Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 1016@j Colsurfb 2020 110823 PDF
10 1016@j Colsurfb 2020 110823 PDF
PII: S0927-7765(20)30053-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110823
Reference: COLSUB 110823
Please cite this article as: Das S, Huey LS, Chye Ting VDC, Chow PS, Macbeath C, Liu Y,
Shlieout G, Development of Microemulsion Based Topical Ivermectin Formulations:
Pre-Formulation and Formulation Studies, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces (2020),
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110823
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as
the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the
definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and
review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early
visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be
discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal
pertain.
Surajit Das a†, Lee Sie Huey a, Vernissa Dilys Chia Chye Ting a, Pui Shan Chow a, Calum
a Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology
of
and Research), 1 Pesek Road, Jurong Island, Singapore 627833, Singapore
bAbbott Laboratories (S) Pte Ltd, 1 Pesek Road, Jurong Island, Singapore 627833, Singapore
ro
cAbbott Laboratories GmbH, Freundallee 9A, 30173 Hannover, Germany
Corresponding author
-p
re
Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and
† Tel: (65) 6796 3719, Fax: (65) 6316 6183, E-mail: surajit_das@ices.a-star.edu.sg;
surajitdas1982@yahoo.com
na
Number of tables: 1
Number of figures: 5
1
Graphical abstract
of
ro
-p
re
lP
Highlights
na
Tea tree oil and ethyl butanoate were suitable oils for ivermectin microemulsions
Ivermectin permeation of was faster from microemulsion gels than Soolantra cream
Jo
Abstract
The aim of this work was to develop microemulsions and microemulsion gels which can
be used as vehicles for the topical delivery of ivermectin. Tea tree oil and ethyl butanoate were
2
solubility of ivermectin in these two oils than other tested oils. The pseudo-ternary phase
diagrams were constructed based on these selected oils and combination of different
microemulsion gels were successfully formulated based on the selected compositions from the
in the continuous phase (via cryogenic field emission scanning electron microscope image) and
the particle size was less than 100 nm (via dynamic light scattering measurement). Ethyl
of
butanoate based microemulsion appeared to be the best microemulsion formulation considering
the stability and permeation profiles while tea tree oil based microemulsion showed the best
ro
stability profile. Overall, microemulsion gel formulations exhibited better stability profiles than
-p
faster in vitro membrane permeation (release) rate of ivermectin than Soolantra cream
re
(reference marketed product by Galderma, USA).The developed microemulsion and
ivermectin.
na
3
1. Introduction
Several attempts have been made to incorporate poorly water soluble (or hydrophobic)
emulsion based formulations (e.g., cream) where the poorly water soluble drug is
dissolved in the oil phase before making the emulsion [1, 2]. Other relatively less
[3] or lipid based nanoparticles [4-6] or nanoemulsion [7] or liposomes [3] prior to their
of
addition in the liquid/semi-solid formulations. Microemulsion is one of the potential
ro
11]. Microemulsion can improve the solubility of hydrophobic drugs [12, 13]. Unlike
-p
than emulsion [14]. It is also macroscopically homogeneous and optically transparent
re
[15]. Furthermore, microemulsion is easy to prepare and scale-up as high energy input is
not required for production, hence cost-effective [8, 16, 17]. It is composed of oil phase,
lP
aqueous phase and surfactant phase (mixture of surfactant and co-surfactant) [10, 18,
19]. Generally, there are three most common microemulsion microstructures: i) oil-in-
na
water or O/W (where oil nano-droplets are dispersed in continuous aqueous phase), ii)
water-in-oil or W/O (where aqueous nano-droplets are dispersed in continuous oil phase)
and iii) bi-continuous (where aqueous and oil phases are inter-dispersed) [19].
ur
Surfactant and co-surfactant form interfacial layer between oil and water phases, which
Jo
helps to stabilize the microemulsion system [11]. Microemulsions can solubilise the
poorly water soluble drugs and improve the permeation of the drug molecules through
skin, hence improve the bioavailability [9, 10, 16, 19]. Microemulsion can also improve
stability of the drugs by encapsulating the drug molecules in the nano-droplets [12, 13,
20]. However, often gelling agent is required to add in the microemulsion to increase
viscosity as microemulsion is difficult to apply on the skin due to its high fluidity [17].
