Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Radio Propagation –
Large-Scale Path Loss
reflection
Reflected Wave
l Scattering
l Occurs when the radio channel contains objects whose sizes are
on the order of the wavelength or less of the propagating wave
and also when the number of obstacles are quite large.
l They are produced by small objects, rough surfaces and other
irregularities on the channel
l Follows same principles with diffraction
l Causes the transmitter energy to be radiated in many directions
l Lamp posts and street signs may cause scattering
Three Radio Propagation
Mechanisms
transmitter R
Street
S
D
D
R: Reflection receiver
D: Diffraction Building Blocks
S: Scattering
Three Radio Propagation
Mechanisms
l As a mobile moves through a coverage area,
these 3 mechanisms have an impact on the
instantaneous received signal strength.
l If a mobile does have a clear line of sight path to the
base-station, than diffraction and scattering will not
dominate the propagation.
l If a mobile is at a street level without LOS, then
diffraction and scattering will probably dominate the
propagation.
Radio Propagation Models
l As the mobile moves over small distances,
the instantaneous received signal will
fluctuate rapidly giving rise to small-scale
fading
§ The reason is that the signal is the sum of many
contributors coming from different directions and since the
phases of these signals are random, the sum behave like a
noise (Rayleigh fading).
§ In small scale fading, the received signal power may
change as much as 3 or 4 orders of magnitude (30dB or
40dB), when the receiver is only moved a fraction of the
wavelength.
Radio Propagation Models
l As the mobile moves away from the transmitter over
larger distances, the local average received signal
will gradually decrease. This is called large-scale
path loss.
l Typically the local average received power is computed by
averaging signal measurements over a measurement track
of 5λ to 40λ. (For PCS, this means 1m-10m track)
l The models that predict the mean signal strength for
an arbitrary-receiver transmitter (T-R) separation
distance are called large-scale propagation models
l Useful for estimating the coverage area of transmitters
Small-Scale and Large-Scale
Fading
Received Power (dBm)
-30
-40
-50
-60
This figure is just an illustration
to show the concept. It is not based on read
data.
-70
14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
T-R Separation (meters)
Free-Space Propagation Model
l Used to predict the received signal strength
when transmitter and receiver have clear,
unobstructed LOS path between them.
l The received power decays as a function of
T-R separation distance raised to some
power.
l Path Loss: Signal attenuation as a positive
quantity measured in dB and defined as the
difference (in dB) between the effective
transmitter power and received power.
Free-Space Propagation Model
l Free space power received by a receiver antenna
separated from a radiating transmitter antenna by a
distance d is given by Friis free space equation:
PL ( d )[ dB ] = PL ( d ) + X σ
d Equation 12
PL ( d )[ dB ] = PL ( d 0 ) + 10 n log( ) + Xσ
d0
Equation 12 takes into account the shadowing affects due to cluttering on the
propagation path. It is used as the propagation model for log-normal shadowing
environments.
Log-normal Shadowing- Received
Power
l The received power in log-normal shadowing
environment is given by the following formula
(derivable from Equation 12)
d
Pr ( d )[ dBm ] = Pt [ dBm ] − PL ( d 0 )[ dB ] + 10 n log( ) + X σ [ dB ]
d0
3000m,
l The table gives the
measured values of
received power
Example of determining n and
σ
l We know the measured values.
l Lets compute the estimates for received
power at different distances using long-
distance path loss model. (Equation 11)
l Pr(d0) is given as 0dBm and measured value
is also the same.
l mean_Pr(d) = Pr(d0) – mean_PL(from_d0_to_d)
l Then mean_Pr(d) = 0 – 10logn(d/d0)
l Use this equation to computer power levels at
500m, 1000m, and 3000m.
Example of determining n and
σ
l Average_Pr(500m) = 0 – 10logn(500/100) = -6.99n
l Average_Pr(1000m) = 0 – 10logn(1000/100) = -10n
l Average_Pr(3000m) = 0 – 10logn(3000/100) = -14.77n
We would like to find a value of n that will minimize this MSE(n) value. We
We will call it MMSE: minimum mean square error.
∑ (p i − pˆ i )2 Equation 14.1
σ2 = i =1
k
pi is the actual measured value of power at some distance d
pˆ i is the estimate of power at that distance d
k is the number of measuremen t samples
∑X i [Equation 15]
µ= i =1
k
k
EXAMPLE:
Probability that Pr is
smaller than 3.3
(Prob(Pr <= 3.3))
is
given with value of
the stripped area under
the curve.
Normal CDF
The figure shows the CDF plot of the normal distribution described previously.
Prob(Pr <= 3.3) can be found by finding first the point where vertical line from 3.3
intersects the curve and then by finding the corresponding point on the y-axis.
This corresponds to a value of 0.09. Hence Prob(Pr <= 3.3) = 0.09
0.5
0.090123
Use of Normal Distribution
− ( x− µ )2
1
p( x) = e 2σ 2
σ 2π
[Equation 18]
∞ −( x−µ )2
1
Pr( X > x0 ) = ∫ 2σ 2 Equation 19
e dx
x0σ 2π
∞ − y2
x0 − µ 1
Pr( y >
σ
)= ∫
x 0− µ σ 2π
e 2
dy Equation 20
( )
σ
Use of Normal Distribution
In the above formula, the kernel of the integral is normalized Gaussian
PDF function with µ = 0 and σ = 1.
Evaluation of this function is designed as Q-function and defined as
∞ − y2
1
Q ( z )= ∫ e 2
dy Equation 21
z σ 2π
Hence Equation 19 or 20 can be evaluated as:
x0 − µ x −µ
Pr( y > ) = Q( 0 ) = Q( z ) Equation 22
σ σ
Q-Function
Q-Function is bounded by two analytical expressions as follows:
1 1 −z2 / 2 1 −z2 / 2
(1 − 2 ) e ≤ Q( z) ≤ e Equation 23
z z 2π z 2π
For values greater than 3.0, both of these bounds closely approximate Q(z).
