Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inquiry
Inquiry
Inquiry
Andrew Williams
English-1103
9 November 2010
Self-Assessment: I feel that this has come out to be a fairly solid paper. I manage to
convey all of my thoughts while using the research I’ve gathered. I paid careful attention to my
Works Cited and my in-text citations, so I feel that’s not a worry. My conclusion could have
probably been stronger, but it does its job of summing up the main ideas and the single main
point of the entire paper. Otherwise I feel the ideas flowed well and it proves convincing for
skeptics.
Literacy is easily one of the most important skills any individual can possess. This has
always been and always will be true. But how does one improve their literacy skills, or begin
with what is commonly called a “jump start”? Music skills and music education have proven
themselves time and time again as invaluable contributors to advanced literacy skills. Musical
ability, musical training, or both lead to advanced literacy, which becomes evident either in early
Many who have studied this particular subject believe that this advancement stems from
learning music at an early age, and by extension the advancement becomes evident early on as
well. However, as said by Dr. Joseph Piro, Assistant Professor at Long Island University’s
Williams 2
beyond a doubt (32). At the same time, convincing evidence that music training has an impact
on mathematical skills has led to the increase in evidence which points to music indeed having
quite an impact on reading and writing skills (32). In order to try to prove this, Dr. Piro and
other professors working in his department gathered 103 students from a large American public
school system who already were involved in regular music lessons along with a second group of
students who had little or no musical experience, and gave each group similar literacy tests in
order to compare literacy performance. The two groups were otherwise very similar, coming
become an entirely unbiased study aside from the musical involvement (Piro 32).
The 103 students from the urban school system who serve as the above experiment’s
experimental group were part of a curriculum where from kindergarten through second grade
music instruction was mandatory. Developed by the Music and The Brain (MATB) project, the
curriculum taught music through “group keyboard instruction” (Piro 32). In other words, the
students attended 45-minute lessons twice a week in a keyboard laboratory, which provided each
of them with headphones and a personal keyboard which they used to read, interpret, and finally
practice music. These lessons taught the students all the basic essentials of notation, hand and
fingering techniques, sight-reading, note values, and rest values, along with various other skills,
Dr. Piro’s study began when the students in the experimental group (103 students who
have had music lessons) and those in the control group (students who had not had music lessons)
began second grade. By this time, the experimental group had already had two years of music
training. However, oddly enough (and to the dismay of Dr. Piro and his colleagues) when both
Williams 3
groups took the pretest at the beginning of the school year, the experimental group’s
performance nearly matched the control group’s performance when the former was expected to
greatly surpass the latter. For this they initially blamed the ten-week summer vacation, but
began to toy with the possibility of two years of music training potentially not being long enough
for the students to be able to retain what they learned or the growth that came from it (Piro 33).
It is heavily suggested that it takes a fair amount of time-potentially several years-for the effects
of prolonged music study to become evident (Hallam 31).Nevertheless, they remained involved
in music training for the rest of that school year, and at the end of the year both the experimental
group and the control group took the test once again. This time the expected results came to
pass: the experimental group highly outperformed the control group (33). Despite this, however,
musician, seems to argue that while the data may appear promising, it’s not quite as reliable as
it’s said to be. Despite results from experiments that all but prove beyond a doubt a connection
between music study and advanced literacy skills, she points out that several studies have not
found any difference in reading ability between students in the experimental group and students
in the control group (31). However, there are many other factors to account for. Summer
vacations always do quite a number on young children in school, learning on the piano may have
had an impact, and, in the case of Dr. Piro’s experiment, it’s very possible that many students
simply may not show much change over the long term if the long term happens to not be a very
long time (33). Nevertheless, Dr. Hallam maintains that there are “benefits for engaging in
musical activities in relation to reading beyond those associated with language development, but
Some argue that there is a direct correlation between musical development and literacy
development, mainly because “human beings are inherently musical” (O’Connor and Kimball
317). In fact, studies show that one of the first intelligences if not the first intelligence is that of
rhythm. This fact is due in part to the presence of the maternal heartbeat during development as
well as other external sounds (318). This supposedly embedded sense of rhythm is one of many
The facts previously stated may very well explain why music stimulation has such a
profound impact on students (young students, especially) with learning disabilities. For
example, a beat/rhythm/melody which holds a student’s attention while directing it to some sort
of task required of the student would be quite ideal. Of course it doesn’t always work that way,
which calls for more experimentation. By observing the language development and emotional
adjustment of students with special needs after placing them into music study, it was reported
that the use of music in their studies increased verbal response and improved language of
“language-delayed children” (McIntire 1). In this way, music is directly linked to language.
Who can really say just how much of an impact music training has on literacy? How do
we know that musical ability and advanced literacy skills aren’t simply things we’re born with
that go hand-in-hand? As of now there is no way of knowing, but evidence seems to consistently
point to the likelihood of music having quite a large impact on literacy, and until now has all but
been proven beyond a doubt, such as the above experiment using the two groups of children. Or
perhaps the sudden advance in lingual ability was coincidental, rather than being a result of prior
music study. Just as O’Connor and Kimball state, “students’ familiarity with music provides an
excellent means of setting up problem-based learning” (319). This suggests that music studies
Williams 5
will lead to increased proficiency in other areas (literacy specifically), no matter how different.
Proficiency in music equates to advanced literacy skills; there is too much evidence to deny it.
Works Cited
McIntire, Jean M. “Developing Literacy Through Music.” Teaching Music Jun. 2009: 1.
href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
Music.</A>.
Hallam, Susan. “The Effect of Music Lessons on Literacy.” Literacy Today Sep. 2009: 2.
href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
literacy.</A>.
Piro, Joseph. “Music Training and Literacy Development.” Literacy Today Jun. 2009: 4.
href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
development.</A>.
Williams 6
Kimball, Katherine, and O’Connor, Lisa. “Engaging Auditory Modalities through the Use of