Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
2
Discovered Created
Opportunity character Objectively given unit in the Dependent on the
environment interactions of the individual
Opportunity emergence Involves discovery Involves creation
Opportunity source The individual who is The individual who creates
attentive towards existing by means of his or her
market information creativity
Opportunity status The opportunity is stable The opportunity is dynamic
Opportunity type Kirznerian hole in the Shumpeterian market
market ruption
Kapitel 4
Evaluation of opportunities
The evaluation tells the entrepreneur whether he or she can expect the idea to become an
economically viable opportunity or what the entrepreneur must do to achieve it. The
evaluation is a bridge between the emergence and organizing of opportunities since it tells the
entrepreneur whether it makes sense to use resources to pursue this opportunity by organizing
activities.
Evaluation = the systematic determination of merit, worth, and significance of something or
someone using criteria against a set of standards. It’s about visualizing and predicting the
future to determine whether the idea can form the basis for a profitable and sustainable
organization.
Evaluation – instrumental or legitimate
Instrumental
This perspective seeks to give the entrepreneur control over the evaluation process with the
entrepreneur’s own situation as a starting point. This evaluation happens before the
entrepreneur seriously commits to involving other actors, like investors, arranges access to
resources, such as capital, and establishes technology.
The instrumental collection of evidence to underpin evaluation can be divided into four areas:
- Product/service
- The market/industry
- Organization
- Financing
Through analysis of these areas it can show how the entrepreneur can assess whether he or
she ought to pursue the idea further.
Wickham refers to the importance of assessing the possibilities of opportunities potential in
light of scale – the opportunities size, scope – the value that it provides in the short and long
term and span – the opportunity’s durability over time (one hit wonder or lasting potential).
The venture intelligence quotient (VIQ) model:
Product: the essence of idea, which may be a product, service, experience or process.
Market: the group of clients and organizations who are interested in the idea and have
resources to acquire the product or service that the idea represents.
Industry: organizations offering the same or substitute products, services, experience
or processes.
People: the entrepreneur/the entrepreneurial team.
Money: the financial dimension
These goes through idea assessment, idea enhancement and venture implementation.
Legitimacy
= something is legitimate if it complies with the norms, values, beliefs, practice and procedures
that are accepted by a particular social group.
Evaluation can also be seen as an integral part of everyday entrepreneurial processes. Only by
acing on the idea and testing its attractive and negative aspects, capacity development etc. in a
social context it is possible to get an understanding of whether the idea represents an
opportunity.
Legitimacy as a process:
1. Innovation – the creation of the idea
2. Local validation – local stakeholders who must be convinced about the opportunity
3. Diffusion – the opportunity starts to spread into another context
4. General validation – it become more widely accepted as a natural part of the
environment.
Strategies for building legitimacy:
- The entrepreneur can imitate other organizations that have already been accepted into
the environment.
- Cooperate with other entrepreneurs to gain legitimacy in society
- Focus on creating trust among key stakeholders that will provide the entrepreneur with
access to knowledge, recourses etc.
- Producing a business card, letterhead and a website
Instrumental Legitimate
Evaluation perception Tool to achieve a certain Legitimacy creation
objective
Evaluation objective To state the direction for To convince the actors of the
action market of the idea
Evaluation criteria They should be formulated They emerge during the
before the process entrepreneurial process
Evaluation process Rational, systematic an Social, interactive,
analytic experimental and exploring
Evaluation character Evaluation and Evaluation and
entrepreneurial action are entrepreneurial action are
two separate activities two inseparable activities
Kapitel 5
Organization of opportunities
People create organizations to accomplish things they cannot do in their own. Developing
meaningful practice, structures, and systems that we call organizations. The process involves
the coordination of elements such as people, resources, strategies, competition, technologies
etc. and it evolves in a complex milieu of interacting individuals.
Organization = the formal structures, common rules, administrative procedures, frameworks
and goals. It can also be focused on the more informal, process-oriented, interactive, social
and human dimensions.
The development of a new organization – Fayolles phase model:
Idea opportunity project emerging organization stable organization
Elements of the organizational efforts the entrepreneur must make to realize his or her
opportunity in the market:
- Technology: machinery, technology, competencies, rules, administrative process,
objectives etc.
- Recourses: raw material, capital, human resources, information, knowledge etc.
- Networks: customers, suppliers, distributors, competitors, family, friends, advisors etc.
Organization – planned or improvised
Planned (causation)
Manufacturing organizations are seen as entities, created by the manager to achieve
predefined goals. The organization in this case is intentional, rational and considered and the
organizing can be driven by analysis and planning. It can also be steered towards a specific
goal.
The entrepreneur need to ask her/himself “what must I do to achieve the desired goal – a
successful organization?”. Then he or her need to choose optimal strategies, resources,
networks etc. that enable to achieve the best possible result.
Example: a cook creating a meal. First, he chooses the menu he will prepare, then he finds a
recipe that he can follow, then he is purchasing the ingredients and then the meal can be
created.
Improvisation (effectuation)
It’s based on the idea that you should make use of what you have when organizing instead of
starting with the ultimate goal.
