Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The Association of Adv PDF
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The Association of Adv PDF
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The Association of Adv PDF
AND ADOLESCENTS
Laurence S. Pe
14 August 2019
Introduction……………………………………………………….….………………5
Bipolar disorder……………………………………………………………...5
Clinical Characteristic of BD……………...……………………...…...5
BD in children and adolescents……………………………………….….….6
Prevalence Rate of BD in Youth……………………………….……...6
Symptoms of BD in Youth…………………………….………………7
Comorbidities of BD in Youth……………………….……….……….7
Adverse Childhood Experiences……………………….…………………....8
Adverse Childhood Experiences and Paediatric BD…….……..….……….9
ACE and Onset of BD…………………….…….…………….……….9
ACE and Symptoms and Duration of BD. ……………..….….…..…10
ACE and Comorbidities in BD………………..…….…………..…...10
1. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder….……….…………10
2. Conduct disorder………………………….………….………11
3. Post-traumatic stress disorder…………………....….……….11
ACE and Suicidality in BD………………….….………….….….….12
Aims and objectives………………………………….…..…………..…..….13
Methods………………………………………………………………………….…...13
Search Strategy.…………..………..…………………….……………..…...14
Search terms…...…………………………………………….……..…….….14
Study Selection.……………………….………………….………..…....…...15
Data extraction…………………………………….……………….….…….15
Assessment of quality…………………………………….…………..……...16
Synthesis of research………………………….……………………………..17
Results…….……………………………………………………………………..……17
Characteristics of participants………………………………………….….18
Demographic profile……………..…………………………………….……18
Gender…………………………………………………………….….18
Age…………………………………………………………………...25
Socioeconomic status………………………………………………...26
Association of ACE and Paediatric BD……………………………………26
Onset of BD……………………………………………………….….27
3
Symptoms of BD………………………………………………….….29
Duration of BD……………………………………………………….30
Comorbidities in Paediatric BD with ACE………………………………..30
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder……………………………...30
Conduct disorder………………………………………………….….31
Posttraumatic stress disorder…………………………………………32
Suicidality…………….…………………………….………………...33
Quality Assessment…………………………………………………...34
Discussion……………………………………………………………………………35
Association of ACE and Paediatric BD.…………………………………...36
Limitations………………...………………………………………………...40
Future Research…………………………………………………………….42
Conclusion……………………..…………………………….………………42
References…………………………………………………………………………...43
Appendix…………………………………………………………………………….55
Appendix A | Quality Assessment…………………………………..……...55
List of tables
Table 1 | Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria……………………….……......16
Table 2 | Summary of Studies………………………………………………20
Table 3 | Data Summary………………………………………….………...28
List of Figures
Figure 1 | Flowchart of selection process………………………………….19
4
Abstract
Objective: Bipolar disorder has been examined extensively in adulthood. An earlier
onset, increased symptoms, longer duration and severe presentation of comorbidities were
found in adult BD with adversity during childhood. However, there are no reports of
review about the risk of childhood maltreatment in youth with BD. The aim of this review
Methods: Studies were generated electronically. From title, abstract and full paper,
studies were screened using the inclusion/exclusion criteria and synthesised findings of
Result: Eight studies were included in this review and revealed that no direct association
can be firmly concluded between diagnosis of BD in children and adolescents and ACE.
History of ACE in BD youth contributed to an earlier onset, however, does not predict
onset of BD. Physical, sexual abuse and SUD were related to severe presentation of BD
and suicidal attempts. However, ADHD did not show difference with non-BD or non-
ACE BD youth.
(symptoms severity, duration of illness, CD, PTSD, and suicidality) in the manifestation
of BD.
Limitation: Outcomes were fluctuating throughout studies and onset of diagnosis was
not significantly indicated due to lack of studies. Additionally, some studies did not
mention the measurement of ACE. Finally, types and degree of adversity differs in BD
Bipolar disorder
mood disorder with episodes of mania or hypomania which intertwine or alternate with
episodes of depression (Grande et al., 2016). The episodic disturbance of mood by elation
major depression and hypomania (Goodwin, G., 2012). Otherwise, if the patient failed to
fulfil the diagnostic criteria of the disorder, either the episode includes manic or
hypomanic or when depressive symptoms did not meet full criteria, it is considered
“specified” or “unspecified” BD. There are also diagnosed BD which are induced by
Clinical Characteristics of BD
mania may include (but not limited to) unusual irritability, grandiose ideas, increased
functioning which must have lasted for at least 1 week or resulted to hospitalisation. These
symptoms may vary in severity from severe psychotic exhaustion or harmful state of
elation channelled by poor judgement (APA, 2013; Mitchel et. al., 2008). Nonetheless, if
symptoms were less severe in form and lasted only for 4 consecutive days, it is considered
mixed state may occur to BD patients and present a rapid alternating mania or depression
or severe depression with complete absence of euphoria, yet displaying extensive period
morbidity, mortality and some of the symptoms may manifest earlier, during childhood
(Goodwin & Jamison, 1990; Marangoni et. al., 2018). While it may be difficult to be
BD can initiate during early childhood; however, it is rare for children to be diagnosed of
Walshaw & Bearden, 2016). One possible reason is that, it takes roughly 10 years in order
to properly diagnose an individual with bipolar disorder, which gives 10% lower chance
children and adolescents may account for complexity of diagnosis (Kraepelin, 1921). One
criteria as it can recognise mania for both children and adult (Leibenluft & Rich, 2008).