4
Ivermectin is a mixture of 22, 23-dihydroavermectin B1a and 22, 23-dihydroavermectin
B1b. It is a poorly soluble compound that belongs to BCS class II drug [21]. It is a broad-
spectrum anthelmintic drug, which is used to treat different types of parasite infestations,
such as scabies [22], rosacea [15], head lice [23], trichuriasis [24], river blindness
exhibits side effects especially at high doses [22]. Therefore topical treatment can be
beneficial to avoid the systemic side effects. Furthermore, parasites for scabies,
of
onchocerciasis also reside in the deep skin layer (epidermis and dermis) and
subcutaneous tissues [27, 28]. Topical microemulsion based formulation with high skin
ro
penetration is expected to be more effective than emulsion based cream formulations in
these cases. It may also reduce the required dose of ivermectin than the marketed
-p
ivermectin topical formulations (emulsion based). One previous study demonstrated
re
better characteristics of microemulsion than micelle and ternary solvent system as
transdermal carrier of ivermectin, which reduced the barrier function of the stratum
lP
The aim of this study was to develop microemulsions and microemulsion gels which can
na
be used as vehicles for the topical delivery of ivermectin. First, suitable oils were
under cryogenic scanning electron microscope. The stability of the formulations were
also evaluated at different storage conditions for three months. Finally the in vitro
5
microemulsion gel formulations and compared with Soolantra 1% ivermectin cream
2.1. Materials
Ivermectin was purchased from Zhejiang Hishun Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd (China). Ethyl-n-
butanoate (ethyl butanoate), tea tree oil, Tween® 80, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DGME),
of
oleic acid, isopropyl palmitate (IPP), triacetin, ethyl-n-octanoate, ethyl-n-oleate, eucalyptus oil,
paraffin oil, rosemary oil, safflower oil and soyabean oil were bought from Sigma (USA).
ro
Methanol and acetonitrile were obtained from Duksan Pure Chemicals (South Korea). Absolute
ethanol, propylene glycol (PG) and isopropyl myristate (IPM) was purchased from VWR
-p
Chemicals (USA). SepiplusTM 400 was a gift sample from Seppic (France). LabrafacTM Lipophile
re
WL 1349 (medium chain triglycerides) and LabrafacTM PG (Propylene glycol
HPLC analysis of ivermectin was conducted as per USP method with slight modification. Agilent
HPLC (1100 series, Agilent Technologies; USA) and ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6
ur
mm x 15 cm, 5 µm, Agilent Technologies; USA) were used. Mixture of acetonitrile (53.0%),
Jo
methanol (27.5%) and de-ionized (DI) water (19.5%) was used as mobile phase. Flow rate and
injection volume were set at 2 mL/min and 20 μL, respectively. Column temperature and
detection wavelength were set at 25 °C and 245 nm, respectively. Standard solutions of
6
The solubility of ivermectin in different oils was determined by dissolving excess amount of
ivermectin to 3 mL of each oil in 5 mL stopper vials. Each sample was initially shaken using a
vortex mixer (Vortexer, Heathrow Scientific; USA) and then stirred at room temperature for 72 h
with a magnetic stirrer at 300 rpm. The sample was then filtered through a 0.45 µm PTFE
syringe filter (Agilent Technologies; USA). The concentration of ivermectin in the filtrate was
determined by HPLC at 245 nm after appropriate dilution with methanol. The oils with good
solubilising capacity for ivermectin were selected for the development of ivermectin-loaded
of
microemulsions.
ro
2.4. Identification of microemulsion region
Pseudo-ternary phase diagrams were constructed using water titration method to identify the
-p
microemulsion regions of the tested systems [30]. Briefly, surfactant phase was prepared by
re
mixing accurately weighed surfactant (Tween® 80) and co-surfactant (ethanol, propylene glycol,
DGME). Oil was accurately weighed in the glass vial (oil phase). Surfactant phase was added in
lP
the oil phase in the glass vials at surfactant phase to oil phase weight ratios of 1:9, 2:8, 3:7, 4:6,
5:5, 6:4, 7:3, 8:2, and 9:1. The mixtures were homogeneously mixed by a vortex mixer
na
(Vortexer, Heathrow Scientific; USA). These surfactant-oil mixtures were continuously titrated by
adding 10 µL water using micropipette and mixed well by a vortex mixer. The titration was
continued until the transparent and homogeneous dispersion turned turbid (end point), signalling
ur
the transition from microemulsion to coarse emulsion. The amount of water required to turn the
Jo
mixture slightly turbid was recorded. The % of each component (oil phase, surfactant phase and
water) was calculated and plotted in a ternary plot to generate the phase diagram.
compositions were selected from the phase diagrams where microemulsion structures are most
7
likely O/W type (significantly lower portion of oil phase than water phase). In case of W/O type
microemulsion, ivermectin remains in continuous oil phase which is not nano-sized. The aim
was to encapsulate ivermectin in the oil nano-droplets of these O/W type microemulsion
systems. Nano size droplets are expected to improve ivermectin penetration into skin.
