Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organizing Technical Activities
Organizing Technical Activities
Organizing Technical Activities
CHAPTER CONTENT
REASON OF ORGANIZING
ORGANIZING DEFINED
THE PURPOSE OF STRUCTURE
THE FORMAL ORGANIZATION
INFORMAL GROUP
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
TYPES OF AUTHORITY
THE PURPOSE OF COMMITEES
INTODUCTION
THE ENGINEER MANAGER NEEDS TO ACQUIRE VARIOUS SKILLS IN MANAGEMENT,
INCLUDING ORGANIZING TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES. IN THIS HIGHLY COMPETITIVE
ENVIRONMENT, THE UNSKILLED MANAGER WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BRING HIS UNIT
OR HIS COMPANY, AS THE CASE MAY BE, TO SUCESS
EVEN TODAY, SKILLS IN ORGANIZING CONTRIBUTE LARGERLY TO THE
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES OF MANY ORGANIZATION, WHETHER
THEY WERE PRIVATE BUSINESS OR OTHERWISE.
THE OPPORTUNITIES OFFERED BE SKILLFULL ORGANIZING ARE TOO IMPORTANT
FOR THE ENGINEER MANAGER TO IGNORE. THIS CHAPTER IS INTENDED TO
REASON OF ORGANIZING
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION IS WHERE EVERYONE IS ENGAGED INTO ONE FUNCTIONAL
ACTIVITY. FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES ARE VERY EFFECTIVE IN SMALLER FIRMS,
ESPECIALLY “SINGLE-BUSINESS FIRMS WHERE KEY ACTIVITIES REVOLVE AROUND WELL-
DEFINED SKILLS AND AREAS OF SPECIFICIALIZATIONS.”
ADVANTAGES
THE GROUPING OF EMPLOYEES WHO PERFORM A COMMON TASK PERMIT
ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND EFFICIENT RESOURCE USE.
THE STRUCTURE PROMOTES HIGH-QUALITY TECHNICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING.
SINCE THE CHAIN OF COMMAND CONVERGES AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANIZATION,
DECISION-MAKING IS CENTRALIZED, PROVIDING A UNIFIED DIRECTION FROM THE
TOP.
COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION AMONG EMPLOYEES WITHING EACH
DEPARTMENT ARE EXCELLENT.
THE ORGANIZATION IS PROVIDED WITH IN DEPTH SKILL SPECIALIZATION AND
DEVELOPMENT.
EMPLOYEES ARE PROVIDED WITH CAREER PROGRESS WITHIN FUNCTIONAL
DEPARTMENTS
DISADVANTAGES
COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENTS ARE OFTEN
POOR
DECISIONS INVOLVING MORE THAN ONE DEPARTMENT PILE UP AT THE TOP
MANAGEMENT LEVEL AND ARE OFTEN DELAYED.
WORK SPECIALIZATION AND DIVISION OF LABOR, WHICH ARE STRESSED IN A
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION, PRODUCE ROUTINE, NON MOTIVATING EMPLOYEE
TASKS.
ITS IS DIFFICULT TI IDENTIFY WHICH SECTION OR GROUP IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
CERTAIN PROBLEMS.
THERE IS LIMITED VIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS BY EMPLOYEES.
THERE IS LIMITED GENERAL MANAGEMENT TRAINING FOR EMPLOYEES.
DISADVANTAGES
HIGH POSSIBILITY OF DUPLICATION OF RESOURCES ACROSS DIVISIONS
LESS TECHNICAL DEPTH AND SPECIALIZATION IN DIVISIONS
POOR COORDINATION ACROSS DIVISIONS.
LESS TOP MANAGEMENT CONTROL
COMPETITION FOR CORPORATE RESOURCES.
MARKET ORGANIZATION
MATRIX ORGANIZATION IS WHERE AN EMPLOYEE REPORTS TO BOTH DIVISION MANAGER
AND PROJECT OR GROUP MANAGER. A MATRIX ORGANIZATION, ACCORDING TO THOMPSON AND
STRICKLAND, “IS A STRUCTURE WITH TWO (OR MORE) CHANNELS OF COMMAND, TWO LINES OF
BUDGET AUTHORITY, AND TWO SOURCES OF PERFORMANCE AND REWARD.” HIGGINGS
DECLARED, “THE MATRIC STRUCTURE WAS DESIGNED TO KEEP EMPLOYEES IN A CENTRAL POOL
AND TO ALLOCATE THEM TO VARIOUS PROJECTS IN THE FIRM ACCORDING TO THE LENGTH OF
TIME THEY WERE NEEDED.”
ADVANTAGES
MORE EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES THAT THE DIVISIONAL STRUCTURE.
FLEXIBILITY AND ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGING ENVIRONMENT.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH GENERAL AND FUNCTIONAL MANAGEMENT SKILLS
ARE PRESENT.
INTERDISCIPLINARY COOPERATION AND ANY EXPERTISE IS AVAILABLE TO ALL
DIVISIONS.
ENLARGED TASKS FOR EMPLOYEES WHICH MOTIVATE THEM BETTER
DISADVANTAGES
FRUSTRATION AND CONFUSION FROM DUAL CHAIN OF COMMAND.
HIGH CONFLICT BETWEEN DIVISIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL INTERESTS.
MANY MEETINGS AND MORE DISCUSSION THAT ACTION.
A NEED FOR HUMAN RELATIONS TRAINING FOR KEY EMPLOYEES AND MANAGERS.
TENDENCY FOR POWER DOMINANCE BY ONE SIDE OF THE MATRIX.