Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07 Tlazovic PDF
07 Tlazovic PDF
© Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade. All rights reserved FME Transactions (2008) 36, 189-196 189
Fi cos ( iγ ) ⎧1, i = 0,1,..., n, z − n,..., z − 1
K r,i = Φi , i = 0,1,...,z-1 (2) Φi = ⎨ (5)
FR ⎩0, n < i < z = n
zs − 1 ⎛ z+3⎞
⎧1, Fi > 0 where: n = and zs = 2 ⋅ INT ⎜ ⎟ − 1 – number
where Φ i = ⎨ . 2 ⎝ 4 ⎠
⎩0, Fi = 0 of rolling elements transmitting external load.
In a case of a radially loaded rolling bearing, the
following equations can be written (Fig. 1):
F1 = Fz −1
F2 = Fz − 2
FR
...
Fn = Fz − n . (6)
LOAD DISTRIBUTION
0,4
0,3
i=0
0,2 i=1
i=2
0,1 i=3
0,0 i=4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
z
Figure 4. Load distribution factor vs. total number of rolling elements in a case of ideally equal load distribution
Кri = 1/zs
Кri (e>0) > Кri
Кri (e>0) < Кri (e=0)
0
z
z
Figure 5. Load distribution factor vs. total number of rolling elements in a case of real load distribution
1,0
A B C D
0,9
z=5
0,8
z=6
0,7 0 z=7
z=8
0,6
zs=3
0,5
Kr,i
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1 1
0,0
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5
e/2δ0
Figure 6. Load distribution factor vs. internal radial clearance
2 2
z=11
zs=5
n=0,1,2
0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0
Figure 7. Reduced load distribution factor of bearing with z =11 rolling elements
The diagram of the reduced load distribution factor element and internal radial clearance, to (20), and after
for two relative radial clearances e/2δ0 of rolling bearing appropriate mathematical transformations, the
containing z = 11 rolling elements is given in Figure 7. expression for the reduced load distribution factor can
Reduced load distribution factor is presented in this be written as follows:
diagram as discrete value. By transition from discrete 3
values of the reduced load distribution factor ⎛ ⎛ e ⎞ ⎞2
determined by (16) to continuous function can be ⎜⎜ 1- ⎜1 + ⎟ (1-cosψ ) ⎟⎟
krψ = kr (ψ ) = ⎝ ⎝ 2δ0 ⎠ ⎠ . (21)
derived an equation, which can be named as load 3
distribution function. For that purpose, it is necessary to ψ0
z ⎛ ⎛ e ⎞ ⎞2
transform (4). On the basis of (4) can be written: ∫ ⎜⎜ 1- ⎜1 + ⎟ (1-cosψ ) ⎟⎟ cosψ dψ
2π 2 δ0 ⎠
−ψ 0 ⎝ ⎝ ⎠
Fi
kr,i = , i = 0,1,...,z-1. (17)
z −1 The expression for the reduced load distribution
∑ Fi cos ( iγ ) factor (21) represents load distribution function. The
i=0 diagram of load distribution function is shown in Figure
By replacement of position angle of each rolling 8. This diagram represents dependence of the reduced
element, expressed by product, of its position number load distribution factor on loaded zone angle (loaded
and rolling elements angular distance elements (iγ) with zone width) and relative radial clearance.
its position angle (ψ), (17) obtains the form:
kr,ψ e/2δ0=0
Fψ e/2δ0=0,25
krψ = kr (ψ ) = . (18) Faktor k
e/2δ0=0,67
ψ =π
∑ Fψ cosψ e/2δ0=1,50
ψ = −π
rolling element-raceway contact, the expression for the Figure 8. Load distribution function
reduced load distribution factor as a function of contact
deformations in rolling element-raceways contacts is By analysis of load distribution function it can be
obtained: concluded, that the loaded zone has two characteristic
areas. One has approximate width ψ ≈ ± (25...35)º in
δψ3 2 relation to a position of “0”-rolling element. Load of
krψ = kr (ψ ) = . (20) rolling elements in this area has the least value at zero
ψ0
z
∫ δψ3 2 cosψ dψ radial clearance and is increased with increase of a
2π clearance. The rolling elements in other area of the
−ψ 0
loaded zone are loaded maximally at zero-clearance.
By introduction of (12), which represents the With increase of clearance, rolling elements in this area
connection between contact deformation of a rolling of the loaded zone are partially or completely unloaded.
0
loaded zone 2ψ0=f(z,e)
Figure 9. Influence of internal radial clearance on the load distribution between rolling elements