Ivermectin-loaded microemulsions were prepared as follows (Table 1). First, oil phase was
prepared by dissolving ivermectin in the oil under magnetic stirring (IKA; Germany). Surfactant
phase was prepared separately by mixing surfactant and co-surfactant using a magnetic stirrer.
of
Surfactant phase was then homogeneously mixed with the oil phase to produce a transparent
mixture. DI water was then added and mixed well using a magnetic stirrer to produce
ro
microemulsion which is a transparent homogeneous mixture.
-p
was replaced by an equivalent amount of thickener (Table 1). SepiplusTM 400 (Polyacrylate-13
re
and Polyisobutene and Polysorbate 20) was used as thickener due to its good electrolyte
resistance power [31]. The total % of DI water and thickener in the microemulsion gel is the
lP
same as the % of DI water in the corresponding microemulsion. The thickener was slowly added
to the microemulsion while stirring at 100 rpm for 15 min with an overhead stirrer (IKA;
na
Germany).
ur
Jo
8
of
Table 1: Compositions of ivermectin-loaded microemulsions and microemulsion gels.
Amount (% w/w)
ro
Ingredients
IME-3 IME-4 IME-5 IME-6 IME-9 IME-10 IMEG-3 IMEG-4 IMEG-5 IMEG-6 IMEG-9 IMEG-10
Oil Phase Ethyl 5.00 - - 5.00 - 4.00 5.00 - - 5.00 - 4.00
-p
butanoate
Tea tree oil - 8.00 5.00 - 4.00 - - 8.00 5.00 - 4.00 -
Ivermectin 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
re
Surfactant Tween® 80 16.67 16.00 11.67 20.00 15.33 12.00 16.67 16.00 11.67 20.00 15.33 12.00
Phase Ethanol 8.33 - - - - - 8.33 - - - - -
DGME
Propylene
glycol
-
-
16.00
- lP -
23.33
10.00
-
-
30.67
24.00
- -
16.00
- 23.33
10.00
- 30.67
24.00
-
na
Water DI water 69.00 59.00 59.00 64.00 49.00 59.00 67.00 57.00 57.00 62.00 47.00 57.00
Phase
Thickener SepiplusTM - - - - - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
ur
400
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Jo
9
2.6. Particle size and polydispersity index
Particle size (z-average diameter) and polydispersity index (PdI) of the microemulsion
using dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique [32]. Size and PdI of the microemulsions were
measured without diluting the samples as dilution with water will disrupt the microemulsion
structure. Briefly, microemulsion was poured in a glass cuvette. The cuvette was then inserted
of
into the cuvette holder of Zetasizer Nano ZS and analysed by DTS v 6.12 software (Malvern
Instruments, UK).
ro
2.7. Cryogenic Scanning Electron Microscopy
-p
Cryogenic Scanning Electron Microscope is a great tool to investigate the morphology of
aqueous based liquid/semi-solid formulations at close to their original state [33]. In this study,
re
cryogenic field emission scanning electron microscope (cryo-FESEM) was used to investigate
lP
the morphology of the microemulsion formulation. Briefly, few drops of the microemulsion were
deposited onto a copper rivet and frozen in liquid nitrogen at less than -196 °C. This frozen
sample was stored in liquid nitrogen and quickly transferred into the cryo preparation
na
chamber(Alto CT2500, Gatan, UK) under vacuum. The frozen sample was then etched with a
knife at -95 °C on the cryo stage and sputter coated with platinum for 180 s. The coated sample
ur
was then inserted into the specimen stage of the cryo-FESEM (JEOL JSM-6700F, Japan) at -
2.8. Stability
The ivermectin contents in the fresh formulations (immediately after preparation) were analyzed
5 °C, 25 °C, 40 °C/75% RH (relative humidity) chambers. Physical stability of the microemulsion
10
formulations were evaluated via appearance check (phase separation, color change).
