Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MS1723 Performance Evaluation of Mechanical Dust Collector PDF
MS1723 Performance Evaluation of Mechanical Dust Collector PDF
MS1723 Performance Evaluation of Mechanical Dust Collector PDF
Introduction
◦ Applicability of MS1723 method
Methodology
◦ Simultaneous isokinetic sampling at inlet & outlet
◦ Dust analysis (gravimetric for weight and laser
diffraction for PSD analysis)
◦ Calculation formulas
Sample results
◦ table and graphs
Challenges in sampling
◦ Factors resulting to inconclusive results
Ways to improve accuracy
Applicability of MS1723
◦ Performance evaluation for mechanical dust
collector
defined as a device which separates dust in a dry state
from gas through the application of inertial and
gravitational forces only
E.g. – settling chamber, cyclones
◦ Valid for confined flow system
No leakage along ducting
Simultaneous isokinetic sampling at both
inlet and outlet of dust collector
◦ Using MS1596:2003 method, measure particulate
concentrations
Consists of two teams (1 at inlet, 1 at outlet)
A coordinator needed (coordinate both teams, log
plant conditions)
◦ Samples collected to be analyzed at accredited
laboratory
Mass determination (gravimetric)
Collected samples further analysed for
particle size distribution (PSD)
◦ Using ISO-13320 method (particle size analysis –
laser diffraction method)
◦ Analyze at least 64 intervals of particle sizes
◦ Size range to be analyzed between 0.1 to 200
micron,
analysis shall always correspond to sizes present in
flue gas
Collection of dust must be simultaneous - at
same time both inlet and outlet
Minimum of 3 tests
◦ 2 conclusive tests required
Preparation before sampling
◦ Choose the most suitable inlet & outlet sampling
points
◦ Coordinator must choose suitable location
Can see both isokinetic teams
If not possible, use 2-way radios (walkie talkie)
Testing procedure
◦ Follow MS1596 method
Coordinator to control the sampling times for both
inlet and outlet teams.
Must be at the same time
Process conditions to be recorded
plant capacities, type of fuel, excess air, temp, pressure,
etc.
Repeat tests 3 times
Efficiency of dust collector:
where mi,out : mass per particle size interval after dust collector
Note:
All particle size distribution (mi,in and mi,out shall be normalized to 100)
Grade efficiency:
where mi,in : mass per particle size interval before dust collector
Source: Boiler in POM, fuel=Palm shell & fiber
Type of dust collector : Multicyclone
Inlet Test Sampling time Static P Temp. Water cont. O2 cont. CO2 cont. Velocity Flowrate Dust conc.
Time (hrs) # minutes "H20 oC % % % m/s Nm3/hr g/Nm3
0905 – 1030 1 60 -7.50 172.1 7.0218 12.9 5.4 9.66 39510.82 4.2629
1145 – 1305 2 60 -7.60 174.8 7.0102 12.8 5.6 9.67 39298.65 4.2134
1400 – 1520 3 60 -7.60 175.5 6.9626 12.7 5.6 9.78 39685.72 4.1002
Outlet Test Sampling time Static P Temp. Water cont. O2 cont. CO2 cont. Velocity Flowrate Dust conc.
