1. Describe what you see from the illustration. Do you think that the situation will merit an investigation?
As what I can see from the illustration, two police officer
arrested a driver. It seems that the accused is seized by the legal authority and will be taken into custody. On the illustration, the police is taking charge of the driver because they believe that he may have committed a crime, a thievery crime as my preconceived notion. My evidence would be the statement in the illustration “Any DNA found in the scene can be held against you”. Since DNA evidence have been the forefront of criminal investigations and it can solve property crimes, and in this situation I presume the suspect is held accountable by a property crime. This is also an active event type of crime since the suspect is still at the scene of the event.
This situation will firmly merit an investigation for the purpose
of determining how events occurred, and to establish an evidence- based fact pattern to prove the guilt or innocence of the accused person in this criminal occurrence. 2. What do you think is the “issue” of the policeman?
Operationally defining “issue”- issue of the police officer in the
situation:
The issue of the policeman in this situation is that there is no
showing of ID or even the presence of police badge. This is an important for the police officers to have; this is a proof that they are legitimate officers.
As what I have observed, there is no warrant of arrest present
or this is a warrantless arrest. So in this case, the police have a good reason or a probable to cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person they want to arrest or they have seen has committed the crime.
Operationally defining “issue”- issue of the police officer
towards the suspect:
They issue of the police officer towards the suspect is on the
action taken by the accused person in which they have reasonable suspicion that justifies the said issue. The issue is that since this is an active event type of crime, the suspect who is still at the crime scene is accused by the police as the suspect. 3. How do you think an inquiry would be useful in the resolution of the above “issue”?
The challenge for every police is that the questioning of a
suspect and the subsequent confession can be compromised by flawed inquiry practices. I think that through understanding the correct processes and the legal parameters can make the difference between having a suspect’s confession accepted as evidence by the court.
4. Suggest possible outcomes for this possible situation.
The first possible outcome is that since an officer cannot arrest
someone just because they feel like or it’s a vague hunch that someone might be a criminal. The police officers justified their arrest by showing tangible evidence that led them to probable cause. The second possible outcome is that forensic science then plays a significant role in the investigation of this crime. The DNA left in the crime scene will be the treasure trove for the forensic scientist. Through DNA Profiling which is the process of determining an individual’s characteristics. Circumstantial inculpatory evidence such as the fingerprint of the accused found at the crime scene would then be presented to the court as the main evidence that leads to a single logical conclusion. The third possible outcome that I can think of for this situation is that the court will reach then their conclusion of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and then the suspect will then be held accountable by a property stealing crime.
What Have I Learned So Far?
1. What might happen to mankind if no research was done?
For me, research is the best thing that has happen to mankind.
This is the crowning glory of every aspect in life. Research is not
limited to any sector but has been done for almost every sector. If no research was done, we will be living in a world without innovation, and without innovation there will be no progress. Research is significant to find answers to questions in life which will head to a great impact to the lives of mankind
2. Make a brief comparison of the present technological situation in
the Philippines (2014-2015) versus that prevailed five years ago, i.e., 2009-2010. What major advances can you attribute to as product of research and investigation?
Comparing what year has the best technological advancement
between year 2009-2010 and 2014-2015, we can say that 2014- 2015 has the better technological advancement due to it is more advance but without the advancement during the year 2009-2010 maybe we can’t have the technologies we used during that year. 2009-2010 paved way to new ideas and improve the technologies more further in 2014-2015. In year 2009-2010 was the rise of smart phone. Smart phone became popular instantly it is because of its features that can be useful in daily life. While in the year 2014-2015 the technology we use became more advance than ever before.
3. Identify new beneficial products, innovation or technologies
arising from research. These innovations, technologies or products may come from the field of chemistry, biology, physics, environmental engineering, or earth science which you have directly experienced or prevailed of.
A lot has changed since technology became more advance, by
improving our current technology it made our lives more easier and productive. Technology didn’t became advance in just only one aspect but it reaches different fields like in Medicine, sciences,robotics,education,engineering and on national defense. All of the advancements was product of research, without it we cannot come up to new ideas that can made our live more easier and also without the effort and knowledge of the researchers. One of notable technological advancement was in the field of medicine.
btw ma'am, I was surprised to find a chocolate bar (ugh!! My
favorite remedy) inside my bag. Just want to let u know I enjoyed the chocolate and it did brightened up my day. I really appreciate it, ma’am.