TEST - 60MM FIFA2 BEKA DUOFILAMENT-310m

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

FIFA
LABORATORY
TEST REPORT
Manual 2012

Product name BEKA DUOFILAMENT

FIFA Licensee Nurteks Hali San.ve Tic. A.S.

FIFA accredited Test Institute Labosport Italia S.r.l.

Laboratory Test report number 16-0453IT

Date of test 27.05.2016


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report

1 – Introduction / Process Overview 3

2 – Test Object, Participants 4


2.1 Test numbers
2.2 Test Object, Product name, Identification codes
2.3 Parties involved, Addresses (turf manufacturer, test institute, certifying body)

3 – Test Conclusion, Product Approval 4

4 – Product Information / Specifications 5


4.1 Overview – a typical product composition
4.2 Artificial turf
4.3 Performance infill
4.4 Stabilising infill
4.5 Shockpad / elastic layer (where applicable)
4.6 Maintenance requirements

5 – Detailed Laboratory Test Results 10


5.1 Overview – ball and player to surface interactions
5.2 Product identification
5.3 Ball / surface interaction
5.4 Player / surface interaction
5.5 Environmental resistance (artificial, light, water)
5.6 Miscellaneous
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures
5.7.1 DSC (Differential Scanning Colorimetry) scans of pile yarn
5.7.2 a) Performance infill particle grading curve
5.7.2.b) Stabilising infill particle grading curve
5.7.3 TGA of performance infill
5.7.4 Unbound sub-base Composition
5.7.5 Simulated wear, photos before / after

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 2 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


1 – Introduction / The Process of certification
In order to be certified, football turf fields must reach the performance and quality criteria established to be as close as
possible to playing characteristics of natural grass. To this end, each field must undergo four steps as outlined below:
• a thorough composition and resilience test of the product in the laboratory (step 1)
• the installation of the product as declared, applying the outlined procedures (step 2)
• a test of the final installation for the relevant characteristics of the field as a whole system (step 3)
• if successful, certification as FIFA QUALITY or FIFA QUALITY PRO field (step 4)
After expiration of the certificate, the field can be retested (step 3/4)

Fig. 1.2 Approval process steps and the related documents / parties

Legend:

This process is part of the FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf in order to
• replicate the playing qualities of good quality natural grass,
• create a playing environment that does not increase the risk of injury to players
• achieve adequate durability (providing it is properly maintained)
For more details on FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf see http://www.fifa.com/quality.

This document covers the complete step 1, FIFA LABORATORY TESTS REPORT. Consider:
• Tests are performed on a representative sample of the manufacturer’s sample delivered to the FIFA accredited test
institutes
• The test report is only valid if reproduced in its entirety
• The results are only valid for the complete Football Turf (related product) as stated in 2.1
• The related product is eligible for undergoing a field test on a final installation.

IMPORTANT:
To reach FIFA Recommended QUALITY PRO (QUALITY) field certification, as next steps
• the installation has to comply with the related Product Declaration / Method Statement (step 2)
• a successfully passed subsequent FIELD TEST (step 3/4)

This FIFA LABORATORY TEST REPORT may only be used in relationship to Football Turf fields that are going to be submitted for
certification under the FIFA Quality Programme of Football Turf. Any other use of this report is a violation of the report’s copy
right which is held by FIFA and breaches the terms of the FIFA Quality Programme of Football Turf licensing agreement.

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 3 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


2 – Test Object, Participants
2.1 Test Numbers

Report Laboratory Test report number 16-0453IT


Identification Test Institute Project number 16-0453IT

2.2 Test Objects

Product Name BEKA DUOFILAMENT

Product Identification code


Name
BEKA DUOFILAMENT
of the synthetic turf system
Performance infill SBR

Stabilising infill SILICA SAND


Shock-pad or elastic layer
FELT
(if applicable)
Sub-base composition Rigid engineered Base

2.3 Participants, Addresses

Applicant
• FIFA preferred producer Name Nurteks Hali San.ve Tic. A.S.
• Licensee
Address Nurteks Hali San.ve Tic. A.S., ISTANBUL

Contact Phone + 90 212 511 1986 email ecengiz@nurteks.com.tr.