The entrepreneur need to ask him/herself: “what effects can I achieve with the resources I
have? What do I do right there?”
Example: the cook begins the improvisation process by looking in the kitchen to find out
which raw materials, ingredients and tools he has available, then he cook designs possible
meals that can be created from the ingredients found.
The entrepreneur has 3 recourses available as they enter the organizing process:
1. Who I am Interact with Effectual New means
2. What I know other people stakeholder
3. Whom I know commitment New goals
Planning Improvising
Starting point The target is given The means are given
Crucial question What can I do in order to What can I do with these
achieve the desired effect? means?
The role of the entrepreneur A rational architect An improvising creator and
social agent
Crucial activities Analysis, planning Small steps, interaction
Predictability of output High Low
Kapitel 6
Nascent entrepreneurship
- focuses on the process leading up to the startup of a business.
Why does some choose to start a business whilst others choose alternative career paths? There
are two main types of explanatory models:
- The ‘person-job fit’ model, people will eventually find a career that is an appropriate
fit between their desires, ambitions and abilities, and what a given career offers and
demands. This is a rational perspective.
- Focuses on how career decisions are made and not least what affects such decisions.
This is a behavioral perspective.
The different types of impact that affect individual’s choice of business startup:
Institutional factors
2 main types of institutions:
Formal – the judiciary and ministries that operate through regulation, laws and
instructions.
Informal – culture, social norms, rules etc.
Institutions help to create the framework for nascent entrepreneurship and thereby to
influence the attractiveness of self-employment for the individual. Also, culture and religion
are important in attracting people to an entrepreneurial career.
Individual factors
Gender equality are a subject for individual factors. It is shown that men and women are
equally likely to start a business but for different reasons and with different results. There are
also a number of psychological traits associated with entrepreneurs like high confidence, they
are extroverts, optimistic, risk-takers etc. Another individual factor is that opportunity cost.
People with good education, good social network, extensive experience – a high human and
social capital – are more likely to start a successful business.
Life events
Factors related to specific events or people’s lives that affect whether they choose to start a
business or not. There are two types of explanations:
Lifecycle – the resource accumulation that occurs over time as people get older and
acquire knowledge, experience and network and it’s also about risk willingness, which
is often assumed to decrease with age.
Events – our lives can be divided into working life and social/family/privacy sphere.
What happens in one sphere affects what happens in another sphere. For example,
events like divorce or children moving from home can affect people’s career choices.
Hybrid entrepreneurship and freelancers
Hybrid entrepreneurship = when people are both employed and self-employed. The reason is
to reduce the risk and opportunity cost.
Freelancers = people find themselves in a grey area, they are formally self-employed but are
actually in a form of employment through a contractual relationship with a particular
company. For example, Uber.
The startup processes
Business lifecycle models
Firstly, a company goes through a number of identifiable phases. The sequence of these
phases is predetermined and predictable, and companies evolve from a primitive stage to a
more advanced stage over time.
Greiner’s business lifecycle model:
1. Growth through creativity
2. Growth through direction
3. Growth through delegation
4. Growth through coordination
5. Growth through collaboration
Process models
These models see development more as an iterative process between creation and discovery,
evaluation and organization of opportunities, where feedback processes, adaption and
complexity play a much larger role.
Nascent entrepreneurship – necessity or opportunity
Necessity
‘Push’ entrepreneurs are those whose dissatisfaction with their positions, for reasons
unrelated to their entrepreneurial characteristics, pushes them to start a venture.
From the necessity perspective, entrepreneurship is not a free choice but a necessary choice.
Necessity can be a matter of survival or the need to improve relative living conditions. The
necessity perspective often refers to an unsustainable economic situation, because of
redundancy, divorce etc.
Opportunity
‘Pull’ entrepreneurs are those who are lures by their new venture idea and initiate venture
activity because of the attractiveness of the business idea and its personal implications.
Here the entrepreneurship is an active and conscious choice. Some of the reasons to choose to
be entrepreneur is:
Independence
Material incentives
Social approval and status
Fulfilment of personal value or norms
Self-realisation
Necessity Opportunity
Basis of action Environmentally determined Deliberate, strategic choice
Motive force Push Pull
Motivation Survival/better living Exploit a possibility (self-
conditions realization)
Career possibility The only choice One among several
Potential Low High
Kapitel 7
Resources
In the entrepreneurial process, the entrepreneur needs resources like money, knowledge,
materials, energy, enthusiasm, motivation, staff etc. The decision about resource are often
made based on the entrepreneur’s expectations about the future.
From a market to a resource focus
The ‘outside-out argument’: creating sustained competitive advantage comes through
better positioning in the market and differentiation from your competitors.
The ‘inside-in argument’: claims that sustained competitive advantaged is best
established within the organization through its unique combination of resources. This
argument is concerned firstly with the organization’s internal resources and then looks
at the market.
