bulgaria’s populations are set to decrease by half. Japan too has seen fewer families due to a fertility rate
that declined by nearly a third between 1975 and 2001, from 1.91 to 1.33.[4]East Asia’s birth rate has
fallen with the fertility dropping from 2.4 in 1970 to 1.5 today. Thailand, Singapore, Taiwan and Burma are
all around 1.5 with South Korea bring up the rear at only 1.1 children per couple. China’s rate is down from
6.06 to 1.8 and declining though with the past stringent one-child birth control policy it is not hard to see
why. Now they have a desperate shortage of females.
The United Nations had predicted world population would reach 11.5 billion by 2050. Due to the population
decline this has been revised to 9.5 billion. According Dr David Coleman, Professor of Demography at
Oxford University global population will begin to decline at around 2070. [5]While overall, the rate is down,
African countries still have significant population growth at 2.6 percent a year. India is set to overtake
China by 2050 and the United States coming in at as the third biggest nation of people at 420 million. In the
UK, France, the Netherlands and Scandinavia birth rates are all steadily increasing. Yet rarely do we hear
about depopulation of these countries. Rather, the developing world is singled out as the over-breeding
culprit. The incredible adaptability of humans and the waiting resource and technology alternatives which
are literally waiting to be applied mean that the most serious demographic problem in the West is not a
population explosion that competes for resources and produces waste but the plummeting fertility rate that
is too low to sustain a healthy workforce.
Is it not ironic that the perpetrators of a system of cartel capitalism which has deformed an already
exploitative system into a global beast which has reduced millions into poverty are still at the head of a
population reduction drive targeting the third world? And this is being pushed through in order to continue
this economic model at a higher rate of commercialisation, consolidation and centralisation? And when we
realise the upper classes in Europe have more children than the lower classes, this increases the blatant
hypocrisy still further.
“Twenty years ago fertility started to decline in Nepal and Bangladesh when they were still poor. Korea
wasn’t rich when fertility declined. By contrast, the Gulf oil states continued with high birth-rates long after
they got huge wealth.” So, said professor of Medical Demography at the London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine, John Cleland, who thinks that falling population levels occur in richer families is: “… the
biggest lie that’s ever been perpetrated.”[6]
Invasive methods to sterilise the world’s populations is a mix of faulty science, the well-intentioned and
covert psychopathy. The macabre irony is that resource scarcity, economic disparity and crippling debt all
contribute the unnatural rise in populations and short-termism of cartel capitalism. Thus the methods of
population control implemented by neo-liberalist visions or the “globalist Elite” are a consequence of their
own
Page 3 ofmisunderstandings
14 of the human and natural world; a result of their imposition of Mar
materialist agenda ofMST
10, 2016 05:31:27AM
own misunderstandings of the human and natural world; a result of their imposition of materialist agenda of
the 4C’s and the inevitable effects it produced. Ultimately, for the psychopath this is about reducing the
numbers of normal people in the global population.
(Note: If the reader is unconvinced please read Kevin Magur Galalae’s Killing us Softly: Causes and
Consequences of the Global Depopulation Policy (2013). Prior to reading a warning must be attached to
the book in that after a detailed analysis of the historical methods of GPC the author advocates much the
same methods though with the caveat of transparency which does not automatically mean a correct path,
as we are discovering. As such, he acts as a supporter of population control methods and buys into the
myth. These problems will not be solved by adopting the same methods, however “transparent.” A whole
new perception across all societal domains is necessary. The e-book can be found available online through
any search engine.
The LtG’s credibility – and its sequels twenty and thirty years later – is founded on computer modelling
which is notorious for not describing the real world in which we live and bypassing a non-linear reality
which offers a profusion of things we do not yet understand. Trying to predict the future or even offer worst
case-scenarios by feeding mathematical formulas into computers and excluding a host of equally important
variables, exacerbates bias and belief within the minds of the modellers and those who do the
commissioning, presumably with their own waiting solutions in mind. [7]Yale economist Henry Wallich
reviewed LtG and concluded: “… the quantitative content of the model comes from the authors’
imagination, although they never reveal the equations that they used.”
LtG forecasts were very carefully assessed by Sterling Professor of Economics at Yale University William
D. Nordhaus in his paper “World Dynamics: Measurement Without Data.” The LtG authors employed the
“world dynamics” model developed by Jay Forrester, an MIT engineering professor who had employed
systems dynamics or the use of differential equations which is standard in economic theory. The model he
proposed and which underlay LtG suffered from a multitude of serious scientific flaws among which were
the lack of: “… effort in ‘World Dynamics’ to identify any relation between his model and the real world.”
The professor continued:
There is no explicit or apparent reference to data or existing empirical studies. […]
“… the methodology of modelling in World Dynamics differs significantly from other studies of
economic systems. World Dynamics constructs a world model using assumptions which are
intuitively plausible to the author, but without reference to current knowledge. The behaviour of
this world model is then examined by calculating the dynamic path of the variables. Whereas
most scientists would require empirical validation of either the assumptions or the predictions of
the model before declaring its truth content, Forrester is apparently content with subjective
plausibility. This discrepancy in scientific standards of acceptability is probably what lies behind
the dispute about the value of World Dynamics.
“… the predictions of the world’s future are highly sensitive to the specification of the model.
Simulations given above indicate that if assumptions regarding population, technological
change, or substitution are changed, Forrester’s model behaves in a dramatically different
manner.” [8]
This same system of computer modelling has been used to promote the human-influenced global warming
agenda under the all-seeing-eye of the International Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and taken up exactly
the4 same
Page of 14 message as the Club of Rome. Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST
the same message as the Club of Rome.
Journalist Donna LaFramboise discusses these computers programmed with complex mathematical
formulas which “confirm” the evil nature of more CO2 in the atmosphere and which constitute “hard
evidence” that nevertheless: “… requires a rather large leap of faith.” LaFramboise points out: “If math and
computing power were the only things necessary to predict the future, investors would already know the
price at which gold will be trading five, ten, and twenty years hence. But the world is chaotic and
unpredictable. It rarely unfolds in the manner that even the smartest people, aided by graphs, charts, and
computers, think it will.” [9]
The problem is that extrapolation of the computer modelling data lends itself to a linear interpretation
without accounting for unknown variables from a multitude of sources. The favourite example of the UN,
UNICEF, UNESCO and the Club of Rome is population growth which, according to their computer
modelling data, will mean a world population of around 12 billion by the year 2025 with over a 100 percent
increase in resource demand which is obviously unsustainable. This is fallacious reasoning as the Earth
and its people operate on unpredictable changes which take place in a system far removed from
equilibrium. Not only is unpredictability not accounted for it is actively avoided by authoritarian personalities
who demand control and certainty. Such narrow, linear thinking amounts to denial that the world is in a
constant state of flux and adaptation based on natural cycles of change. What is more, nothing that the
Club of Rome offers in its double speak and carefully chosen words approaches anything like true
alternatives: only a very Darwinist centralisation under cover of emotional appeal to world unity.
What we discover is that The Limits to Growth is the phase in a Malthusian agenda placing the blame on
the poor, not as victims of cartel-capitalism but as perpetrators of environmental destruction while a
Western Elite can defer land reform and bolster existing rural class structures. [10] The overemphasis on
the environmental impact of over-population obscures the real cause and effect while eclipsing many and
variable alternative solutions to deal with finite resources and the failure of the present economic model.
This overarching desire to protect the environment, resources and “feed the world” has nothing to do with
saving the earth and its environment but quite a lot to do with maintaining control of the mass mind and
claiming global resources for the Establishment’s survival when the inevitable changes do arrive – as they
surely will. (Yet, the current co-opted version of climate science may find itself blind-sided on that one too.)
From on an article on the CoR website we can read:
“Prophets of doom, nowadays, are not stoned to death, at least not usually. Demolishing ideas
that we don’t like is done in a rather subtler manner. The success of the smear campaign
against the LTG ideas shows the power of propaganda and of urban legends in shaping the
public perception of the world, exploiting our innate tendency of rejecting bad news. Because of
these tendencies, the world has chosen to ignore the warning of impending collapse that came
from the LTG study. In so doing, we have lost more than 30 years. Now, there are signs that we
may be starting to heed the warning, but it may be too late and we may still be doing too little.
Cassandra’s curse may still be upon us.”
Well, there can certainly be “smear” campaigns based on fear and reflex and that may have been the case
from conservative reactionaries. However, if “we have lost more than 30 years” in tackling the problem of
climate change and innumerable other problems then it wasn’t due to LtG, it was due to a recurrent and
persistent lack of understanding of psychopathy within our Establishment, the way our social systems
reflect their values and how they work through institutions exactly like the Club of Rome; to hijack and
enforce agendas through otherwise well-meaning folks. Anything else is window dressing and distraction.
Climate modelling is only as good as the objective science behind it. And there were plenty criticising
precisely
Page 5 of 14 this. Yet, the simplistic notions behind LtG remain in their updated versions.Mar
They10, appear to haveMST
2016 05:31:27AM
Climate modelling is only as good as the objective science behind it. And there were plenty criticising
precisely this. Yet, the simplistic notions behind LtG remain in their updated versions. They appear to have
no awareness that social trajectories are engineered, financial crises are manipulated and designed. The
onus is placed firmly on the public and the natural flow of social science as though divorced completely
from any notion of social control. It is not just that the LtG’s focus was wrong rather it is the absolute
omission of the psycho-spiritual causes of our predicament which allows solutions to be so neatly
streamlined into a pathocratic definition of ecological balance and sustainability. You can be sure that with
resource scarcity and imminent collapse touted for so long, the promotion of specific solutions will be
ONLY those that align themselves to Earth Summit, UN Agenda 21 and SMART protocols. One world
themes still permeate CoR initiatives and without any reference or awareness of institutional psychopathy
nor its eco-fascistic presence. Aside from purposeful obfuscation, we can only assume this is because it
part of the agenda, unconsciously or otherwise. There is second component to this distraction we will come
to presently.
This imminent collapse termed the ‘World Problematique’ and their proposed solution the ‘World
Resolutique’ was tailored towards their own carefully engineered alternative of a truly global society
interdependent and “organic.” The Limits to Growth: The first Report to the Club of Rome represented the
first phase in a comprehensive eco-social engineering exercise was which would alert humanity to the
urgency of the problem. The second phase arrived with a book entitled Mankind at the Turning Point: The
Second Report to The Club of Rome (1974) culminating in a third phase: The First Global Revolution: A
Report by the Council of The Club of Rome (1991).
In Mankind at the Turning Point gloves are removed and it is here that you see the Establishment agenda
shining through. Remember the emphasis on global governance/world government, global economics, a
global religion and a global consciousness all presided over by the same Council of the Club of Rome and
their various Elite members? Using the same flawed system of computer modelling, the infiltration of New
Age terms and neo-pagan philosophies begins to make an appearance, unveiling and hijacking ancient
wisdom concerning a genuine “holism” and “organicism” that was also appropriated by fascists for their
own aims.
The objective is to promote the idea of a Master Plan or blueprint which exists in Nature and to encourage
the idea of interdependence and interrelatedness as key principles. Why? “Such a ‘master plan’ is missing
from the process of growth and development of the world system.” [11] Would that include The Plan and
Great Invocation that Bailey proposed? Does that include the dissolving of sovereignty and nations as a
perquisite of that Plan? It seems the usual euphemisms indicate precisely that because:
“Cooperation by definition connotes interdependence. Increasing interdependence between

