Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ECON1101 Notes PDF
ECON1101 Notes PDF
ECON1101 Notes
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● To find out how to derive an economy-wide PPC, look at the steps in the
following link: http://lionsheartstudios-publishing.com/unsw/ch_1_pg_3/
● Any combination of goods that lies on this economy-wide PPC will result in
the use of ALL inputs
● Any combination of goods that lies below/to the left of this economy-wide
PPC indicates an underutilisation or inefficient use of resources
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Looking at the diagram above, we see that the opportunity cost of bananas
increases (the gradient of the blue slope becomes steeper).
○ This is due to the fact that resources are scarce
● The Low-Hanging Fruit Principle (or increasing Opportunity Cost):
This principle states that in the process of increasing production of any
good, one first employs those resources with the lowest opportunity cost.
Once these resources are exhausted, it is then viable to turn to resources
with a higher opportunity cost
● The main factors driving economic growth (pushing the economy-wide
PPC out and to the right) come from an increase in inputs. This can come
in the form of:
○ an increase in infrastructure such as factories, equipment, etc
○ an increase in the population, such so in the labour force
○ advancements in knowledge and technology (education, R&D, IT
and communications technologies)
http://lionsheartstudios-publishing.com/unsw/ch_1_pg_66/
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● The principles of the two agent economy applies in this scenario as well
● Start by considering the two scenarios in which all workers collect bananas
or catch rabbits. This gives you the points on the x & y axis
● With just two agents, the curve started to arc from its origin. With millions
of agents, this will translate to a smooth arc
● Remember that this slope reflects the opportunity cost of 1 kg of bananas
in terms of forgone rabbits
○ As we increase the quantity of bananas produced, the PPC slope
also increases, meaning the opportunity cost rises
○ As in the two-agent case, if we need more bananas, we will assign
the task to the agent with the lowest opportunity cost at picking
bananas in the economy. If society wants even more bananas, it will
be necessary to employ another agent that has a higher opportunity
cost than the first agent
General Notes
● For the chapter 1 question 2, the answer is $79 because she has spent
$19 for the movie and lost $60 in terms of the opportunity to babysit ($60 is
the second best option)
● To calculate OC, the formula is loss OVER gain (loss is the whatever the
question wants in terms of and gain is the item which you are calculating
the opportunity cost for. For example, let’s say one person produces 24
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Market: The market for a given good or service is the set of all the
consumers and suppliers who are willing to buy and sell that good or
service at a given price
● Market Equilibrium: Market equilibrium occurs when the price and the
quantity sold of a given good is stable
○ The equilibrium price is such that the quantity that consumers want
today is the same as the quantity that suppliers want to sell
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Let’s consider an entrepreneur producing soft drinks that sell at $1.20 per
unit (data in table below)
○ Requires machinery with a daily repayment of $100
○ Each employee costs him $12
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● For the first worker, marginal benefit is simply the price where you can sell
the cans at ($1.20)
● The marginal cost is (change in total cost divided by change in quantity
produced):
○ Using formula below, the marginal cost of first employee will be
$0.30. Using the cost benefit principle, the firm should hire the first
worker because the marginal benefit is greater than the marginal
cost
ΔT C
ΔQ
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● The above graph plots the average variable cost (AVC), average total cost
(ATC) and Marginal Cost (MC)
○ This is a discrete model
● The above graph is the same as the first graph but it is using a continuous
model (labour supply was more flexible and employees were hired for as
many hours as the entrepreneur wants)
● The above graph allows you to easily find the optimal quantity
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● We can also use this graph to verify whether the entrepreneur should shut
down in the short run (shut down condition in the short run) by seeing if the
price line is below the minimum point o
n the AVC (Average Variable Cost
Curve) (see diagram below)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● To verify whether entrepreneur should shut down in the long run, they
should shut down if the price is lower than the minimum of the ATC
(average total cost) curve (see diagram below)
● The supply curve for a firm is equal to the Marginal Cost (MC) curve
○ Only for values that are higher than the minimum AVC (in the short
run)
○ Only for values that are higher than the minimum ATC (in the long
run)
● The MC curve eventually increases with quantity produced (subject to
increasing marginal costs) due to productivity losses
● The MC curve cuts the AVC curve and ATC curve at their minimum points
● In the long run, the AVC curve would become identical to the ATC curve
(this is not shown in the diagram above) because all costs become variable
(fixed costs don’t exist)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
○ Input prices
○ Expectations: If sellers expect the demand for a product to rise,
they might reduce supply until the price rises due to this increase in
demand