Time (hrs) # minutes "H20 oC % % % m/s Nm3/hr g/Nm3
0905 – 1030 1 60 -0.60 170.5 6.9626 13.0 5.2 24.68 37164.29 0.2653
1145 – 1305 2 60 -0.61 170.8 7.0453 13.2 5.2 24.68 37163.72 0.4345
1400 – 1520 3 60 -0.60 171.0 7.4737 13.2 5.2 24.66 37268.31 0.4366
Test 1 Test 1 Test 2 Test 2 Test 3 Test 3 Average Average
Dust concentration
4.2629 0.2653 4.2134 0.4345 4.1002 0.4366 4.1922 0.3788
(g/m3N)
Efficiency
0.9378 0.8969 0.8935 0.9094
(mass basis)
11.0 0.00 0.05 na 0.00 0.02 na 0.00 0.01 na 110 3.42 0.15 0.96 3.50 0.35 0.90 3.69 0.37 0.90
12.0 0.00 0.06 na 0.00 0.02 na 0.01 0.01 -0.39 120 3.09 0.14 0.96 3.27 0.33 0.90 3.66 0.34 0.91
13.2 0.00 0.07 na 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.06 0.02 0.70 132 2.76 0.13 0.95 3.04 0.32 0.89 3.61 0.32 0.91
14.5 0.11 0.08 0.28 0.14 0.04 0.75 0.11 0.03 0.76 145 2.44 0.12 0.95 2.81 0.31 0.89 3.53 0.29 0.92
15.8 0.26 0.09 0.64 0.29 0.05 0.84 0.19 0.04 0.79 158 2.14 0.11 0.95 2.58 0.29 0.89 3.43 0.27 0.92
17.4 0.45 0.11 0.75 0.49 0.06 0.87 0.30 0.06 0.81 174 1.87 0.11 0.94 2.36 0.28 0.88 3.29 0.24 0.93
19.1 0.70 0.13 0.81 0.74 0.08 0.89 0.44 0.08 0.82 191 1.65 0.10 0.94 2.15 0.26 0.88 3.14 0.22 0.93
20.9 1.01 0.15 0.85 1.05 0.11 0.90 0.61 0.11 0.82 209 1.47 0.09 0.94 1.95 0.25 0.87 2.97 0.20 0.93
22.9 1.37 0.17 0.87 1.40 0.13 0.90 0.82 0.14 0.83 229 1.34 0.08 0.94 1.76 0.23 0.87 2.78 0.18 0.94
25.1 1.77 0.20 0.89 1.79 0.16 0.91 1.05 0.18 0.83 251 1.26 0.07 0.94 1.59 0.21 0.87 2.57 0.16 0.94
27.5 2.20 0.22 0.90 2.20 0.19 0.91 1.30 0.22 0.83 275 1.22 0.06 0.95 1.45 0.20 0.86 2.37 0.14 0.94
30.2 2.65 0.23 0.91 2.61 0.23 0.91 1.57 0.26 0.83 302 1.22 0.04 0.96 1.32 0.18 0.86 2.16 0.12 0.94
33.1 3.08 0.25 0.92 3.02 0.26 0.92 1.85 0.30 0.84 331 1.23 0.02 0.98 1.20 0.17 0.86 1.95 0.11 0.94
36.3 3.49 0.26 0.93 3.39 0.28 0.92 2.12 0.34 0.84 363 1.26 0.01 0.99 1.11 0.16 0.86 1.76 0.10 0.94
39.8 3.86 0.27 0.93 3.72 0.31 0.92 2.39 0.38 0.84 398 1.27 0.00 1.00 1.03 0.15 0.86 1.60 0.09 0.94
43.7 4.18 0.27 0.94 4.00 0.33 0.92 2.64 0.41 0.85 437 1.26 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.14 0.86 1.44 0.08 0.94
47.9 4.42 0.27 0.94 4.20 0.35 0.92 2.85 0.43 0.85 479 1.21 0.00 1.00 0.88 0.12 0.86 1.32 0.08 0.94
52.5 4.59 0.26 0.94 4.35 0.37 0.92 3.06 0.45 0.85 525 1.13 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.11 0.86 1.22 0.07 0.94
57.5 4.67 0.25 0.95 4.41 0.38 0.92 3.23 0.46 0.86 575 1.02 0.00 1.00 0.72 0.10 0.86 1.14 0.07 0.94
63.1 4.68 0.24 0.95 4.42 0.38 0.91 3.37 0.47 0.86 631 0.86 0.00 1.00 0.63 0.09 0.86 1.09 0.07 0.93
69.2 4.61 0.22 0.95 4.36 0.38 0.91 3.50 0.46 0.87 692 0.71 0.00 1.00 0.53 0.08 0.85 1.04 0.08 0.93