The prevalence rate of BD in youth have increased in the past decades, filling roughly
2% of the BD population (Merikanges et. al., 201l; Walshaw & Bearden 2016). In 11
countries (Brazil, Bulgaria, Colombia, India, Japan, Lebanon, Mexico, New Zealand,
Romania, Shenzhen, and United States) lifetime prevalence rate of Bipolar I (M= 0.6%),
Bipolar II (M=0.4%) and subthreshold BD (M=1.4%) were recorded and found that
United States had the highest lifetime prevalence rate of 4.4% as oppose to India with the
lowest life time prevalence rate of 0.1% (Merikanges et. al., 2011). In addition, one factor
that contributes to the increasing prevalence rate of BD were instances where some
7
disorders also fall to BD criteria. For example, 30% of major depressive disorder cases
Symptoms of BD in Youth
utilised in distinguishing BD in youth (Biederman et. al., 2005; Woznak et. al., 2005).
Children and adolescents who were diagnosed of BD were found to report a moderate to
severe manic or hypomanic episodes or major depressive episodes within 12 months than
adults diagnosed at later age. Particularly, Bipolar I and Bipolar II disordered patients,
who were diagnosed at an earlier age (before 15 years old) displayed a more severe
Comorbidities of BD in Youth
psychiatric disorder, and failure to distinguish these disorders may lead to wrong
diagnosis, hence wrong treatment (Spencer et al., 2001). Furthermore, these other
which lead to a worse manifestation of BD (Frías, Palma and Farriols, 2015; Wilens et.
al., 2003). For example, youth who were diagnosed of BD and comorbid ADHD were
found to have longer and higher number of mood symptoms presentation compared to
With all the findings in the previous studies, diagnosis of bipolar disorder during
disorder, yet, there are determinants which may affect the development of the disorder
8
(Simon, 2016; Suotullo et. al., 2015), including psychosocial contributors – such as stress
and neglect – and childhood trauma (Etain et al., 2010; Larsson et al., 2013).
Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) refer to various negative life events including
physical, sexual, emotional and verbal abuse, neglect, any form of domestic violence,
relational stress such as parental separation, and excessive substance use or criminal
behaviour of family members (Anda et. al., 2010). It was acknowledged to be usually first
experienced at home – familial violence (Xavier et al., 2016). ACE, though not specific
and limited, is a strong risk factor for earlier onset of psychiatric disorder – on children
or adolescents (Teicher et. al., 2014). These experiences also contribute to negative
outcomes of psychiatric disorders and induce the course of severe mental disorders, such
as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (Danese et. al., 2009; Fisher & Hosang, 2010).
Furthermore, the rates of ACE were found to be twice in individuals diagnosed of BD,
particularly in bipolar I, triggering other psychiatric disorders which mostly co-occur with
Thus, it is feasible that adverse experiences during childhood may be associated with BD
conduct this systematic review in order to address the gap in the literature of BD,
particularly, the association between traumatic experiences during childhood and the
earlier onset of BD considering that the emphasis of majority of the studies and reviews
suicidality, earlier onset of BD, rapid cycling pattern, and comorbid disorders such as
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), conduct disorder (CD) and panic disorder (Brown
et. al., 2005; Carballo et. al., 2008; Garno et. al., 2005). Hence, these specific domains –
onset of BD, symptoms and duration of BD, ADHD, CD, PTSD, and suicidality – were
First episodes of symptoms of bipolar disorder (BD) can approximately be present at the
age of 18 (APA, 2013). Nevertheless, onset of the disorder was found to be earlier in
patients who were exposed to maltreatment such as physical abuse, sexual abuse and
neglect. Particularly, physical abuse, as strongest predictor of BD, and sexual abuse were
(Leverich et. al., 2002). For instance, 92% of abused patients and neglected children had
the diagnosis of BD on or before that age of 14, as compared to 83% non-abused patients
with later diagnosis, 18 years and above (Dienes et. al., 2006; Leverich et. al., 2002).
et. al., (2008) found that child abuse did not predict the onset of the BD. However, it is
worth to note that McIntyre et. al., (2008) measurement of maltreatment history was only
based on psychiatric records, therefore, was not able to interview patients regarding
non-ACE BD individuals.
10
ACE and Symptoms and Duration of BD
Any form of adverse experiences was significantly associated with more depressive
episodes and increased manic/depressive symptoms severity (Garno et. al., 2005). In fact,
when childhood maltreatment (physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and
neglect) and the polygenic risk were examined, BD patients who experienced
depression and rapid cycling, but not on manic episodes. While, individuals with genetic
risk only had fewer mood episodes (Aas et. al., 2019). Thus, a severe form of BD needs
increased symptoms of depression, but not mania. Aside from increased symptoms, after
BD was reported by abused patients when compared non-abused (Sala et. al., 2014).
exposed to maltreatment during childhood and may result to a longer duration of the
disorder.
abuse and neglect) during childhood. However, these were not extensively examined in
children and adolescents. Therefore, in this systematic review, it was assessed whether
with bipolar I or bipolar II and history of abuse are 44% more often to develop
ADHD (Pinna et. al., 2018). Furthermore, individuals with history of ADHD had
earlier age onset of BD, greater risk of suicide attempts and substance misuse in
development (Pinna et. al., 2018; Tamam et. al., 2008; Perugi et. al., 2013).
criminal behaviours (Anda et. al., 2010). For instance, from 2 North Ohio
Counties in 2003-2006, it was found that maltreatment (abuse and neglect) and
although resulted to less delinquency (Mallett, Stoddard Dare and Seck, 2009).
While Olvera et al., 2014 found that BD youth with comorbid CD, as compared
to non-CD, were more likely to present a worse lifetime functioning, further mood
with CD also had ADHD and MDD which differed significantly with non-BD CD
BD were more likely to acquire PTSD after surviving a trauma than those with
major depressive disorder (Dilsaver et. al., 2007) in contrast to Maguire et. al.,
convenient sampling, hence, a selection bias cannot be ruled out. Moreover, adult
12
BD patients with PTSD had 4.5-fold increase in their suicide attempt. This may
diagnosed of bipolar disorder were found to have comorbidities (Amiro et. al., 2014;
Leahy, 2007). Hence, comorbidities in adult BD was proven to significantly affect the
an increased number of symptoms with longer duration of the disorder. Since in adult
BD, it was found that more than half of the BD population have co-occurring psychiatric
disorders, it was examined whether similar changes was present in the diagnosis of BD
Aside from comorbidity, suicidality (both fatal and non-fatal behaviours) was known to
accounting for the highest risk across 21 countries (Nock et. al., 2009). The association
was substantially reduced after controlling for comorbid disorders, albeit remained
significant. Depressed days of BD patients were associated with greater risk of suicidal
attempts and completion, where bipolar II disordered individuals were at a higher risk.
patients (APA, 2013; Nock et. al., 2009).). Thus, suicidality in patients diagnosed of BD
13
increases the risk of mortality rate of patients, emphasising the need for more extensive
care.
