Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Three Common Temperature Calibration Methods - Travis Porter, 2014-03-05
Three Common Temperature Calibration Methods - Travis Porter, 2014-03-05
Travis Porter
• 15 years with Fluke/Hart Scientific
– Currently: Inside Sales Account Manager
– Past: 10 years technical support – temperature, manufacturing
• travis.porter@flukecal.com
• Phone: 425.466.6351
Common Methods of Calibration
Agenda
Calibration of…
► Electronics with a simulator
► Electronics and sensor in a drywell
► Electronics and sensor in a drywell with a
reference thermometer
Component vs. System Calibration
Calibration Comparison
Pot 1 Pot 2
Calibration with a Simulator
Instrument
Sensor
Simulator
Temperature Simulators - Role
100 ºC
100 ºC
Steps
1. Set simulator to 0.0 ºC or 100.00 ohms
2. Record as-found reading
3. Set simulator to 100.0 ºC or 138.50 ohms
4. Record as-found reading
5. Set simulator to 0.0 ºC and adjust “pot 1” until meter reads 0.0 ºC
6. Set simulator to 100.0 ºC and adjust “pot 2” until meter reads 100.0 ºC
7. Repeat steps 5 and 6 and adjust pots again if necessary
8. After adjustments, repeat settings and record post-calibration results in
the calibration report
Traceability: Simulator Calibration
Pros:
Fast, the electrical settings are instant and
require no stabilization times
Calibration equipment may be more
portable
Meter can still be used with
interchangeable probes
Cons:
Requires a separate calibration procedure
for the probe or:
The probe remains uncalibrated.
Therefore, the thermometer system
remains uncalibrated and measurements
made with the instrument remain
untraceable
Calibration in a Drywell
Comparison
Heated Block
Insert
Instrument
Dry-Well’s Thermometer/Controller
Drywell
Process: Calibration in a Drywell
Steps
1. Place thermometer in 0.0 ºC drywell
2. After stabilization, record as-found reading
3. Place thermometer in 100.0 0.0 ºC drywell
4. After stabilization, record as-found reading
5. Set drywell to 0.0 ºC, adjust “pot 1” until meter
reads 0.0 ºC
6. Set drywell to 100.0 ºC, adjust “pot 2” until
meter reads 100.0 ºC.
7. Repeat steps 5 and 6 and adjust pots again if
necessary
8. After all adjustments, repeat settings and
record post-calibration results in the
calibration report
Traceability: Drywell Calibration
Pros:
Probe and meter are calibrated as a system
Actual temperature is used
Simple to set-up, a single instrument is used
Cons:
Accuracy is limited by the calibrated accuracy
of the drywell
If the probe does not reach the bottom of the
well, additional error can occur
UUT probes are not interchangeable after
calibration
Time required for drywell to change
temperatures
Calibration with a Reference Thermometer
Comparison
Probe
F
Sample
K
Comm Exit
Menu
Enter
1502 Your Sensor and
Readout
External Reference
Thermometer
Dry-Well’s Thermometer/Controller
Process: Calibration with a
Reference Thermometer
Steps
1. Set heat source (drywell) to 0.0 ºC
2. Insert calibrated reference thermometer and the Unit Under Test
3. After stabilization, record as-found readings of the UUT and the reference
4. Set heat source (drywell) to 100.0 ºC
5. Insert calibrated reference thermometer and the UUT
6. After stabilization, record as-found readings of the UUT and the reference
Process: Calibration with a
Reference Thermometer (continued)
Steps (continued)
7. Insert thermometers in 0.0 ºC and adjust “pot 1” until the reading of the
UUT matches the reading of the reference
8. Insert thermometers in 100.0 ºC and adjust “pot 2 “ until the reading of
the UUT matches the reading of the reference
9. Repeat steps 7 and 8 and adjust pots again if necessary
10. After all adjustments, repeat readings at both settings and record post-
calibration results in the calibration report
Pros/Cons: Calibration with a
Reference Thermometer
Pros:
The best accuracy results
Calibration is traceable to the separate reference
More versatility in matching UUT sizes
Cons:
More expensive
Two instruments are used, slightly more involved set-up
UUT probes are not interchangeable after calibration
Time required for drywell to change temperatures
Limited ranges
Component vs. System Calibration
Component Calibration:
Probe calibrated in conventional manner
Readout calibrated in conventional manner
Each has individual traceability
Probe and readout joined in use
System Calibration:
Probe connected (married) to readout
System compared to reference thermometer
Individual calibration not performed
Traceability applies to system calibration
Pros/Cons: Component Calibration
Pros:
Calibration is conventional
Uncertainties are easier to define
Uncertainties are more robust
Traceability is straightforward
Components are interchangeable
Cons:
More expensive
Data not in temperature units
Calibration results more difficult to interpret
Not always acceptable to auditors
Pros/Cons: System Calibration
Pros:
Less expensive
Data in temperature units
Calibration results simple to interpret
Auditors understand results
Mathematics can often overcome measurement errors
Cons:
Uncertainties difficult to define
Uncertainties lack robustness
Components not interchangeable
Future web seminars
Temperature Calibration seminars coming in
March and April:
• 1586A Temperature Scanner Introduction
• Infrared Temperature Calibration 101
• How to Set-up a Thermocouple Calibration System
• How to Calibrate an RTD (presented in Spanish)
Our seminar topics cover principles and practical tips about electrical,
flow, pressure, RF and temperature calibration
www.flukecal.com/signmeup