75.9 4.47 0.20 0.95 4.25 0.38 0.91 3.58 0.45 0.87 759 0.53 0.00 1.00 0.43 0.07 0.85 1.01 0.08 0.92
83.2 4.28 0.19 0.96 4.11 0.37 0.91 3.64 0.44 0.88 832 0.25 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.05 0.84 0.98 0.08 0.92
91.2 4.02 0.17 0.96 3.92 0.37 0.91 3.68 0.42 0.89 912 0.12 0.00 1.00 0.22 0.04 0.82 0.93 0.09 0.91
100 3.74 0.16 0.96 3.72 0.36 0.90 3.71 0.39 0.89 1000 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.11 0.03 0.73 0.87 0.09 0.90
Test is conclusive if:
◦ Highest difference between grade efficiencies is
<20%
◦ Average difference is <10%
Efficiencies measured may be exempted, if
PSD <2% of total mass on inlet
Sizes below 25.119 micron can be exempted,
due to <2% of total mass on inlet
11.0 0.00 0.05 na 0.00 0.02 na 0.00 0.01 na 110 3.42 0.15 0.96 3.50 0.35 0.90 3.69 0.37 0.90
12.0 0.00 0.06 na 0.00 0.02 na 0.01 0.01 -0.39 120 3.09 0.14 0.96 3.27 0.33 0.90 3.66 0.34 0.91
13.2 0.00 0.07 na 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.06 0.02 0.70 132 2.76 0.13 0.95 3.04 0.32 0.89 3.61 0.32 0.91
14.5 0.11 0.08 0.28 0.14 0.04 0.75 0.11 0.03 0.76 145 2.44 0.12 0.95 2.81 0.31 0.89 3.53 0.29 0.92
15.8 0.26 0.09 0.64 0.29 0.05 0.84 0.19 0.04 0.79 158 2.14 0.11 0.95 2.58 0.29 0.89 3.43 0.27 0.92
17.4 0.45 0.11 0.75 0.49 0.06 0.87 0.30 0.06 0.81 174 1.87 0.11 0.94 2.36 0.28 0.88 3.29 0.24 0.93
19.1 0.70 0.13 0.81 0.74 0.08 0.89 0.44 0.08 0.82 191 1.65 0.10 0.94 2.15 0.26 0.88 3.14 0.22 0.93
20.9 1.01 0.15 0.85 1.05 0.11 0.90 0.61 0.11 0.82 209 1.47 0.09 0.94 1.95 0.25 0.87 2.97 0.20 0.93
22.9 1.37 0.17 0.87 1.40 0.13 0.90 0.82 0.14 0.83 229 1.34 0.08 0.94 1.76 0.23 0.87 2.78 0.18 0.94
25.1 1.77 0.20 0.89 1.79 0.16 0.91 1.05 0.18 0.83 251 1.26 0.07 0.94 1.59 0.21 0.87 2.57 0.16 0.94
27.5 2.20 0.22 0.90 2.20 0.19 0.91 1.30 0.22 0.83 275 1.22 0.06 0.95 1.45 0.20 0.86 2.37 0.14 0.94
30.2 2.65 0.23 0.91 2.61 0.23 0.91 1.57 0.26 0.83 302 1.22 0.04 0.96 1.32 0.18 0.86 2.16 0.12 0.94
33.1 3.08 0.25 0.92 3.02 0.26 0.92 1.85 0.30 0.84 331 1.23 0.02 0.98 1.20 0.17 0.86 1.95 0.11 0.94
36.3 3.49 0.26 0.93 3.39 0.28 0.92 2.12 0.34 0.84 363 1.26 0.01 0.99 1.11 0.16 0.86 1.76 0.10 0.94
39.8 3.86 0.27 0.93 3.72 0.31 0.92 2.39 0.38 0.84 398 1.27 0.00 1.00 1.03 0.15 0.86 1.60 0.09 0.94
43.7 4.18 0.27 0.94 4.00 0.33 0.92 2.64 0.41 0.85 437 1.26 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.14 0.86 1.44 0.08 0.94
47.9 4.42 0.27 0.94 4.20 0.35 0.92 2.85 0.43 0.85 479 1.21 0.00 1.00 0.88 0.12 0.86 1.32 0.08 0.94