Reflecting upon the findings, adverse experiences during childhood impact the mental
conducted, they were particularly emphasized on adult BD. It is therefore worth to discern
Despite the limited studies concerning the significance of ACE in the presentation of BD
in youth, this systematic review was conducted to examine the association of history of
adolescents. Moreover, the main objective was to assess the relationship of ACE in
clinical characteristics of BD in youth that were shared in previous studies, such as onset,
Methods
Systematic review synthesises the collected studies with their individual findings
population.
14
Search Strategy
Electronic searching was conducted in this review through PsycInfo via EBSCO,
2000 and 2019. The search for studies was conducted from November 2018 to December
2018, then again in February 2019 to June 2019. Moreover, grey literature was
considered only if they met the criteria in the screening test. Grey literature articles may
contribute to the systematic review only with its academic papers such as dissertations,
theses, government papers, and some ongoing research, though not published. These
studies can be retrieved through PsycExtra, GLIN, UMI database, and ProQuest.
The search strategy was done by looking at the population of the studies within the age
criteria who were diagnosed of BD. For instance, searching for bipolar disorder in
children “and/or” adolescents, the results that usually appear are those studies which
examined the diagnosis of BD in children “and” adults since most study which relates to
BD and ACE are focused on adults with the disorder. In addition, all studies with benefit
and relevance to the topic and fit the inclusion and exclusion (table 1) were considered,
albeit was carefully assessed. Also, only studies with quantitative design were queued for
consideration. During the search, duplicated studies from a different database were
excluded. Finally, articles and studies recognised through the reference list and
bibliography will also be considered based on their title and whether or not they fulfil the
criteria provided.
Search terms
There are various initial key searches and Boolean operators that were used to identify
articles such as “paediatric bipolar disorder OR bipolar disorder AND children AND
“bipolar disorder AND children AND adolescents OR bipolar disorder AND youth AND
of BD in children and adolescents with history of ACE were addressed with search terms
and Boolean operators such as “adverse childhood experiences AND bipolar disorder
Study selection
The articles that were used went through 4 stages of screening: 1. The titles were searched
using the databases and search terms, and gathered all related studies, 2. Read the
abstracts to see the relevance to the current systematic review based on the inclusion and
exclusion criteria, 3. The researcher run through full-copy articles and assessed content,
and; 4. Selected and included studies which were able to examine the aim of the
Data Extraction
Through the pilot study, inclusion and exclusion criteria (table 2) was refined and applied
in order to gather data for the research question from included 8 quantitative studies which
characteristics of BD (onset of BD, symptoms and duration of BD, ADHD, CD, PTSD,
suicidality).
16
Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Exclusion
Population - Young people between birth - Participants with ACE but
and 18 years old adult-onset of bipolar
- Diagnosis of any Bipolar disorder
Disorder according to DSM
or ICD
Variables of - Adverse childhood - Schizophrenia diagnosis
Interest experience (physical, sexual, - Personality disorder
emotional, verbal abuse, - Neurodegenerative disease
neglect, substance misuse, and learning disabilities
relational stress, criminal
behaviour of family)
- Comorbid diagnosis of
ADHD, CD, or PTSD
- Present suicidality issue
Study - Any quantitative study - Studies with mixture of
Characteristics designs child-onset and adult-onset
- Published from year 2000 of bipolar disorder
and up - Published studies which are
not in English language
- Only discussed about
prevalence of bipolar
disorder
- Studies comparing youth-
onset of bipolar disorder with
another disorders
Assessment of quality
The quality of the selected studies was assessed using a tool by National Heart, Lung and
Blood Institute (Nhlbi.nih.gov, 2019). There were various tools provided for different
study design, and the tool that was used was specifically for cohort and cross-sectional
studies. It is used to check the quality of quantitative studies which involves synthesising
and appraising research evidence. The tool contains assessment of; 1. Research question,
whether they explicitly rationalised the goal of conducting the study; 2. Study
Participants, if they followed the criteria of recruitment, if the participants came from the
same group, and is the population enough to detect a possible association; 3. Exposure,
17
to investigate if the exposure caused the outcomes, it is essential to allow enough time of
exposure prior to measurement and assessment at baseline for possible number of levels
Outcome measure, in order to produce a precise and detailed outcome, tools and
procedures were assessed on their reliability and accuracy. It would also be more effective
if the assessors were blinded in terms of whether the participants were exposed or not.
This is useful in developing recommendation for the study in order to produce high
quality literature in public health programs and policy. Hence, this was applied for the
Synthesis of Research
This systematic review utilised narrative synthesis as it helped to best to explain the
analysis within and between the gathered studies for the overall assessment of the
to fully analyse and interpret collected data in a more rigorous way and to be transparent
Results
In attempt to supply the gap in the literature of bipolar disorder, studies retrieved were
there was limited full-access studies that were published, hence the researcher contacted
paediatric BD) in order to gain more relevant sources however, no response received.
Finally, a total of 8 studies were included in the present systematic research (Goldstein
et. al., 2008; Goldstein et. al., 2013; Heffner et. al., 2013; Marchand et. al., 2005; Romero
et. al., 2008; Schudlich et. al., 2014; Stephen et. al., 2014; Wilens et. al., 2007) and a
18
summary of characteristics is presented in table 2 with significant values of the variables
A total of 2,045 children and adolescents were included across 8 studies of this review.
