Baldwin Gambit

N B Qxf3 Qf6 7.Nc3 Qd4+ 8.Kh1 Qxc4

Database: 31-XII-2010 (4,399,153 games)

N
Report: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3. f3 g5 4. c4 g4 5.O-O gxf3 6.
9. d5 (6 games)
ECO: C37 [KGA: Muzio Gambit]
Generated by Scid 4.2.2, 2011.02.15

rmbZkans
opopZpZp
0Z0Z0Z0Z
Z0ZNZ0Z0
0ZqZPo0Z
Z0Z0ZQZ0
POPO0ZPO
S0A0ZRZK
0.1 Statistics and History
0.1.1 Statistics
1 1
Games 1:0 :
2 2
0:1 Score
All report games 6 1 1 4 25.0%

0.1.2 Oldest games

1: 0:1(17) Blankenberg Bruno – Holzhauser Alexander, 2001 6
2: 0:1(28) Lagemann Tobias – Blankenberg Bruno, 2001 5
3: : (24) Lagemann Tobias – Hanison, 2001 4
1 1
2 2
4: 1:0(26) Lagemann Tobias – Ball, 2001 3
5: 0:1(11) Kishinevsky – Pott, 2001 2
6: 0:1(27) Ball – Buenjer Carsten, 2001 1

0.1.3 Newest games

1: 0:1(17) Blankenberg Bruno – Holzhauser Alexander, 2001 6
2: 0:1(28) Lagemann Tobias – Blankenberg Bruno, 2001 5
3: : (24) Lagemann Tobias – Hanison, 2001 4
1 1
2 2
4: 1:0(26) Lagemann Tobias – Ball, 2001 3
5: 0:1(11) Kishinevsky – Pott, 2001 2
6: 0:1(27) Ball – Buenjer Carsten, 2001 1

0.1.4 Current popularity

Year 1800-99 1900-49 1950-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09
Once every X games — — — — — — 320655
 Frequency in all years: once every 733192 games
In the 10 years to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)
In the 5 years to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)
In the 1 year to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)

0.1.5 Most frequent players (White)

1: 3 2001 50% Lagemann Tobias 3,4,5
2: 1 2001 0% Blankenberg Bruno 6
3: 1 2001 0% Ball, Joerg 1
4: 1 2001 0% Kishinevsky, Dimitry W 2

0.1.6 Most frequent players (Black)

1: 1 2001 100% Blankenberg Bruno 5
2: 1 2001 50% Hanison, Bernard 4
3: 1 2001 0% Ball, Joerg 3
4: 1 2001 100% Buenjer Carsten 1
5: 1 2001 100% Pott, Brian 2
6: 1 2001 100% Holzhauser Alexander 6

0.2 Ratings and Performance

0.2.1 Average ratings and performance
White rating: 0 (0 games); White performance: 0 (0% vs 0)
Black rating: 0 (0 games); Black performance: 0 (0% vs 0)

0.2.2 Games with highest average rating

1: 0:1(11) Kishinevsky – Pott, 2001 2
2: : (24) Lagemann Tobias – Hanison, 2001 4
1 1
2 2
3: 1:0(26) Lagemann Tobias – Ball, 2001 3
4: 0:1(27) Ball – Buenjer Carsten, 2001 1
5: 0:1(17) Blankenberg Bruno – Holzhauser Alexander, 2001 6
6: 0:1(28) Lagemann Tobias – Blankenberg Bruno, 2001 5

0.3 Result Trends

0.3.1 Result lengths and frequencies
Score Game length Frequency
1:0 12 : 12 0:1 1:0 1 1
:
2 2
0:1
Report games 25.0% 26 24 20 16.6% 16.6% 66.6%
All games 53.9% 39 35 40 38.6% 30.5% 30.7%

0.3.2 Shortest wins (White)

1: 1:0(26) Lagemann Tobias – Ball, 2001 3
0.3.3 Shortest wins (Black)
1: 0:1(11) Kishinevsky – Pott, 2001 2
2: 0:1(17) Blankenberg Bruno – Holzhauser Alexander, 2001 6
3: 0:1(27) Ball – Buenjer Carsten, 2001 1
4: 0:1(28) Lagemann Tobias – Blankenberg Bruno, 2001 5

