Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Ecological Modelling is a methodological key skill in modern environmental research. Ecological


models are very useful for simulating and analyzing the long-term dynamics and stability properties of
complex ecological systems. They allow integrating information from different disciplines as well as
analysing, interpreting and understanding field observations. Moreover, they allow alternative
scenarios to be developed, simulated, analyzed, compared, and ranked according to their effect. This
provides a basis for the development of tools for management support and policy advice. This is
particularly important in the context of mastering one of the grand challenges of the future: the
preservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions in face of Global Change (esp. climate, land use
or institutional change).

In the paper “Food web model of the Upper Parana´ River Floodplain: description and aggregation
effects” by Angelini and Agostinho (2004) they have analysed and created a food web model using the
software ECOPATH and described the aggregation effects thus increasing the importance of the
integrity’s maintenance of this segment of Parana´ River, which should be necessarily linked to a
greater rationalization for operation of the dams upstream.

The aims of their work are:

(i) To quantify the ecotrophic community of the Upper Parana´ River Floodplain and,
(ii) To study the effect of two grouping methods of species on system-level information and
other ecosystem attributes.

They used software known as ECOPATH. Recent trends in ecosystem modelling have produced
complex simulation models which are very data intensive. However in situations like this construction
of a biomass budget for a box model of an ecosystem is relatively simple and can provide important
information about the ecosystem’s standing stock and energy flow. ECOPATH with ECOSIM (EwE)
is an ecological modelling software suite for personal computers that has built and extended on for
almost twenty years. The development is centred at ECOPATH International Initiative, a non-profit
research association established to secure the long-term development of EwE. EwE applications are
widespread throughout the world. EwE is the first ecosystem level simulation model to be widely and
freely accessible. As of January 2018, EwE has an estimated 8000 users in over 170 different countries
and well over 800 publications in ISI Web of Knowledge, making EwE an important modelling
approach to explore ecosystem related questions in marine science. For all these reasons, ECOPATH
software was recently recognized as one of NOAA’s top ten scientific breakthroughs in the last 200
years. The ECOPATH model is an analytical procedure to estimate a biomass budget for a box model
of an ecosystem given inputs which specify the components of the ecosystem, together with their
mortality, diet and energetic value.
EwE has three main components: ECOPATH – a static, mass-balanced snapshot of the
system; ECOSIM – a time dynamic simulation module for policy exploration; and ECOSPACE – a
spatial and temporal dynamic module primarily designed for exploring impact and placement of
protected areas. The ECOPATH software package can be used to

 Address ecological questions;


 Evaluate ecosystem effects of fishing;
 Explore management policy options;
 Evaluate impact and placement of marine protected areas;
 Evaluate effect of environmental changes.
The basic condition considered for ECOPATH model is that input to each group is equal to the output
from it (equilibrium conditions). Then, a series of biomass budget equations are determined for each
group as:
Production- all predation on each grouped species-non-predatory mortality-all exports = 0 which can
be expressed as:
0= Bi × PBi × EEi – Σj (Bj × QBj × DCji) – EXi

Where,

Bi – Biomass of the group

PBi – Production /biomass ratio, usually assumed equal to total mortality.

EEi – Ecotrophic efficiency, i.e. the proportion of ecological production consumes by predators or
exported and usually as summed to range from 0.7 to 0.99.

Bj – The biomass of the predator

QBj – Food consumption per unit of Biomass for predator j

DCji – Fraction of i in the diet of j

EXi – The export of i

Therefore, a system with n groups (boxes) will have n linear equations. Since ECOPATH links the
different groups, it allows the estimation of one unknown parameter for each group. The data required
for ECOPATH were assembled and standardized to ton × km-2 and ton × km-2 × year-1.

Sampling of fish was conducted at each three months on the various habitats (river, channels, lakes),
from March 1992 to February 1995. It was used gill nets (2–16 cm mesh) and trammel nets (6–8 cm
mesh). Fishing gears were deployed for 24 h sampling periods, with inspections at early morning, dusk
and late evening. Fishes were anesthetized with tricaine or oil of cloves before being sorted by species,
counted and measured. Each of the 28 fish species more abundant was represented by one
compartment, for which PB was calculated using Z (total mortality), QB using Palomares and Pauly
(1998) and B, was assessed by ECOPATH or in some cases by virtual population analysis (VPA) in
Fisat. When required, i.e., when B was unknown, EE’s values were provided all between 0.9 and 0.99.
Five others fish compartments were assembled to the model resulting from grouping 143 other species
accenting to their diet composition. For those species PB and QB, were calculated as an average of
compartments with same tropic level. The effect of grouping species on system-level information and
other attributes was investigated by two ways of aggregation of a 40-compartment model of Upper
Parana River Floodplain, called ´ original and used as a control. From this model two series of
aggregated variations were produced. The first series is the “classic” one and assumes the role of a
researcher, whom normally would lump species in an intuitive way and by food preferences. The
second series is “by pathway”. In this attempt, the first species groupings were those with higher
number of input pathways and longest mean length of pathways. Input pathways refer to number of
pathways leading to one specific group (or compartment) and mean path length is defined as total
number of groups that an inflow passes through before leading to one specific compartment/number of
input pathways of the specific compartment

To summarize, the ECOPATH model shows the number of input pathways and mean length of
pathways of each compartment. Surprisingly in this balanced model, the transfer efficiencies from
Lindeman pyramid did not present lower values in higher tropic levels. Therefore, an aggregation or
removal of compartments by the “classical” way (researcher experience and food preferences) was
attempted. Nevertheless, the anterior atypical structures remained, in exception of model with eight
compartments.
Although Power et al. (1995) affirmed that to understand food web dynamics on Floodplain Rivers,
heterogeneity in both space and time needs to be taken into account, we believe that the average
pattern described in Planicie model is suitable during the whole year. Planicie model permits
interdisciplinary research, despite generalizations that diminish precision and realism. This preliminary
approach could connect investigations in different compartments and to introduce hypothesis that
might be studied more thoroughly (by ECOSPACE) and systematically (by ECOSIM) in the future,
increasing the importance of the integrity’s maintenance of this segment of Parana River, which should
be necessarily linked to a greater rationalization for the operation of the dams upstream.

You might also like