nations and regions must then translate as a decrease in independence. Nations cannot be
interdependent without each of them giving up some of, or at least acknowledging limits to, its
own independence.” […] “…the statement acknowledged, even if unintentionally, the dawn of an
era of limits to independence – even for the strongest and biggest nations of the world.” [12]
I wonder if this applies to the Elite and already formed, covert network of global governors? If there is a
decrease in independence towards an increase in interdependence then where exactly is the cut-off point
where interdependence becomes totalitarianism?
The only course of action open to us is away from a particular mindset that seeks control through the
auspices of benign solutions. That means grassroots, creative community empowerment fully cognizant of
the issues previously discussed. Before that happens, a collapse of the old order will be necessary. Who
arises from the chaos to redesign society will either be those with the conscience and perspicacity to have
truly learned from the recent past or those who will gladly turn over the reins of self-empowerment to those
offering
Page 6 of 14 the exact same plans as they always have: to initiate change through a cycle Mar
of DIS-empowerment
10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST
offering the exact same plans as they always have: to initiate change through a cycle of DIS-empowerment
where collapse and rejuvenation redefine the “resolutique” actually permitting greater and greater
consolidation and centralisation while ostensibly offering its exact opposite. This is how it has always been
and characterises the rise of Empires or Pathocracies.
Limits to Growth? Yes, but limits to the rise of psychopaths in our midst and who turn cultures into the
unsustainable and chaotic systems which must end in collapse.
The real waste of 30 years’ of research was not the modelling of population growth and the consumption of
resources but the systematic withholding of knowledge concerning cyclic catastrophe borne from the
alleviation of psychopaths in power. Once again, the ultimate focus of LtoG and Club of Rome mentality
serves as a monumental distraction from the real issues, diverting attention to humanity as pariah rather
than our pathocratic Establishment who remain locked into the same continuum, at both ends of the green
and corporate wheel.
Though all of us have a responsibility to engage in ecological conscience and the promotion of holistic
values, it is is not people who are the cause, most of whom are struggling to survive, it is sourced from the
very institutions aligned to the CoR and which have likely the same seeds of ponerisation. The real
collective error is not to see the Magician behind the curtain and who still manages both the World
problematique and resolutique toward the same patterns of collapse at ever greater turns of the spiral. And
this is the challenge: to recognise and seek solutions that take into account institutional pathology. Perhaps
then, when global collapse has arrived we will all be in the position to truly initiate a New World – in the
truest sense of the term.
Until we breakthrough this pattern of cyclic ignorance to which ancient history attests, all such re-inventions
will move toward the same scenario with the usual suspects at the helm all over again. The problems
highlighted in Limits to Growth thesis, whether a perceived overpopulation or resource depletion will not be
solved by encouraging the exact same forces who perpetrated these social dynamics to appeal to the
eco-conscience of the public at large. How can the latter truly tackle these problems when even activism is
shackled by eoc-fascist visions about which they remain largely unaware and which the Club of Rome and
the United Nations actively embrace?
Having scanned briefly the importance of organicism in Nazi, aristocracy and Establishment circles and the
perennial attraction to fascist organisations, the theme of an “organic” global society is exactly what the
Club of Rome is pushing. And what does an organic society under the auspices of Elite control usually
mean? Let’s go back to Bertrand Russell whom we explored in a previous chapter:
“Totalitarianism has a theory as well as a practice. As a practice, it means that a certain group,
having by one means or another seized the apparatus of power, especially armaments and
police, proceed to exploit their advantageous position to the utmost, by regulating everything in
the way that gives them the maximum of control over others. But as a theory it is something
different: it is the doctrine that the State, or the nation, or the community is capable of a good
different from that of individual and not consisting of anything that individuals think or feel. This
doctrine was especially advocated by Hegel, who glorified the State, and thought that a
community should be as organic as possible. In an organic community, he thought, excellence
would reside in the whole. An individual is an organism, and we do not think that his separate
parts have separate goods: if he has a pain in his great toe it is he that suffers, not specially the
great toe. So, in an organic society, good and evil will belong to the whole rather than the parts.
This is the theoretical form of totalitarianism. …In concrete fact, when it is pretended that the
State has a good different from that of the citizens, what is really meant is that the good of the
government
Page 7 of 14 or of the ruling class is more important than that of other people. Such
Mar a
10,view
2016 can
05:31:27AM MST
government or of the ruling class is more important than that of other people. Such a view can
have no basis except in arbitrary power. … I do not believe that dictatorship Is a lasting form of
scientific society – unless (but this proviso is important) it can become world-wide.” [Emphasis
mine] [13]
Obviously this embracing of our benevolent “World State” of plenty depends on “Whether or not [humanity]
… embark[s] on the path of organic growth” and “…a question of mankind’s very survival…” [14] This is the
danger of having holistic concepts and ancient wisdom principles in the hands of pathocratic human beings
– they become something entirely different, though masked by “double-speak.”
As with the Lebensräume of Nazi Germany and the Land ethic of American conservationists later imbued
with deep ecology and holism, the “whole” is always in danger of subsuming the individual and notions of
independence. Add together constant brainwashing of global consciousness and global governance you
have a recipe for totalitarianism by the eco-friendly garden gate. In other words, ecologists, environmental
activists – and particularly conservationists – praise the “meta-organismic” processes in nature, which, by
the definition of ecology and systems thinking the individual component parts are lost in a “web of life.”
While lip-service is given to honouring of local, individual independence, in reality, holistic, macro-ecology
takes precedence. And this is a theme we see over and over again from the members of the Club of Rome,
the Sierra Club, as well as Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and WWF, many of whom do not have the
slightest awareness of ponerology or even a basic understanding or knowledge of social engineering. Yet,
they do exhibit a rather militant form of green awareness which makes it almost impossible to approach
their cherished beliefs rationally since they are often completely identified with sanctity and sacredness of
Mother Earth. Thus, any perceived move away from that trajectory is seen as an attack on the
Goddess/eco-psychology/eco-science etc.
(Having been both a Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth member and activist I can assure you fanatical
thinking most assuredly exists in these organisations).
The American philosopher John Baird Callicot, had this to say on the preference for a ‘biotic right’ to
preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the community, a right which tends to “species, not to
specimens.” Conservationists and ecologists: “… are professionally concerned about biological and
ecological wholes – populations, species, communities and ecosystems – not their individual constituents.
For example, the conservation of endangered plant species is often most directly and efficiently affected by
the deliberate eradication of the feral animals that threaten them.” In response to Aldo Leopold’s vision he
stated succinctly:
“If members of overpopulous species, such as deer, ought to be ‘culled’ or ‘harvested,’ in the
name of preserving the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community, and if
staggeringly over-populous Homo sapiens is also but “a plain member and citizen” of the biotic
community, then why should culling and harvesting humans be any less obligatory?” Further, if
“… preserving the integrity of a biotic community often requires reducing the population of some
component species…” [15]
We may then ask: what would happen if humanity itself was seen as the greatest impediment to the
survival of Planet Earth and where you saw yourself not only as a superior being granted a divine right to
rule but your duty to cull the population by any means necessary to ensure that your survival is at the top of
the pile?
Callicott believes that accusations toward notions of land ethic and deep ecology are weak because such
eco-ideology lacks any notions of nationalism and militarism. He also believes that because such fine
ecological movements do not seek to replace a code of ethics but add to the underlying ethical discourse
already
Page 8 of 14 present. This is the same ignorance on display that somehow means such movements
Mar 10, 2016are immuneMST
05:31:27AM
ecological movements do not seek to replace a code of ethics but add to the underlying ethical discourse
already present. This is the same ignorance on display that somehow means such movements are immune
from ponerisation. This becomes especially problematic when humanity is held in obvious contempt by so
many in the ecological or environmental Establishment. Sacrificing human beings to the God of Nature is
an inversion and just another expression of the “ends justify the means”. This fuses with pathocratic
discourse creating the groundswell for manifestations of fascism inside an emerging “global
consciousness”. After all, according to the authors of Mankind at the Turning Point: “The Earth has cancer
and the cancer is Man.” The CoR would no doubt agree with Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepard
Conservation Society who said: “Curing a body of cancer requires radical and invasive therapy, and
therefore, curing the biosphere of the human virus will also require a radical and invasive approach.” [16]
Does that mean a form of chemotherapy is being enacted on the global populace?
Developing a “one world consciousness” and a global ethic where every individual realises his role as a
member of the world community… and where such an ideology “… must become part of the consciousness
of every individual” doesn’t sound something aligned to democratic freedoms. Especially as this can only
happen if: “… the basic unit of human cooperation and hence survival is moving from the national to the
global level.” [17]Which means a linear and narrow move from the individual, which for the Club of Rome
script is equated with selfishness rather than a healthy autonomy within the whole. Indeed, we all need to
forget about all our petty concerns and give ourselves over to the “… necessity of a change in the
man-nature relationship and the emergence of a new perception of mankind as a living global system.”
Sure, but what will underlie this new global SYSTEM? Sustainable development programs and SMART
growth, which as we will discover is very from an ideal template despite the effect of such buzzwords.
It seems we won’t have time to answer that question because doomsday is so urgent that: “… the use of
human resources and the survival of the human species” will dominate this new apocalypse where
“personality and social classes” will not feature. [18]These “one world” ideas are not about joining together
in genuine unity but establishing a homogenous world order of bland mediocrity and sameness, where
conformity replaces true unity. This prescriptive ideology has nothing to do with true community but an
imposed form of communitarianism where centralisation and individual freedom are the causalities – by
(SMART) design. These ideas are the soft, gradualist version of green militancy or eco-fascism that is
particular to Liberal Establishment machinations.
The following declarations from Dave Forman, co-founder of Earth First! proves this point when he states:
“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide,
destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species,
returning throughout the world.”
Or in another fit of inspiration he proclaimed:
“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We
must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free
shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.” [19]
What about Gaia theorist and biologist Sir James Lovelock who suggested:
“The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and
burning too much oil.”
And our depopulationist friend Professor Paul Ehrlich:
“A
Page 9 of 14 massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development
Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST
“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development
means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world
resource situation.”
Whilst Michael Oppenheimer of the Environmental Defence Fund chimes in with:
“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let
other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the
US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
Not leaving the eco-feminists outside in the cold, theologian Rosemary Radford Ruether also follows the
humanity-as-amoeba approach and cheerfully uses a gardening metaphor to illustrate her point:
“We need to seek the most compassionate way of weeding out people … In place of the pro-life
movement we need to develop the ‘spirituality of recycling’ … a spirituality that includes
ourselves in the renewal of earth and self. We need to compost ourselves.” [20]
Not elucidating exactly how we must evaporate the population surplus to requirements, Ruether
nevertheless breezily told the liberal Catholic organisation, “Call To Action” that “We must return to the
population level of 1930.” [21] Would this mean that roughly 2 billion people are stamped for termination
and consigned to the big compost heap in the sky?
All of the above green advocates are happy to wipe away industrialisation – something I have some
sympathy for – but when ideology meets reality on the ground the usual result is more chaos. Artificially
restrict and interfere with the natural order in an attempt to reverse already pathological human constructs
with more of the same will not work. Yet, returning power to people and their communities outside of elite
designs may offer more hope. For now, however, the United Nations and most environmental movements
are entirely ponerised and embedded in eco-intelpro, whether they are aware of it or not.
To illustrate a more classic example of modern-day eco-fascism, Deep Ecologist Pentti Linkola is a text
book social dominator who just happens to be drawn to ecology as the belief, which might as well be as
random as falling leaves. He has no problem in voicing his opinions, stripped down of the kind of
euphemistic camouflage so typical of Club of Rome adherents. The Finnish ecologist advocates the
enforced stoppage of immigration; downsizing the population; the killing of “defectives” and the halting of
“rampant technology.” He also thinks in order to combat the encroachment of industrialisation cities they
should be attacked with nuclear weapons.
As with so many eco-fascists, Linkola has interesting perspectives and genuine insights into the ecology of
the Earth but they are crushed under the jackboot of his own delight in creating a tyranny to protect Nature.
Sure enough, the same “humans-as-cancer” meme is dragged up as a reason to eliminate everyone who
doesn’t tow the ecological line. Accordingly, when any act of genocide, war and natural disaster befalls
humankind, you will find Linkola rubbing his hands together in glee. To say he is a cold rationalist would be
the kindest of labels. For instance, in the context of the Madrid Bombing he stated in a televised interview
that: “Every act which disrupts the progress of Earth’s life-destroying Western culture is positive.” [22]
The following passage comes from his book Can life Prevail? Written in 2009:
Any dictatorship would be better than modern democracy. There cannot be so incompetent a
dictator that he would show more stupidity than a majority of the people. The best dictatorship
would be one where lots of heads would roll and where government would prevent any
economic growth. We will have to learn from the history of revolutionary movements — the
Page 10 ofnational
14 socialists, the Finnish Stalinists, from the many stages of the Russian revolution,
Mar 10, 2016from
05:31:27AM MST
national socialists, the Finnish Stalinists, from the many stages of the Russian revolution, from
the methods of the Red Brigades — and forget our narcissistic selves. A fundamental,
devastating error is to set up a political system based on desire. Society and life have been
organized on the basis of what an individual wants, not on what is good for him or her. Just as
only one out of 100,000 has the talent to be an engineer or an acrobat, only a few are those
truly capable of managing the matters of a nation or mankind as a whole. In this time and this
part of the World we are headlessly hanging on democracy and the parliamentary system, even
though these are the most mindless and desperate experiments of mankind. In democratic
countries the destruction of nature and sum of ecological disasters has accumulated most. Our
only hope lies in strong central government and uncompromising control of the individual
citizen. [23]
Where have we heard that before? Nazi Germany perhaps? (Or Prince Philip?)
From “narcissism” to overt totalitarianism where the former is merely the results of a covert totalitarianism.
And so the wheel goes around so fast that no sensible, creative solutions are allowed access. Indeed, it’s
becoming difficult to see where some quarters of the Western Establishment begins and Nazi ethos ends.
Perhaps because the mind-set and direction is the same, only differing by degree. While the above may
appear as brutal example of eco-fascism as it is possible to find, it follows exactly the same beliefs and
wishes of the Club of Rome, the only difference being that Linkola has dispensed with the buffering, from
the use of euphemisms, jargon, double-speak, NLP, and Delphi methods – going straight for the jugular.
Now take the view of perhaps the most influential man in the UN-mandated environmentalist/New Age
movement Mr. Maurice Strong, who essentially follows the same line of thought as Linkola, if we follow the
implications of what he is saying. In a 1992 interview, the founder of the UNEP was discussing a possible
plot-line of a book he would like to write:
“What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth
comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries
would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The
group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to
save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized
civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” [24]
What he doesn’t mention is what will replace such a collapse brought about by manipulation and the
possibility he is merely being used to consolidate and centralise control still further.
Though clearly passé for the likes of Linkola, a third phase of green hijacking called for the 1991 book
entitled The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of The Club of Rome.It was co-authored by
one of the founders of The Club of Rome, Alexander King and euro economist Bernard Scheider.It had
been decided that this book would up the ante on the fear and threat factor this time posing that
environmental destruction was the new terrorist. Time is up and radical changes needed to be made.
Failure to do so would be dire consequences for all. Just like the members of the Bilderberg Group,
Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Round Table and the Royal Institute for International
Affairs – they deem democracy as outmoded and ineffective to deal with the global ‘Problematique’ – world
government is the only solution. Before the foreword on the first page there is a reminder of where the
CoR’s ideological allegiance lies with the following quotation from Edward Fitzgerald’s The Rubiyat of
Omar Khayyam:
Ah love! Could thou and I with fate conspire,
Page 11 of 14 Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST

To grasp this sorry state of things entire,
Would not we shatter it to bits and then,
Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire?
Where have we seen this before?
In none other than the Fabian Society’s cherished stained-glass window created by George Bernard Shaw.
The Earth is on an anvil being shattered into bits by Fabian leaders so that they may remould it into their
heart’s desire – A New World Government or World State. It would be well to keep this in mind that when
reading the Club of Rome literature – it sounds great on paper but needs a finely-tuned attention to
“double-speak” in order to extract the underlying thinking from the euphemisms and mechanistic
platitudes.
After the foreword we have a quotation included from our friend Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh who
dispensed his usual wisdom in the following way: “No generation has ever liked its prophets, least of all
those who point out the consequences of bad judgement and lack of foresight. The Club of Rome can take
pride in the fact that it has been unpopular for the last twenty years. I hope it will continue for many years to
come to spell out the unpalatable facts and to unsettle the conscience of the smug and the apathetic.” [25]
Knowing what we know about the Duke of Edinburgh’s heritage and true beliefs it is a bit rich to consider
that he is not, at the very least one of the “smug” and “apathetic” that characterises the very essence of the
Establishment of which he is a part. Secondly, would you really want someone of this nature blessing a
book unless you followed the exact same precepts yourself?
Let’s have a look at what Mr. King and Mr. Schneider are broadcasting to their fellow members and the
environmental movement they wish to influence:
Order in society is determined by the cohesion of its members… Thus a vacuum has been
created in which both the order and the objectives in society are being eroded. […] The
opposition of two political ideologies no longer exists, leaving nothing but a crass materialism.
Nothing within the governmental system and its decision-making process seems capable of
opposing or modifying those trends which raises questions about our common future and
indeed about the very survival of the race. […] The task is indeed formidable but if we show no
sign of accepting its challenge it is likely that people may panic, lose faith in their leaders, give
in to fear and offer support to extremists…[…] Capitalist and free-market economies have found
it necessary to make adjustments so as to survive while socialist systems also made
adjustments belatedly did not survive. […] [26]
Unfortunately, the obsession with “order in society” is borne from their own technocratic beliefs and has
little to do with reality. A natural order has to arrive naturally without such “cohesion” being imposed.
Vacuums are created as a routine by-product of geo-political policy sourced from exactly the same
Establishment circles that commissioned The First Global Revolution. What is being suggested here is that
if we do not jettison the democratic process and all that goes with it then the only avenue is fear, panic and
headless-chicken extremism. What a very dim view of people, a view no doubt that his viral-highness
Prince Philip would endorse. Actually, faith in our leaders is exactly why we are in this predicament. The
only realisation that needs attention is that people have the power rather than a minority of psychopaths
who are the designated “leaders.”
Page 12 of 14 Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST

Notes
[1] http://www.clubofrome.org/
[2] Ibid.
[3] The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind by
D.H. Meadows. Published by Macmillan 1972 Revised Edition 1979.
[4] ‘Population Paradox: Europe’s Time-Bomb’ by Paul Vallely, The Independent, August 9, 2008.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] ‘Lethal Model 2: The Limits to Growth Revisited’ by William Nordhaus, Economic Studies Program, The
Brookings Institution, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Volume 23 Issue 2, 1992.
[8] ‘World Dynamics: Measurement Without Data’ William D. Nordhaus, The Economic Journal, Vol. 83,
No. 332. (Dec., 1973), pp. 1182-1183.
[9] p.23; The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert by Donna
Laframboise. Published by Createspace, 2011 | ISBN-10: 1466453486.
[10] The Malthus Factor: Poverty, Politics and Population in Capitalist Development by Eric B. Ross. Zed
Books; First Edition edition, 1998 | ISBN-10: 1856495647.
[11] pp. 39, 144 ; Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to The Club of Rome, 1974. By
Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel | ISBN 0-525-03945-7
[12] op. cit. Mesarovic; Pestel (p.7, p.21)
[13] op. cit. Russell
[14] Ibid. (p.70)
[15] “Holistic Environmental Ethics and the Problem of Ecofascism.” Pages 59-76 in J. Baird Callicott.
p.60; Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, N.Y., State University of
New York Press. 1999| ISBN 0-7914-4084-2. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: by Tom Regan,
University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-049047
[16] ‘The Beginning of the End for Life as We Know it on Planet Earth? There is a Biocentric Solution.’
Commentary by Paul Watson, Founder and President of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, May 4 2007.
[17] op. cit. Mesarovic; Pestel (p.146)
[18] Ibid.
[19] Earth First! Confessions of an Eco-Warrior By David Foreman, 1993. | Sourced also from: ‘This Land
is OUR Land – Untamed nature & the removal of humans.’ By Tim Findley Range Magazine,
http://www.rangemagazine.com/archives/stories/fall03/fall03_this_land.shtml
[20] Michael S. Rose, “Feminist Theologian Urges Religious To Find A Way To ‘Weed Out People’,” The
Wanderer, June 11, 1998, (p.1)
[21] Ann Sheridan, “CTA Conference Presents The Reality of Unreality,” The Wanderer, November 12,
1998,( p.1)
[22] On Madrid bombing in “Persona non grata” –show, 2004.
[23] pp. 13 and 177; Can Life Prevail? By Pentti Linkola Published by Arktos Media Ltd; 2009. ISBN-10:
1907166009 | The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of The Club of Rome: A Strategy for
Surviving the World by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, 1993.
[24] p.95; Environmentalism: ideology and power By Donald Gibson. Nova Publishers, 2002 |
ISBN1590331494.
[25] Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh’s Message to the 20th Anniversary Conference of the Club of Rome,
Paris, 1988.
[26]
Page 13 p.79;
of 14 The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome:Mar
A Strategy for
10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST
[26] p.79; The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome: A Strategy for
Surviving the World By Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider. Published by Orient Longman, 1993
edition| ISBN-10: 0679738258.
Page 14 of 14 Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST

https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/dark-green-vii-the-club-of-rome-and-world-problematique-2/
Dark Green VII: The Club of Rome and “World Problematique” (2) wordpress.com
“Every man is a moon and has a dark side which is turned towards nobody – you have to slip
around behind if you want to see it.”
– Mark Twain
Eco-fascism and World State advocates incorporate a host of well-intentioned people. Such movements
work, precisely because the genuine emotions behind the propaganda have been tapped. It does not mean
every person involved is somehow part of a nefarious conspiracy – it’s much more clever than that.
Knowledge of mass psychology ensures compliance. Self-censorship and our adherence to comfortable
belief and the authority that supports it, usually proves enough. It is also true that many of those doing their
part under the Club of Rome and many other organisations we have discussed may be subconsciously
aware of these authoritarian principles and have the make up of an authoritarian follower. This doesn’t
necessarily make them pathological but it does make them ignorant of the wider spheres of manipulation,
thus easily swayed, whether academic or layman, politician or scientist. We tend to jump on the
band-wagon of belief that most readily conforms to our deep-seated desire and thus our programming.
The Club of Rome is an outfit designed to appeal to the green arm of those romantic visions of one world
unity and eco-authoritarian sensibilities. If World State principles are to have a chance they need to adapt
quickly and conform to the Rockefeller ideal of a corporatist-collectivist hybridisation which can foster the
needed economics, just as they did after World War II. The directive for institution building was “peace,”
here, it is “environmental catastrophe” – regardless of the validity. The psychopath’s mind piggy-backs
macro-social imperatives in order to extract the best possible outcome for its minority species. In this case,
the survival and dominance of their genetic code, not that of normal people.
The CoR authors state:
“The period of absence of thought and a lack of common vision – not of the world of tomorrow
will be, but of what we want it to be, so we can shape it – is a source of discouragement, even
despair. […] It seem would that many men and women need a common motivation, namely a
common adversary, to organize and act together. In the vacuum such motivations seem to have
ceased to exist – or have yet to be found.” [Emphasis mine]
This harks back to the stanza of “Remoulding it to the heart’s desire” and the allusions to commonality,
consensus, communitarianism etc. (Remember Common Core and Common Purpose?) Nothing wrong
with any of those things but just who is doing the “shaping” here on behalf of humanity? The same movers
and shakers are still in control. It’s the difference between self-organised communities independent of
State controls or inverted totalitarianism hijacking truth and so far, every indication seems to be it is the
latter.
© Cienpiesnf | Dreamstime.com – Green Development

Concept Earth Photo
It seems the Club of Rome and its various offshoots have

arrived at the idea that we need a “common motivation” being
so disempowered and bereft of ideas of our own. Further, we
need an “adversary” in order to act together and get organised
Page 1 of 12 just like we need an adversary in the shapeMar
of 10,
a terrorist threat MST
2016 05:33:28AM
need an “adversary” in order to act together
and get organised
just like we need an adversary in the shape of a terrorist threat
or the nonsense of Vladimir Putin as a Hitlerian instigator of a
new cold war. It’s exactly the same dynamic used to hoodwink
the mass mind. The CoR is using in plain sight, the same
technique to elicit a Pavlovian response from the populace to
create the groundswell to “save the planet” and prevent an
ecological catastrophe. In the “vacuums” created by power
structures and with psychopaths at specific nodes of influence
almost anything can be inserted into the mass mind with enough
appeal to instinct (fear) and emotion (altruistic desire) to create
a potent force upon which the Elite can ride to fruition. We find
the same “scientific technique” so favoured by governments
dreamstime_m_32017617 everywhere:
“The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to
overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of
finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself – when things become too difficult at home,
divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside
enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose.”
No arguments there. Rather than moving away from such a manipulation they decide to employ the exact
same tactics simply because it is “green” and the future of the planet is at stake. And here we come to the
whole point underlying much of the global warming hysteria of the last twenty years:
Can we live without enemies? Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as
friend or foe that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public
opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined and
new weapons devised. The new enemies are different in their nature and location but they are
no less real. They threaten the whole human race and they are and their names are pollution,
water shortage, famine, malnutrition, illiteracy and unemployment. [Emphasis mine]
Finally, the dénouement arrives:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of
global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are
caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they
can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” [1]
Transmute our need for bogeyman and graft them onto sensible, ecological salvation. Notice how State
and society are one in the authors’ minds. To combat the perceived threat to the human race deception is
necessary for the good of the whole – i.e. The Elite. Similarly, true to eco-fascist principles, the
Establishment are not the enemies but “humanity itself” who has been raised and inculcated along the very
same lines of perception management that the CoR is proposing here.
Indeed, taking his cue from the propaganda was the late CoR member Prof. Stephen Schneider of
Stanford Professor of Biology and Global Change who claimed: “We need to get some broad based
support, to capture the public’s imagination … So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified,
dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts … Each of us has to decide what the right
balance is between being effective and being honest.” [2] However, in order to achieve this aim notions of
democracy and freedom must be turned on their head for the greater good.
In 2the
Page 1991
of 12 edition, (though carefully re-worked in the 1993 edition) we find: Mar 10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST
In the 1991 edition, (though carefully re-worked in the 1993 edition) we find:
But freedom alone cannot reorganise a state, write a constitution, create a market and establish
economic growth, rebuild industry and agriculture and or build a new social structure. It is a
necessary and noble, inspirational force but it is far from being an operating manual for a new
government. This is why the concept of human rights simply initiates but cannot implement the
process of democratization […] The old democracies have functioned reasonably well over the
last 200 years, but they appear now to be in a phase of complacent stagnation with little
evidence of real leadership and innovation. The slowness of decision-making in a democratic
system is particularly damaging at the international level. […]
Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits.
These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no
longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of
today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at
the right time.” [3]
They are right: “Democracy is not a Panacea.” Yet, these proffered “Global Revolutions” – as every
managed and co-opted revolution in the past – are not offering progressive change that lies with the people
but the exact same notions of change residing in global governance and a New Renaissance of World
State dreams percolating in the minds of leaders. They are advocating tighter centralisation grafted on to
regionalism and Communitarianism. As the “wise man” of new age environmentalism Maurice Strong
mentioned in a recent essay for the World Policy Journal: “… our concepts of ballot-box democracy may
need to be modified to produce strong governments capable of making difficult decisions.” [4]
Once again, when you place this in context you see a pattern and you slowly realise that this is ditching
democracy in order to replace it with a re-packaging of the 4C’s with the exact same management team
presiding over a new Social Contract using ecological catastrophe as the “enemy”. This is a ruse to
seemingly “unite us” but it is a unity that serves the few. The same is happening with economics
(manipulated collapse) and society as a whole (SMART growth/sustainable development).
In the same vein, the UN as a policing body enforcing world disarmament is also promoted as an
achievable goal. Now, think about this from a minority psychopath’s point of view. What would the
psychopath do if he wanted to ride normal humanity’s back without the possibility of being discovered?
Further, when he was revealed, you could no longer cause him harm? He would feed humanity an array of
enticing “foods” and cultivate distractions that would make make it progressively docile and asleep to
psycho-spiritual danger; a mass condition of Stockholm Syndrome would arrive, effectively disabling
humanity’s ability to SEE evil in its midst. While it slept the psychopath caused us to to gorge on empty
mental, emotional and physical “nourishment” while eventually removing our teeth under cover of night.
When we finally awoke with our teeth missing our will and ability to defend ourselves from psychic infection
would be gone.
Whilst violence is not the answer, disarming the population is a standard, historical tactic of the
Establishment and ensures compliance to a World Order with the minimum of resistance, both in terms of
the mind and regarding the possibility of civil unrest. A future armed resistance from those who would
rather have the choice as to whether they are embedded in a pathocratic “SMART society” is an
understandable reaction.
If you think the CoR is doing its level best to defer to those with conscience and use language that would
buffer the true meaning – then you would be correct. The real intention is stated far more bluntly by Fred G.
Thompson
Page 3 of 12 in his article for the Canadian Association for the Club of Rome: Mar 10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST
Thompson in his article for the Canadian Association for the Club of Rome:
[W]e have temporarily acquired the means to defy Nature, it is only for a short time. If we do not
design policies to halt, and then reverse population growth, Nature by default will soon exact a
most punishing solution. […] The reduction of human population by default means in plain
language the reduction of human numbers by war, disease and famine. […]
Over-consumption is, of course, the basic cause of polluting the atmosphere and global
warming. So it must be dealt with.
One possible scenario would be the imposition of birth control by a world government which
possesses the capacity to enforce it globally. Not a pretty scene, but an alternative to global
war, disease and starvation. [5]
[Emphasis mine]
And yet, global war, disease and starvation are exactly the methods and effects which have been used by
the Elite for centuries. Talk about a contradiction! Despite the insistence that: “ ‘Global ‘governance’ in our
vocabulary does not imply a global ‘government’ but rather the institutions set up for cooperation,
coordination, and common action between durable sovereign states” it is one of many disingenuous
statements which amount to semantics. How likely is such a global scenario to play out when those same
players that coordinated past disasters are still residing at the top of these institutions which are attempting
to become supra-global and when democracy is deemed inefficient and out-dated?
How likely is any notion of success to be realised when deception, bad science and blatant determinism is
used as the arbiters of a perceived truth?
Democracy has indeed succumbed to the very same forces proposing global consciousness along
eco-fascist principles. Democratic decision-making is seen as “damaging at the international level”
because of its slow pace. It can also be argued that it can act as a safeguard to precipitous decisions and
runaway policies based on reaction and reflex instead of careful thought and transparent arbitration.
The Club of Rome