52.5 4.59 0.26 0.94 4.35 0.37 0.92 3.06 0.45 0.85 525 1.13 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.11 0.86 1.22 0.07 0.94
57.5 4.67 0.25 0.95 4.41 0.38 0.92 3.23 0.46 0.86 575 1.02 0.00 1.00 0.72 0.10 0.86 1.14 0.07 0.94
63.1 4.68 0.24 0.95 4.42 0.38 0.91 3.37 0.47 0.86 631 0.86 0.00 1.00 0.63 0.09 0.86 1.09 0.07 0.93
69.2 4.61 0.22 0.95 4.36 0.38 0.91 3.50 0.46 0.87 692 0.71 0.00 1.00 0.53 0.08 0.85 1.04 0.08 0.93
75.9 4.47 0.20 0.95 4.25 0.38 0.91 3.58 0.45 0.87 759 0.53 0.00 1.00 0.43 0.07 0.85 1.01 0.08 0.92
83.2 4.28 0.19 0.96 4.11 0.37 0.91 3.64 0.44 0.88 832 0.25 0.00 1.00 0.33 0.05 0.84 0.98 0.08 0.92
91.2 4.02 0.17 0.96 3.92 0.37 0.91 3.68 0.42 0.89 912 0.12 0.00 1.00 0.22 0.04 0.82 0.93 0.09 0.91
100 3.74 0.16 0.96 3.72 0.36 0.90 3.71 0.39 0.89 1000 0.02 0.00 1.00 0.11 0.03 0.73 0.87 0.09 0.90
Max.
Grade efficiency Diff
Test Test Test Average Test Test Test
Size under
(um) 1 2 3 Test 2-3 1-2 2-3 1-3
14.454 0.28 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.47 0.01 0.47
15.849 0.64 0.84 0.79 0.81 0.20 0.05 0.15
17.378 0.75 0.87 0.81 0.84 0.12 0.06 0.06
19.055 0.81 0.89 0.82 0.85 0.07 0.07 0.00
20.893 0.85 0.90 0.82 0.86 0.05 0.07 0.03
22.909 0.87 0.90 0.83 0.87 0.03 0.08 0.05
25.119 0.89 0.91 0.83 0.87 0.02 0.08 0.06
27.542 0.90 0.91 0.83 0.87 0.01 0.08 0.07
30.200 0.91 0.91 0.83 0.87 0.00 0.08 0.08
Accuracy test for full range and ranged 15.849 33.113 0.92 0.92 0.84 0.88 0.00 0.08 0.08
36.308 0.93 0.92 0.84 0.88 0.01 0.08 0.09
onwards:
39.811 0.93 0.92 0.84 0.88 0.01 0.07 0.09
43.652 0.94 0.92 0.85 0.88 0.02 0.07 0.09
47.863 0.94 0.92 0.85 0.88 0.02 0.07 0.09
Test Test Test Accepted 52.481 0.94 0.92 0.85 0.88 0.03 0.06 0.09
1-2 2-3 1-3 Criteria 57.544 0.95 0.92 0.86 0.89 0.03 0.06 0.09
63.096 0.95 0.91 0.86 0.89 0.04 0.05 0.09
max diff (Full range) 0.46632 0.59556 0.47457 <20% 69.183 0.95 0.91 0.87 0.89 0.04 0.04 0.08
avg diff (Full range) 0.09604 0.08135 0.07581 <10% 75.858 0.95 0.91 0.87 0.89 0.04 0.04 0.08
83.176 0.96 0.91 0.88 0.89 0.05 0.03 0.08
max diff (15.849 91.201 0.96 0.91 0.89 0.90 0.05 0.02 0.07
onwards) 0.27362 0.17274 0.10089 <20% 100.000 0.96 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.05 0.01 0.06
109.648 0.96 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.06 0.00 0.06
avg diff (15.849 120.226 0.96 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.06 0.01 0.05
onwards) 0.07867 0.06424 0.05731 <10% 131.826 0.95 0.89 0.91 0.90 0.06 0.02 0.04
144.544 0.95 0.89 0.92 0.90 0.06 0.03 0.03
158.489 0.95 0.89 0.92 0.90 0.06 0.04 0.03
173.780 0.94 0.88 0.93 0.90 0.06 0.04 0.02
Test 2 and 3 conclusive for size range 15.849 micron onwards.