The age was between 4 to 22 years old (M= 10.4 years to 17.0 years) Using either
International Classification (ICD) (World Health Organization, 1992) (see table 2 for
specific screening tools), participants were diagnosed with different types of bipolar
disorder. Bipolar I disorder was found to be the most common diagnosis of the majority
finally. Bipolar II disorder. In the current systematic review, majority of the participants
were exposed to different adverse experiences such as physical abuse, sexual abuse, and
heavy smoking and other substance use disorder (SUD). In addition, only small number
Demographic profile
Gender
According to the majority of studies, gender did not determine the diagnosis of BD in
children and adolescents nor differ in diagnosed youth. Goldstein et. al., (2008) revealed
no significant difference in the gender of BD youth with and without SUD (x2=1.6,
p=0.20). Goldstein et. al., (2013) also stated that youths with bipolar disorder who
experienced abuse did not differ significantly in their gender (p=0.97). While, physical
abuse, sexual abuse or both abuses were observed more in male youth, in 19 of 32
19
Studies generated
Irrelevant studies
from search of
removed
databases
n=3,534
n=3,576
n=1
n=8
20
K-SAD-PL Cannabis Use, and -Better overall
Depression Rating Lifetime Repeated functioning as to C-
Scale Alcohol Use GAS, lower
adolescent-reported
Longitudinal Interval Children’s Global familial cohesion and
Follow-Up Assessment Scale more negative life
Evaluation (LIFE) (C-GAS) events were observed
in adolescents who
Psychiatric Status developed SUD at
Rating (PSR) follow-up.
Heffner et. To examine the -80 adolescents Washington Child Semi- Adolescents -BD subjects with
al., (2013) prevalence and age 13-22. University at St. Structured without cannabis use disorder
correlates of heavy Louis Kiddie Assessment for the psychiatric appear to be in a
smoking and nicotine -38 females, 42 Schedule for Genetics of disorder significantly greater
dependence in males Affective Disorders Alcoholism- chance for progression
bipolar adolescents and Schizophrenia Adolescent version in patter of tobacco use
with co-occurring -Diagnosed of (WASH-U-KSADS) (C-SSAGA-A) than those without
cannabis use disorder Bipolar I psychiatric disorder.
disorder. Teen Addiction
Severity Index -Current heavy
(Teen ASI) smokers were
associated with older
Drug Use ages, lower diastolic
Screening blood pressure,
Inventory-Revised diagnoses of ADHD,
(DUSI-R) CD, and illicit drug use
disorder.
-Marijuana Craving
Questionnaire-
Short Form (MQC)
21
Marchand To determine the -66 patients age Clinical diagnosis Not mentioned -BD youth -There was a
et. al., (2005) frequency and effects 4-17 based on DSM-IV- without significant association
of adverse events in TR. abuse between adverse
the life of children -22 females, 44 events in the life of
and adolescents with males patients with BD and
BD treated in a -Diagnosed of measures related to
community mental BD according to symptoms severity and
health setting. DSM-IV-TR treatment outcomes.
Romero et. To examine the -446 youth age Schedule for K-SAD-PL abuse Non-abused -There is a significant
al., (2008) prevalence and 7-17 Affective Disorders questionnaire youth. association of history
correlates of physical and Schizophrenia of physical and/or
and sexual abuse. -Diagnosed of for School Age sexual abuse and older
either BD-I, BD- Children – Present age, longer duration of
II or BD-NOS. and Lifetime (K- illness, non-intact
SADS-PL) family, lifetime PTSD,
-From Psychosis, CD, and
Outpatient and Structural Clinical first-degree family
Inpatient units. Interview (SCID) history of mood
disorder and remained
significant after
regression analyses.
Schudlich To determine if -829 youth age 4Schedule for Child Abuse Youth -BD youth found to
et. al., (2014) physical and sexual years 11 Affective Disorders History (ABH) without the have correlation with
abuse showed months- 18 and Schizophrenia diagnosis of physical, sexual, and
relationship to early- years and 0 for School Age Achenbach System Bipolar both types of abuse.
onset bipolar month. Children – Present of Empirically Disorder
spectrum disorder. and Lifetime (K- Based Assessment -Though rate of the
-332 females, SADS-PL) (Child Behaviour overall abuse, physical
497 males Checklist 2001 for and sexual abuse were
22
primary care givers not significantly
-152 subjects and Youth elf- different in both
were diagnosed report for subject groups.
of either BD- participants However, BD youth
NOS, were significantly
Cyclothymia, more likely to
BD-I, BD-II. experience both types
of abuse together.
Stephens et. To examine clinical -103 adolescents Washington Addiction Severity No SUD -There was no
al., (2013) and demographical age 12-20 years University at St. Index (ASI) during difference in terms of
characteristic of age Louis Kiddie follow-up demographic profile of
associated with Schedule for Structural Clinical Bd youth with and
SUDs in adolescents -Diagnosed of Affective Disorders Interview for DSM without SUD – sex,
with BD BD-I, and and Schizophrenia (SCID) race, SES, rates of
hospitalized for (WASH-U-KSADS) ADHD and PTSD.
To identify potential the first time for Urine drug screens
risk and resilience a manic or Structural Clinical -Association between
factors associated mixed episode Interview for DSM- lifetime SUD and
with the onset of IV Axis I Disorder – disruptive behavior
SUD following Patient Edition trended towards
hospitalization for a (SCID-I/P). significance.
first manic episode
-SUDs were
significantly
associated with later
age of index
hospitalization, later
age at onset of BD,
baseline psychotic
symptoms, physical or
23
sexual abuse, and a
manic (vs mixed)
mood episodes at
baseline.
24
25
participants who are currently heavy smokers (p=0.66) and in 29 of 56 nicotine dependent
youths (p=0.99), there was no significant difference depicted (Heffner et. al., 2013).