A three-way split of resources
Financial resources
= capital supplied by the owners or external players. Simply the money that the entrepreneur
has in his or her pocket. There are two main types:
- Equity capital (own money)
- Debt capital (borrowed money)
Human resources
= intangible resources such as knowledge and experience. Example:
- Education and training
- Experience (business, startup, managerial experience)
- Engagement, motivation and enterprise
Social resources
= resources provided by the entrepreneur’s personal contacts. Example:
- Entrepreneurial role models
- A large network
- Diverse networks
- Supportive circle of friends
The difference between the three types of resources are that some of them are reduced when
used (financial - money can only be used), while others actually multiply with increased use
(human – use of knowledge create new knowledge).
The relationship between the three types of resources is that the various resources can be
transformed from one type to another. For example, it is possible to use one’s personal
networks (social) to recruit new qualified employees (human) or to obtain financial resources.
Resource – exploitation or exploration
Exploitation
The entrepreneur uses the existing resource position through rational and systematic
consideration of how he or she can most effectively select and deploy those resources so that
they best support the opportunity. The entrepreneur should have a clearly defined goal for the
resource use and also be aware of the resources value. The challenge is to maximize efficient
use of existing resources to achieve the goal. The entrepreneur is presumed to have
management and control of resource use in the entrepreneurial process, it reduces the
complexity and risk associated with the process. The key is search, variation, risk-taking,
experimentation, play, flexibility, discovery, innovation.
Exploration
Resources cannot be taken for granted and therefore the entrepreneur starting from a position
of limited resources must explore and perhaps even create new resources. The exploration
activities include search, risk taking, experimentation, flexibility, discovery, innovation etc.
This may lead to creation or discovery of new opportunities and countless new ways of
evaluating and organizing. Here the entrepreneur attempts to create resources that can lead
him or her in exciting new directions in terms of the developing entrepreneurial process. The
exploratory entrepreneur is continually open to unexpected resources that can lead to radically
new opportunities or ways to exploit them.
The key is refinement, choice, production, efficiency, selection, implementation.
Exploit Explore
Resources Existing New
The entrepreneur’s role To use existing resources To find and gain control of
efficiently the new resources
Focus To improve efficiency To move
Changeability Stability Dynamics
Perspective Short term Long term
Kapitel 8
Networks
In order to be successful, the entrepreneurial process requires the involvement of network.
The central argument of social network theory is that the network influences individual’s
behavior in four main ways:
Provide people with information that can be applied to the situations they face.
Influence other people in the network, network relations have influence on the
decisions and actions made.
Create social legitimacy for people within a network structure, people can then
effectively gain access to resources through other individuals in the network vouching
for them.
Develop and enhance personal identities, individuals can strengthen their identity by
interacting with others who wish to maintain their identity.
The heterogeneity argument
- differences among individuals in the entrepreneur’s network and weak relationships between
these are the most efficient network. Entrepreneurs obtain optimal access to valuable market
information that they can apply through the entrepreneurial process by having networks that
consist of diverse individuals with regard to their attitudes, values, jobs, experiences, skills,
etc. the argument takes place at two different levels:
- The relational level: focuses on the relationship between the individual entrepreneur
and his/her contacts. The less emotional attachment and trust between an entrepreneur
and his or her contact, the weaker the relationship. But this weak relationship can lead
to that you get more valuable information because these relationships generally behave
in other social networks.
- The network level: includes all contacts the entrepreneur has in his/her entire network.
Strong relationships lead to that they are often related to each other and thus possess
the same information. But it may occur structural holes which means that some
individuals in the entrepreneur’s network do not know each other and in this way, you
can get access to non—redundant.
The homogeneity argument
- dense networks are the best, where as many people possible in the network know each other
and the relationship between the entrepreneur and these people are strong. It’s about gaining
access to the type of resources that are exchanged only if both parties trust each other, spend
much time together and have emotional attachment to each other.
- The relational level: the entrepreneur needs contacts that he or she has strong and
close relations with. Trust and mutual commitment between the contacts are often
established, increasing the likelihood that the entrepreneur will receive the necessary
emotional support required.
- The network level: in dense networks, where many people in the network know each
other, are more likely to increase the collective power to act. In personal dimensions
of network and shared interests, the provision of emotional support and exchange of
sensitive market information are more likely.
Effective networking is situation dependent – a lifecycle model
In the early stage the entrepreneur is interested in a network consisting with many
structural holes.
When the opportunity is identified the entrepreneur is in a stage where he/she needs
advice and support for to help with taking the final decisions.
After the organization has started the entrepreneur needs access to the market
information again to become established.
Networks – rational or embedded
Rational
Calculation of who it pays to get involved with. In a rational perspective the relationship
between entrepreneur and the people involved are concrete and the people are widespread
among researchers, politicians, consultants and entrepreneurs. Stephanie Speisman has
formulated tips for successful business networking, three of them are:
Ask yourself what your goals are in participating in networking meeting so that you
will pick groups that will help you get what you are looking for.
Have a clear understanding of what you do and why, for whom and what makes the
way you are doing it special or different from others.
Be able to articulate what you are looking for and how others may help you.
