Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perspectives On The Indian Economy and The Financial Sector: Renny Thomas, Partner Mckinsey & Company October 2007
Perspectives On The Indian Economy and The Financial Sector: Renny Thomas, Partner Mckinsey & Company October 2007
This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be
circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client
organization without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company.
This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral
presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
CONTENTS
1
INDIA’s GDP HAS RISEN STEADILY SINCE THE 1950’s. . .
4.4%
279
3.4%
118
60
2
AS GROWTH HAS INCREASED VOLATILITY HAS DECREASED
Per cent
7
10-year
6 mean growth
2 10-year
volatility of
1 GDP growth
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
3
AND TRANSFORMED INDIA FROM AN AGRARIAN TO A
SERVICES-LED ECONOMY
Value added to GDP (Per cent)
India China
25.0
Services** 39.0 40.0
55.0
46.0
Industry* 24.0
50.0
27.0
Agriculture 37.0
29.0
18.0
10.0
1980 2006 1980 2005
* Industry includes Mining, Manufacturing, Electricity ,Gas & Water and Construction **Services includes Whole & retail Trade, Restaurants &
Hotels, Transportation & Communications, Finance, Insurance, Real Estate & Business Services and Community, Social & Personal Services
Source: Global Insight; Team Analysis
4
SEVERAL MEGA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS High Low
National Rural Employment 3.2 (2006-07) • Providing income security to the poor and
Guarantee Scheme* bridging the rural poverty gap
Integrated Child Development 0.9 (2006-07) • Improving the nutritional and health status of
Services* children in the age group of 0-6 years and
reducing the incidence of infant mortality
4 (2010) • Upgrading Delhi’s infrastructure in preparation
Commonwealth Games 2010 for games
* Government Flagship Programmes
Source: Economist; Press-articles; Government Budget Speech 2006-07; Analyst Reports; Team Analysis
5
CONTENTS
6
A GROWING WORKING AGE POPULATION WILL PROPEL
GROWTH TILL 2035 LATER THAN CHINA
Working age population (age 15-60)
Per cent of total population - Average no. of
people per
72% household in 2007
70%
66%
Brazil 4.0
64%
60%
Russia 2.8
58% G6
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
7
HOUSEHOLD INCOMES WILL ACCELERATE ACROSS INDIA
Average household disposable income
Compound annual
Thousand; Indian rupees; 2000 growth rates
1985-2005
2005-2025
400
All India
300 5.8%
4.6% 3.6%
100 3.6%
2.8%
0
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
8
THE SHAPE OF INDIA’s INCOME PYRAMID WILL CHANGE
DRAMATICALLY AS INCOMES GROW
Household income Number of Aggregate
brackets households consumption
Thousand, Indian Million Trillion, Indian rupees,
rupees, 2000 2000
• Middle class to
Globals (>1,000) 1.2 1.2 swell from just
Strivers (500–1,000) 2.4 1.0 under 50 million
2005
2025
Seekers (200–500) 94.9 24.6
Aspirers (90–200) 93.1 11.9
Deprived (<90) 49.9 2.4
Source: MGI India Consumer Demand Model, v1.0
9
CURRENT PLANS REVEAL ASPIRATIONS TO SPEND OVER
~US$585 BILLION DURING 2007-12 (1/2)
Expected
Area spend Key projects
US$ billion
• Six-laning of 6,500 kms and four-laning ~18,000
Roads 96 kms of corridors and highways
Power
(generation, • Additional generation capacity of ~70,000 MW
transmission, 177
(includes rural areas)
and distribution)
10
CURRENT PLANS REVEAL ASPIRATIONS TO SPEND OVER
~US$585 BILLION DURING 2007-12 (2/2)
Expected
Area spend Key projects
US$ billion • Growing subscriber base to 600 million, including
Communi- 200 million rural telephone connections
cation 77 • Providing broadband access to 20 million and 40
million internet connections
Total 585
Source: Planning commission;
11
A ROBUST AND HIGH-GROWTH PRIVATE SECTOR
CONTINUES TO BOOST CONFIDENCE LEVELS
The transformation Local corporates expanding overseas
Number of billion dollar companies Spurt in number of cross-border deals by Indian
companies
2006 2007*
175% 88 Deals # 163 143
increase 5 Value $23 bn $18 bn
9
Some success stories
• Incorporated in 1995, world's 5th
30 leading & Asia's leading manufacturer
of wind turbines
• Current sales of US$1.7 billion and