190.546 0.94 0.88 0.93 0.90 0.06 0.05 0.01
Test 1 and 3 conclusive for size range 15.849 micron onwards. 208.930 0.94 0.87 0.93 0.90 0.06 0.06 0.00
229.087 0.94 0.87 0.94 0.90 0.07 0.07 0.00
Test 1 and 2 not conclusive (size 15.849 onwards) 251.189 0.94 0.87 0.94 0.90 0.08 0.07 0.01
275.423 0.95 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.09 0.08 0.01
301.995 0.96 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.10 0.08 0.02
331.131 0.98 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.13 0.09 0.04
363.078 0.99 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.14 0.09 0.05
398.107 1.00 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.14 0.09 0.05
436.516 1.00 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.14 0.09 0.06
478.630 1.00 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.14 0.08 0.06
524.807 1.00 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.14 0.08 0.06
575.440 1.00 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.14 0.08 0.06
630.957 1.00 0.86 0.93 0.89 0.14 0.08 0.07
691.831 1.00 0.85 0.93 0.89 0.15 0.07 0.07
758.578 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.15 0.07 0.08
831.764 1.00 0.84 0.92 0.88 0.16 0.07 0.08
912.011 1.00 0.82 0.91 0.86 0.18 0.09 0.09
1000.000 1.00 0.73 0.90 0.81 0.27 0.17 0.10
Isokinetic sampling ratio
◦ Isokinetic ratio not within 90-110% are not
acceptable; test should be repeated
Sampling not simultaneous
◦ Site conditions could make coordination difficult
No visual/audible cues between the two teams (inlet
and outlet) due to obstacles, distance, noise
If sampling temporarily stopped by one team, the other
team may not be aware
Poor handling of dust samples
◦ Esp. during transferring of dust laden filter into
sealed container after finish sampling. Fine particles
could be loss due to spill;
affecting gravimetric and particle size analysis
Poor siting of sampling point
◦ Either at both inlet or/and outlet
Porthole too close to disturbances
MS1596 requires minimum 5 diameters from disturbance
Flow not steady state (turbulence)
Improper design of dust collector
◦ Dust collector not appropriately sized according to
emission conditions (P, T, gas compositions,
flowrate, moisture content)
Mismatch of operating and design capacity
◦ Source emitting more than what dust collector is
designed to accept
Too high dust load due
Higher moisture content
Non-steady state condition during sampling
◦ Source combustion not steady
Varying velocity and gas density in chimney/ducting,
affecting accuracy of MS1596 isokinetic sampling
Insufficient dust samples
◦ Not enough amount to determine particle size
distribution via laser diffraction
Dust loss from poor handling of filter/thimble
Prior arrangement with site operator
◦ Inform earlier on actual sampling date/time
◦ Site operator can plan ahead source emission
conditions for testing
Operation must be steady state
Minimize unplanned operating conditions
Sudden fuel type change
Sudden increase/decrease in load to prevent plant upset,
etc.
Competent isokinetic sampling teams
◦ Important to maintain the 90-110% isokinetic
percentage ratio
◦ Careful handling of thimble/filter after sampling (to
avoid spill/loss)
Competent coordinator
◦ Requires 1 person (not the test sampling team member)
◦ Skillfully coordinate both inlet and outlet team
sometime need to improvise accordingly to overcome site
conditions (heat, noise, weather, barriers)
◦ Can record real time flue gas data without need to
disrupt isokinetic teams
Competent designer
◦ Reputable contractor to design the dust collector to fit the
actual operating conditions
Not copy paste design based on principal manufacturer
template
Make sure the sampling porthole location suitable (minimum
5d from disturbance)
Awareness of MS1596 requirement is vital
◦ Plant engineer must give useful data
Wrong data given mismatch of operating & design para.