Division of Antipolo City

SAN ISIDRO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: MA.DINAH B. OLIVEROS Name of Rater: MR. ROLANDO I. ATA
Positon: Teacher I Position: PRINCIPAL II
Review Period: June 2016 – May 2017 Date of Review:April 2017
Bureau/Center/Service: DepEdAntipolo –SAN ISIDRO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
To be filled in during planning To be filled in during planning

RATING
MFO2: KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight Quality Efficiency Timeliness ACTUAL *SCORE
per KRA RESULTS Quality Efficiency Timeliness

1. Prepared 180 daily log with aligned
objectives and learning activities
appropriate to the learners
5-Evaluated the prepared 180 daily logs with 5-Executed 180 daily log with Supporting *Checklist of
aligned objectives and learning activities documents daily lesson logs
appropriate to the learners 4-Executed 170 daily logs with supporting for SY 2016-
4-Executed the prepared daily logs with aligned documents 2017
objectives and learning activities appropriate to the 3-Planned and executed 160 daily logs aligned *List of utilized
learners objectives, teaching strategies, and learning strategies and
June 2016 – 20% 3-Prepared 180 daily logs with aligned objectives, activities appropriate to the learners with activities
March 2017 teaching strategies and learning activities supported documents * Compiled daily
appropriate to the learners 2-Planned and executed 150 daily logs aligned lesson logs
2-Crafted/designed daily logs with aligned objectives, teaching strategies, and learning *Curriculumguid
objectives, teaching strategies, and learning activities appropriate to the learners with e
activities appropriate to the learners supported documents *References
1-Planned daily logs with aligned objectives, 1- Planned and executed 140 daily logs aligned *Mastery level
teaching strategies, and learning activities objectives, teaching strategies, and learning *Test results
appropriate to the learners activities appropriate to the learners with *Test questions
supported documents

Basic Teaching – 5- Evaluated the effectiveness of rubrics in measuring the 5- Crafted and utilized assessment tools and 90- *List of utilized
Education Learning students' performance 100% of the students were assessed strategies and
Services Process activities
(40%) 4-Used assessment tools to measure students' 4-Crafted andutilized assessment tools and 80-89% * Compiled daily
2. Crafted 10 rubrics and used to measure June 2016 – 10% performance as reflected in the index of participation of the students were assessed lesson logs
the students' outcomes in performance March 2017 *Curriculum
test/authentic learning 3-Crafted 5 assessment tools to measure students' 3-Crafted and utilized assessment tools and 75-79% guide
performance of the students were assessed
*Compiled
Rubrics
2-Conceptualized assessment tools to measure students' 2-Crafted and utilized assessment tools and 70-74%
performance of the students were assessed

1-Planned to craft assessment tools 1-Crafted and utilized assessment tools and 60-69%
of the students were assessed

5- Evaluated ICT materials through the learning outcome. 5- Prepared 32 ICT materials suited to the learning 5- Prepared, Utilized, *Saved Soft and
objectives and compiled 8 ICT hard copy / Print
3.Prepared 40materials or visual materials 4- Utilized ICT materials suited to the learning objectives materials quarterly. out of ICT visual
with the use of ICT suited to the learning 4- Prepared 25 ICT materials suited to the learning materials
3- Prepared ICT materials suited to the learning objectives 4- Prepared, Utilized,
objectives.
June 2016 – 10% objectives and compiled 6 ICT * List of topics
March 2017 3- Prepared 18 ICT materials suited to the learning materials quarterly. with ICT
2- ListedICT materials suited to the learning objectives objectives
materials
3- Prepared, Utilized,
1- Planned to prepare ICT materials suited to the learning 2- Prepared 12 ICT materials suited to the learning and compiled 4 ICT
objectives objectives materials quarterly. *Pictures

1- Prepared 5 ICT materials suited to the learning 2- Prepared, Utilized, *List of ICT
objectives and compiled 2 ICT materials and
materials quarterly date use.
1- Prepared, Utilized,
and compiled 1 ICT
materials quarterly.
 To be filled in during planning To be filled in during planning

RATING
MFO2: KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight Quality Efficiency Timeliness ACTUAL RESULTS Quality Efficiency Timeliness *SCORE
per KRA
5- Recorded submitted records of grades to the Submitted records of grades Class Record signed
compilation/office. on time. by the school head
(4) Submitted records of
1. Submitted Accurate records of June 2016 – 15% 4- Checked submitted records of grades on time. grades 1 day late List of
grades (class records and March 2017 (3) Submitted records of percentage of
grading sheets) on time 3- Submitted accurate records of grades (class records grades 2 day late students passed
and grading sheets) on time. (2) Submitted records of Grading
grades 3 day late
sheet
2- Computed records of grades on time. (1) Submitted records of
grades 4 day late
1- Gathered scores to be recorded in the class record. Compilation of
outputs,
summative test,
Basic Students
Education Outcomes Periodical test,
Services (30%) performance test.