Embedded
The embedded perspective goes one step further in terms of social embeddedness and
socialization and is more skeptical about the ability of people and entrepreneurs to be rational
and calculating in selecting the network that suits them. Networking is something that is
created and maintained through all life’s activities and it cannot be identified and isolated in
relation to specific challenges such as the start-up of an organization.
The embedded perspective describes relationships as broader, emotional, trusting, mutually
binding and long term. Networking is something that is embedded and brings some structure
that defines and constrains the opportunities you have to network.
Rational Embedded
View of the entrepreneur Goal-oriented, rational A socially embedded
player player
View of the networks A rational tool Ungovernable condition
View of the relation Concrete, emotionally Diffuse, emotional,
neutral, contract like and trusting, reciprocally
short term binding and long term
The importance of social Low High
Kapitel 9
The business plan
= precisely defines your business, identifies your goals and serves as your firm’s resume. Its
basic components include a current and pro forma balance sheet, an income statement and a
cash flow analysis. It helps you allocate resources properly, handle unforeseen complications
and make the right decisions.
Context, content and process
These three dimensions are connected and influence each other. Some industries (for example
in the production sector) require the business plan and the planning process more than other
industries. The need and relevance of a business plan also varies according to the degree of
uncertainty in the actual idea and the context within which it occurs. The business plan also
depends on what background you have, individuals with an education where planning plays a
major role or an education with a more creative process.
Written document
- Ensures critical thinking
- It can be used in both internal and external communication
- It can serve as internal control of company development
Thought process
The process of thinking provides clarity regarding the organization’s objectives and how they
can be fulfilled. This process provides motivation. Market conditions, technological
possibilities, regulatory etc. related to the organization’s environment change so fast today
that a thought process is better than a written.
Planning
Four main factors that one should be aware of in connection with the development of a
business plan:
- Goals must be realistic
- The plan must provide commitment and dedication
- The plan must include milestones
- The plan must be flexible
From this you can make the business model canvas that is a tool to understand and reflect on
the business model that can support the implementation of the idea. The model focuses on
how to earn money what’s make the business unique. This model also helps to get investors.
The plan’s content
The business plan must be adapted to the opportunity, the situation and the target audience of
the plan. Different audience (bankers, investors, customers, suppliers etc.) will have different
requirements for the information in the business plan. The business plan should:
Not be too long
Be oriented toward the future
Avoid exaggerations
Clarify critical risk factors
Identify the target group
Be written professionally
Catch the reader’s attention and interest
The business plan – management tool or creativity curb
Management tool
The business plan is seen as a means to manage and plan for an organization’s future.
Wickham says that it’s a tool to targeted to exploit opportunities. March speaks of some pre-
conditions that must be presented before planning:
- Knowledge of alternatives
- Knowledge of consequences
- A consistent preference ordering
- A decision rule
Proponents of the business plan as a management tool are not naive in relation to the
assumptions on which they base their beliefs. They are aware that people can only act with
bounded rationality, but they still recognize the importance of planning and the importance of
the business plan in managing this process.
Creativity curb
It’s about predicting and prioritizing bases in the entrepreneur’s preferences compared to the
alternatives with the most profitable consequences in the future. Some entrepreneur’s use
previous experience and some mimic what others have done in the hope that this behavior will
again prove to be effective. It is strategic thinking that is important in the planning process
and this requires a high degree of creativity. Successful planning requires that the
entrepreneur thinks out of the box and breaks with the existing dominant paradigms in the
market.
Entrepreneurship can be seen as art, where opportunities are generated and utilized as a result
of a creative and intuitive process.
Management tool Creativity curb
What is the business plan? Tool for planning Creativity curb
Logic Logic of consequentiality Other types of logic
(experience, imitation)
The importance of business Rationality over creativity Creativity over rationality
development
Focus Consistency Break with the existing
Metaphor Science Art
Kapitel 10
Design thinking
Design offers a way of thinking that makes entrepreneurs able to address complex
entrepreneurial issues in new ways. Design thinking is portrayed to solving all complex
problems, including helping to build economic growth, sustainability, increased prosperity,
enhanced quality of life etc.
Three ways of design thinking:
The designer:
- focus: the designer’s way of thinking and working
- purpose: understanding how designers solve problems
- starting point: design problems are complex, and problems and solutions co-evolve
- key contributions: Schön, Cross
The discipline:
- focus: design as a theoretical discipline that is relevant to many other fields
- purpose: present approaches to working with wicked problems
- Starting point: design problems are wicked problems
- key contributions: Simon, Buchanan
Organizational resource
- focus: organizations in need of innovation, differentiation etc.
- purpose: innovation, strategy-making, organizational transformation
- starting point: organizational problems are design problems
- key contributions: Dunne and Martin, Brown, Verganti
The design thinking process
Simon describes the process as consisting of seven sub-processes:
Define research ideate prototype choose implement learn
Brown indicates a process consisting three sub-processes:
Inspiration ideation implementation
There are many ways of seeing the design thinking process, this is the design thinking process
in greater detail:
1. Discover the present – what is? Enable the problem area to be seen in a new light.
Looks into the complexity, paradoxes, limits, players, history and relation to other
problem areas.