market cap of US$9.8 billion
12
INDIAN COMPANIES ARE AGGRESSIVELY ESTABLISHING
GLOBAL FOOTPRINT
Cross-border M&A by Indian companies
* Number of deals for calendar year 2000, and till Sep 2007
** Average deal size is based on deals for which the values has been disclosed
*** As on 13 September, 2007
Source: Dealogic; Team Analysis
13
SIMILARLY, MNCs ARE ACTIVELY SEEKING THE INDIA
OPPORTUNITY…
Acquisitions of Indian companies by MNCs
No. of
166 131 110 195 301 250 Break-up by sector
Deals*
27.442 Per cent of Total Deal Value, 2007^
Others
Services**
16
Telecom 35
4
Cons-
10
truction
10.969
13
Hi-Tech 22
5.748
3.030 2.268 2.502 Manufacturing***
Value
US$ billion
14
THERE ARE 7 MANTRAS FOR SUCCESS IN INDIA…
15
IN SUMMARY, INDIA IS ON COURSE TO BE AN ECONOMIC
SUPER POWER OF THE 21ST CENTURY
India – most rapid growth potential of the BRICs India – will contribute
Real GDP growth (Per cent) a giant share of the
incremental GDP growth
9 Fastest growing global of major world economies*
8 economy by 2012
7 Per cent 20.1
6 India
5 China
4 Brazil
3
2 5.0
Russia 2.1
1
0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2000 2020 2050
16
AND GROWTH IN INDIA IS AT AN INFLECTION POINT, SIMILAR
TO CHINA 15 YEARS AGO
Triggers behind growth
Real GDP growth PPP adjusted* inflection in India
US$ billion Inflection • Taxes: Laws simplified
8,000 scenario resulting in better
compliance and ease of
7,000 China tax payment
CAGR = 10.1% • Infrastructure: Increased
6,000 (1990-2005) investment in
5,000
infrastructure e.g., Ultra
Inflection in Conservative Mega Power Projects
4,000 China GDP growth • Liberalisation: FDI in key
estimates sectors like airports,
3,000 India NBFCs, Insurance,
1990-2005 electrical equipments,
2,000 CAGR = 5.98% telecommunications,
1992: India construction etc allowed
1,000 1978: China liberalizes
liberalizes
0 “Lead indicators”
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 of inflection
visible in India
* Base year: 2002
Source: Global Insight; Team Analysis
17
CONTENTS
18
THERE ARE CHALLENGES THAT COULD DETER GROWTH
Risks (in decreasing
order of likelihood) Description Mitigating factors
2. Socio - • Highly fragmented country • Few budgetary, fiscal and supply side
economic factors geographically measures announced by the Govt.
(moderate) • Risk of social unrest, resulting • Numbers below poverty line reducing
from increasing income divide
– urban and rural India
• Realization (in last election) that only
broad-based economic reform is
– rich states and poor states
sustainable
• Higher inflation
19
2. Socio-economic factors
INDIA IS A LARGE COUNTRY WITH HUGE Total land
963 17.8%
US
171 329 48.5%
846 7.09%
Brazil
60
161
998
Canada 4.6%
46
960
China 15.4%
148 Total Arable
land land
768
Australia 6%
46 Arable land in India is the
highest and almost as
1,710 much as that available in
Russia 7%
121 the US in absolute terms
20
1. Internal political complexities
THE BIGGEST RISK IS POLITICAL INDECISION WHICH COULD
PREVENT INDIA FROM CAPTURING ITS POTENTIAL
Reforms completed
• Lack of nationwide VAT coupled with Reforms pending
lower indirect taxes • Urban land ceiling act Reforms under
• Small scale reservations • Unclear land titles consideration/
• Poor regulation in power sector • Tenancy laws work under way
• High import duties • Low property taxes • Central PSUs
• FDI restrictions (e.g., retail) and low user charges • State PSUs
• Delicensing key sectors (e.g. coal, • Urban transportation including power
fertiliser, retail, mining, railways) infra-structure • Municipal services
21
2. Socio-economic factors
22
2. Socio-economic factors
INCREASING INCOME DIVIDE COULD LEAD TO RISK OF
SOCIAL UNREST
Urban income is 2.3X rural. . . . . .and income of rich states is 2.2X that of poor states
Rs. ‘000, 2006 prices Rs. ‘000, current prices
49.8
+2.3X
21.7 28.5
+2.2X
12.9
Urban average* Rural average* Per capita income Per capita income
per capita income per capita income average* of rich average* of poor
states# states#
* Average over 2002-2005 # Rich states are ones having higher per capita income than the All-India average, poor states are all others
Source: Market Skyline 2006 – Indicus Analytics; Global Insight; CSO; Team Analysis