Romero tet. al., (2009) revealed that there is no significant difference in gender of BD
youth with abuse, albeit female participants in sexually abused group were greater
compared to non-abused group (p=0.05). Conversely, Manchard et. al., (2005) illustrated
that among 35 abused youth 40.9% participants were male and 77.3% were female, thus,
Age
studies showed that older age was associated with more adverse experiences in BD youth
(Heffner et. al., 2013; Romero et. al., 2008). Romero et. al., (2009) reported in their study
that BD youth with older age were more exposed to abuse (p=0.02) with a higher rate
(p=0.04) compared to participants ≤12 years of age (16% vs. 24%, respectively). Adjusted
odd ratio showed that older age remained significantly associated with physical or sexual
abuse, or both type of abuse (OR=1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.2, p=0.015). Furthermore, after
associated with history of combined abuse (p=0.05), specifically older age (p=0.03).
Correspondingly, BD youth who are currently heavy smokers were found to have older
age (p=0.03) compared to non-users or light-users in the study of Heffner et. al., (2013).
However, BD youth who are nicotine dependents found to have no significant difference
in terms of age (p=0.83) compared to non-nicotine dependents. Goldstein et. al., (2008)
intake than the non-SUD BD youth (p<0.001). On the other hand, Marchand et. al.,
(2005), as well as Wilens at al., (2008) (p=0.83), revealed no significant difference in the
26
age of BD youth with ACE and the control group. Nevertheless, Wilens at al., (2008)
illustrated that BD participants had significantly higher age-adjusted rates of SUD than
the control group (4% vs. 34%, p=0.001). Finally, Goldstein et al., (2013) found no
significant difference in the age of BD youth with Substance use disorder and the control
group (p=0.97).
Socioeconomic status
Majority of their participants who were exposed to any form of adverse experiences
during childhood were predominantly from a lower socioeconomic status (SES). Romero
et. al., (2009) stated that the abused BD group, compared to non-abused BD youth, was
significantly from lower SES backgrounds (p=0.05). Wilens et. al., (2008) revealed that
BD youth participants also had significantly lower SES that the control group (p=0.02).
Although Schudlich et. al., (2014) noted that SES may be associated with particular
found to have no relation with the rest of the variables and did not influence pattern of
findings. One possible reason for this finding is that majority of their participants were
difference between the SES of BD participant with and without substance use disorder
was found in the study of Goldstein et. al., (2008), Goldstein et. al., (2013) and Stephens
outcomes. Nevertheless, included studies were able to address the research question.
Some studies emphasised the age of onset, while some were focused on the number of
years after ACE until BD onset. Nonetheless, in youth with history of ACE, onset of BD
was found mostly during adolescence (12 years of age and above). Goldstein et. al.,
(2008) discovered that diagnosis of BD was antecedent to SUD among 60% of the
and SUD was found in the remaining 10% of the sample. Furthermore, an increased trend
onset (x2=3.3, df=1, p=0.07). One study (Wilens et. al., 2008) reported that 22 of 33 BD
participant with SUD had onset of BD before SUD while 3 subjects was exposed to SUD
before BD diagnosis. Moreover, eight subjects experienced both onset on the same year.
Manchard et. al., (2005) found that after the first presentation of mood symptoms was
recorded, 8 was the median number of years until diagnosis of BD in participants who
were exposed to physical abuse, 3 years for those without abuse which was a significant
difference (p=0.010). Moreover, the onset of BD in youth with any physical or sexual
abuse did not significantly differ (p=0.06) in the study of Romero et. al., (2009). On the
other hand, Schudlich et. al., (2014) found that physical and sexual abuse did not
significantly predict age of onset for bipolar disorder, depression spectrum, depression or
hypomanic episodes. Whereas, Stephens et. al., (2014) found a significant difference in
28
29
Similar to adult BD, findings in the symptoms of BD children and adolescents with ACE
were inconsistent. Heffner et. al., (2013) illustrated that both current heavy smokers and
nicotine dependent youths indicated severe symptoms of mania, yet nicotine dependent
youths had significantly higher rates (no values depicted). Another study (Schudlich et.
al., 2014) showed a strong relationship between increased depressive symptoms and
independent physical abuse (p≤0.05). On the other hand, sexual abuse was correlated with
reports of mood changes within the same day (no values depicted). However, neither of
the associations was found to have significant relationship with number mood episodes
According to Goldstein et. al., (2008), symptoms of BD in youth may have increased after
sexual abuse, however, changes were not significant regardless of the exposure to ACE
(physical abuse, sexual abuse and substance misuse). However, symptoms of BD were
found to precipitate the development of substance use disorder (SUD). SUD was not a
significant predictor of baseline manic (x2=0.0, df=1, p=0.97) and depressive (x2=0.1,
df=1, p=0.74) symptoms (and vice versa) and did not impact the significance of other
predictors. Goldstein et. al., (2013) stated that greater hypo/manic symptoms in the
developing SUD (HR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.56, p=0.03). Furthermore, Wilens et. al.,
(2008), although no values reported, found that substance use disorder (SUD) has no
significant effect on the likelihood of occurrence of rapid cycling or mean annual number
found in the number of manic symptoms or episodes in BD youth either with or without
SUD. Also, number of major depressive disorder (MDD) symptoms or lifetime number
30
of depressive episodes on BD with and without SUD subjects with both BD and MDD
Only physical and sexual abuse were found to initiate a longer duration of BD in children
and adolescents. The study of Romero et. al., (2009) revealed that abused group, either
physically or physically and sexually abused, had greater duration of illness (p=0.01)
BD youth (x2=6.27, p=0.01). Also, physical abuse, independently, and both abuses were
the other hand, Schudlich et. al., (2014) found neither physical nor sexual abuse had
significant association with duration of mood episode (no values were presented). Wilens
et. al., (2008) found no significant difference in the duration of BD in either with or
without substance use disorder, even after the age-adjusted model (p>0.5).