2. Envisioning the future – what if? Provoke the designer into thinking outside the box
about the problem area and its solutions. The idea is to open up a wealth of different
pictures of possibilities and solutions.
3. Select futures – what wows? Get a picture of what could have a future in the real
world or to find out how the solution can be developed, adjusted and modified so as to
have the potential to cover the needs. This can be seen as a prototype-driven process.
4. Test futures – what works? Testing and acting in the market to find out what works.
Usually you can see to whether the project is feasible, viable and desirable.
Design thinking methods
- ‘Thinking with the hands’ = the designer uses it to produce ideas, concepts, things, etc.
tangible through visualization, mock-ups and prototype construction.
- Co-creation = concerned with discovery, creation, evaluation and launching the new
product or idea through creative and social interaction processes.
Design thinking – entrepreneurial or design
Entrepreneurial
A discovery-driven way of thinking and acting entrepreneurially. The entrepreneurial thinking
is about how the new opportunity is made use of and converted into market value. In order to
deal with the uncertain situation, the entrepreneur may develop different strategies, such as
growth from a small scale, entry by acquisition, focus strategy and forming alliances.
Design thinking
New entrepreneurial opportunities are designed through frequent and creative movement
between the past, present and future, which involves exploitation as exploration and discovery
as creation. The focal point for design is the fuzzy front end, where new ideas and concepts
are created and converted into prototypes, products and various other benefits and services
that create human value.
Entrepreneurial thinking Design thinking
Main orientation Exploitation of past and present Exploitation and exploration of
past, present and future
Driving forces Discovery driven Driven by the interplay between
discovery and creation,
empathy, rapid prototyping and
co-creation
Approach Unconscious alertness More conscious
Who The individual Socially constructed
Assumptions of the Linear Iterative
entrepreneurial process
Future orientation Low High and multiple
Output Entrepreneurial value Human value
Key focus The back end The front end
Constraints Have to be eliminated A way forward
Kapitel 11
Intrapreneurship
= entrepreneurship within the context of an existing business. New opportunities are
discovered or created which need to be evaluated and organized. The result may be new
organizational units, strategic reorientation or innovations within the existing organization.
Factors that help or inhibit work with intrapreneurship:
- Most companies work with multiple objectives rather than a precise measurement of
intrapreneurship.
- There is no adequate managerial support. The result is that the skills required to
develop intrapreneurial ideas and opportunities will not be developed.
- Remuneration systems, such as shares to employees, are not being implemented.
There is simply no carrot that motivates the team behind the new opportunity.
Intrapreneurship can appear as dispersed (wide) or focused (narrow) which means that it can
be both activities that involve employees or only involve a few employee’s wo are considered
to be a particularly entrepreneurial.
The difference between entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship:
Entrepreneurship: the process through which an individual or a group of people who
are independent of connections to an existing business, establish one or more new
independent organizations,
Intrapreneurship: process takes shape, when opportunities are developed by
individuals or groups of people that are dependent upon a company’s existing
organizational framework.
3 different branches or trends characterize intrapreneurship research:
1. Emergence of a new organizational unit – new project, new company or new division.
- Internal: new groups, projects or companies.
- External: establishment of joint ventures and spin-outs.
2. Strategic renewal – an organizational change strategy that may include changing core
competencies, resource uses and competitive parameters at project, corporate,
divisional or group level,
3. Innovation – new combinations of knowledge
The degree of innovation in intrapreneurship
Incremental intrapreneurship: the idea that opportunities remain fundamentally the same, but
are renewed gradually.
Radical intrapreneurship: concerned with how existing companies develop in leaps and
bounds, coming up with potential opportunities that are completely different from existing
ones.
Intrapreneurship – top down or bottom up
Top down
Characterized by the management within existing companies taking the initiative through the
formulation of strategies, action plans ad commencement of actual operations in the field.
Bottom up
Focuses on the situation in which intrapreneurship is created as a result of employee initiative.
This perspective assumes a loose coupling between the existing corporate governance, the
intrapreneurs and the potential opportunities that are discovered or created.
Top-down Bottom-up
Hierarchical level Top level Operational level
Source of initiative Top management Employees
The process Controlled behavior Autonomous behavior
Tool Administrative mechanisms Political mechanisms
Mechanisms for Control and minimal Autonomy and minimum
implementation autonomy control
Balance
Creating successful intrapreneurship is about finding a balance between top-down
management and bottom-up initiatives and requires elements of both control and autonomy.
Simon recommend that existing companies appoint three people to handle the new business
and existing business interests when intrapreneurship is being implemented. The three people
are firstly a “venture manager” – for the new company whose task is to run the new company
and ensure that is procures the resources required for it to develop, next is “venture
godparent” – protect the new business from existing corporate bureaucracy and ensure that the
resources that are central to its development are provided, the last one is the “venture
ombudsperson” – handling the existing business interests.
Kapitel 12
Social entrepreneurship
- is about discovering or creating opportunities and evaluating them in order to finally exploit
those opportunities through organizing. The goal is to create better conditions for people both
locally and globally, while profit is merely a means to achieve social goals.