23
CONTENTS
24
KEY MESSAGES
25
KEY MESSAGES
26
INDIA’s FINANCIAL DEPTH HAS GROWN RAPIDLY Equity
Corporate debt
SINCE 2001 Government debt
Bank deposits
Financial depth
Financial stock as a percent of GDP CAGR1
Per cent
1994- 2001-
CAGR 2001 2006
14.1% 195
No 172
deepening 160
146 -7.5 31.5
89
56 70
122 5.9 33.9
98 116 110 47
106 95 108
2 2 26 2 5.2 6.5
93 94 1 3 5
41 32 23 1
39 31 25 1 30 33 34 34 36
34 30 2 1
2 2 24 27
2 20 22
19 20 17
18
3.2 2.1
57 64 65 68 66 64
46 44 44 48 51 53
40
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Note: Umbers may not add due to rounding
1 Compound annual growth rate
Source: McKinsey Global Institute Global Financial Stock Database; team analysis
27
BANKING SECTOR HAS BEEN AT THE CORE OF FINANCIAL
SECTOR GROWTH AND HAS CREATED SIGNIFICANT WEALTH
FOR INVESTORS
Contribution to economy of banking
sector has improved over the years Indian banks have outperformed share indices in last few years
Per cent New Private
TRS CAGR Jan 01 – Oct 07
~3.5 PSU Banks
Banking
Indian
1 value add Indian Market: 29.63%
1.6 Banking
to GDP 1400
Bank index: 40.54% Old Private
Old Private: 38.92% Indian
1994 2007 1200 Market
New Private: 44.17%
Rs billion
1000 Public Sector Banks: 42.67%
16.7
26,237
2 Deposits 800
3,500
600
1994 2007
400
Rs billion
3 Advances
0
Jan-01
Jul-01
Jan-02
Jul-02
Jan-03
Jul-03
Jan-04
Jul-04
Jan-05
Jul-05
Jan-06
Jul-06
Jan-07
Jul-07
1,700
1994 2007
Sources: RBI; national income statistics; Datastream; team analysis
28
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF INDIAN BANKING SECTOR IS
AMONG THE BEST IN THE REGION
Per cent, FY 2006
Asset quality Profitability
NPL/GDP NPL/Net loans Pretax ROA Pretax ROE
Weak
29
OTHER FINANCIAL MARKETS HAVE BEEN ON AN
ACCELERATED GROWTH TRAJECTORY OVER PAST FEW
YEARS
Life insurance Equity Mutual Fund
New business premium Market capitalization; $ bn AUM; $ bn
(APE)*; $ bn
9.9 816 75
+295%
+519% +677%
19
1.6 105
30
HOWEVER, JUST 3-4 YEARS OF HIGH ECONOMIC GROWTH
SEEMS TO HAVE LED TO A SITUATION OF TIGHT LIQUIDITY
AND RISING INTEREST RATES
Rapid credit expansion in past few years… … resulting in tightening liquidity..
Outstanding advances; US$ billion Credit/deposits ratio; Per cent
72 75
448 59 55 61
+30%
341
Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar
’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07
252
… and rising interest rates
196
10 year G Sec rates; Per cent
157
Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar
’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07
Source: RBI; Bloomberg; McKinsey analysis
31
KEY MESSAGES
32
OVERALL FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING FINANCIAL SYSTEM
IN INDIA
1 3 2
Informal finance
4
1 Supply of funds from savers 3 Efficiency of each market
2 Allocation of funds to borrowers 4 Regulatory environment
33
BUT INDIA’s FINANCIAL DEPTH IS LOW Government debt
Bank deposits
COMPARED TO OTHER ASIAN NATIONS Equity
Private debt
Financial depth, 2006
Financial assets as a percent of GDP
504
427
369
104 281
155 45
243 254
209 220
195 92 145
43 51
65 119 78
138 89 14 13 43
22 10 60
70 5 37 42
36 150 56 32
6 134 129
24 85 94
64 58 70
39
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding*Japan number is for 2005
Source: McKinsey Global Institute Global Financial Stock Database; McKinsey analysis
34
THIS IS DESPITE INDIA’S HOUSEHOLDS BEING AMONGST
THE HIGHEST SAVERS IN THE WORLD
Household savings as a share of gross national savings rates, 2005
Per cent
69
55
44
37
24
20
16
35
LARGE PROPORTION OF HOUSEHOLD SAVINGS NOT
ACCESSIBLE TO FINANCIAL SYSTEM
Distribution of household savings by asset type
$ billion, per cent
100% = 66 96 132
Machinery and 13
equipment 19 18
Construction 28
32 35
Financial assets 59
50 47
36
GOLD CONTINUES TO BE USED AS A SAVINGS VEHICLE
DESPITE NEGATIVE RETURNS SINCE 1990
Index, adjusted for inflation
Gold was an attractive investment in the . . . but has offered negative real returns
1970s and 1980s . . . in recent years
450 160
400 140 Bank
Gold
350 deposits
120
300
100
250
80
200
60 Gold
150 Bank
100 deposits 40
50 20
0 0
1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000
Source: Press Trust of India; Bombay Bullion Association; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