Furthermore, any changes in particle size and PdI of the microemulsions were also evaluated
during stability test period. Chemical stabilities of ivermectin in the formulations were analyzed
by HPLC after one week, one month and three months of storage at the above mentioned
stability conditions. HPLC samples were prepared by dissolving the formulations in methanol
[4]. Briefly, accurately weighed formulations were first added in the volumetric flasks and then
methanol was added. The flasks were sonicated for 30 min for complete extraction of ivermectin
of
from the formulations and finally filtered through 0.45 µ PTFE syringe filters (Fisher Scientific;
USA) into the HPLC vials. Product colors of the stability samples were also visually compared
ro
with the fresh samples.
-p
re
Franz diffusion cells (Teledyne Hanson Research, 6-cell manual diffusion test system, standard
7 ml vertical diffusion cell; USA) and synthetic polysulfone membranes (Tuffryn® PALL Life
lP
Science, HT-450, P/N 66221, 0.45 μm pore size, 25 mm diameter; USA) were used to measure
the in vitro membrane permeation of ivermectin from the microemulsion gel formulations.
na
Double walled Franz diffusion cells were placed on a multistage magnetic stirrer and connected
with a water circulator (Julabo; Germany). Hydro-alcoholic solution (70 % (v/v) phosphate buffer
saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and 30 % (v/v) methanol) was used as receptor fluid to maintain sink
ur
condition. Receptor fluid was placed in the receptor chamber. Temperature of the water
Jo
circulator was set at 33 °C so that the temperature of receptor fluid was maintained at 32 ±
0.5 °C. The membrane was placed in between donor chamber and receptor chamber. The
donor chamber was filled with ivermectin-loaded microemulsion gel or blank microemulsion gel
stirrer was set at 300 rpm. Samples from the receptor fluid were collected through sampling port
at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h for HPLC analysis of permeated ivermectin. Topical gel type
11
products do not stay on the skin for more than few hours (less than 6h). Therefore permeation
study of the gel formulations were conducted till 6h. During sample collections, magnetic stirrer
was switched off, 2 mL fresh receptor fluid was injected from the bottom port, first 1 mL sample
was discarded and next 1 mL sample was collected in the HPLC vial from the top sampling port
and finally magnetic stirrer was again switched on. The integrity of the membranes was
of
3. Results and Discussion
ro
HPLC assay method for ivermectin was developed and validated. Retention time of ivermectin
was ~18.2 min. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of ivermectin were 1
-p
µg/mL and 2.5 µg/mL, respectively. The calibration curve was linear (r2 = 0.9995) within 2.5 –
re
500 µg/mL ivermectin concentration.
lP
The solubility data indicate that ivermectin has the highest solubility in tea tree oil followed by in
na
ethylbutanoate among the oils tested. The solubility profile of ivermectin in different oils can be
found in Supplementary Figure 1. Therefore, these two oils were selected to prepare
Figure 1A represents the pseudo-ternary phase diagram where ethyl butanoate, Tween® 80 and
ethanol were used as oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively. Three compositions
of surfactant phase at surfactant to co-surfactant ratios of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1 were investigated to
identify their impact on microemulsion region (1φ). The data showed differences in
12
ratios. Surfactant phase containing Tween® 80 and ethanol at 2:1 ratio was selected for
Figure 1B represents the pseudo-ternary phase diagram where ethyl butanoate, Tween® 80 and
DGME were used as oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively. Three compositions
of surfactant phase at surfactant to co-surfactant ratios of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1 were investigated to
identify their impact on microemulsion region (1φ). The data showed no significant difference in
of
microemulsion regions between surfactant to co-surfactant ratios of 1:2 and 1:1. However,
surfactant to co-surfactant ratios of 2:1 showed higher microemulsion region towards water rich
ro
region and lower microemulsion region towards oil rich region than other 2 surfactant phase
compositions. That is why surfactant phase containing Tween® 80 and DGME at 2:1 ratio was
-p
selected for ivermectin loading. Tween® 80 to DGME ratio of 1:2 was also selected in one
re
formulation to reduce Tween® 80 level in the formulation.
lP
na
ur
Jo
13
A.
