Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soil Plant Atmosphere Continum
Soil Plant Atmosphere Continum
Arbitrary numbers picked to represent decreasing water potentials from the soil, through the
plant, to the atmosphere. This shows the net movement of water down its potential energy
gradient, from highest water potential in the soil to lowest water potential in the air.
Introduction
The dominant distinguishing feature of the Earth, in comparison with all other celestial bodies
we observe, is the presence of life. Humans, as a part of life on Earth, attempt to understand all
of the life system, albeit from an anthropocentric perspective. James Lovelock proposed a
perspective that was unsettling to some and appealing to others when he suggested that the entire
Earth may be functioning as a living organism. As our integrative understanding of living
systems within the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum (SPAC) grows, the idea that a whole
ecosystem can function as a living entity becomes more acceptable.
Water potential & Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum
Scientists, engineers and land managers now have the ability to continuously monitor the soil-
plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC). This fundamentally crucial aspect of plant physiology has
to date been beyond technological capabilities to measure. But now ICT International has
advanced technology which can continuously measure the soil, plant and atmospheric
environment.
The number of hypotheses, theories, and models which can now be tested in plant physiology,
and in particular plant-water relations, has increased exponentially.
The SPAC is defined as the movement of water from the soil, through the plant and to the
atmosphere along an interconnected film of liquid water (Lambers et al 2008).
The SPAC is fundamental to the hydrologic cycle, the ability of plants to photosynthesize, and
therefore to most life on earth. Understanding the SPAC is crucial in plant physiology studies.
Water movement through the SPAC is driven by the passive movement of water generated by an
energy gradient. The energy gradient is created by a difference in water potential from high
potential in the soil, to a gradually lower potential in the plant and the atmosphere. Figure 1
outlines the water potential gradient along the SPAC for a hypothetical tree growing in a mild
environment and well-watered soil. Technology previously available to scientists could not
practically or conveniently measure water potential along the SPAC.
Soil water potential, difficult at the best of times, was measured with instruments such as
tensiometers and thermal matric sensors in the field, or with a pressure chamber extractor in the
lab.
Plant water potential was measured destructively with a plant water status console (pressure
bomb). Leaves were harvested from the plant at various times of the day and measurements
made.
To create pre-dawn values, or diurnal curves, let alone a week of continuous data, required
dedicated and costly staff. The atmosphere was the easiest to measure as all that was needed was
a good quality weather station.
ICT International can now provide a solution for continuous monitoring in soils, plants and the
environment.
Figure 2 outlines the placement of various sensors along the SPAC for continuous monitoring.
The soil is monitored with the SMM Soil Moisture Meter and the MP306 Soil Moisture Sensors,
configured to measure both volumetric water content and water potential. The roots, trunk,
branches and leaves of the plant can be continuously monitored with the PSY1 Psychrometer.
The atmosphere is measured with the advanced weather station, the AWS Automatic Weather
Station. The AWS has the ability to measure air water potential, as well as other variables such
as Vapour Pressure Deficit (VPD) and evapotranspiration.
Figure 2 displays real data as collected from a Banksia spinulosa shrub, growing in Armidale,
New South Wales, Australia.
The data in Figure 2 clearly shows a water potential gradient from high potential in the soil, to
lower potentials in the trunk and canopy, and extremely low potential in the atmosphere.
Figure 3 is 7 days of continuous data from the same plant. Sunday was a hot day followed by
Monday which was cloudy and cool. Throughout the week, temperatures progressively increased
to beyond 35°C before a slightly cooler Saturday. Late on Saturday a storm passed over the
monitoring site, with rainfall reaching 43.4 mm.
At the start of the monitoring period the soil was purposely near-saturated with an irrigation
system. A MP306 Soil Moisture Sensor, connected to a SMM Soil Moisture Meter, was installed
to continuously monitor water potential at a depth of 15 cm. Throughout the week, soil water
potential gradually declined to approximately -0.5 MPa before heavy rainfall late on Saturday
afternoon. The trunk PSY1 Psychrometer was installed approximately 10 cm from the soil
surface. The midday value ranged between -0.8 and -1.2 MPa during the week.
The canopy PSY1 Psychrometer was installed approximately 30 cm from the distal tip of a
foliated stem. The canopy water potential reached as low as -5 MPa on the very hot Friday.
The atmosphere, or air, water potential was extremely negative, reaching -160 MPa,
demonstrating how dry the atmosphere is. The main feature of Figure 3 is the gradient of water
potential from the soil to the atmosphere.
Figure 4 shows the daily sum of water potential for the soil, trunk, canopy and air. This is a
useful way to summarise the continuous data from Figure 3 which can then be used for further
statistical analysis of experimental treatment groups.
Figure 4 clearly shows that the atmosphere is overwhelmingly drier than the soil and the plant.
Figure 4 also suggests that the canopy of this plant is tightly coupled with atmospheric water
potential over this measurement period. A longer measurement period, with differing treatments
such as an imposed drought, or differing plant varieties such as a plant with greater fine root
biomass, would provide even more interesting data and insights into the SPAC.