Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lipski Curriculum Model Cie 685 Fall 2019
Lipski Curriculum Model Cie 685 Fall 2019
Units of Inquiry
Courtney Lipski
October 6, 2019
CURRICULUM MODEL 2
Curriculum development must reflect the philosophy and objectives of the developers of
that curriculum. The developers must understand the purpose of student learning and what
outcomes the learning will achieve amongst students. In other words, the acquisition of
knowledge is largely defined by the curriculum developer’s philosophical view of education and
pedagogy.
feel curriculum should be developed to integrate multiple subject areas, interconnecting content
and building upon student experience. Learning should be continuous and constantly challenging
students to solve new problems from past experiences and new investigations. “[The educator]
must constantly regard what is already won not as a fixed possession but as an agency and
instrumentality for opening new fields which make new demands upon existing powers of
observation and of intelligent use of memory” (Dewey, 1963, p. 75). More specifically, I find my
CBC requires students to ask big questions and utilize their experiences and prior
knowledge to begin explorations into problem solving or inquiries to discover new knowledge
and experiences. Students investigate essential questions, or big concepts, which are investigated
cross-content. Lynn Erickson’s 3-D model is a constructivist approach where “[u]nits of inquiry
are developed to transect different subjects” (Grisham, 2019, slide 18). In the 3-D model,
students develop knowledge, understand that knowledge, and apply that knowledge to real world
situations. The learning thus becomes continuous, building upon prior knowledge, and
challenging students to make connections between what they are learning, to how their new
CURRICULUM MODEL 3
knowledge is applicable to their lives. In Erickson’s curriculum model, students are advocates of
their own learning and can thus take ownership of the knowledge that they acquire. The teacher
can act as the facilitator of the learning, while students lead investigations and discoveries,
natural form of learning that can provide accessibility to all students, regardless of their abilities
in specific subjects. Rather than teaching only math, where some students may have a false
narrative about their ability in math, the curriculum can integrate math with reading, science, and
social studies, providing more accessibility and meaning to the math content. The constructivist
views students, not as lacking knowledge and needing to be told, but instead as possessing
intellect that can then be nurtured and expanded upon (Wiles & Bondi, 2015). Curriculum should
To write my own curriculum unit, I would follow CBC or Erickson’s 3-D curriculum
model. It is imperative that students understand the interconnectivity and relevance of all
subjects, while seeking answers to big questions. Not only would this make student learning
more relevant, but it would be engaging for students. Students would be leaders of their own
learning, making mistakes and learning from their own missteps. New knowledge would thus
References
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
WebCampus
curriculum/
Wiles, J. W., & Bondi, J. C. (2015). Curriculum development: A guide to practice (9th ed.).