Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Making Choices MARR PDF
Making Choices MARR PDF
10-2
Sct 10.1 Comparing Mutually
Exclusive Alternatives by Different
Evaluation Methods
10-3
Evaluation Times
Equal lives of the alternatives
PW, AW, FW
LCM of lives
PW approach
Specified study period
Normally exercised in industry
Infinity (capitalized cost)
10-4
Decision Guidelines
Select the alternative with:
Numerically largest
PW, FW, or AW value
10-5
Sct 10.2 MARR Relative to the Cost
of Capital
Establishing the MARR within the enterprise
Requires:
Cost of equity capital (cost of corporate funds)
Cost of retained earnings included here
Cost of debt capital (cost of borrowed funds)
Debt Capital
$$ acquired from borrowing outside of the firm
Equity Capital
$$ acquired from the owners and retained earnings
10-6
Cost of Capital and the MARR
Established MARR
Established Risk factor added (R%)
MARR is the sum
of: (expressed as a % ER + R%
cost)
Cost of capital + Expected return
(%) ER
Expected return +
Risk factor
CC + x% = ER
MARR will vary
from firm to firm
and from project Min. MARR Cost of capital
(%) CC
to project
10-7
Factors Impacting the MARR
Perceived project risk
Higher the risk – higher the MARR for that project
Investment opportunity
Expansion opportunity – may set a lower MARR
Maintain flexibility
Tax structure
Higher tax rate – higher MARR
Federal reserve monetary policy – interest rates
Limited capital
Tighter constraints on capital – higher MARR
Market rates of other firms
Competitors alter their MARR - the firm could follow suit
10-8
Sct 10.3 Debt-Equity Mix and WACC
D/E ratio (Debt to Equity mix)
Ex.: 40-60 DE = {40% from debt, 60% from equity}
10-9
WACC: Example 10.3
Source of Capital Amount ($) Cost (%)
Common Stock $5 million 13.7%
10-11
Sct 10.4 Determining Cost of Debt
Capital
Debt financing
Loans (borrowing)
$ borrowed from banks
$ borrowed from Insurance companies, etc
Issuance of bonds (borrowing)
Interest on loans and bonds are tax deductible in the US
Bonds are sold (floated) within a bond market by investment
bankers on behalf of the firm
Subject to extensive state and federal regulations
10-12
Tax Savings from Debt Financing
The cost of financing by debt is lower than the
actual interest rate charged because of the tax
deductibility of the interest payments
Assume Te = the effective tax rate (%)
Tax Savings = ($ expenses)(Te)
Net Cash Flow = {$ expenses - $ tax savings}
NCF = expenses (1 – Te)
See Example 10.4
10-13
Example of Tax Deductibility
Impact on Cost of Debt Capital
Assume a loan has a 10% interest rate charged
to the borrower
The effective tax rate is 30%
The after-tax cost of borrowing at 10% is
Observations
Due to tax deductibility the effective cost is 7% after tax
Higher tax rates result in lower after-tax borrowing
rates
10-14
Sct 10.5 Determination of the Cost
of Equity Capital and the MARR
Sources of equity capital
1. Sale of preferred stock (PS)
2. Sale of common stock (CS)
3. Use of retained earnings (RE)
➢ RE = past profits retained within the firm
➢ This money belongs to the owners of the
firm
Sale of new stock is handled by investment
bankers and brokerage firms – highly regulated
– charge the firm for these sales
10-15
Types of Stock
Preferred Stock
A form of ownership
Pays a stated dividend per share periodically
Generally a conservative type of stock
Common Stock
A form of ownership
Carries more risk than preferred
No guarantee of dividends to be paid
10-16
Cost of Equity Capital
Cost of equity capital generally applies some
form of a dividend growth model or valuation
model.
first-year dividend
Basic model R e expected growth rate
price of the stock
DV1
Re = g
P
“g” is the estimated annual increase in returns to
the shareholders
10-17
Capital Asset Pricing Model --
CAPM
Re for equity capital is specified by
Re = risk-free return + premium above risk-free return
Re = Rf + (Rm – Rf)
= volatility of firm’s common stock relative to other stocks
= 1 is the norm
Rm = return on stocks is a defined market portfolio as measured
by a prescribed index
Rf = quoted US Treasury Bill rate (considered a safe investment)
(Rm – Rf) = premium paid above the safe or “risk-free” rate
10-18
Sct 10.6 Effect of Debt-Equity Mix
on Investment Risk
D-E mix (Review Section 10.3)
As the proportion of debt increases Due to t the
calculated cost of capital tends to decrease
Tax advantage of deducting interest
But…..leverage offered by larger percentage of
debt capital increases the risks of funding future
projects within the company
Too much debt is a “bad thing”
Objective – strive for a balance between debt
and equity funding
10-19
Too Much Debt…..
Use of larger percentages of debt capital
increases the risk that is assumed by
Investors (owners) and
Lenders
Over time, investor confidence in the firm may
diminish and the value of the stock could well
decline
Difficult to attract new investment funds
Lenders will charge higher and higher interest rates
to hedge the risk
10-20
Sct 10.7 Multiple Attribute Analysis:
Identification and Importance of Each Attribute
Refer back to Chapter 1 and
7-steps in Figure 10-5
Up to now we have focused on one attribute of a
decision making problem
Economic attribute!
Complex problems possess more than one
attribute
Multiple attribute analysis is often required
Quantitative attributes
Subjective attributes
10-21
Identification of Key Attributes
Must ID the key attributes
Comparison
Input from experts
Surveys
Group discussion
Delphi methods
Tabulate and then agree on the critical mix of
subjective and objective attributes
10-22
Importance of Each Attribute
Determine the extent of importance of each
attribute
Implies some form of weighting – wi
Given m attributes we want:
10-23
Weighting Methodologies
Equal Weighting
All defined attributes are assigned equal weights
Default model
May or may not be appropriate
Rank Order
m attributes are ranked in order of increasing
importance (1 = least important; 2, 3, ….)
Weighted Rank Order
m attributes ranked in order of importance and apply:
si
Wi m
s
i 1
i
10-24
Value Rating of Attributes
Each alternative is assigned a value rating – Vij
for each attribute i
Can apply a scale of 0-100
Can apply a Likert Scale
4-5 graduations (prefer an even number of choices)e.g.
Very Poor
Poor
Good
Very good
10-25
Sct 10.8 Evaluation Measure for Multiple
Attributes
Weighted Attribute Method
n
R j WV
i ij
j 1
Selection guideline
Choose the alternative with the largest Rj value
Assumes increasing weights mean more important
attributes
Increasing Vij mean better performance for a given
alternative
10-26