Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crosby's Philosophy For Quality Improvement
Crosby's Philosophy For Quality Improvement
1|Page
Crosby's Fourteen Steps for Quality Improvement
The quality improvement process is never-ending.
Step 1-- Management Commitment
Crosby's suggested form of words for the policy is-- “Perform exactly
like the requirement”. These include the following:
Writing a treatise instead of a short statement
Allowing for non-conformance with an Accepted Quality Level
(AQL) built into the policy
Indicative statements on how to deviate from the policy
A delegation of the responsibility for evaluating the policy away
from the chief executive
3|Page
Crosby summarizes the entire education process in what he calls “The
Six Cs:”
Comprehension (understanding of what is necessary,
abandonment of the old way of thinking and of outdated
practices)
Commitment (management-led dedication to cultural change)
Competence (methodical and scientific implementation of the
improvement process)
Communication (complete cooperation throughout the
production process, including suppliers and customers)
Correction (elimination of all causes of problems and
prevention of new ones arising)
Continuance (never-ending effort for improvement)
4|Page
Step 11-- Error-Cause Removal
One of Crosby's suggestions here is to set up a suggestion box into
which workers can pop a one page error-cause removal form.
1. If someone decides to do nothing about an error-cause removal
form, he or she should clear this decision with at least one but
preferably two levels of supervision.
Step 12-- Recognition
Crosby considers recognition as a necessary reference point and as a
guideline to help the improvement efforts in the right direction.
Step 13-- Quality Council
All quality professionals can be brought together in one group under the
name of the quality council. These will be the people who will define
the mission, vision, values and policies necessary for managing the
improvement process.
Step 14-- Do it All Over Again
This step indicates to do it all over again to emphasize that quality
programs never end and that they are indeed a journey not a destination.
This is shown in Crosby’s triangle.
5|Page
2. The effort is called a program rather than a process. There is an
apparent management’s non-involvement in the quality effort.
6|Page
more proud of their work. Such apprehensions are not warranted,
provided:
1. The management (including the top management) is itself not
demotivated toward ZD.
2. All the important precautions regarding implementing the zero
defects program are properly taken care of.
7|Page