For values of z higher than 3.9, you should use the equations on the
previous slide to compute Q(z).
Q-Function Graph: z versus
Q(z)
Q(z)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
z (1 <= z <= 3.9
Erf and Erfc functions
The error function (erf) is defined as:
∞ [Equation 26]
2
∫e
− x2
erfc ( z )= dx
π z
z
2 [Equation 27]
∫e
− x2
erf ( z )= dx
π 0
[Equation 28]
erfc ( z )= 1 − erf ( z )
Erf and Erfc functions
The Q-function is related to erf and erfc functions by:
1 z 1 z [Equation 29]
Q ( z )= [1 − erf ( )] = erfc ( )
2 2 2 2
erfc ( z ) = 2Q ( 2 z )
[Equation 30]
γ − Pr ( d ) Equation 32
Pr( Pr ( d ) >γ ) = Q ( )
σ
AREA(OBC ) = π r − = r − ∆θ
r D 2 2π 2 2
C ∆r ∆r
2 2
1 1
∆r ∆A = r + ∆θ − r − ∆θ
2 2 2 2
∆θ ∆r
2
∆r
2
O ∆A = r + − r −
2 2 2
∆θ
∆A = [2r∆r ] = r∆r∆θ
2
Then we can integrate a function f(r) over the
surface area of the circle as follows :
F = ∫ f (r )dA
2π R
F= ∫ ∫ f (r )rdrdθ
0 0
Percentage of Coverage Area
Using equation 32:
γ − Pr (d )
P( Pr (d ) >γ ) = Q( ) = Q(γ − [ Pt − PL(d 0 ) + 10n log(r / d 0 )])
σ Equation 33
The path loss at distance r can be expressed as:
O d0 r R
γ − Pr ( d ) 1 1 γ − Pr ( d )
P ( Pr ( d ) >γ ) = Q ( ) = − erf ( )
σ 2 2 σ 2
a = (γ − Pt + PL (d 0) + 10 n log( R / d 0)) / σ 2
b = (10 n log e ) / σ 2
Then
R
1 1 r
U (γ ) = − 2 ∫ erf (a + b ln ) rdr Equation 37
2 R 0 R
Substitute t = a+ blog(r/R)
1 1 − ab
1− 2 ab
b2
U (γ ) = − 1 − erf (a ) + e 1 − erf ( ) Equation 38
2 b
Percentage of Coverage Area
l By choosing a signal level such that Pr (R ) = γ
(i.e. a = ), we obtain:
1 1
2 1
U (γ ) = − 1 + e b 1 − erf ( )
2 b
The simplified formula above gives the percentage coverage assuming the
mean received power at the cell boundary (r=R) is γ.
In other words, we are assuming: Prob(Pr(R) >= γ) = 0.5
Outdoor Propagation
l We will look to the propagation from a transmitter in an outdoor
environment
l The coverage area around a tranmitter is called a cell.
l Coverage area is defined as the area in which the path loss is at
or below a given value.
l The shape of the cell is modeled as hexagon, but in real life it
has much more irregular shapes.
l By playing with the antenna (tilting and changing the height), the
size of the cell can be controlled.
l We will look to the propagation characteristics of the three
outdoor environments
l Propagation in macrocells
l Propagation in microcells
l Propagation in street microcells
Macrocells
l Base stations at high-points
l Coverage of several kilometers
l The average path loss in dB has normal
distribution
l Avg path loss is result of many forward scattering over
a great many of obstacles
§ Each contributing a random multiplicative factor
§ Converted to dB, this gives a sum of random variable
l Sum is normally distributed because of central limit
theorem
Macrocells
l In early days, the models were based on
emprical studies
l Okumura did comprehesive measurements in
1968 and came up with a model.
l Discovered that a good model for path loss was a
simple power law where the exponent n is a function
of the frequency, antenna heights, etc.
l Valid for frequencies in: 100MHz – 1920 MHz
for distances: 1km – 100km
Okumura Model
Equation 40
l L50(d)(dB) = LF(d)+ Amu(f,d) – G(hte) – G(hre) – GAREA
l L50: 50th percentile (i.e., median) of path loss
l LF(d): free space propagation pathloss.
l Amu(f,d): median attenuation relative to free space
l Can be obtained from Okumura’s emprical plots shown in the book
(Rappaport), page 151.
l G(hte): base station antenna heigh gain factor
l G(hre): mobile antenna height gain factor
l GAREA: gain due to type of environment
B C
A
Breakpoint
C n=4
n=4~8 D
log (distance) log (distance)
Indoor Propagation
l Indoor channels are different from traditional
mobile radio channels in two different ways:
l The distances covered are much smaller
l The variablity of the environment is much greater for a
much smaller range of T-R separation distances.
l The propagation inside a building is
influenced by:
l Layout of the building
l Construction materials
l Building type: sports arena, residential home,
factory,...
Indoor Propagation
l Indoor propagation is domited by the same
mechanisms as outdoor: reflection,
scattering, diffraction.
l However, conditions are much more variable
l Doors/windows open or not
l The mounting place of antenna: desk, ceiling, etc.
l The level of floors
l Effect of Height
l Penetration loss decreases with the height of the building
up-to some certain height
§ At lower heights, the urban clutter induces greater attenuation
l and then it increases
§ Shadowing affects of adjascent buildings
Conclusion
l More work needs to be done to understand
the characteristics of wireless channels
l 3D numerical modeling approaches exist
l To achieve PCS, new and novel ways of
classifying wireless environments will be
needed that are both widely encompassing
and reasonably compact.