Social entrepreneurship – better world or business
Better world
Social objectives are the ultimate goal, and any commercial exchanges take place only as a
means of achieving social goals. Therefor it is an activity for creating a better world which
often take place within the voluntary sector.
Business
Focus on financial objectives as the ultimate goal and social objectives as a mean to achieving
financial goals, to create a business and the social elements are a product in line with other
commercial products. This social entrepreneurship exists primarily in a commercial context.
Business A better world
Primary objective Financial Social
Sector The for-profit sector The voluntary sector/non-
profit sector
Motive To create a financially To create a better world and
sustainable business better conditions for people
The relevance of Crucial for the success and Supporting the primary
commercial exchange development of the social objectives
organization
The relevance of social A product similar to other The deeper purpose of
output commercial products creating social
entrepreneurship.
“The plunge decision” = När man beslutar sig för att ta steget.
Drivkraften för att våga ta steget skulle t.ex. kunna vara nyfikenhet.
Det entreprenöriella ekosystemet = Man är ute efter rörelsen, t.ex. hur folk flyttar runt bland
företagen (Silicon Valley). Ny logik med att rörelsen är viktig, tidigare ville man inte framstå
som en person som varit på för många olika företag.
Institutionalizing = establish us a convention or norm in an organization or culture.
Cantillon’s Circular Flow Economy
Joseph Schumpeter
Han ägnade sitt liv till att se hur den ekonomiska rörelsen såg ut. Hans nyckelbegrepp är
”kreativ förstörelse”.
“How the economic system generates the force which instantly transforms it.”
Kreativ förstörelse
Nya varor, nya kvaliteter
Nya metoder
Nya marknader
Nya källor för råvaror
Nya organisationsformer
Handlingsorientering: Är
man bra på det så leder det
till hyperaktivitet vilket
innebär att man inte tänker
efter.
Konceptualisering: Tänker
man för mycket kommer
man få fler och fler problem
vilket gör att man aldrig
handlar.
Möjligheter, människan, miljön och processen svarar på vad, vem, var, och hur.
Entreprenöriella ”debatter”
Management: existerande
produkter på existerande
marknad.
Entreprenörskap: Ny
produkt på en ny marknad
(Apple). Här blir
bestlutssamheten helt
annorlunda, man får i stället
använda entreprenöriella
metoder för att kunna
kontrollera (uppleva) risk.
Different kinds of uncertainty
‘Knightian uncertainty’ – consequences cannot be assigned probability and cannot be
calculated;
‘Goal ambiguity’ – we don’t know exactly where we are headed;
‘Isotropy’ – we don’t know which conditions in the environment are important and which
conditions can be ignored.
Fyra nivåer av osäkerhet
Möjligheten
”Möjligheter är centralt för entreprenörskap, utan dessa skulle entreprenörskap inte
existera.” – Shepard & Grégoire
”Entreprenörskap är centrala för möjligheterna, utan entreprenörskap skulle inte möjligheter
existera.” – Saravathy
I den översta där finns möjligheterna medan i den andra är det entreprenören som skapar
möjligheterna.
Vad talar vi om när vi talar om möjligheter?
Vi talar om gynnsamma omständigheter, ett tillfälle, en chans.
Entreprenöriell möjlighet = Gynnsamma omständigheter som möjliggör skapandet av det nya
eller signifikant förbättrade produkter, tjänster, affärsmodeller, processer eller praktiker.
”Att hitta eller skapa möjligheter”
Var kommer möjligheterna ifrån?
- De kan spåras till samhällsutvecklingen och konsumenttrender - ”gaps in the market”
(PESTEL)
- De utvecklas ur forskning/ny teknik/ny kunskap
- De utgår från och löser ”customer pains”
- De hittas genom att finna saker som fungerar någon annanstans (analogi-transfer)
- Produceras genom ”effectuation” (att arbeta fram) – den entreprenöriella metoden
- De blir till genom entreprenörens blick – integrationen av hitta och skapa.
Möjligheterna sitter i betraktarens ögon, t.ex. ishotellet i Jukkasjärvi. Agentberoende
möjligheter.
- Ekonomiska perspektiv: transformera resurser med lite värde till högvärdiga produkter
- Ekologiskt perspektiv: vi använder värdefulla resurser…
Hållbarhet
Kan illustreras som en pall, den kan inte stå på ett ben utan måste ha tre: ekonomiska
hållbarhet, miljömässiga hållbarhet och hållbarhet i samhället. Alla benen behövs för att skapa
balans och stabilitet för en långsiktig hållbarhet.
Tragedy of the commons (Hardin 1968)
- Behov av systemperspektiv
- Tekniska lösningar inte nog
- Kontrakt/överenskommelse som lösning
Allt börjar i naturen där vi har råmaterial. Det ska hålla så länge som möjligt i cirkeln. T.ex. är
det viktigt att designa så att den håller, att tillverka så att delarna lätt kan bytas ut, ska kunna
spridas både ut till kunder och tillbaka för reparation. Det är också viktigt att kunna samla in
råmaterialet igen så att det inte hamnar på fel ställen, för att sedan kunna återvinna
råmaterialet (för förhoppningsvis är förnybart) och därmed kan man börja om cirkeln utan att
göra speciellt stor skada.
