Project Title: “ PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN OF SOCIALIZED HOUSING PROJECT IN

BARANGAY SAN ISIDRO, CAINTA, RIZAL”

Proponents:

1. Aguisanda, John Dave L.

2. Ilagan, Ryan C.

3. Valencia, Apple Grace S.

Date of Defense: December 13, 2019

Panel: Dr. Cristina Amor M. Rosales

Summary of Comments

Comment Page No. Action Taken Page No. Remarks

The proponents started the discussion

Be direct to the point and specific to the
issue.
State why Cainta needs this project.
directly with the demographic profile
of Cainta, reason of high number of
1 to 4 population and the problem with the 1 to 8
informal settler families along the
Manggahan Floodway in Brgy. San
Andres.
The proponents able to revised the
1 to 4 1 to 8
Poject Background. It covers the
 problem along the Manggahan
floodway and the eviction of the ISF.
The proponents changed the map with
a more readable figure. Project
State the exact location of the project 4 to 12 Location is also revised which also 8 to 19
covers the Technical Description of the
proposed site.
The proponents discussed the number
of informal settlers along the
Manggahan Floodway. It also discusses
State the potential users 17 23 to 25
how the NHA/LGU and other
government agencies will choose the
eligible beneficiaries.
From the Project Background and
Potential Users, the proponents able to
State how the potential users are going 1 to 8;
discussed how the benefiaries are
to addressed 23 to 25
chosen and how the APOAMF alliance
communicate with the government.
The standards used are based on the
standards set by the government
State how you select the standards to be
housing agencies. The standards are 33
used.
stated at the Chapter 3-Design
Requirements.
State the service do your facilities focus In the nature of service, the proponents
14 to 17 21 to 22
on? discussed the needs of the facilities.
With the census done by the NHA,the
Not enough data for potential users proponents discussed the number of
informal settlers along the Manggahan
 Statistic
17 Floodway. It also discusses how the 23 to 25
 Graph
NHA/LGU and other government
 Migration Data agencies choose the eligible
beneficiaries.
Project Title: “ PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN OF SOCIALIZED HOUSING PROJECT IN
BARANGAY SAN ISIDRO, CAINTA, RIZAL”
Proponents:
1. Aguisanda, John Dave L.
2. Ilagan, Ryan C.
3. Valencia, Apple Grace S.
Date of Defense: December 13, 2019
Panel: Engr. Vivian D. Guda
Comment
State what is a socialized housing.
State the amenities/facilities inside the
socialized housing
Summary of Comments
Page No. Action Taken Page No. Remarks
The proponents include informations
regarding the socialized housing such
as the eligible criteria of benefiaries,
1 to 4 1 to 8; 23 to 25
the amortization rate, facilities within
the housing and the design
requirements set by the government.
The proponents able to discussed the
facilities needed in Chapter 2- 21 to 22;
1 to 4
Facilities and why it is needed in 27 to 29
Chapter 2- Nature of Services.
 Data regarding the census done by
No data presentation regarding the no.
1 to 4 the NHA is presented in Potential 23 to 25
of informal settlers,etc.
Users Chapter 2.
Add pictures showing the current Pictures are added in Project 7;
1 to 4
condition of the informal settlers. Background and Documentation. Documentation
The proponents able to revised
project background stating the
Additional justification/data
problems along the Manggahan
supporting the need for this project. 1 to 4 1 to 8
Floodway and how this is addressed
Improve project background.
by the ISF/APOAMF and the
government.
The structures are enumerated in
Identify/enumerate your structures 13 19 to 20
specific objectives.
The proponents changed the phrase
Change the phrase “underprivileged,
17 into “ underprivileged and homeless 23
homeless and informal settlers”
citizen”
Separate discussion for the three
The apartments are discussed
apartment since they are different 20 27
separately.
with each other
Change the term “living unit” to 20, 31 to The “living unit” was change into
27, 37 to 42
“unit” 37 “unit”
Change the location of the MRF 25 The location of MRF is changed. 32
38 to 39,
33, 34,
Make your dimension exact. All the dimensions used are exact. 40,41,42 to 43,
36, 38
44
Change the thickness/line weight in The proponents changed the line
all elevation in Architectural Plans. weight in all elevation.
The proponents changed the
Too much spaces for the clouds
projection of figures.
The proponents add a Livelihood
Add Livelihood Training Center Training Center consisting of 3
rooms, the lecture room and two
 rooms for practical work area.
Consider hanging the balcony into a The balcony is changed into a
laundry area laundry area.
Project Title: “ PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN OF SOCIALIZED HOUSING PROJECT IN