Tw
40
of
r
ee
te
60
Wa
n8
0/E
ro tO
60
H
40
-p
80
20
re
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
lP
Ethyl Butanoate
na
ur
Jo
14
B.
Tw
40
of
r
te
ee
60
Wa
n8
0/D
ro
60
GM
40
E
-p
80
20
re
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
lP
Ethyl Butanoate
water system at room temperature with different weight ratio of Tween® 80 and ethanol (EtOH).
B. ethyl butanoate / (Tween® 80 + DGME) / water system at room temperature with different
ur
weight ratio of Tween® 80 and DGME. ME (1φ) represents single-phase microemulsion region.
Jo
Figure 2A represents the pseudo-ternary phase diagram where tea tree oil (TTO), Tween® 80
and DGME were used as oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively. Three
compositions of surfactant phase at surfactant to co-surfactant ratios of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1 were
investigated to identify their impact on microemulsion region (1φ). The data showed wider
15
microemulsion regions towards water rich region for Tween® 80 to DGME ratio of 1:1 than 1:2
and 2:1. Therefore, Tween® 80 to DGME ratio of 1:1 was selected for ivermectin loading.
Figure 2B represents the pseudo-ternary phase diagram where TTO, Tween® 80 and propylene
glycol (PG) were used as oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively. Three
compositions of surfactant phase at surfactant to co-surfactant ratios of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1 were
investigated to identify their impact on microemulsion region (1φ). The data for different
surfactant to co-surfactant ratios showed no significant difference towards water rich region.
of
Tween® 80 to PG ratio of 1:2 was selected for ivermectin loading as PG is more compatible with
ro
A.
-p
re
0 Tween 80/DGME (1:2)
100 Tween 80/DGME (1:1)
lP
Tw
40
ter
ee
60
n8
Wa
0/D
ur
60
GM
40
E
Jo
80
20
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
TTO
16
B.
20
80
ME (1f)
40
of
Tw
r
60
te
ee
Wa
n8
0/P
ro
60
G
40
-p
80
20
re
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
lP
TTO
Figure 2: The pseudo-ternary phase diagram of A. tea tree oil (TTO) / (Tween® 80 + DGME) /
na
water system at room temperature with different weight ratio of Tween® 80 and DGME. B. tea
tree oil (TTO) / (Tween® 80 + propylene glycol) / water system at room temperature with
ur
different weight ratio of Tween® 80 and propylene glycol (PG). ME (1φ) represents single-phase
microemulsion region.
Jo
Particle size of all ivermectin loaded microemulsions were within 18 – 54 nm (Figure 3A). IME-3
and IME-6 showed the lowest particle size while IME-9 showed largest particle size.
17
Polydispersity index (PdI) of all ivermectin loaded microemulsions were within 0.3 – 0.5 range
(Figure 3B). IME-5 and IME-6 showed the narrowest and widest size distribution, respectively.
A.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
B.
na
ur
Jo
18
Figure 3: Particle size (A) and PdI (B) of the ivermectin-loaded microemulsions during stability
study. 3M @ 5°C, 3M @ 25°C and 3M @ 40°C in the graphs indicate the data after three
months storage at 5 °C,25 °C,40 °C/75% RH, respectively. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3).
3.5. Cryo-FESEM
of the microemulsions. IME-3 was chosen for cryo-FESEM study as this microemulsion appears
of
to be the best formulation considering stability and release profiles (to be discussed later).