Name Labosport Italia S.r.l.


Labosport Italia S.r.l., CERNUSCO LOMBARDONE
Address

FIFA accredited
Contact Phone +390398962684 email roberto.armeni@labosport.it
Test Institute

3 – Test Conclusion, Product Approval


The presented Football Turf surface satisfies the FIFA LABORATORY TEST requirements of

FIFA QUALITY Passed «passed» or «failed»

FIFA QUALITY PRO Passed «passed» or «failed»


IMPORTANT: A successfully passed test of the final installation (FIFA FIELD TEST)
is mandatory to obtain FIFA QUALITY / QUALITY PRO Certification!

Name Roberto Armeni


Report Position Laboratory Director
originated
by Date 27.05.2016

Name Roberto Armeni


Report Position Laboratory Director
approved
by Date 27.05.2016

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 4 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report

4 – Product Information / Specifications

4.1 Overview – a typical product composition


The basic structure and composition of artificial turf varies. To reach the goal of defined quality and specific functional
performances, a set of the relevant parameters for the products / materials used was defined.
Materials / products typically used are as follows:

Fig. 1.3 Products / materials used to build up artificial turf

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 5 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


4 – Product Information / Specifications

4.2 Artificial turf (1/2)

Manufacturer NURTEKS HALI SAN. TIC. AS

Tuft pattern STRAIGHT

Standard
Pile yarns Yarn A Yarn B Yarn C
Test
Method

Yarn Manufacturer Gulsan Holding Gulsan Holding

Product name, code Sports 1300 Sports 1300

Pile yarn profile Spine Spine



Pile thickness
310 (spine) micron 310 (spine) micron
[ȣm] –

1 Pine Green (6002) Pacific Green (6025)



Pile colour
2
[RAL] –

3

Pile width [mm] 1,4mm 1,4mm



No of tufts/m 2 8250 8250
ISO1773
Pile length [mm] 60mm 60mm
ISO 2549
Pile weight [g/m ] 2 1300 g/m² 1300 g/m²
ISO 8543
Pile yarn PE
PE
characterization –

Pile yarn dtex 12000/6 12000/6


Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 6 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


4 – Product Information / Specifications

4.2 Artificial turf (2/2)

Product name / code H18


Primary
backing
Manufacturer Tencate

Product name / code -


Re- enforcement scrim
Manufacturer -
Product name / code SBR latex
Secondary Manufacturer Styron
backing
Dry application rate [g/m2] 1100g/m2
Minimum tuft
>30
withdrawal force [N]
Carpet
Carpet mass
2750
per unit area [g/m2]
Method of jointing
Adhesive brand name Henkel R710 / Tatmut T333
Adhesive manufacturer HENKEL - TATMUT
Bonded joints
Application rate [g/lm] 200g/lm
Jointing film brand name Helmetin
Jointing film manufacturer Serta Tekstil
Tread brand name/product code -
Stitched seams
Tread manufacturer -
Stitch rate [stitch per lm] -

4.3 Performance infill

Specifications Standard
Test
Product name / code Black SBR Method

Manufacturer Soysal Kaucuk, Kahya Kaucuk

Material type SBR

Material grading 0.5-3.0

Particle shape Angular medium sphericity - A2 prEN 14955

Particle size range 0.5-3.0 EN 933-Part 1

Bulk density [g/cm3] 0.55 g/cm3 EN 1097-3

Application rate [kg/m2] 16.5kg/m2

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 7 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


4 – Product Information / Specifications

4.4 Stabilising infill

Specifications Standard
Test
Product name / code Silica Method

Manufacturer Siltas, Emek and Fares Kum

Material type Siliceous sand

Material grading 0.2-1.0

Particle shape Round High Sphericity - C1 prEN 14955

Particle size [range] 0.2-1.0 EN 933-Part 1

Bulk density [g/cm3] 1.5 g/cm3 EN 1097-3

Application rate [kg/m2] 15 kg/m2

4.5 Shockpad / elastic layer*

Standard
Specifications Test
Product name / code FELT Method

Manufacturer Sar‘k‘l‘ç

Type Fabric

Composition** Textile

Bulk density [g/cm3] -

Thickness 1.5mm EN 1979

Shock absorption [%] - FIFA 4a

Deformation - FIFA 5a

Tensile strength [N] -


Mass per unit area
[kg/m2] 0.15kg/m2

* if part of system supplied


** type, rubber granule grading, binder content, etc

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 8 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