○ Changes in the pricing of other products: if a seller sells more
than one good and a particular good experiences a surge in
demand, the seller will shift its productive focus to the high demand
good (= supply curve shifts to the right)
○ Number of suppliers: the higher the number of suppliers entering a
market, the larger the shift to the right in the aggregate supply curve
● This denotes the percentage change in the quantity supplied resulting from
a change in price
1
P rice
Quantity x Slope
● Law of Supply: Supply curves have the tendency of being upward sloping
○ This is why the price elasticity of supply is usually positive (when
price increases, supply increases as well)
● Supply is elastic when the price elasticity of supply is greater than 1
● Supply is unit elastic when price elasticity of supply is equal to 1
● Supply is inelastic when the price elasticity of supply is less than 1
● Elasticity is not the same at each point
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Special Note
● In the example above, the first total cost of $10 for 0 quantity is a fixed cost
○ This is how we can easily identify the fixed cost if it is not given
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
OR
P rice 1
Quantity x Slope
● Note that the price elasticity of demand is almost always negative. This is
due to the fact that price and quantity tend to move in opposite directions
○ For simplicity, we will ignore the negative sign and consider the
absolute value of price elasticity
● Demand is elastic if the price elasticity is greater than 1
● Demand is unit elastic if price elasticity = 1
● Demand is inelastic if price elasticity is lower than 1
● Even for a straight line with a constant gradient, the elasticity is different at
different points on the line
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Let’s say we have two producers of Apple juice. Each of them have
different supply curves due to differences in their respective production
processes. To find the aggregate supply curve (total supply for the
economy), simply take a price, check how much each producer supplies at
this price and then sum up these quantities
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● For the aggregate demand curve, the same concept applies (see diagram
below)
● The aggregate demand and supply is the horizontal sum of the individual
demand and supply curves
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Market Equilibrium
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● The Invisible Hand Principle: The invisible hand principle states that
individuals’ independent efforts to maximise their gains (profits for sellers
and utility for buyers) will generally be beneficial for society and result in
the socially optimal allocation of resources
● If firms in a market are making positive profits, there is an incentive for new
ones to enter the market. This will cause the supply curve to shift to the
right and which in turn, reduces the equilibrium price
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● As illustrated in the diagram above, there is profit and thus, more firms will
enter the market. The resulting effect is shown in the picture below:
● As set out above, the long run supply curve will be a horizontal line that is
equal to the minimum average total cost
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Price Ceiling
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● The price ceiling forces the price down, creating excess demand
● The buyers with the highest willingness to pay can acquire the good at a
lower cost price, thus the surplus increases (area A’) compared to their
surplus before the price ceiling (area A)
● However, a certain group of consumers will be left unserved after the price
ceiling is introduced since the reduction in price results in a decrease in the
quantity supplied. The amount of surplus lost is area B (the pink area in
picture below)
● Furthermore, producers are also worse off as their initial surplus (area C) is
larger than the final one (area C’) (see picture below)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Deadweight loss: This is the loss in economic surplus due to the market
being prevented from reaching the equilibrium price and quantity where
marginal benefit equals marginal cost
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Price Floor
● Consumers are also worse off since some won’t be able to afford the
higher price
● In this case, the losers are the consumers that can’t buy and producers
that don’t sell
○ Another loser are consumers that currently buy and have to pay a
higher price
● The only winners are the producers that manage to sell their product
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Taxation
● By introducing the tax, consumer surplus will decline due to the increase in
price
● Now let’s say that there is a $1 tax (levied on per unit of good produced)
and as a result of this $1 tax, the price increase is $0.5
○ Hence, the consumers bear a fraction of the tax burden (they would
bear the full amount if the price rose by $1)
● The remaining part of the tax burden is borne by producers (in this case,
$0.5 would be borne by the producers since the other $0.5 was borne by
consumers)
● To determine the government tax revenue, this should be the tax amount
(in our case, $1) multiplied by the quantity supplied after the tax (this is the
red area in the diagram)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Subsidy
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Also in the diagram above, the red area is the deadweight loss
● A better option than a subsidy would be to lump-sum transfer from the rich
to the poor
Exporting Country
● Let’s say the price of rabbits domestically is $10 and the world price is $15.
