This document provides a rubric for evaluating essays submitted for an essay competition hosted by the EEF University of Majalengka in 2020. It outlines 5 aspects that will be assessed: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. Each aspect is assigned a point value and describes the criteria for scoring as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating essays submitted for an essay competition hosted by the EEF University of Majalengka in 2020. It outlines 5 aspects that will be assessed: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. Each aspect is assigned a point value and describes the criteria for scoring as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating essays submitted for an essay competition hosted by the EEF University of Majalengka in 2020. It outlines 5 aspects that will be assessed: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. Each aspect is assigned a point value and describes the criteria for scoring as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating essays submitted for an essay competition hosted by the EEF University of Majalengka in 2020. It outlines 5 aspects that will be assessed: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. Each aspect is assigned a point value and describes the criteria for scoring as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
Excellent Knowledgeable; relevant 1. Content 30-27 to Very to assigned topic; Good substantive Some knowledge of 26-22 subject; adequate range; Good to limited development Average thesis; mostly relevant to topic, but lacks of detail Limited knowledge of 21-17 Fair to subject; little substance; Poor inadequate development of topic Do not show knowledge of 16-13 Very subject; non-substantive; Poor not pertinent; or not enough to evaluate Ideas clearly 2. Organization 20-18 stated/supported; well- Excellent organized; fluent to Very expression; succinct; Good logical sequencing; cohesive Somewhat choppy; loosely 17-14 Good to organized but main ideas Average stand out; limited support; logical but incomplete sequencing Non-fluent; ideas confused 13-10 Fair to or disconnected; lacks Poor logical sequencing and development Does not communicate; no Very 9-7 organization; or not Poor enough to evaluate Effective word/idiom 3. Vocabulary 20-18 Excellent choices and usage; to Very sophisticated range; word Good from mastery; appropiate register Adequate range; 17-14 occasional errors of Good to word/idiom form, choice, Average usage but meaning not obscured Limited range; frequent 13-10 Fair to errors of word/idiom form, Poor choice, usage; meaning confused or obscured Essentially translation; 9-7 little knowledge of English Very vocabulary, idioms, word Poor form; or not enough to evaluate Effective complex 4. Language Use 25-22 constructions; few errors Excellent of agreement, tense, to Very number, word Good order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions Effective but simple 21-18 constructions; minor problems in complex constructions; several Good to errors of agreement, tense, Average number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscured Major problems in 17-11 simple/complex constructions; frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, Fair to word order/function, Poor articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments, run-ons, deletions; meaning confused or obscured Virtually no mastery of 10-5 sentence construction Very rules; dominated by errors; Poor does not communicate; or not enough to evaluate Demonstrates mastery of 5. Mechanics 5 Excellent conventions; few erros of to Very spelling, punctuation, Good capitalization, paragraphing Occasional errors of Good to 4 spelling, punctuation, Average capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured Frequent erros of spelling, 3 Fair to punctuation, capitalization, Poor paragraphing; meaning confused or obscured No mastery conventions; 2 dominated by errors of Very spelling, punctuation, Poor capitalization, paragraphing; or not enough to evaluate