The Supreme Court ruled search warrants issued against Jose Burgos, publisher of two newspapers, to be invalid. The warrants lacked probable cause, as the supporting affidavits made only broad generalizations and conclusions without particulars about allegedly subversive materials published. For a warrant against a media publisher, probable cause requires specificity about subversive materials published or intended for publication. Mere statements that printing equipment was being used for subversion were insufficient. The Court found the respondent judge erred in issuing warrants without valid probable cause.
The Supreme Court ruled search warrants issued against Jose Burgos, publisher of two newspapers, to be invalid. The warrants lacked probable cause, as the supporting affidavits made only broad generalizations and conclusions without particulars about allegedly subversive materials published. For a warrant against a media publisher, probable cause requires specificity about subversive materials published or intended for publication. Mere statements that printing equipment was being used for subversion were insufficient. The Court found the respondent judge erred in issuing warrants without valid probable cause.
The Supreme Court ruled search warrants issued against Jose Burgos, publisher of two newspapers, to be invalid. The warrants lacked probable cause, as the supporting affidavits made only broad generalizations and conclusions without particulars about allegedly subversive materials published. For a warrant against a media publisher, probable cause requires specificity about subversive materials published or intended for publication. Mere statements that printing equipment was being used for subversion were insufficient. The Court found the respondent judge erred in issuing warrants without valid probable cause.
Chief of Staff newspaper publisher or editor in connection with the publication of
G.R. No L-64261 subversive materials, as in the case at bar, the application and/or its December 26, 1984 supporting affidavits must contain a specification, stating with particularity the alleged subversive material he has published or is Facts: intending to publish. Mere generalization will not suffice. Respondent Judge Ernani Cruz-Pano issued 2 search warrants to search the premises of the “Metropolitan Mail” and “We Forum”. The broad statement in Col. Abadilla's application that petitioner "is Various equipment, paraphernalia and written documents were in possession or has in his control printing equipment and other searched. Written literature alleged to be in the possession and paraphernalia, news publications and other documents which were control of petitioner Jose Burgos, Jr., publisher-editor of “We Forum” used and are all continuously being used as a means of committing newspaper were seized. the offense of subversion punishable under Presidential Decree 885, The validity of these warrants were questioned through a petition for as amended ..." is a mere conclusion of law and does not satisfy the certiorari and so that the articles and equipment may be returned to requirements of probable cause. Bereft of such particulars as would the petitioners. justify a finding of the existence of probable cause, said allegation cannot serve as the basis for the issuance of a search warrant and it Issue: was a grave error for the respondent judge to have done so. Whether or not the warrant of arrest is valid to justify the seizure of the items.
Supreme Court Ruling:
The law provides that “…no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined by the judge, or such other responsible officer as may be authorized by law, after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.”
Probable cause for a search is defined as such facts and circumstances
which would lead a reasonably discreet and prudent man to believe that an offense has been committed and that the objects sought in connection with the offense are in the place sought to be searched. And when the search warrant applied for is directed against a