4 – Product Information / Specification

4.6 Maintenance requirements (recommendations)

Equipment / material Remarks


Purpose - the power unit that pulls the maintenance tools over the
Tractor Unit
field
A maintenance attachment that re-distributes the infill and brings
Brush
the fibres into a more upright position
Drag
Mat
A maintenance tool used to re-distribute infill
A testing device used to assess the speed of a football over the
Ball roll ramp
surface

Is used to record all the maintenance activities that take place on the
Maintenance logbook
Football Turf Surface

Top up infill materials


to top up penalty spot and corner areas

For further maintenance requirements, please consult the



manufacturer’s recommendations for your specific system

FIFA Licensee’s comments / hints

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 9 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Laboratory Test Results
5.1 Overview – ball and player to surface interactions

How is the field to play? By means of the following 8 parameters, this question can be answered very well.
Furthermore, some values allow conclusions regarding maintenance in order to keep the field in top shape.

Parameter Comments / hints Parameter Comments / hints

1- Vertical 5- Shock
ball rebound absorption Shock absorbency is an indicatio
of how hard the field feels to th
player. A value that is too lo
indicates a hard field and caus
T
The higher the value the damage to player’s joints too so
higher the ball will rebound. and the surface is energy sappin
TThe ball should not bounce resulting in increases in fatigue an
ttoo high or too low. over-use injuries.
Ball / surface interaction Player / surface interaction

2- Angled
ball rebound A
Angled ball rebound is a 6- Deformation
combination of the hardness
of the field and the resistance
ffrom the fibres to the ball and A surface that deforms too
tthus a high reading can come much will result in
ffrom a hard surface, or a low overstretching of ligaments
grip surface or a combination particularly the around the
of both ankle.
Ball / surface interaction Player / surface interaction

7.1- Linear friction


3- Ball roll Stud decelerat. value

If when stopping, the player’s


ankle is subject to too high a
T
The higher the value the deceleration, damage to the
ffaster the ball will run over ankle can occur. Therefore too
tthe surface. The ball should high a value will result in an
not be too fast or too slow. increased risk to ankle injuries.
Ball / surface interaction Player / surface interaction

4- Rotational 7.2- Linear friction A player needs to accelerate


resistance T
This simulates the player’s Stud slide value and decelerate rapidly. To
ability to alter direction, too achieve this effect the player
high a value and stress can needs to obtain grip from the
occur across knee ligaments, surface. Too high a grip will
ttoo low and the player will lead to injury too low a grip will
not be able to grip the surface result in the boot slipping in the
and may slip causing ligament surface and the player cannot
damage. accelerate or decelerate safely.
Player / surface interaction Player / surface interaction

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 10 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.2 Product identification

Property Test result


Carpet mass per unit area [g/m2] 2919
Tufts per unit area [m2] 8125
Pile length above backing [mm] 60
Artificial Turf Pile weight [g/m2] 1214
Water permeability of carpet [mm/h] 1426

Yarn cross section and thickness 300

Particle size range 0.5-2.5


Particle shape A2
Performance infill Bulk density [g/cm3] 0.48

Thermographic % organic 57.4


analysis % inorganic 42.6

Particle size range 02.-1.0


Stabilising infill Particle shape C1
Bulk density [g/cm ] 3 1.53

Shock absorption [%] 11%


Shockpad /
Deformation 1.2mm
elastic layer
(if part of system supplied)
Thickness 4.4mm

5.3 Ball / surface interaction

FIFA Approval P = passed


requirements F = failed
Quality Quality Quality
Property Condition Test Results Quality Pro
Pro

Dry 0.69 Passed Passed


Initial,
0.6 –1m
un-aged 0.6-0.85
Wet 0.66 Passed Passed
Vertical m
ball rebound
After 5’200 cycles
simulated
wear 20’200 cycles 0.82 0.6 – 1m Passed Passed