ro
2 demonstrates the microstructure of the microemulsion formulation. IME-3 was considered as
O/W type microemulsion due to the presence of significantly higher proportion of water than oil
-p
in its composition (Table 1). The droplet size in Supplementary Figure 2 appears to be slightly
re
larger than the value obtained from the DLS measurement (Figure 3A). This may be due to the
expansion of the aqueous phase during freezing process of Cryo-FESEM, which can change
lP
3.6. Stability
temperature), 25 °C (to check stability at room temperature) and 40 °C/75% RH (to check
ur
stability at accelerated condition) for three months. All microemulsions were physically stable at
Jo
all storage conditions (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 3) except IME-5 which showed
phase separation at 40 °C/75% RH after just a week (Supplementary Figure 3D) and at 25 °C
within three months (Supplementary Figure 3F). This indicates that the amount surfactant/co-
surfactant was not enough in IME-5 to maintain the microemulsion structure at high
temperature. Slight decrease in sizes of IME-3, IME-9 and IME-10 were observed at 40 °C/75%
RH after 3 months. However, the changes in these sizes did not impact microemulsion
19
structures. At 40 °C/75% RH, IME-6 and IME-10 showed slight color change after one month
(Supplementary Figure 3D) and the color became darker after three months, especially for IME-
6 (Supplementary Figure 3G). Other microemulsion samples did not exhibit significant
discoloration after one month in all storage conditions (including 40 °C/75% RH) and exhibited
minor color change after three months at 40 °C/75% RH only. Generally, there is a higher
of
ivermectin crystal was observed in all microemulsions even after three months at any storage
conditions (including 5 °C), which indicates that all microemulsions were able to keep ivermectin
ro
in dissolved state at wide temperature range (5 – 40 °C). In comparison to initial particle size
and polydispersity index (PdI), there were no huge deviation of particle size and PdI of all
-p
ivermectin-loaded microemulsions (except IME-5 where phase separation occurred) after three
re
months storage at all stability conditions (Figure 3).
IME-4 showed the best chemical stability of ivermectin (>98% after three months) followed by
lP
IME-3 and IME-9 (>93% after one month and >85% after three months) under all storage
conditions (Figure 4A-C). Although IME-6 showed good ivermectin stability (>90%) at 5 °C and
na
25 °C for three months, it showed moderate stability (~86%) after one month and poor stability
(~59%) after three months at 40 °C/75% RH. IME-10 showed good ivermectin stability (>90%)
after one month and moderate stability (>80%) after three months at 5 °C and 25 °C. However,
ur
it showed poor ivermectin stability (~68% after one month and ~48% after three months) at
Jo
40 °C/75% RH. IME-5 showed >98% ivermectin stability at 5 °C and 25 °C after one month and
at 5 °C after three months. As mentioned earlier, phase separation of IME-5 was observed after
one week at 40 °C/75% RH and after three months at 25 °C. Therefore, ivermectin stability
assay was not conducted on this sample. Overall, poor ivermectin stability in the
microemulsions (IME-6 and IME-10) was observed at 40 °C/75% RH when ethyl butanoate and
20
Stability of ivermectin-loaded microemulsion gels were also monitored at 5 °C, 25 °C and
40 °C/75% RH for three months. All microemulsion gels were physically stable (no phase
separation) at all storage conditions (Supplementary Figure 4). There was no visible
discoloration in any of the samples after one month at all storage conditions and after three
months at 5 °C, 25 °C. However, IMEG-6 and IMEG-9 turned to light yellow (IMEG-6 > IMEG-9)
after three months at 40 °C/75% RH. All other microemulsion gels showed negligible color
change after three months at 40 °C/75% RH. Precipitation of ivermectin crystal was not
of
observed even after three months at any storage conditions including low temperature (5 °C).
IMEG-3, IMEG-4 and IMEG-5 showed very good chemical stability of ivermectin (>96%) at all
ro
storage conditions even after three months (Figure 4D-F). IMEG-10 showed moderate stability
(>85%) at all storage conditions for three months. IMEG-6 and IMEG-9 showed relatively lower
-p
stability after three months, especially at 40 °C/75% RH (78% – 80%). Overall, chemical stability
re
of ivermectin in the microemulsion systems increased after addition of thickener (microemulsion
gels).
lP
A.
na
ur
Jo
21
B.
D.
C.
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
22
F.
E.
