RUBRIC FOR SYSTEM DESIGN
Instructions:
1. Rate the presenters based on their performance according to the criteria provided.
2. To compute for the total score, multiply the Rate by the Weight.
3. Provide a comment highlighting both the strongest and weakest part of the oral presentation in the comments section.
CRITERIA
A. Ability to solve industrial
engineering problem by
implementing systems to
achieve specific
requirements (6)
B. Ability to use appropriate
techniques and skills in
developing design
systems (6)
C. Knowledge of
contemporary issues
pertinent to
modernization and
implementing new
technologies (4)
D. Communication Skills (4)
E. Creativity and
Innovativeness (4)
F. Writing Quality/Visual Aid
(1)
EXECELLENT (4) PROFICIENT (3) DEVELOPING (2) POOR (1) RATING
System Design is
System Design is System Design is well System Design is
defined but requires
excellent based on defined based on poor; Did not meet
further refinement of
needs and specific needs and specific needs and specific
needs and specific
requirements. requirements. requirements
requirements.
Independently selects Needs guidance in
Independently selects Cannot select
appropriate tools, the selection of
appropriate tools, appropriate tools,
methodologies and appropriate tools,
methodologies and methodologies and
procedures but needs methodologies and
procedures in the procedures in the
guidance in the procedures in the
analysis and design of analysis and design
analysis and design of analysis and design
industrial systems of industrial systems
industrial systems of industrial systems
Important issues One or more
All applicable issues Most if not all issues
considered; certain important issues
are adequately ignored
minor ones may have ignored
considered.
been ignored
Answers show fluency Answers show
Answers show fluency
and confidence but fluency but there are Answers show little
and confidence and
there are slight some significant knowledge about
very knowledgeable
deficiencies in the deficiencies in the the study and
about the study and
student’s knowledge student’s knowledge unable to handle
effectively handles
of the study when of the study when questions
difficult questions
answering questions answering questions
Very creative or
Topic is limited in
original and uses Topic is somewhat
Topic is fairly original originality and
innovative ideas in original or creative.
or creative. creativity.
analyzing their study Design/approach
Design/approach Design/approach
and introduces new somewhat
fairly appropriate or only marginally
design/approach or appropriate or
innovative. appropriate or
expands on innovative.
innovative.
established ideas.
The study was written
with great clarity and
organization and The study lacked
there was a logical The study was written clarity and precision.
flow in the text. with clarity. The study was written Sentences were
Transitions between Word choice, in a clear manner. poorly constructed
sections of the grammar, Word choice, and confusing.
document were punctuation, and grammar, Word choice,
smooth. spelling were used punctuation, and grammar,
Word choice appropriately and the spelling were punctuation, and
selection, grammar, text was presented in appropriate. spelling reflected a
punctuation, and an organized manner. poor grasp of basic
spelling are excellent writing conventions.
and the narrative is of
high quality.