Without trade, the price will obviously remain at $10 (equilibrium). However
with trade (assuming there are no trade restrictions), domestic suppliers
are willing to sell to overseas producers at $15
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Importing Country
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Total surplus is always higher with trade than without (assuming that there
are no trade restrictions like tariffs or quotas)
○ However, domestic consumers lose surplus when producers export
and sell goods at the higher world price
○ Domestic producers lose surplus when the country starts to import
cheaper goods
○ This is what leads to trade restrictions by lobbying the government
Trade Restrictions
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Due to the tariff of $10 (which increases the price from $15 to $25),
consumers will lose the surplus of H, I, J and K
● Domestic producers gain H through the increase in price
● The government gains J through tariff revenue
● I and K become deadweight loss
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Price will be $25 and consumers will buy 6,000 books in total (4,000
domestically, 2,000 in imports)
● The impact on consumer surplus is the same as the tariff; it falls by
H+I+J+K
● Surplus of producers will rise by H again
● The area J will go to importing agents (they buy at $15 and sell at $25)
○ If the government charges a fee to importing agents, then
government revenue would be the same as tariff revenue
● Deadweight loss is also I + K
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● As soon as there are barriers to entry, market power is likely to arise. A list
of barriers to entry include:
○ Control over scarce resources: If a firm has exclusive control over
key inputs of production, it might be impossible for other firms to
enter the market
○ Government-Created Barriers to Entry: This is through issuing
patents, offering copyright protection or granting licenses. If a
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Monopoly
ΔR
Marginal Revenue = ΔQ
● Now that we know this, we know how to maximize the monopolist’s profit.
Simply expand production until the marginal revenue equals the marginal
cost
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● For the monopolist, there is an implicit cost in increasing the quantity sold
(to increase quantity, they need to reduce price to attract more customers)
● Thus, equilibrium production level is lower than the socially optimal one
(600 units as opposed to 1000 units)
● The deadweight loss in this situation is the red area (due to the fact that
the monopolist does not select the socially optimal quantity)
● It is clear that the invisible hand principle does not apply in this case (the
principle says that individual’s independent efforts to maximise their gains
(profits for sellers and utility for buyers) will generally be beneficial for
society and result in a socially optimal allocation of resources
Government Regulation
1) The government can only estimate the ATC (it does not know actual, exact
figures)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
Cartel Game
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● These are a type of game where the players benefit from coordinating
their decisions
● A strategy profile denote a set of strategies, one for each player.
● Nash Equilibrium - a strategy profile is a Nash Equilibrium if no
player can benefit from unilaterally changing their strategy
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● In the diagram above, the red curve represents the social demand
curve
● The marginal external benefit is $2 (see the horizontal red line at the
bottom)
○ As such, we get the red lines by shifting the blue line upwards
by $2 (vertical distance is marginal external benefit)
● Looking at the graph above, assume the market price is $8
● If you only considered your own marginal benefit, you would consume
4 units of the good (marginal benefit would be = $8 and this is equal
to the marginal cost)
● However, the socially optimal quantity is 6 units (the social demand
curve is $8 when you consume 6 units)
● By making consumption decisions without accounting for external
benefits, you are not maximising social surplus. This results in a
deadweight loss (see diagram below)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● This highlights the limitations of the invisible hand principle where the
action which maximises personal satisfaction does not translate to
the optimal amount of consumption for society as a whole
● To solve this problem, parties can undergo a private negotiation
○ The person gaining the marginal external benefits can pay $2 to
get the consumer to consume 2 more units of the good
● Coase Theorem: this theorem states that if trade in an externality is
possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an
efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights
○ This is also the idea that inefficiency arising from externalities
can be solved without government intervention
● Other examples of positive consumption externalities include:
○ Fitness activities - reduces health care for society
○ Vaccinations - by being vaccinated, an individual reduces the
likelihood that others get infected
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● The socially optimal quantity occurs when you produce 2 units (the
social marginal cost will be $3 which is equal to the benefit you gain)
● Similarly, this problem can also be solved by private bargaining.
Someone could offer you $1 to decrease production by one unit
● Examples of negative production externalities include:
○ Harmful production activities - increase water, noise and air
pollution
○ Excessive risk taking - banks can kickstart global financial
crises
○ Overfishing - depletes stock of fish in the ocean
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Now let’s consider a market with many buyers and sellers (smooth
demand and supply curves)
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● Note that panel A shows the social demand curve in a market with
positive consumption externalities. Panel B shows the social supply
curve in a market with negative production externalities
● It is important to note that in this a market with a large number of
buyers and sellers, the Coase theorem no longer applies since the
sheer number of buyers and sellers creates high transaction costs
● As such, government intervention is necessary to fix what the market
cannot handle (subsidies and taxes)
● We know that subsidies can stimulate consumption by shifting the
demand curve to the right
● A tax equal to the marginal external cost would shift the private
supply curve to the left
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
● As long as the marginal social benefit (gray curve) is greater than the
marginal cost, you should hire the cleaner
● When setting marginal social benefit equal to the marginal cost, what
we’re really doing is setting the sum of the individual marginal
benefits equal to the marginal cost
● The Samuelson Condition states that the efficient quantity of a
public good is found by setting the sum of the individual marginal
benefits equal to the marginal cost
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
http://lionsheartstudios-publishing.com/unsw/ch_10_pg_3/
InsideSherpa
ECON1101
InsideSherpa