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
23
of
ro
Figure 4: Stability of ivermectin-loaded microemulsions at different storage conditions: A. 5 °C,
B. 25 °C (excluded three months data point of IME-5 as phase separation was observed at
-p
three months), C. 40 °C/75% RH (excluded IME-5 as phase separation was observed at one1
re
week). Stability of ivermectin-loaded microemulsion gels at different storage conditions: D. 5 °C,
polysulfone membranes (0.45 µm pore size) was evaluated by Franz diffusion cells. Soolantra
(1% ivermectin cream for topical use) was used as the reference standard. In case of Soolantra,
ur
ivermectin in the receptor fluid was below detection limit in the first three hours and only
Jo
detectable at very low levels thereafter (Figure 5). Ivermectin permeation was significantly better
from all microemulsion gel formulations. Among the microemulsion gel formulations, IMEG-3
showed the highest permeation rate followed by IMEG-10 and IMEG-6. IMEG-4 and IMEG-5
showed the lowest permeation among the tested microemulsion gels. Ivermectin permeation
from IMEG-9 was equivalent to IMEG-6 in the first hour but subsequently became equivalent to
IMEG-4 and IMEG-5. The result indicates that microemulsion systems containing ethyl
24
butanoate exhibited higher ivermectin permeation than the microemulsion systems containing
tea tree oil (although composition of surfactant phase was different which was decided from the
phase diagrams). Among the ethyl butanoate based microemulsion gels, Tween® 80 and
ethanol (IMEG-3) combination showed faster permeation than Tween® 80 and DGME
combinations (IMEG-6 and IMEG-10). Higher permeation from IMEG-9 in the first hour than
other TTO based system was probably due to higher amount of surfactant and co-surfactant
combination.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
4. Conclusion
25
Selection of oils, surfactants, co-surfactants and construction of phase diagram(s) are
ivermectin (drug) has poor aqueous solubility, the oils were selected based on their
formulations can dissolve 1% ivermectin. Ethyl butanoate and tea tree oil were found to
be suitable for this purpose. Phase diagrams were successfully constructed on these oils
of
identified. Stable ivermectin-loaded microemulsion and microemulsion gel formulations
were prepared based on the selected compositions from the phase diagrams. The
ro
microemulsion gel formulations showed significantly higher membrane permeation of
ivermectin (i.e., higher drug release from the microemulsion-gels) than marketed product
-p
(Soolantra 1% ivermectin cream). The outcome of this study can be utilized for the
re
following three purposes. i) Significantly lower level of ivermectin content in the
microemulsion gel formulations may provide equivalent or better efficacy than Soolantra
lP
due to higher membrane permeation. This will reduce cost and may reduce side effects
of the product. In fact, clinical study of 1%, 0.3% and 0.1% ivermectin creams were
na
performed for the registration of Soolantra [35]. 1% ivermectin cream was selected
because 0.3% and 0.1% ivermectin creams did not show the desired efficacy. ii) Some
parasites (e.g., parasites for scabies, onchocerciasis) also reside inside the skin
ur
(epidermis and dermis) and subcutaneous tissues. Penetration of drug through stratum
Jo
corneum can help to act on those parasites. Therefore, the microemulsion based
ivermectin) than Soolantra for topical treatment of parasites. iii) High membrane
permeation (or drug release) of these microemulsion based formulations can be utilized
to develop topical/transdermal delivery systems of other BCS class II drugs for systemic
actions.
26
Notes
Author Contributions
All authors have contributed in this work. The final version of the manuscript has been
of
ro
Credit Author Statement
-p
Surajit Das: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data
Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project
re
administration, Funding acquisition.
lP
Pui Shan Chow: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - Review & Editing.
ur
27
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financialinterestsor personal relationships that
could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a joint collaborative grant between A*STAR (Agency
for Science, Technology and Research), Singapore and Abbott Laboratories. We would
of
like to thank Mr. Ng Jun Wei and MS. Inez Kwek for their technical assistance.
ro
References
-p
[1] S.C. Jayaraman, C. Ramachandran, N. Weiner, Topical delivery of erythromycin from
various formulations: an in vivo hairless mouse study, J Pharm Sci, 85 (1996) 1082-1084.
[2] J.S. Schwarz, M.R. Weisspapir, D.I. Friedman, Enhanced Transdermal Delivery of Diazepam
by Submicron Emulsion (SME) Creams, Pharmaceutical Research, 12 (1995) 687-692.
re
[3] R. Goyal, L.K. Macri, H.M. Kaplan, J. Kohn, Nanoparticles and nanofibers for topical drug
delivery, J Control Release, 240 (2016) 77-92.
[4] S. Das, W.K. Ng, R.B. Tan, Sucrose ester stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles and
lP
nanostructured lipid carriers. II. Evaluation of the imidazole antifungal drug-loaded nanoparticle
dispersions and their gel formulations, Nanotechnology, 25 (2014) 105102.
[5] S. Das, W.K. Ng, P. Kanaujia, S. Kim, R.B. Tan, Formulation design, preparation and
physicochemical characterizations of solid lipid nanoparticles containing a hydrophobic drug:
effects of process variables, Colloids and surfaces, 88 (2011) 483-489.
na
[6] S. Das, W.K. Ng, R.B. Tan, Development and In Vitro Evaluations of a Lipid Nanoparticle
Formulation Containing Tretinoin, in: G. Tiddy, R.B.H. Tan (Eds.) NanoFormulation, RSC,
London, UK, 2012, pp. 38-52.