5. Evaluated an interview class for students at risk 5- Zero failed students in TLE 9 for this
in G9 TLE school year
4. Conducted intervention Matrix for students at 4- 5% failed students in TLE 9 for this
2.Conducted interventions in G9 June 2016 – 10% risk in G9TLE school year
TLE Cookery class (Handled March 2017 3. Designed training matrix of students at risk in 3- 7% failed students in TLE 9 for this
Section) G9 TLE school year
2. Identified students at risk in G9 TLE. 2- 10% failed students in TLE 9 for this
1. Plan students at risk in G9 TLE school year
1- 12% failed students in TLE 9 for this
school year

3.Increased the MPS of the
students in School Achievement
test
5. Implemented the compiled reviewer for the
SAT
4. Compiled reviewer for the SAT
June 2016 – 5% 3. Designed a reviewer for the SAT
March 2017 2. Drafted reviewer for the SAT.
1. Planned a reviewer for the SAT
5. Increased the MPS of the student by 5%
based on the previous SAT.
4. Increased the MPS of the student by 4%
based on the previous SAT.
3. Increased the MPS of the student by 3%
based on the previous SAT.
2. Increased the MPS of the student by 2%
based on the previous SAT.
1. Increased the MPS of the student by 1%
based on the previous SAT.
 To be filled in during planning To be filled in during planning
RATING
MFO2: KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight Quality Efficiency Timeliness ACTUAL Quality Efficiency Timeliness *SCORE
per KRA RESULTS
Basic Professional 4.Passed the commercial cooking 5- Passed the commercial cooking NC IV
Education Growth and NC IV assessment assessment
Services Development 4- Take the commercial cooking NC IV assessment
(15%) June 2016 – 10% 3- Attended the commercial cooking NC IV
March 2017 assessment
2- Enrolled the commercial cooking NC IV
assessment
1- Planned to take commercial cooking NC IV

5.. Monitored evaluated and
submitted student’s progress
mean profile, grade sheets, class
records by the end of every
semester, which were:
a. Accurate
b. Up to date
c. Neat
d. With complete entries on
reports such as MPS and class
record
5- Monitored student’s progress mean profile, 5- Monitored student’s Student
grade sheets, class records by the end of every progress mean profile, grade Progress
June 2016 – semester sheets, class records by the Report
March 2017 3% 4- Evaluated the student’s progress mean profile, end of every semester
grade sheets, class records by the end of every 4- Evaluated the student’s Grading
semester progress mean profile, grade sheet
3- Checked the student’s progress mean profile, sheets, class records by the
grade sheets, class records by the end of every end of every semester Class
semester 3- Checked the student’s Record
2- Listed the student’s progress mean profile, progress mean profile, grade
grade sheets, class records by the end of every sheets, class records by the Test
semester end of every semester Results
1- Planned to monitor submission of student’s 2- Listed the student’s progress
progress mean profile, grade sheets, class records mean profile, grade sheets,
by the end of every semester class records by the end of
every semester
1- Planned to monitor
submission of student’s
progress mean profile, grade
sheets, class records by the
end of every semester

6.Participated in trainings, 5- Monitored the implementation of the re- - Participated in 4 trainings, Certificat
seminar, conferences and echoed training, seminar, conference and seminar, conferences and e of
meetings for professional meetings. meetings for professional participa
growth. June 2016 – 2% growth. tion/
March 2017 4- Re-echoed training / seminar, conference and written
meetings in the department. 4- Participated in 3 trainings, report/
seminar, conferences and picture
3- Participated in training / seminar for meetings for professional documen
professional growth. growth. ts. .

2- Inquired in training / seminar for professional 3- Participated 2 trainings, Training

growth. seminar, conferences and matrix
meetings for professional
1- Planned to participate in training / seminar for growth. Memora
professional growth ndum
2- Participate in 1 trainings,
seminar, conferences and Travel
meetings for professional order
growth.

1- Planned to participate in
training / seminar for
professional growth.
 To be filled in during planning To be filled in during planning
RATING
MFO2: KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight Quality Efficiency Timeliness ACTUAL Qualit Efficiency Timeliness *SCORE
per KRA RESULTS y
5- Monitored supports from the parents through the 5- 4 meetings conducted PHOTOS
students’ performance. DURING THE
Basic Community 4- 3 meetings conducted. MEETING
Education Involvement 1.Conducted regular meetings June 2016 – 8% 4- Participated in the meetings and support the
Services (10%) with learners and parents to March 2017 learners. 3- 2 meetings conducted Minutes
report learner’s progress
3- Conducted meetings with the parents. 2- 1 meetings conducted Attendance

2. Served as a member in
community outreach program
2- Planned meeting with the parents. 1- Parents confirmed the attendance Agenda
to the set meeting.
1- Identified the list of learners needed support
5-Evaluated the efficiency of the outreach program 5- Conducted community outreach Gift giving as
June 2016 – program and 50% of the clienteles certificate
March 2017 4-Conducted outreach program finished the school year
SI-care
2% 3- Helped in the conduct of the outreach program 4 - Conducted community outreach receipt
program and 40% of the clienteles
2-Contributed financial support for the conduct of the finished the school year Memorandu
outreach program m/letters
3 - Conducted community outreach
1-Planned to help in the conduct of the outreach program and 30% of the clienteles Documentat
finished the school year ion

2 - Conducted community outreach List of

program and 20% of the clienteles beneficiaries
finished the school year

1 - Conducted community outreach

program and 10% of the clienteles
finished the school year

MFO2: KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight Quality Efficiency Timeliness ACTUAL RATING
per KRA RESULTS Qua Efficiency Timeliness *SCORE
lity
Basic Plus Factor Served as Nutrition Coordinator June 2016 – 5% 5- Submitted reports on time 5-Decreased the number of severely
Education (5%) in the school. March 2017 4- Monitored feeding program. wasted students by 5%.
Services 3- Conducted the feeding program.
2-Facilitated the feeding program.
1-Planned the feeding program activity.

**To get the score, rating is multiplied by the weight assigned Overall Rating for Accomplishment

. RONALDO I. ATA MRS. MA.DINAH B.OLIVEROS

Principal II Ratee