37
ACCESS TO QUALITY BANKING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES IN
INDIA IS LIMITED
Access to banking products is significantly
lower in India . . . . . . and is limited to large cities
2006; per cent 2006; per cent
Card
ATM penetration penetration*
Per million people Per cent of 100% = 70,776 20,911 15,138 Rs bn
population
Metro centers 17
Australia 1,240 199
Top 100
Korea 755 362 17.9
centers 54.1
Singapore 477 335 excluding 65.4
metro centers
Thailand 330 76
Poland 261 63
* Includes both debit and credit cards; ** India Data as on March 2006 ; Mexico only credit cards
Source: Febraban; IBGE; Brazilian Central Bank; FSS; BOK; Bank of Thailand (BOT); NESDB; National Banking and Securities Commission;
Bank of Mexico; China Unionpay; Lit search; RBI; Venture Infotek
38
INDIA’s GOVERNMENT CONSUMES 70 PERCENT OF NET
SAVINGS INJECTED INTO THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM
Net contributions to the financial system1
Per cent of GDP, average FY 1995-2005 ESTIMATED
Household net
contributions 9.0
to the financial system2
Foreign capital
1.2
inflows
Private sector
3.2
borrowing
Public sector
7.0
borrowing
39
MORE THAN 80 PERCENT OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES ARE
HELD BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
HOLD THEM
Ownership of central government securities
100% = $ 306 billion, FY 20071
Financial institutions required to hold
Public sector banks 45.5 government securities
• Statutory liquidity ratio requires banks
to hold 25% of assets in government
Other banks 9.0 securities; actual holdings are higher
• Life insurance companies must hold
Insurance companies 25.0 50% of their assets in government or
other approved securities; additional
Employee provident 15% must be invested in infrastructure
6.0 and social sectors
fund organization
• Provident regulations cause 90% of
Total regulated
85.5 assets to be held in government
holdings securities
RBI own account 8.0
Other 6.5
Total 100.0
40
INDIAN BANKS HAVE RELATIVELY A HIGH PORTION OF
ASSETS IN GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
Asset breakdown of banks
Per cent, 2006
Fixed/other assets 5 8 2
12 10 13
Other securities 16 16
and cash 18 18 25 0
18
Government 25 0.8
16 15 12
securities
81
68
54 54 57 57
Loans
41
MORE THAN HALF OF COMMERCIAL CREDIT GOES Priority sector
Public sector
TO SECTORS WITH LOW INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY Private corporate
sector
100% = 211
1 Gross bank credit to non-financial companies, corporate bonds and private placements, and loans and investments from the government to public
sector enterprises.
2 The incremental capital output ratio is defined as the sum of gross investment divided by the total change in GDP over the period.
Source: CSO; RBI; Public Enterprise Survey; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
42
PRIORITY SECTOR ACCOUNTS FOR NEARLY A THIRD OF
TOTAL LENDING, LIMITING ACCESS TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR
Distribution of gross bank credit outstanding1
$ billion, per cent Priority sector
lending
100% = 87 323
Other 4 6
4
Mortgages 8 13
Consumer credit 9
12
Other priority sectors2 12
Agriculture 16
14
Small scale industry
14
Medium and large 7
enterprises
48
and other private
sector3
32
FY 2000 FY 2007
1 Excludes public food procurement credit
2 Small businesses determined by either amount of capital, sales, or employees. Now includes small loans to software industry and
investment in venture capital funds registered with SEBI.
3 Includes wholesale trade, tourism, and non-bank financial companies.
Source: RBI; CSO; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
43
PRIORITY SECTOR LOAN DEFAULT RATE IS ~40 PERCENT
HIGHER THAN THE NON-PRIORITY SECTOR
Nonperforming assets relative to gross bank credit outstanding
Per cent, FY 2007
Agriculture 3.5
Small scale
8.3
industry
Other priority
4.6
sectors1
Priority
4.9
sector total
Non-priority 1.8x
2.7
sector total2
1 Small businesses determined by either amount of capital, sales or employees. Now includes small loans to software industry and
investment in venture capital funds registered with SEBI.