[7] F. Shakeel, S. Shafiq, N. Haq, F.K. Alanazi, I.A. Alsarra, Nanoemulsions as potential
vehicles for transdermal and dermal delivery of hydrophobic compounds: an overview, Expert
ur
28
[14] R.P. Bagwe, J.R. Kanicky, B.J. Palla, P.K. Patanjali, D.O. Shah, Improved drug delivery
using microemulsions: rationale, recent progress, and new horizons, Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier
Syst, 18 (2001) 77-140.
[15] K. Siddiqui, L. Stein Gold, J. Gill, The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ivermectin
compared with current topical treatments for the inflammatory lesions of rosacea: a network
meta-analysis, SpringerPlus, 5 (2016) 1151-1151.
[16] M. Kreilgaard, E.J. Pedersen, J.W. Jaroszewski, NMR characterisation and transdermal
drug delivery potential of microemulsion systems, Journal of Controlled Release, 69 (2000) 421-
433.
[17] C. Nastiti, T. Ponto, E. Abd, J.E. Grice, H.A.E. Benson, M.S. Roberts, Topical Nano and
Microemulsions for Skin Delivery, Pharmaceutics, 9 (2017).
[18] E.N. Agbata, R.L. Morton, Z. Bisoffi, E. Bottieau, C. Greenaway, B.A. Biggs, N. Montero, A.
Tran, N. Rowbotham, I. Arevalo-Rodriguez, D.T. Myran, T. Noori, P. Alonso-Coello, K. Pottie, A.
Requena-Mendez, Effectiveness of Screening and Treatment Approaches for Schistosomiasis
of
and Strongyloidiasis in Newly-Arrived Migrants from Endemic Countries in the EU/EEA: A
Systematic Review, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16 (2018).
[19] M.J. Lawrence, G.D. Rees, Microemulsion-based media as novel drug delivery systems,
ro
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 45 (2000) 89-121.
[20] F.F. Lv, N. Li, L.Q. Zheng, C.H. Tung, Studies on the stability of the chloramphenicol in the
microemulsion free of alcohols, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 62 (2006) 288-294.
[21] S. Raman, J.E. Polli, Prediction of positive food effect: Bioavailability enhancement of BCS
class II drugs, Int J Pharm, 506 (2016) 110-115.
-p
[22] Y. Panahi, Z. Poursaleh, M. Goldust, The efficacy of topical and oral ivermectin in the
treatment of human scabies, Ann Parasitol, 61 (2015) 11-16.
re
[23] D.M. Pariser, T.L. Meinking, M. Bell, W.G. Ryan, Topical 0.5% ivermectin lotion for
treatment of head lice, N Engl J Med, 367 (2012) 1687-1693.
[24] M.S. Palmeirim, E. Hurlimann, S. Knopp, B. Speich, V. Belizario, Jr., S.A. Joseph, M.
Vaillant, P. Olliaro, J. Keiser, Efficacy and safety of co-administered ivermectin plus albendazole
lP
for treating soil-transmitted helminths: A systematic review, meta-analysis and individual patient
data analysis, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 12 (2018).
[25] M.G. Basanez, S.D. Pion, E. Boakes, J.A. Filipe, T.S. Churcher, M. Boussinesq, Effect of
single-dose ivermectin on Onchocerca volvulus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet
na
Onchocerciasis modulates the immune response to mycobacterial antigens, Clin Exp Immunol,
117 (1999) 517-523.
[29] L. Chen, J. Zhou, Influence of formulation factors on transdermal absorption of ivermectin
Jo
29
[33] S. Das, W.K. Ng, R.B.H. Tan, Are nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) better than solid lipid
nanoparticles (SLNs): Development, characterizations and comparative evaluations of
clotrimazole-loaded SLNs and NLCs?, Eur J Pharm Sci, 47 (2012) 139-151.
[34] W. Jahn, R. Strey, Microstructure of microemulsions by freeze fracture electron microscopy,
The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 92 (1988) 2294-2301.
[35] Australian Public Assessment Report for Ivermectin, in: D.o. Health (Ed.), 2015.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
30