Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Employee Engagement Whitepaper PDF
Employee Engagement Whitepaper PDF
engagement
All you need to know about
employee engagement
www.thomasinternational.net
Contents
3
Introduction –
4
The history of
5
What does an
What is employee engagement theories engaged employee
engagement? and models look like?
6
Low engagement
7
High engagement is a
8
Factors affecting
is a strategic risk competitive advantage employee
engagement
9
The development
11 12
Key takeaways
of Thomas Engage
2
Introduction
What is employee engagement?
It is easy to get employee complete those small tasks if they positive experience resulting from
engagement confused with think no one will notice. Happy or the relationships you have, the
employee happiness or satisfied aren’t enough. Engaged role you do and the rewards you
satisfaction. An employee may be employees really care about the get in the workplace.
happy at work, but that doesn’t company and its vision and they
mean that they are working have an emotional commitment The concept of engagement has
productively or feel passionate to their work and the company, been discussed extensively by
about the organisation and its which means that they will work both psychologists and HR/L&D
goals. An employee might be on behalf of the organisation’s practitioners for the best part
satisfied, showing up for work goals and not just for the next pay of 25 years; developing from a
and doing the job without any date or promotion (Forbes). purely role-focused model to
complaints, but that doesn’t mean new models incorporating the
that they would ever go the extra At Thomas International, we psychological and social contexts
mile when required, or bother to define employee engagement as a of the workplace.
3
The history of
engagement theories
and models
1990 1997 2003 2009
4
What does an engaged employee look like?
ideas
M
O
N
TH
5
Low engagement
is a strategic risk
Products, services, processes titled ‘Engaging for Success: - The ‘Kelly Global Workforce
and strategies can all enhancing performance through Index’ (2013) revealed that
contribute to superior employee engagement’. The organisations with
performance making your 2009 report recommended engagement scores in the top
organisation more successful increasing employee engagement 25% demonstrate attrition
than others, but they can all to safeguard the UK Economy rates, on average, 40% lower
be copied over time. The one from the challenges presented by than those organisations with
thing that creates sustainable the recession and increased global engagement scores in the
competitive advantage is your competition. bottom 25%.
workforce. This is why low
engagement is so damaging. Increasing employee engagement - According to the independent
should be a strategic priority for Employee Engagement Task
The risks of low engagement to businesses. Higher engagement Force (Engage for Success),
the UK economy became a key has been consistently shown to backed by the government
focus for business leaders and relate to positive individual and department of Business
government as we approached organisational outcomes: Innovations and Skills:
the late-2008 financial crisis and
the recession years that followed. - Engagement has been • Only a third of UK employees
associated with many positive say they are actively engaged
The Secretary of State for business outcomes, including at work
Business in 2008 commissioned but not limited to: reduced • 20 million workers are not
a report examining the benefits turnover, increased client delivering their full capability/
of employee engagement for satisfaction, employee realising their potential at
business. In 2009 MacLeod & commitment and business work
Clarke submitted their findings as productivity • UK productivity is 20% lower
a government whitepaper, (Harter, Schmidt & Hayes, than then rest of the G7
2002). (Canada, France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, UK, US)
6
High engagement
is a competitive
advantage
Engagement can improve Innovation’ report in December that engagement is linked to the
productivity and effectiveness at 2009, providing recommendations improved success of innovation
work because engaged employees for businesses keen to increase initiatives at work. Highly engaged
enjoy their work, feel driven to innovation in their organisation. individuals are likely to ‘job
perform and are more likely to In short, organisations need craft’, this involves making small
proactively change how they their employees to feel positive efficiency changes to the way
approach their work. In short, at work and ensure there is a someone completes their work.
highly engaged people are more supportive management structure Although small, cumulatively these
innovative in the workplace. in place to foster innovation. innovations can greatly support
the productivity of an organisation
The National Endowment of A Chartered Management (Bakker, Albrecht and Leiter,
Science, Technology and the Arts Institute report by Patterson 2011).
(NESTA) published the ‘Everyday & Kerrin, 2009 demonstrated
7
Factors affecting employee engagement
8
The development
of Thomas ‘Engage’
1 2 3
Developed by Prof. Mark Slaski, Grounded in the psychosocial Focus groups conducted with
University of Hertfordshire theory of workplace public and private organisations
(2009). engagement. re: positive & negative aspects
of work.
6 5 4
Statistical factor analysis Questionnaire provided to A 28-item questionnaire created
confirmed the seven areas of 2,500+ individuals for to measure seven areas of
engagement. psychometric analysis. engagement.
7 8
Engage has strong positive From this research, Engage
correlations with the UWES showed criterion validity,
(Utrecht Work Engagement predicting the following outcomes:
Scale) demonstrating construct • Employee morale
validity. • Organisational belonging
• Workplace distress
A: The challenge for businesses today is firstly to measure the right things i.e. the psychological factors and drivers
that will actually lead to actions and improvements; and secondly, to realise that high engagement is enhanced by
the daily behaviour of managers and specifically how they make the most of every interaction and conversation to
inspire their people.
9
How do you measure engagement?
Measuring engagement can be One of the biggest barriers to getting the best results from an employee
complex as it is made up of a engagement programme is regarding it as a ‘tick-box’ exercise and
number of different drivers, each doing little or nothing with the results. Sending out your survey and
contributing to the overall level then presuming that you’ve successfully addressed your employee’s
of engagement, including the engagement could be counterproductive and more damaging than
relationships employees have in doing nothing at all. Be prepared to action a meaningful follow up on
the workplace, the role that they the results. The Thomas Engage report provides you with accessible
do and the rewards they receive. and practical guidelines that can form the basis of your next steps to
improving engagement in your organisation. The report also provides
Running a health check for your recommendations specifically for leadership and organisational change.
organisation can help you to
establish the current levels of
engagement within the workforce
and identify actions for making
C T
RA
any necessary improvements.
10
Key
takeaways
There is a famous quote by former Campbell’s Soup CEO, Doug Conant, who
once said, “To win in the marketplace you must first win in the workplace.”
Remember these three key takeaways to get you in the right mind-set to embark
on your employee engagement journey to success:
11
© Copyright Thomas International Ltd 2016 www.thomasinternational.net
TL_Employee Engagement whitepaper_1115v1