2 Includes non-priority sector commercial credit, mortgages, consumer loans, and other.
Source: RBI; CSO; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
44
SMALL CORPORATE BOND MARKET LIMITS ACCESS TO
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES
Corporate bonds
Per cent of GDP, 20051
143
102
85
74
64
48 45
39
28 27
21 15 13 10 8
3 2 1
United Kingdom
United States
Czech Republic
Korea, Rep.
Japan
Poland
Philippines
India
Canada
Chile
South Africa
China
Brazil
Singapore
Thailand
Germany
Malaysia
Turkey
1 India as of March, 2005; If bonds issued by development banks were included, China’s corporate bond market would be 11% of GDP
Source: McKinsey Global Institute Global Financial Stock Database
45
INDIAN COMPANIES HAVE VERY LOW LEVELS Corporate bonds
Corporate bank loans
OF DEBT
Corporate borrowing Corporate borrowing
Per cent of GDP, 1999 Per cent of GDP, 2004
United
22 117 139 31 143 174
States
Chile 48 23 71 51 31 82
2 2
India1 13 14 16 17
46
INDIAN FIRMS RELY HEAVILY ON RETAINED EARNINGS
Sources of funds raised
$ billion; percent, 2000–051
100% = 204 1,916 40 562 89 91 100 393
Equity 2 2 3 3 4 6 6
10
Debt 20 26
34 39
35 40
47 52
Internal
78 72
funds
63 59 55 55
47 42
1 Based on sample of 160 companies per country outside of United States. Companies were ranked by gross sales, and 40 companies from
each quartile were taken as the sample. US sample includes all listed companies with revenues exceeding $500 million, 1995 to 2004.
Source: Bloomberg; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
47
~ 55% OF EQUITY SHARES ARE HELD BY CORPORATE
INSIDERS
Shareholding of NSE equity listings
Per cent, December 2006 Institutional Investors
100
3
6
11
5
6
54 14
48
KEY MESSAGES
49
INCREASING FINANCIAL DEPTH IS A KEY Financial system
problems
IMPERATIVE FOR THE FINANCIAL SECTOR Key outcomes
Suboptimal
distribution of
capital in the Root causes:
economy
• Cumbersome
Root causes: issuance
Low lending procedures
• Lack of rates and Very small • Lack of investor
competition in conservative corporate bond demand
banking and approach in market
high state banking • Poor bankruptcy
ownership procedures and
• Statutory lack of creditor
liquidity ratio and rights
directed lending Underdeveloped
Underdeveloped Root causes:
policies domestic
consumer
finance market
institutional • Restrictions on
investors asset holdings
• Government
Limited ownership of
household intermediaries
participation in • Above-market
capital markets deposit accounts
Source: McKinsey Global Institute analysis
50
DOMESTIC INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ARE
UNDERDEVELOPED IN INDIA
Total assets as percent of GDP, 2005
Registered
Life insurance pensions Mutual funds
51
A PHASED APPROACH HAS TO BE ADOPTED FOR A
TRANSFORMATION OF THE INDIAN BANKING SECTOR
Move towards freer
Apply competitive pressure 3
Build infrastructure and 2 to local banks
structure
1 capabilities
• Ease capital restrictions • Encourage market driven • Create 3-4 global sized
Industry • Provide more operational consolidation institutions, 6-8 national
structure freedom to public sector banks champions
• Develop blue print for sector • Reduce government
participation in the sector
• Allow greater access to foreign
banks
• Offer market based incentives • Remove directed lending and
Social for under-penetrated segments branch restrictions
development
• Remove regulatory arbitrage • Move to a coordinated regulator • Separate central bank and
Unified regulator across different entities model regulator roles
• Effectively implement
Corporate principles of good corporate
governance governance
52
FINANCIAL SYSTEM REFORMS ARE WORTH US$48 BILLION
ANNUALLY
Direct impact of financial system reform Indirect impact
US$ billion, FY 2005
21.8 25.5
2.3
0.3
5.1 Improved
allocation 18.9
6.3 of capital
7.8
Capturing
more
savings 6.6
Percent
1.1 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.3 3.2 3.5
of GDP
53
MORE EFFICIENT INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL MARKET
REFORMS CAN BOOST INDIA’S GROWTH RATE TO 9.4
PERCENT
Real GDP CAGR1
US$ billion 2000, fiscal year 2005–2015
1,600
Baseline 2015 per capita
1,400 Efficient investment and
9.4% income: US$
financial market reform 1,203
1,200
2015 per capita
6.5% income: US$
1,000
919
800
600
400
CAGR1
200 1995–2005
5.9%
0
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
1 Compound annual growth rate.
Source: CSO; RBI; Oxford Economics; McKinsey Global Institute analysis
54