subsequently founded two
sister organisations, the
Club of Budapest which
focuses on social and
cultural issues and the
Club of Madrid which has a more political emphasis. Both follow the same themes of sustainability and
developing new socio-political and ecological frameworks which leave capitalism and democracy behind.
The CoR has also established a network of over 35 National Associations. Although, as of writing, the “Ex
Officio membership” at the CoR website is conveniently blank which would have otherwise given a
snapshot of the kind of belief from which the CoR has traditionally drawn. A brief summary of current and
past members from CoR and its sister organisations include:
Al Gore – former VP of the USA, leading climate change campaigner, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Academy
Award winner and Emmy winner. Gore led the US delegations to the Rio Earth Summit and Kyoto Climate
Change conference and chaired a meeting of the full Club of Rome held in Washington DC in 1997. Stating
in Grist Magazine in 2006: “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the
solutions
Page 4 of 12 are…” He is most well-known for being opposition candidate to the Bush-Cheney
Mar 10,Reich in 2004 MST
2016 05:33:28AM
solutions are…” He is most well-known for being opposition candidate to the Bush-Cheney Reich in 2004
and for producing the scientifically compromised but multi-award-winning global warming documentary An
Inconvenient Truth.
Javier Solana – is a Spanish physicist and Socialist politician. Secretary General of the Council of the
European Union, High Representative for EU Foreign Policy. He is a frequent speaker at the prestigious
U.S. based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He was also Secretary-General of NATO from 1995-1999
and gave the Clinton led go ahead for the bombing campaign of the former Yugoslavia as well as giving full
support for the invasion of Iraq under the illusion of full European support: “Today’s message to Baghdad
is very clear: the UN Security Council resolution expresses the unity and determination of the entire
international community to assume its collective responsibility.” [6]
Mikhail Gorbachev – The big Daddy of New World Order change; a CoR executive member, former
President of the Soviet Union, founder of Green Cross International and the Gorbachev Foundation, Nobel
Peace Prize winner, co-founder (with Hidalgo) of the Club of Madrid, co-author (with Maurice Strong) of the
Earth Charter. Gorby has come out with some memorable statements: “The threat of environmental crisis
will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”
Most recently the Russian elder statesman had this to say at Lafayette College commenting on the Occupy
Wall St. Movement:
“Others, including myself, have spoken about a new world order, but we are still facing the
problem of building such a world order…problems of the environment, of backwardness and
poverty, food shortages…all because we do not have a system of global governance. We
cannot leave things as they were before, when we are seeing that these protests are moving to
even new countries, that almost all countries are now witnessing such protests, that the people
want change. As we are addressing these challenges, these problems raised by these protest
movements, we will gradually find our way towards a new world order.” [7]
Diego Hidalgo Schnur – Cutting his teeth at the World Bank from 1968 to 1977, he is the founder and
president of FRIDE, (Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior), of the Club of
Madrid. He is the Chairman of the Board for DARA (international organization) and Concordia 21. He is
also a founding member and senior fellow of the Gorbachev Foundation of North America (GFNA).
Ervin Laszlo – Concert pianist, scientist and philosopher. Founding member of the CoR, founder and
President of the Club of Budapest, founder and Chairman of the World Wisdom Council.
Anne Ehrlich – Population Biologist. Married to Paul Ehrlich with whom she has authored many books on
human overpopulation. Also a former director of Friends of the Earth and the Sierra Club, and a member of
the UN’s Global Roll of Honour.
Sir Crispin Ticknell – former British Permanent Representative to the United Nations and Permanent
Representative on the Security Council, Chairman of the ‘Gaia Society’, Chairman of the Board of the
Climate Institute, leading British climate change campaigner. Ticknell is a keen believer in Gaia theory
stating that: “Gaia has no particular tenderness for humans. We are no more than a small, albeit immodest,
part of her.” [8]
Maurice Strong – Described by the New York Times as the “Custodian of the Planet” Strong has been
Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Chief Policy Advisor to Kofi
Annan, Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit, co-author (with Gorbachev) of the Earth Charter,
co-author
Page 5 of 12 of the Kyoto Protocol, founder of the Earth Council. He is also a devout follower of2016
Mar 10, the 05:33:28AM
Baha’i MST
co-author of the Kyoto Protocol, founder of the Earth Council. He is also a devout follower of the Baha’i
religion and propagator of Gaian theology.
And Here’s what Mr. Strong said in his autobiography, in a section described as a report to the
shareholders, Earth Inc, dated 2031: “And experts have predicted that the reduction of the human
population may well continue to the point that those who survive may not number more than the 1.61 billion
people who inhabited the Earth at the beginning of the 20th century. A consequence, yes, of death and
destruction — but in the end a glimmer of hope for the future of our species and its potential for
regeneration.” [9]A “glimmer of hope” after death and destruction over which he is not only happy to
preside, but to encourage. This is key to understanding the impetus behind global warming and other
forms of eco-Intelpro: it is eco-fascism of the highest order. Yet commenting on Strong’s legacy of
environmentalism Kofi Anaan thought: “It would be a mistake to think of Maurice solely as one of the
world’s leading environmentalists. His main cause has been people.” [10]It’s a “cause” all right, just one
that ignores the true roots of the global crises while promoting Nature over humans.Robert Muller – former
Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, founder and Chancellor of the UN University of Peace.
No surprise that we found the late Mr. Muller here who observed:
“In my view, from all perspectives — scientific, political, social, economic and ideological —
humanity finds itself in the pregnancy of an entirely new and promising age: the global,
interdependent, universal age … the birth of the global brain, heart, senses and soul to
humanity, of a holistic consciousness of our place in the universe and on this planet, and of our
role and destiny in them.”
Which may well be, but such gushing statements are quite useful for those wish to build a global
consciousness based on the opposite. Muller’s World Core Curriculum was based directly on the Alice
Bailey teachings. His role seems to have been to plant the seeds of a New World Religion in the faithful:
“We must, together, create an agency within the U.N. and perhaps an independent United Religions
Secretariat. What an incredible challenge that would offer to the United Nations, and what untold good it
would bring to humanity, which desperately needs a moral and spiritual Renaissance.” [11]
Which of course means supporting the CoR and all it stands for.
Other Club of Rome members include Kofi Anaan, Lionel Jospin, George Soros, Hassan bin Talal, Tony
Blair, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Javier Perez de Cuellar, Jose Maria Anzar, Bill Gates,
The Dalai Lama, Garret Hardin, King Juan Carlos of Spain and his wife Queen Sophia, Queen Beatrix of
the Netherlands, Prince Philippe of Belgium and many more. And of course, as ever, David Rockefeller,
whom we know a little about …
Project partners and funding for the organisations comes from a variety of foundations and government
bodies which by their mere presence is enough to conclude that such organizations cannot be trusted:
Cisco Systems; International Economic Club of China; Turkish Future Researches Foundation (TUGAV)
United Nations Foundation (UNF) Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Eurasian Economic Club of Scientists;
Bertelsman Stiftung; Hunt Alternatives Fund; The Cousin’s Charitable Foundation; Institute for Security
Studies (South Africa) Institute on Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) Brookings Institution; Centre for
Concern Rethinking Bretton Woods Project. With annual conference sponsorship from the Rockefeller
Foundation; Google; Samsung; Microsoft; McKinsey & Co and GDF Suez.
The Rockefeller funding is present in all three CoR organisations.
Page 6 of 12 Blame it on
MarRio
10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST
Blame it on Rio
The drive to protect the Earth