Hållbarhet
1. Lagstiftning som möjlighet
2. Värdekedjor
3. Produkter och tjänster
4. Nya affärsmodeller
5. Disruptiva innovationer
Ekoprenörskap
- Affärsmodeller med miljön som utgångspunkt.
- Utmaning att balansera miljömässig, ekonomiska och samhällelig utveckling.
Kritik
- Vad är nytt?
- Är det ekonomiskt hållbart?
- Är det attraktivt?
- Är det nog utvecklat?
Samhällsentreprenörskap
Definitioner brukar inkludera:
- Samhällsomvandling: att ha en social agenda för att förändra något i samhället.
- Sociala värden: att förstärka eller förändra olika åsikter och värden.
- Förändring och behov: förändringspotential och tar tag i saker och ting.
- Nytt värdeskapande som ger något tillbaka till samhället
- Drivet av samhälleliga mål men behöver balansera alla tre benen
Vem är samhällsentreprenören?
- Någon som tar på sig ett kall
- Som ser och agera på möjligheter kopplat till detta kall
- Som drivs av en process av innovation, anpassning och lärande
- Som agerar riskfyllt med begränsande resurser
Varför samhällsentreprenörskap?
- Kontextberoende
- Tid och plats
- Unika situationer
- Stora förändringar: Statens roll, globalisering, urbanisering
Perspektiv på samhällsentreprenörskap
1. Hur mäter man förändring?
2. Begränsat kapital
3. Vikten av nätverk och mobilisering av resurser?
4. Går det att skala upp?
5. Hinder för förändring
Vikten av nätverk
Samhällsentreprenören har ofta stort social kapital.
- Socialt kapital – ”förmågan att arbeta tillsammans för gemensamma mål i grupper
och organisationer” – Fukuyama 1995
- Inkluderar relationer, nätverk, förtroende och samarbete.
Har alla socialt kapital? Svar ja, alla känner någon som vidare känner någon osv.
Aktuella utvecklingslinjer inom entreprenörskap
Samhällsentreprenören fokuserar på människorna idag.
Hållbart entreprenörskap fokuserar på de tre benen.
Miljöentreprenören fokuserar på de tre benen men främst på ekonomi och ekologi.
- Det är inte all samhällsentreprenörskap som är miljömässigt och vice versa, men
hållbart entreprenörskap inkluderar både och.
- Miljömässigt entreprenörskap utnyttjar hål i marknaden som leder till ekonomiska och
ekologiska vinster.
Föreläsning 4
Entrepreneurship as the art and science of opportunity based action
Entreprenörskap handlar om både konst och om handling. Möjligheten till konst (att betrakta
världen) och möjligheten till handling.
Nödvändighetsdriven entreprenörskap = man tvingas bli entreprenör i och med
omständigheterna.
Environmental sensitivity = förmågan att se vad som pågår i omvärlden.
”Självklarhetens tyranni”
Färdigproducerade tankescheman som inte längre är föremål för diskussion.
- Etablerad visdom
- Dominant logik
- Trossystem
- Kognitiva kartor
- Paradigm
- Ideologier
- Stora berättelser
- Kognitiva komfortzoner
- Intellektuell ”inertia”, fördomar
- Ta-för-givet-antaganden
Human Agency - Människans agentskap, d.v.s. kapacitet att göra val, handla och påverka
verkligheten. Idéen om att människan är fri.
Agent dependent vs. agent independent
Vissa möjligheter är mer beroende av människans handlingsförmåga att påverka verkligheten.
- Agent independent = T.ex. göra beräkningar på en fastighet för att sälja den.
- Agent dependent = T.ex. att personen tänker att de ska göra en 5:a till 5 st 1:or.
Strukturell determinism och agentens voluntarism
”Det måste finnas en väg mellan strukturell determinism och agentens voluntarism”.
Människor gör val och agerar i linje med dem för att påverka verkligheten i den riktning man
vill (”enact them on the world”).
Potentialitet = att se potentialen i någonting, att se någonting bortom det existerande.
Entreprenöriella möjligheter och omöjligheter
Restriktion 1: Det ”tekniskt” möjliga – är det tekniskt möjligt att lösa problemet?
Restriktion 2: Det efterfrågade – är mottagande intresserade av den lösningen?
Restriktion 3: Det ekonomiskt möjliga – kan det löna sig? (alt. Skapar det värde?)
Entreprenörskap som lärande i handling
Att odla sin blick för att förstå och handla i världen.
Människan
Sociologin och geografins bidrag
- Weber: Den protestantiska etiken
- McClelland: The Achieving Society
- Hofstede: Kulturella kontexter
- Putnam: Det sociala kapitalet, tillit mellan människor
- Saxenian: Silicon-valley-dynamiken
- ”Gnosjöstudier”
- Florida: The creative class – desto högre Gay-index, ju mer innovativa.