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Although there is a higher number of ADHD children and adolescent with BD, ADHD
was not significantly associated with diagnosis of BD in children and adolescents. In the
diagnosis were found to not have a significant difference in terms of prevalence between
BD youth with and without SUD (x2=0.09, p=0.35). Goldstein et al., (2013) also found
that diagnosis of ADHD in children and adolescent with BD at intake of first-onset SUD
did not significantly differ with non-SUD group (x2=0.64, p=0.42). Also, at follow-up of
first-onset SUD where a small number of BD youth developed SUD (12 weeks prior to
onset and earlier 23-week interval) BD youth with SUD did not differ significantly with
31
non-SUD (x2=0.40, p=0.53). Although ADHD was diagnosed in the majority of the
participants in the study of Marchand et. al., (2005), it was not revealed to be significantly
associated with BD diagnosis in youth with history of any adverse childhood experience.
Likewise, Stephens et. al (2009) illustrated that the number of participants diagnosed with
ADHD did not significantly differ to the control group (p=0.82) and ADHD showed no
significant association with BD in youth (95% CI 0.4-1.4, p=0.39). Wilens et. al., (2008)
stated that when ADHD was included in the significant association of BD in youth and
ACE, specifically substance use, there was no significant risk found and the effect on the
association was not significant (x2=1.45, p=0.09). Nevertheless, there is a higher number
(x2=40.45, p<0.001). Romero et. al, (2009) revealed a non-significant difference between
BD participants with and without history of ACE in terms of ADHD diagnosis (p=0.09).
Furthermore, only Heffner et. al., (2013) found an association between ADHD and heavy
Conduct disorder
history of ACE, specifically physical abuse, sexual abuse and substance misuse.
Goldstein et. al., (2008) revealed that there is a significantly greater lifetime prevalence
of conduct disorder (CD) in BD youth diagnosed with SUD than those without (p<0.001).
In the study of Goldstein et. al., (2013), out of 167 participants, 54 BD youth developed
first-onset of SUD while 113 did not (HR=1.03, x2=6.52, p=0.01). Heffner et. al., (2013)
illustrated that there are more BD youth who are current-heavy smokers with conduct
disorder (CD) than light/non-current heavy smokers (p=0.01). While the number of
difference (p=0.09). Romero et. al., (2008) found a considerable correlation of abuse on
32
BD youth and conduct disorder (CD) (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8, p=0.03) with a greater
significantly associated with either physical or sexual abuse (p>0.05), combined abuse
degree family history of CD was also found to be greater in abused BD youth than non-
abused (p≤0.01), while second-degree family history did not significantly differ.
Moreover, Wilens et. al., (2008) revealed CD to have influenced the significant effects of
BD on age-adjusted risk for any SUD (x2=6.22, p=0.01) and the effect was significant
(p=0.05). When CD was accounted in the analyses, BD status had significant effects on
the age-adjusted risk of alcohol abuse (x2=4.5, p=0.03), drug abuse (x2=4.38, p=0.04) and
smoking (x2=4.67, p=0.03) and the effects of CD was also significant (x2=4.16, p=0.04;
Consistent with adult BD findings, PTSD was significantly associated with BD children
and adolescents who had ACE. Goldstein et. al., (2008) found that BD youth with
substance use disorder (SUD) had a significantly greater lifetime prevalence of post-
correlation (OR=8.8, 95% CI 3.1-25.1, p<0.001) of abuse and children and adolescents
with BD and a greater lifetime prevalence of PTSD (p<0.01) were noted in the
participants of Romero et. al., (2008). Specifically, PTSD was significantly associated
with physical abuse (p<0.001), sexual abuse (p<0.01) and combined abuse (p<0.03) in
BD youth. Likewise, Schudlich et. al., (2014) found that 20 % of the participants with
history of physical abuse had PTSD, 7% in sexually abused, 19% with both abuse and
with physical abuse or combined physical and sexual abuse in youth with BD (p<0.050).
33
Marchand et. al., (2005), who indicated gender differences, revealed that out of 35 BD
participants who experienced any abuse or neglect 13 had diagnosis of PTSD (23.1%
male vs. 76.9% female, p<0.001). Thirty-eight per cent of those diagnosed are from foster
care or adaption while only 11% are not in foster care (p=0.018). Although Stephens et.
al., (2014) found no difference between PTSD of BD youth with and without substance
abuse disorder (SUD) at baseline, after entering into univariate proportional hazards (PH),
PTSD significantly increased the risk for having a lifetime SUD diagnosis (HR=2.8, 95%
CI1.206.7, p=0.02).
Suicidality
There was inconsistency in terms of suicidality, one reason is that it was split into ideation
and adolescents with history of ACE had a higher lifetime prevalence of suicide when
compared to non-ACE Bd youth. Goldstein et. al., (2013) revealed that suicidality (self-
injurious behaviour, attempts and ideation) was not significantly associated with the
intake variables on the first-onset SUD in adolescents diagnosed with bipolar spectrum
disorder (p>0.05). Likewise, Heffner et. al., (2013) exposed no correlations on suicidality
– attempts and ideation – of BD adolescents both current heavy smokers (p>0.05) and
nicotine dependents (p>0.05), although, significantly high rates of lifetime suicidality was
observed. On the other hand, Goldstein et. al., (2008) depicted that BD youth with SUD
Romero et. al., (2008) found children and adolescents diagnosed with BD who had history
of physical and/or sexual abuse to have significantly greater lifetime prevalence of suicide
(p=0.08). Similarly, Schudlich et. al., (2014) specified that physical abuse in BD youth
tends to triple the probabilities of ideation (p=0.06) and quadruple the attempts (p=0.019).
