Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Simpson Weeding Exercise and Report
Simpson Weeding Exercise and Report
Simpson Weeding Exercise and Report
LIS 60614
November 10, 2019
DCDL is a five (soon to be six) location library system and they have a floating collection. This
means that as materials are checked out, returned, and requested at different locations books
may live at different locations but all be equal parts of the collection. After determining what
books I would cull from this physical shelf, I consulted the catalogue to see if there were any
additional copies at other locations in the system.
DCDL is also a member of the Central Library Consortium (CLC). Card holders at DCDL can
request items from CLC libraries to be delivered and placed on hold for them as if these items
were part of the DCDL collection. This expands the offerings to patrons and requires that we
can be a bit more decisive when weeding the collection at DCDL. Therefore, I also considered
what was available from CLC members too when making recommendations for this set of
shelves.
increase, then reconsider purchasing a copy for the DCDL collection. This allows the
money that might be used to purchase a copy to be used to purchase another more
relevant title for the collection.
7. The Glory and the Dream (Written in 1974; 1990 edition on shelf)
This book is, first of all, ugly. Its pages are brittle and yellow. Secondly, this
history of America from 1932-1972 was published only two years after the
scope of its contents ends. The ramifications of events happening during the
contents of this history book could not have been resolved by then -- for
instance the Vietnam War was still going on. This means that the content of
the book is likely incomplete or misleading. There are three other copies
available through CLC, but I’d remove this title from the DCDL collection and
offer it to the FOL. There is no need to replace this title.
Through this exercise, I have learned that although a segment of a collection may appear trim
and well kept, there is always room for reevaluation. I also see very little need for multiple
copies of a history title in one collection, especially when it is so easy to obtain copies of these
infrequently circulated titles from CLC libraries. I wish I had access to the circulation history of
some of these objects so that I could make a more informed decision. Making weeding a
regular practice and not a monumental event is key to keeping a collection in check. It’s easy to
get rid of books that are in poor physical condition, but I found it much more difficult to decide if
books were still relevant based on their content. With more practice, and input from a
supervisor, I believe I could be even more successful at weeding.