and Nature under attack is
obviously an admirable one. The
destruction of the Rainforests is
something that actually gives
me a literal pain in my heart
when I see it. But how is all this
mass emotional energy actually
being used? The last thing the
pathocratic Establishment want
Rio Earth Summit 1992 is an informed and thinking
public who are able to discern signposts to eco-social engineering. It seems we still have a long way to go
when it comes to green issues and notions of just who is “healing the Earth”.
When the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit arrived in 1992 it was chaired under the ubiquitous Maurice
Strong. The Convention on Biological Diversity; The Framework Convention on Climate Change; and the
UN Agenda 21 were all birthed there on a wave of green emotion and a sincere desire to take action.
Psychological seeding was the intent rather than rapid change. Since then, in concert with SMART society
initiatives and redevelopment cartels these policies have redrawn the framework of local and national
government policy. Regardless of whether they understood the nature of the green mask, change agents
were needed. What counted was their iconic presence.
In 1994, Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, formally introduced the Earth Charter as a civil society initiative as
part of the declaration of Rio. The independent Earth Charter Commission, “… was convened by Strong
and Gorbachev with the purpose of developing a global consensus on values and principles for a
sustainable future. The Commission continues to serve as the steward of the Earth Charter text.” [12]Now,
one of the principle creators of the Earth Charter was… (drum-roll) … Steven Clark Rockefeller! He was
chairman of the Earth Charter international drafting committee and member of the Earth Charter
Commission and Steering Committee. He also happens to be an advisory trustee of the Rockefeller
Brothers Fund while still finding time to act as professor emeritus of Religion at Middlebury College. The
ideal person to create such a UN-driven declaration that: “we are one human family and one Earth
community with a common destiny,” and that a “change of mind and heart” is needed for this global
undertaking. Like Alice Bailey’s “New Group of World Servers,” – who and what exactly, are we ultimately
following?
Towards the end of the Earth charter we are provided with more “choices” dressed up as no choices at all:
”As never before in history, common destiny beckons us to seek a new beginning. Such
renewal is the promise of these Earth Charter principles. To fulfill this promise, we must commit
ourselves to adopt and promote the values and objectives of the Charter. This requires a
change of mind and heart. It requires a new sense of global interdependence and universal
responsibility. We must imaginatively develop and apply the vision of a sustainable way of life
locally, nationally, regionally, and globally. Our cultural diversity is a precious heritage and
different cultures will find their own distinctive ways to realize the vision. We must deepen and
expand the global dialogue that generated the Earth Charter, for we have much to learn from
the ongoing collaborative search for truth and wisdom.”
“In order to build a sustainable global community, the nations of the world must renew their
commitment
Page 7 of 12 to the United Nations, fulfil their obligations under existing international
Mar 10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST
commitment to the United Nations, fulfil their obligations under existing international
agreements, and support the implementation of Earth Charter principles with an international
legally binding instrument on environment and development. Let ours be a time remembered for
the awakening of a new reverence for life, the firm resolve to achieve sustainability, the
quickening of the struggle for justice and peace, and the joyful celebration of life.” [13]
[Emphasis mine]
When we come to talk about the UN Agenda 21 and its push for SMART growth redevelopment within
urban centres and suburbia, you will see why the above is dangerous manipulation – a green mask, if you
will.
By 2000, the Earth Charter text had been taken to activists, NGOs and governments hearts appealing to
both romantic and ideological aspirations, with huge glut of conferences, seminars, neighbourhood
meetings all attended by suitably paid “facilitators” and lobbyists. Sustainable development in the 1990s
was only the first stage. Once SMART growth and society were not merely buzzwords but the technology
was there to support it, SD and SMART fused into one. The Earth dialogues followed in 2002, launched by
Strong and Gorby as an outgrowth of Green Cross International. These series of annual public forums
sought to: “… bring together civil society and the private and public sectors in the search for solutions to
resolve the most pressing and interconnected challenges of insecurity, poverty and environmental
degradation.” [14]
Sounds inspiring doesn’t it? It’s a shame this is another lie. It seems the young have been sucked into yet
another Strong/Gorby production: the Earth Charter Initiative where children are sought as “change
agents” for the new “Global ethic.” According to the website description:
“The Earth Charter Initiative is the collective name for an extraordinarily diverse, global network
of people, organizations, and institutions who participate in promoting the Earth Charter, and in
implementing its principles in practice. The Initiative is a broad-based, voluntary, civil society
effort, but participants include leading international institutions, national governments,
university associations, NGOs, cities, faith groups, and many well-known leaders in sustainable
development.” [15]
Its objectives regarding education is an example of a familiar dogma:
“The Earth Charter values and principles must be taught, contemplated, applied and
internalized. To this end, the Earth Charter needs to be incorporated into both formal and
non-formal education. This process must involve various communities, continue to integrate the
Charter into the curriculum of schools and universities, and constitute an on-going process of
life-long learning.” [16]
The best way to gain a commitment from the awakening mass mind is to appeal to their values and shared
commonality. The Earth Charter text and initiative are worded in such a way that a form of entrainment
occurs which fits seamlessly into grass roots aspirations. Social transformation of young minds can then fit
into the Agenda 21 structures currently being implemented. After all, according to Strong: “The real goal of
the Earth Charter, is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments.” [17]
Once again, this isn’t about saving the planet or offering a new template that will empower people to find
creative solutions outside of the Establishment. This is about the exact reverse: to homogenise thought and
action related to green issues and ecological science by contouring focus into pre-designed, socially
engineered parameters, where national parks, land allocation, land resource, the prohibition of private
property
Page 8 of 12 and SMART ghettoization takes place by stealth. This society will be supremely green
Mar 10, 2016 and highlyMST
05:33:28AM
property and SMART ghettoization takes place by stealth. This society will be supremely green and highly
efficient but lacking any freedom to choose. Indeed, the whole concept of sustainability and SMART is are
already being sold as desirable – even inevitable – choices when in fact, it has all been based on another
dialectical formula to herd the population.
The reader may remember the late former Assistant-Secretary of the UN Robert Muller, who was a highly
influential spiritual guru within the institution and a follower of the Alice Bailey teachings explored in a
previous post. The Earth Charter Initiative is overseen by the United Nations University of Peace founded
by Muller (yes, Maurice Strong is the President) its governing council a veritable honey-pot of Club of
Rome members, including the now retired Secretary-General Martin Lees. Like the Earth charter initiatives
in education, Robert Muller schools continue to pop up all over the world “educating” children towards a
singular perception of reality. Yet, the more we look into Muller’s background and what he is advocating
the more troubling it becomes. The laudable sentiments for world peace and harmony on earth are
undercut by the same spiritual fascism that we can find in the Bailey writings and militant
environmentalists. What is more, it presents a spiritual narcissism so extreme it defies belief that such a
man until recently had such power over the decision-making process in UN circles. Yet it is this very
genuine and highly devotional personality that is so often useful in promoting a fake agenda.
“global visionary” Robert