34
Also, in their full sample, physical abuse doubles suicidal ideation (p=0.001), while both
physical and sexual abuse together triple the attempts (p<0.001). Thus, a significant
association (x2[6 df] =42.45, p<0.001) between history of abuse and suicidality in BD
youth was depicted. Furthermore, no significant difference was noted on the effect of
Quality assessment
Most of the papers (Goldstein et. al., 2008; Heffner et. al., 2013; Manchard et. al., 2005;
Romero et. al., 2009; Schudlich et. al., 2014; Wilens et. al., 2008) received a rating of
“fair” while 2 studies (Goldstein et. al., 2013; Stephens et. al., 2013) were marked “good.”
All of the studies were not able to justify the sample size used in their paper. A reason
could be that some studies did not pay much attention whether the number of participants
not applicable to their study design – retrospective studies, analyses of the association of
the exposure and the outcome are exploratory and was examined on the same timeframe.
Thus, the study design did not allow studies to measure the exposure prior to the outcome.
One study (Manchard et. al., 2005) was not able to perform a follow-up of the exposure
of their participants as the measurement of the exposure was not specified. Though this
is not a fatal flaw, it may still have affected the outcome. Nonetheless, Goldstein et. al.,
(2013) and Stephens et. al., (2013), which involved follow-up of current exposure as part
of the procedure, were not able to validate the reason of using the sample size as well.
Hence, lowers the degree of generalisability of the findings of the systematic review.
Manchard et. al., (2005) did not present adjusted variables such as age and gender of their
adolescents and ACE exposure. It is also important to note that blinding of the assessor
to the exposure does not apply to the study design of the selected studies .
35
Discussion
This systematic review examined the association between history of adverse childhood
experience (ACE) and paediatric bipolar disorder (BD), as well as the relationship of
(Goldstein et. al., 2008; Goldstein et. al., 2013; Heffner et. al., 2013; Marchand et. al.,
2005; Romero et. al., 2008; Schudlich et. al., 2014; Stephen et. al., 2014; Wilens et. al.,
2007) were included after comprehensive searching and screening were done. These
studies were then utilised to examine the association between ACE and BD in children
BD and which of those variables was found to be the most common among all participants
across studies.
The results showed that BD in children and adolescents were indirectly associated with
adverse childhood experiences. Also, not all BD youth who had history of adverse
experiences had the same modifications in the manifestation of the disorder. Nonetheless,
history of ACE (physical abuse, sexual abuse and substance misuse) contributed in an
earlier onset of BD, specifically, adolescent-onset (from 12 years old and above).
relationship was only found between physical and sexual abuse and increased depressive
symptoms and mood changes within the same day, respectively. Moreover, Attention
and did not postulate risk to BD presentation in children and adolescents. While, a greater
lifetime prevalence was only found in conduct disorder (CD) and post-traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD) in BD children and adolescents with physical and sexual abuse or
substance use disorder (SUD), which increased the risk for developing lifetime SUD.
Finally, a higher rate of suicidality was found in BD youth with history of physical and
36
sexual abuse and SUD, but only physical and sexual abuse were significantly associated
There was an indirect association observed between BD in children and adolescents and
history of ACE, specifically, physical and sexual abuse, neglect, heavy smoking, nicotine
dependence, and substance use disorder (SUD). It can be presumed that the changes
observed in the presentation of BD in youth are influenced by various factors which are
led by adverse experiences of children and adolescents but not caused by ACE itself.
However, it should be considered that other young people (less than 12 years old) may
not be able to distinguish abusive treatment (e.g. physical abuse, sexual assault and
neglect) which increases the likelihood for under-reporting and bias (Downs & Harrison,
1998; Cawson et. al., 2000). Consistent with Curell, E., (2016), childhood maltreatment
systematic review included number of adverse experiences, where some did not
specifically report the degree of ACE in BD youth. Feasibly, this yielded to false positive
results. Future research should substantially regard the measurement for adverse
adolescent and history of ACE could not be ascertained to be precipitated directly. This
is because the focus of the systematic review is just the association and the included
studies did not extensively examine the causal relationship. Hence, ACE cannot be
accounted as an indicator of the diagnosis with this systematic review, but rather a
prevalent life stressor. In fact, maltreatment was considered as one of the leading social
37
(Diaz et. al., 2002; May-Chalhal & Cawson, 2005). Taken as a whole, this systematic
consequence of trauma (Bierderman et. al., 1990) or could be both an outcome to and a
risk factor for adverse experience (Wozniak et. al., 1999). However, association remains
unclear (Fisher & Hosang, 2010). ACE, in the course of the disorder, in youth was found
Similar to the findings of McIntyre et. al., (2008) and Brown et. al., (2005), ACE did not
predict the onset of BD in children and adolescent. Although BD children and adolescents
with history of adversity (such as abuse, neglect, relational stress, and substance misuse)
had an earlier onset when compared to non-ACE paediatric BD, the difference did not
show significance since both groups had adolescent-onset (12 years and above).
However, Brown et. al., (2005) only based their conclusion on male adult population,
therefore, findings cannot be generalised. Moreover, consistent with Carballo et. al.,
behaviour and history of abuse, the onset of BD did not differ significantly with BD
patient with history of abuse or suicidal, or neither. However, history of abuse was
measured mainly through semi-structured interview and did not validate answers with
other informants. It can be assumed that since the diagnosis of BD in children is not
always clear (Simon, D., 2016) there is a higher chance of being undiagnosed or
et. al., 2008; Goldstein et. al., 2013; Heffner et. al., 2013; Stephen et. al., 2013) have
early-adolescent participants and did not include children (≤11 years old), contributing to
abuse correlates with mood changes within the same day. In line with previous findings,
there was an increase of severity in the symptoms of BD with the presence of childhood
maltreatment than BD without maltreatment (Garno et. al., 2005). However, in previous
study childhood maltreatment was not specified whether each has contribution to the
observed changes or rather just general findings of maltreatment. Moreover, SUD is not
that SUD may not have shown relationship to increased symptoms is because other
studies provided the needed treatment for children and adolescents with SUD, which
A longer duration of BD was found in children and adolescents with history of physical
abuse or physical and sexual abuse, which is consistent to previous findings (Garno et.
al., 2005). However, the systematic review did not have enough data to confirm this.