BARANGAY SAN ISIDRO, CAINTA, RIZAL”

Proponents:

1. Aguisanda, John Dave L.

2. Ilagan, Ryan C.

3. Valencia, Apple Grace S.

Date of Defense: December 13, 2019

Panel: Engr. Rhea S. De Ocampo

Summary of Comments

Comment Page No. Action Taken Page No. Remarks

Did not even mention anything about The proponents added information
the situation of the residents in Cainta regarding the situation of the ISF of
1 to 8
and why it is in need to propose such Cainta along the Manggahan Floodway
project. and the necessity of the project.
1 to 4
The proponents added information
Background of the study is lacking of regarding the situation of the residents
1 to 8
important data. of Cainta and the necessity of the
project.
5, 7, 9 to The proponents italicized sources for 2, 3, 4,
Figure source should be italicized.
12 figures and tables. 5,7, 9, 10,
 11, 12,
13, 14,
15, 16,
17, 18, 25
The proponents provided a better
Provide a better readable picture. 9 10
readable map.
The proponents adjusted the vicinity
Make the vicinity map bigger 10 11
map.
Add the hazard map. 11, 12 Hazard Maps are added. 15 to 17
State if Cainta near the West Valley
11, 12 Fault lines near Cainta are stated. 15 to 17
Fault.
The proponents added information that
Prove that it is safe to put the housing will prove the location is safe. Hazard
11, 12 12 to 19
project to the said location. Assesment from PHIVOLCS is also
included in Appendix.
Facilities are stated in the specific
Objectives must be specific. 13 19 to 20
objectives
The proponents changed the discussion
The discussion of the nature of services
14 to 16 of the nature of services and included a 21 to 22
is different. Have too long introduction.
shorter introduction.
The proponents added information and
the census done by the NHA regarding
Add more discussion for potential
17 the potential users and how the 23 to 25
users.
NHA/LGU chooses the eligible
beneficiaries.
The proponents placed the name of the
Do not use color coding and change the
structure instead of color coding. Term
term “Site Development Plan” to “Site 19 32
“Site Development Plan” is also
Layout” for Figure 7.
changed with “Site Layout”
State how you arrived with 300 Percentage of the beneficiaries is
20 23
beneficiaries. stated.
Show Proposed Site Layout not Proposed Site Layout is shown instead
25 32
Perspective of the perspective.
 The proponents indicate the title of BP
State the Full Title of BP 220. 26 33
220
The proponents removed the design
The remarks passed should be shown in
and remarks column of Table 5 to 8
Thesis 2. Describe only the minimum 26 to 30 33 to 36
and show only the minimum
requirements.
requirements.
The projection of the figure was
Half of the drawing is the sky 32, 34, 36 38, 39, 41
change.
2, 3, 18,
23, 33,
6, 26 to
The proponents single spaced all the 35, 36,
Tables should be single spaced 32, 34,
tables used. 37, 38,
35, 37
40, 41,
42, 44
Adjust image for Multi-Purpose The image of Multi-Purpose Building
37 42
Building is adjusted.
The proponents removed figure of
Remove figure of MRF 40 45
MRF.
Do not use color coding for the site The proponents placed the name of the
32 32
development plan structure instead of color coding.
The proponents show the layout of
Show the layout of roads in park 32 32
roads in park.
Gridlines should not be solid Gridlines used are hidden lines
Text height and dimension should be Text height and dimensions are same
the same for all pages for all the plans
Maximize the spaces in the apartment The proponents make use of the
type building. available spaces.
Add “typical” on the name of second to Term “typical” is added for all the
fifth floor plan. same floorplans.
Consider changing the layout of the Layout of one of the apartment type
floor plan. building is changed.
The proponents stated the use of the
Add use for the roof deck. 38
roofdeck aside from the watertank.
 The proponents changed the layout of
Put the rental spaces in front.
the multi-purpose building.
The proponents changed the dimension
Use millimeter for the dimension.
used from meter to millimeter.