Dry 58 Passed Passed


Angled
45 – 80% 45 – 80%
ball rebound
Wet 76 Passed Passed

Dry 7.4 Passed Passed


Ball roll 4 – 10m 4 – 8m
Wet 7.8 Passed Passed

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 11 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.4 Player / surface interaction

FIFA Approval P = passed


requirements F = failed
Quality
Property Condition
Test Quality Quality Quality
Results Pro Pro

Dry 64 Passed Passed


Initial,
55 – 70%
Un-aged 63 60 – 70%
Wet Passed Passed

5’200
After cycles
Shock
simulated
absorption
wear 20’200 60 Passed Passed
cycles

64 55 – 70% Passed Passed


40qC
60 – 70%
– 5qC(1) 66 Passed Passed

Dry 8.0 Passed Passed


Initial 4 – 11mm
Wet 8.0 4– Passed Passed
10mm
Deformation 5’200
After cycles
simulated
wear 20’200 6.5 4 – 11mm Passed Passed
cycles

Dry 34 Passed Passed


Initial 25–50Nm
Wet 32 Passed Passed
30–45Nm
Rotational
resistance 5’200
After cycles
simulated
wear 20’200 40 25–50Nm Passed Passed
cycles

Stud Dry 4.2 Passed Passed


3.0 –
deceleration 3.0 – 7.0g
4.1 5.5g
value Wet Passed Passed
Linear friction
Dry 190 Passed Passed
Stud slide 130 –
120 – 220
value 185 210
Wet Passed Passed
Skin / surface 0.68 0.35 – 0.35 –
Dry Passed Passed
friction 0.75 ų 0.75 ų
24 + 30 % + 30 % Passed Passed
Skin abrasion Dry

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 12 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results

5.5 Environmental impact (artificial, light, water)

FIFA Requirements
P= passed F= failed

Property Aspect Condition Test result P/F

1 Light 4 Passed

Colour change 2 dark 4 > Grey scale 3 Passed

3
Pile yarns
1 After artificial Light -5%
weathering
Yarn tensile
strength 2 Dark -9% Change < 50% Passed

Colour change 4-5 > Grey scale 3 Passed


Polymeric infill
Visual change in
No change No change Passed
composition

Complete
Water permeability N/A 1289 >180 mm/h Passed
system

Un-aged
Stitched joints Strength > 1000N/100mm
Water aged

Un-aged 96 Passed
Bonded joints Strength > 25N/100mm
Water aged 42 Passed

Un-aged 49 Passed
Carpet tuft Withdrawal force > 30N
Water aged 36 Passed

5.6 Miscellaneous

Shockpad
Tensile strength Un-aged 0.49 > 0.15 MPa Passed
Elastic layer

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 13 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results

5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.1 DSC (Differential Scanning Colorimetry) scans of pile yarn


5.7.2 Performance infill particle grading curve / Stabilising infill particle grading curve
5.7.3 TGA (Thermo Gravimetric Analysis) of performance infill
5.7.4 Composition of unbound sub-base (if tested as part of system) Sub-base particle grading curve
5.7.5 Simulated wear, photos before / after

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 14 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.1 DSC Differential Scanning Colorimetry scans of pile yarn

Comments:

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 15 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.2 a) Performance infill particle grading curve

5.7.2 b) Stabilising infill particle grading curve

Comments:

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 16 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.3 TGA of performance infill

Comments:

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 17 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.4 Sub base (if tested as part of system)

Composition

Particle size range

Particle shape

Thickness

Compaction & test method

Sub-base particle grading curve

Comments:

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 18 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.5 Simulated wear (photos before / after wear) Page: 1

Before wear After wear

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 19 / 20


FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf

Football Turf Laboratory Test Report


5 – Detailed Test Results
5.7 Explanatory graphs / pictures

5.7.5 Simulated wear (photos before / after wear) Page: 2

Before wear After wear

Manual 2012 REPORT – No. 16-0453IT Date: 27.05.2016 20 / 20

You might also like