Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vajra Sucikopanisad About Brahmana
Vajra Sucikopanisad About Brahmana
Vaishnava":
"In the Muktikopaniṣad there is a list of one hundred eight Upaniṣads, among which,
the thirty-eighth is named Vajra-sūcikopaniṣad. It is said that Śrī Śaṅkarācārya
became famous by composing an elaborate commentary on this Upaniṣad. In the Vajra-
sūcikopaniṣad it is stated:
cit-sad-ānanda-rūpāya sarva-dhī-vṛtti-sākṣiṇe
namo vedānta-vedyāya brahmaṇe 'nanta-rūpiṇe
“There are four varṇas—brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya, and śūdra. According to the
statements of the Vedas, the brāhmaṇas are the highest class. This is confirmed by
the smṛtis as well. Therefore the question now comes: Who is a brāhmaṇa? The living
entity, the body, the caste, the knowledge, the activities, or the religionist—of
these, which is the brāhmaṇa? If it is proposed that the living entity is the
brāhmaṇa, that is not correct. The living entity remains the same in the past,
present, or future. Though he receives various types of bodies according to his
karma, he remains unchanged. Therefore the living entity is not the brāhmaṇa. Then
is the body the brāhmaṇa? No, it is not. The bodies of human beings down to the
caṇḍāla are all made of the same five gross elements. Therefore birth and death and
religion and irreligion equally effect all bodies, and since there is no law that
the brāhmaṇas are white, the kṣatriyas are red, the vaiśyas are yellow, and the
śūdras are black, the body is therefore not the brāhmaṇa. Moreover, when the son of
a brāhmaṇa burns the body of his dead father, he does not commit the sin of killing
a brāhmaṇa. Therefore the body is not the brāhmaṇa. So, then, is caste the
brāhmaṇa? No, this is also not the case. Many great sages have been born of other
living entities. Ṛṣyaśṛṅga was born from a deer, Kauśika was born from kuśa grass,
Jāmbuka Ṛṣi was born from a jackal, Vālmīki was born from an ant hill, Vyāsadeva
was born from a fisherman's daughter, Gautama was born from the back of a rabbit,
Vaśiṣṭha was born from Ūrvaśī, and Agastya was born from a pitcher. Apart from
these personalities, there are many other wise persons born from other castes who
became sages. Therefore caste is not the brāhmaṇa. So, then, is knowledge the
brāhmaṇa? No, it is not that either. Because many persons, such as some kṣatriyas,
were very learned and knew the Absolute Truth. Therefore knowledge is also not the
brāhmaṇa. Then are activities the brāhmaṇa? No, they are not. Because every living
entity shares the common nature of having to suffer the matured reactions of his
karma that come to him in the future. By karma, human beings are engaged in further
karma. Therefore activities are not the brāhmaṇa. Then is the religionist the
brāhmaṇa? No, he is not. Because many kṣatriyas give gold in charity. Therefore the
religionist is not the brāhmaṇa. Then who is the brāhmaṇa? Anyone who knows the
Self as one; devoid of mundane caste, qualities, and activities; devoid of
contamination by the six enemies1 and six waves2; the personification of
transcendental knowledge and bliss; beyond duality, yet the basis of all material
dualities; the Supersoul of all living entities; all-pervading inside and outside
like the vast sky; endowed with uninterrupted bliss; immeasurable; known only
through spiritual realization; and directly self-manifesting—one who directly
realizes the Self (as one sees an āmlakī fruit in the palm of his hand), who lives
always satisfied, devoid of faults like lust and anger, who posesses qualities like
peacefulness and self-control, who is devoid of envy, the thirst for material
enjoyment, illusion, and other faults, and who is untouched by pride, false ego,
and so on—such a person is a brāhmaṇa. This is also the opinion of the śrutis,
smṛtis, Itihāsas, Purāṇas, and other scriptures. Otherwise one cannot be a real
brāhmaṇa. The Upaniṣads instruct us that the Supreme Soul is sac-cid-ānanda and the
Absolute Truth, one without a second.”