The ubiquitous Maurice Strong
Muller
On Muller’s website goodmorningworld.org a series of personal conversations with God ensue:
God: “Dear Robert, congratulations for having finished your 4000 ideas. May I ask you: which
one do you consider the most important?”
I: Well, my most important idea and conclusion after all my adult life as a world civil servant is
this: The United Nations must be vastly strengthened to resolve the major global problems
henceforth increasingly confronting humanity and the Earth. It must be empowered to adopt
and enforce world laws and regulations.
God: “Thank you, dear Robert, for what you are recommending. Perhaps after all, the greatest
jewel of my Creation, the Earth, can be saved.” […]
Under these circumstances I cannot accept that you consider your 4000 ideas to be the end.
You should, you must continue and work hard on implementation. I will help you from heaven,
creating the right circumstances and ensuring that your ideas and efforts will be known at the
right, highest world levels.” [18] [Emphasis mine]
Notwithstanding the assumption that Muller has been hand-picked by God because of the quality of his
ideas
Page which
9 of 12 will work at the “highest world levels,” he proceeds to enthusiastically trumpet
Mar 10,his visions
2016 05:33:28AM MST
ideas which will work at the “highest world levels,” he proceeds to enthusiastically trumpet his visions
which include the United Nations mandating: “… urgency plans or conferences to halt the rapid decline of
Plane Earth’s life giving capacities and wealth,” such as a: “… world emergency plan to stop for at least five
years the human population explosion;” “… a world emergency plan for the more rapid reduction of carbon
dioxide emissions;” and “… a world emergency plan to avoid further risks of climatic changes;” and many
other “ideas” which are by now quite familiar. [19] All of this, with the enforcement of “world laws and
regulations.”
It seems Robert Muller’s delight at being a “world civil servant” is genuine… Is this global governance to be
made up of eco-technocratic elite of civil servants, traditional Iagos and Machiavellian snakes which
inhabit all the quangos and corridors of political power, easing, oiling and subverting where necessary? It
would seem so. This is not to say that Muller isn’t sincere. He may be a thoroughly decent man. But this
isn’t the issue. Good intentions never have been.
While there is much to praise in Muller’s stream of ideas, his ignorance of the nature of geo-politics is
frightening considering the position he found himself. His comments on population: “Perhaps the recent
increase of terrorism is the beginning of that revolution. The attacks against the US World Trade Centre
and the Pentagon were perhaps the opening of it. Among the measures, which can reduce this new world
danger, the UN should urgently convene a World Emergency Population Conference. Another is a new,
immediate World Marshall Plan, as recommended by the Club of Budapest.” [20] And the CoB is Muller’s
own bar-code of approval. Not a just a danger but a “New World danger!” Is there a New World toaster
perhaps or a New World Supermarket with New World baked beans? Has Muller exhausted the call for a
New World —– (fill in the blank) enough? Urgently convening conferences based on Elite blessings and
interminable calls for New World authorities and centralisations were Muller’s speciality and therefore,
fairly meaningless.
Everything in Muller’s vision is sourced from Alice Bailey and moulded into his own prolific worldview which
is dangerously naïve, messianic, blind to the dangers inherent in the ideas he is proposing. His impression
of humanity is that we: “… are still a very primitive, underdeveloped species” which needs his stewardship
and desperate need for a New World. Muller further believes: “Communism has died. It is now the turn of
capitalism to change or die. The new ideology should be Earthism, the proper management and
conservation of our precious, life-nurturing and sustaining Earth. Capital should be used to save the Earth
and become eco-capitalism.” Not a word on ponerology, not a word about the fact the very challenges we
face are not sourced from the human species but a minority who soil the sandpit. The underdeveloped
species of course, clearly doesn’t include Muller who sits on the right hand of God and is therefore his
valuable conduit outside such nastiness.[21]
This isn’t education. It’s indoctrination. “New” is prefixed in front of every possible discipline and domain,
from a new political system to a new economics; a new education and a new media and new
communications to a new democracy and a new global leadership; a new science and technology to a new
anthropology, sociology and new ways of life; a new human biology and a new philosophy, cosmology and
long term, view of evolution to a new world ethics and justice and a new world psychology all connected
under “the art of planetary management” and group consciousness. A vast homogenous mass –
collectivism at the ground level of a clinical, urban wasteland with romantic, warm and fuzzy trigger words
to engender conformity. Will you become one of the chosen few who will be living in the assigned zones of
ectopia with their neighbourhood police and gated round the clock security?
The Earth Charter is a set of principles which enhances and streamlines Agenda 21 which is a framework
by which a re-shaping of society according to sustainable principles can be implemented. They go hand in
hand. The International Covenant on Environment and Development allows a smooth passage of laws in
relation
Page 10 of 12to Charter to go through unimpeded and is being prepared by the CommissionMar
on10,
Environmental
2016 05:33:28AM MST
relation to Charter to go through unimpeded and is being prepared by the Commission on Environmental
Law at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) which is a monolithic agency
straddling more than 700 other international agencies. (You will not be surprised to hear that Maurice
Strong is giving the Rockefellers a run for their money by being on the board of the directors of the IUCN as
well as everywhere else…)
Alongside corporations who are also patrons of the very same UN philosophies and providers of education
materials with their logos stamped on every page, thousands of schools and educational organisations are
currently promoting Earth Charter materials. Children are being exposed to entrainment that subtly
conforms to the habitual group think and group consciousness hitherto discussed. Many of the themes and
principles in the Earth Charter are sound and practical – even visionary – but they sourced from a purview
of highly contested computer modelling techniques of the Club of Rome, UNEP and the IPCC who work
together to fuel fear and alarm alongside the imperative for change via global governance. Underpinning
New Age declarations for Global unity is bad science and cynical perception management that most
assuredly does not have the best interests of humanity at heart.
Of utmost importance is education towards the idea of a

World State and the imposition of a New World Religion or
“spirituality” depending on which agency you are involved in.
As such, standard religion has to be side-lined or preferably
done away with all together. After all, according to
commongood.org a forum for Inter-Religious Groups and
Spiritual Leaders “… it is clear that our religious institutions
have barely begun to articulate the core values of
sustainable development.” [22] It seems the Bahá’í Faith is
Seat of the Universal House of Justice, governing one of the models which is deemed an exception to the rule.
body of the Bahá’ís, in Haifa, Israel
The New World Religion that is doing the rounds at the UN offices and heavily promoted by Strong and
Gorby is the Bahá’í faith. Founded by Bahá’u’lláh in 19th century, it is a monotheistic religion with, of
course, a strong emphasis on world government. This is why New Agers, collectivists and UN acolytes
have been persuaded (mostly by Strong) to embed the Bahá’í religion within the UN. Much like the Lucis
Trust, it is permitted to have consultative status with the following organisations: United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF); United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM); United Nations Economic and
Social Council (ECOSOC); United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); World Health Organization
(WHO).
The Bahá’í International Community is an agency under the direction of the Universal House of Justice in
Haifa, Israel. Drums, rituals and sacred messages at numerous conferences organised by Strong have
featured a background of Bahá’í-inspired rituals in praise of Gaia and Mother Earth. Similar to the Lucis
Trust and its “Great Invocation” the Bahá’í religion adds a further layer of institutionalised ritual to the UN.
Perhaps we could say that there’s nothing wrong with a bit of ritual and the rehashing of ancient wisdom.
After all, don’t we want to live in a world of peace, harmony, tolerance and social justice? Don’t we want to
preserve our emerald lands and provide a sustainable way of life which includes access to clean water and
plentiful food for the planet’s inhabitants?
Even if it were based upon entirely authentic intentions, forcing it into being won’t work, and it will be
especially hollow if we allow a monoculture of laws alongside a ritually-based platform for an authoritarian
band of Word Civil Servants” to control the mass of humanity.
11 of 12
Page Mar 10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST

Notes
[1] Ibid. (p.85)

[2] Schneider SH (August/September 1996). “Don’t Bet All Environmental Changes Will Be Beneficial”.
APS News (American Physical Society): 5.
[3] op. cit. King; Schneider, 1991 edition: (pp.82 and 159) Interestingly, the 1993 version is worded
differently but says exactly the same thing.
[4] ‘Facing Down Armageddon: Our Environment at a Crossroads’ by Maurice Strong, World Policy
Journal, May 2009.
[5] ‘Turning the Elephant Around’ By Fred G. Thompson Canadian Association for the Club of Rome,
Proceedings: Analysis of the Human Predicament, VoSeries 3 / Number 10 May 2007. (p.17).
[6] Disarming Iraq by George Sedall, p.53.
[7] ‘Mikhail Gorbachev Says Uprisings Signal an Emerging New World Order’ October 20, 2011,
Layfayette College, Philadelphia.
[8] p.224; Scientists Debate Gaia: The Next Century By Stephen Henry Schneider, Published by MIT
Press 2004.| ISBN-0262-19498-8|
[9] Where on Earth are we Going? By Maurice Strong 2000. Published by Vintage Canada.
[10] http://www.mauricestrong.net
[11] Spring 1995 issue of The Temple of Understanding newsletter under the headline, ‘Preparing for the
Next Millenium.’
[12] http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/
[13] Ibid.
[14] http://www.gcint.org/what-we-do/earth-dialogues
[15] Ibid.
[16] Ibid.
[17] Maurice Strong on “A People’s Earth Charter” Interview with Maurice Strong Chairman of the Earth
Council and Co-Chair of the Earth Charter Commission. | www. http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/
March 5, 1998
[18] ‘Paradise Earth Robert Muller’s Ideas & Dreams Nurturing Our Home’ http://www.paradiseearth.us/
[19] http://www.robertmuller.org/ideas/
[20] Idea 2055 http://www.robertmuller.org/ideas/
[21] Idea 6335 Robert Muller ‘s Good Morning World Today’s Idea Dream For A Better World From Robert
& Barbara Muller, Friday, August 10, 2007. http://www.goodmorningworld.org/blog
[22] http://www.commongood.info/cooperation
Page 12 of 12 Mar 10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST

Club of Rome-26

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Club of Rome-26

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

https://infrakshun.wordpress.

Although claiming to be a non-governmental, non-partisan organisation, this is not the

There is no explicit or apparent reference to data or existing empirical studies. […]

From on an article on the CoR website we can read:

“Cooperation by definition connotes interdependence. Increasing interdependence between

Or in another fit of inspiration he proclaimed:

And our depopulationist friend Professor Paul Ehrlich:

Whilst Michael Oppenheimer of the Environmental Defence Fund chimes in with:

Ah love! Could thou and I with fate conspire,

Page 11 of 14 Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST

To grasp this sorry state of things entire,

Would not we shatter it to bits and then,

Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire?

Where have we seen this before?

Page 12 of 14 Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST

Page 14 of 14 Mar 10, 2016 05:31:27AM MST

The CoR authors state:

© Cienpiesnf | Dreamstime.com – Green Development

It seems the Club of Rome and its various offshoots have

Finally, the dénouement arrives:

The Club of Rome

The Rockefeller funding is present in all three CoR organisations.

The drive to protect the Earth

Its objectives regarding education is an example of a familiar dogma:

“global visionary” Robert

On Muller’s website goodmorningworld.org a series of personal conversations with God ensue:

Of utmost importance is education towards the idea of a

[1] Ibid. (p.85)

Page 12 of 12 Mar 10, 2016 05:33:28AM MST

You might also like