0.4 Moves and Themes

0.4.1 Move orders reaching the report position

N B Q Qf6 7.Nc3 Qd4+ 8.Kh1 Qxc4 9.Nd5 (6)

There was only one move order reaching this position:
1: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3. f3 g5 4. c4 g4 5.O-O gxf3 6. xf3

0.4.2 Moves from the report position

Move ECO Frequency Score µElo Perf µYear % Draws
1 d6 6: 100.0% 25.0% 2001 17%
Total 6: 100.0% 25.0% 2001 17%

0.4.3 Positional Themes

Frequency of themes in the first 20 moves of each game:
Same-side castling: 0% White Isolated Queen Pawn: 17%
Opposite castling: 0% Black Isolated Queen Pawn: 33%
Kingside pawn storm: 0% White Pawn on 5/6/7th rank: 50%
Queens exchanged: 100% Black Pawn on 2/3/4th rank: 100%
Only one side has Bishop pair: 33% Open c/d/e file: 33%

0.4.4 Endgames

R Q QR
Material at the end of each game:

p BN R BN Q BN QR BN
Report games 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
All games 3% 9% 9% 25% 2% 4% 4% 43%
 0.5 Theory Table
N B Q Q N Q K Q
N
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3. f3 g5 4. c4 g4 5.O-O gxf3 6. xf3 f6 7. c3 d4+ 8. h1 xc4
9. d5: +1 =1 –4 (1.5/6: 25%)
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
N B xf41
Q B
1 d5 d3 2: 0%
d6 c6 e62
R B Q N R
Q N Q K N N
2 ... b3 d3 f2 b2 h5+ xf6 c2 1: 100%
... xc2 a6 c6 f6 d8 e7 c53
B R B
Q Q K B N
3 ... ... d4 xf4 ae1 e5 g3 exd6 1: 50%
... ... c6 d7 d8 e7 a6 cxd64
B R N B
N B Q N Q B
4 ... ... ... xf4 ac1 xc7+ d5 g5 1: 0%
... ... a6 e6 xa2 xc7 a6 e75
N R B N
Q Q R Q
5 ... ... ... xf4 f2 d5 b2 e6 1: 0%
... ... ... h5 c6 d7 h7 e76

1
N Q N N B B
R N Q R
11. xf4 d7 12. d5 c6 13. d2 g7

N Q N N B
14. ae1 h5 15.c3 e5 16. g3 h7 17.d4

Q B Q N Q Q
g6 18. f3 c6 19. e3 h4 20. f5 f6

N K K
21. f4 e7 22. g4 h6 23. h5 e6 24.e5
d5 25. xe7 xe7 26.h3 e8 0:1(27) Ball –
Buenjer Carsten, 2001.
2
0:1 Kishinevsky – Pott, 2001.
3
R B Q
B B R Q
17.b4 b6 18.bxc5 dxc5 19. d1 g7 20. h4

Q B
xf6 21. xf6 e8 22.d4 c4 23.d5 c5
24. xf4 d7 25.e5 b5 26.e6 1:0 Lagemann
Tobias – Ball, 2001.
4
Q N N N B R
R Q B R Q N
17. xf7 c7 18. xe7 xe7 19. h4 e8

Q K Q
20. xe7 xe7 21. xe7+ xe7 22. g8+ e8
23. g5 d7 24. g4+ 21 : 12 Lagemann Tobias –
Hanison, 2001.
5
R B N K
R Q Q R Q K
17. xc7 xg5 18.dxe6 h6 19.exf7+ d8

Q B Q Q Q R
20. xb7 xb7 21.f8 + xf8 22. xf8+ d7

R
23. g7+ e7 24. xh6 xb3 25. xh7 f8
26. a1 a5 0:1(28) Lagemann Tobias –
Blankenberg Bruno, 2001.
6
17.Qg3 f6 0:1 Blankenberg Bruno – Holzhauser
Alexander, 2001.