“Entrepreneurship is not a magic, is not mysterious, and it has nothing to do with genes, it is
a discipline. And like any discipline it can be learned” – Drucker, 1985.
E-genen – forskning kring egenskaper
- Self-efficacy:” Internal locus of control” (ungefär självtillit)
- Prestationsbehov
- Riskhantering (Hanterar risker och är inte gamblers)
- Osäkerhetstolerans (Tål osäkerhet och letar inte efter säkra situationer)
- Typ A-beteende (strukturerad och har många bollar i luften samtidigt)
Self-efficacy
= den psykologiska förklaringen för hur entreprenörer tänker.
”tron på sin förmåga att påverka och göra skillnad i olika situationer” – A. Bandura
”det där som förvandlar tankar till handling”
“a belief that you can make a difference”
- Hög self-efficacy: ”Jag tror på att jag kan bidra till att göra skillnad och förändra olika
situationer”. Man fullföljer något man påbörjat och det är de som blir entreprenörer.
- Låg self-efficacy:” Jag är ett offer och ett hinder stoppar mig från att fortsätta”.
Människor med en stark känsla av ”self-efficacy”:
- Ser utmanande problem som uppgifter att hantera/behärska
- Utvecklar ett djupare engagemang för aktiviteter de deltar i
- Glömmer snabbt motgångar och misslyckanden
1. Konventioner/regler: Genom att se ett föremål som vi känner igen har vi svårt att kunna
se det föremålet som något annat. Ex. galgen.
2. Sunt förnuft: En vägg i boxen som är vår inre kompass, den säger åt oss att vara logiska.
Vi är inskolade i att det finns ett rätt svar och är oroade för vad andra ska tycka.
3. Fysiologi: Hur vi är byggda rent biologiskt. Här diskuteras hjärnan. Den vänstra sägs
vara den som är logiskt tänkande och den högra är den kreativa, målet är att låta båda
halvorna samarbeta.
4. Medvetande: Handlar om förmågan att vara medveten om både delar och helhet.
Förmåga att växla mellan detaljnivå och helikopterperspektiv.
Entreprenörskap – fågelperspektivet
Processen
William B Gartner - Det viktiga är inte vem entreprenören är utan hur entreprenören gör.
Per Davidsson - Processen beror av hur individen samspelar med miljön och möjligheten
Man kan inte förutse en process utan det beror på vilka människor som är inblandade, hur
omvärlden ser ut etc. som formar processen.
Process – en stegvis utveckling
Discovery
- Hur skall värde skapas och kunna tillfalla den nya organisationen? Identifiera
nyckelaktörer samt samla och analysera information.
Exploitation
- Skapa en juridisk enhet, skaffa tillstånd och licenser, ta fram prototyper. Anskaffa,
kombinera och koordinera resurser samt generera efterfrågan
Man växlar mellan att upptäcka saker och genomföra dem, handlar om ett samspel.
Hur initieras processen?
- Externt initierad process: Utgår från beslutet att starta en verksamhet och sökande
efter en lämplig idé.
- Internt initierad process: Entreprenören identifierar ett behov och tillfredsställer det,
vilket leder till att en affärsmöjlighet uppstår.
Sara Sarasvathy: Två vägar att gå
Causation: Entreprenören sätter upp mål och syften och försöker nå dem genom att använda
olika medel. Bra att använda sig av när man vet att man vet att man ska. Liknar
projektplanering. Planerad, systematiserad, förutbestämd, rationell, och linjär.
Effectuation: Entreprenören utgår från befintliga medel och låter mål och syfte utvecklas
under arbetsprocessen. Kan identifieras som vad man har för givna medel och vad man ska
göra med dem. Handlar om vad man har, inte vart man ska. improviserad, serendipity, kreativ,
experimentell, flexibel och ickelinjär.
Serendipity
= ”Förmågan att vara på rätt ställe vid rätt tillfälle”. Handlar inte om att ha tur, utan hur man
hamnat i dessa tillfällen.
Ingen slump… ”accidental discoveries” vs. ”prepared minds”.
- Colombian serendipity: Man ger sig ut för att finna nya saker, man hamnar på något
helt annat ställe än det man tänkt sig och att man gör något bra av det.
- Archimedean serendipity: Innebär att man är så inne i en problemlösning att man kan
hitta lösningen någon annanstans. Vi måste vara öppna för att se dessa saker.
Arkimedes kom på hur man mäter volym genom att bada.
- Galileian serendipity: Handlar om att man skaffar sig resurser för att upptäcka nya
saker utan att veta vad man ska upptäcka.
Nätverk
Heterogenitets argumentet
- Relationell nivå: Handlar om ytliga och lösa kontakter
- Nätverksnivå: de människor som man känner men de man känner, de känner inte
varandra. Man själv är spindeln i nätet.
Homogenitets argumentet
- Relationell nivå: Alla våra nära nätverk. T.ex. släkten.
- Nätverksnivå: Alla man känner, de känner också varandra.