Nevertheless, it could be that, physical and sexual abuse were found to contribute to a
duration of BD in children and adolescents. Future research should examine whether the
ADHD was found to be the most prevalent comorbid disorder in BD children and
BD and SUD and does not contribute to a risk in ACE and BD youth. In contrast with
39
Perroud et al., (2014), ADHD was associated with earlier onset of BD, increased
depressive symptoms and greater number of comorbid disorders and SUD. However,
adolescents or adult) and the number of participants (n=24) was too low for
generalisation. It could be that in this systematic review, all studies assessed the difference
in prevalence of ADHD between BD youth with and without ACE and only half of the
studies (Heffner et. al., 2013; Manchard et. al., 2005; Stephens et. al., 2009; Wilens et.
al., 2008) examined the association of ADHD and paediatric BD with ACE.
Unlike ADHD, CD and PTSD in BD youth proved a strong association with physical
and sexual abuse and SUD contributes to the development and severe presentation of BD.
Comparably, Docherty et al., (2018) found that youth who experienced any maltreatment
before the age of 14 is associated with development of CD. It can be assumed that abused
trait, such as lack of guilt. Hence, initiating a higher risk of developing CD (Frick, 2012).
SUD is prevalent more in BD youth with CD than CD but non-BD youth, however, with
the presence of ADHD diagnosis the generalisation of findings is limited (Masi et al.,
2008). Yet, although CD does not confer to an elevated risk of SUD in BD adolescence,
Moreover, physical abuse and/or sexual abuse or SUD initiates a greater lifetime
BD. Similarly, traumatic experiences, childhood sexual abuse, adult sexual assault as well
as survival of suicide and accident or death of loved ones increases the risk or the
40
likelihood of developing PTSD in children and adolescents with BD (Goldberg & Garno,
2005). It could be that children and adolescents may have a hampered recovery due to
self-blame or guilt, which exacerbate symptoms of PTSD (Foa, Steke- tee, & Rothbaum,
1989; Janov-Bulman, 1979). Furthermore, substance abuse interferes with coping skills
violence as well as trauma (Jacobsen, Southwick and Kosten, 2001). Thus, SUD is one
ACE, specifically abuse, in BD youth. A tripled suicide ideation and quadrupled suicide
attempt in physically abused BD youth (Schudlich et. al., 2014) matched with previous
finding that physical abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect initiates 3 to 5 times higher attempted
suicide in youth (Hadland et. al., 2019) with 8% of US high school students attempted
suicide within a year (Kann et. al., 2017). Consistently, SUD was not found to be linked
with suicidality in youth (Waxmonsky et. al., 2005). However, previous studies had
mixed population of adult and adolescents and used binary indicator (yes/no) of substance
misuse which could have biased the results. Nonetheless, ACE, regardless of type,
adolescents.
Limitation
There are number of limitations that were identified in the current systematic review
which could have influenced the association between the history of ACE and diagnosis
of BD in children and adolescents. Some studies did not specify the measurement of
adverse experiences and some was based exclusively on direct interviews with subjects
41
and/or parents which may result recall bias. Degree of adversity was also not identified,
which may influence the changes observed in the manifestation of the disorder due to
variation of adversities. Some studies did not have control group leaving no comparison
Additionally, some participants are on medication, lowering the positive result of the
findings which may have affected the association; therefore, results may not be
included in the systematic review, but only 4 (physical abuse, sexual abuse, SUD, and
Moreover, the researcher found a very low number of studies which could examine the
research question. Hence, gathered papers were inadequate for the review to provide more
Furthermore, it is worth to note that since there were few studies included, one study was
still utilised after failing on one criterion. Specifically, Heffner et. al., (2013) defined
adolescent up to 22 years, but ideally it is limited to 18 years of age which resulted to bias
during the screening process. Finally, the current systematic review only focused on the
association between history of ACE and diagnosis of BD in children and adolescents and
some specific clinical variables that were common to other studies. Therefore, causality
It is therefore important to narrow down and strictly imply inclusion and exclusion criteria
for the future research. This could also help to reduce inconsistency and contradicting
propositions of some studies. A more focused approached on particular ACE (maybe one
type of ACE) would be beneficial in order to come up with a more specific and precise
synthesis. It is also worth to add more papers to increase reliability and validity of claims.
42
Overall, the review needs more studies, be reviewed again by another rater and assess the
Future Research
future studies should; 1. Imply strictly the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 2. Focus on a
fewer ACE, or one; 3. Include more studies and; 4. Have a second rater on the quality
specific ACE and the duration of BD in children and adolescents were found to be longer
Conclusion
diagnosis of BD during childhood or adolescents and history of any ACE, the findings of
the present review validate the significance of investigating the research question
symptoms and longer duration of BD was documented in youth with history of physical
and sexual abuse and SUD. However, the onset of BD either with or without history of
sexual abuse were the strongest predictor of lifetime prevalence of PTSD and CD in BD
youth, while any abuse or SUD indicates lifetime prevalence of suicidality in BD youth.
References
Aas, M., Bellivier, F., Bettella, F., Henry, C., Gard, S., Kahn, J., Lagerberg, T., Aminoff,
S., Melle, I., Leboyer, M., Jamain, S., Andreassen, O. and Etain, B. (2019).
Afifi, T.O., McMillan, K.A., Asmundson, G.J.G., Pietrzak, R.H. & Sareen, J. 2011, "An
sample", Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1564-1572.
Almeida, O., Hankey, G., Yeap, B., Golledge, J. and Flicker, L. (2018). Substance use
among older adults with bipolar disorder varies according to age at first
Anda, R., Tietjen, G., Schulman, E., Felitti, V. and Croft, J. (2010). Adverse Childhood
Back, S., Brady, K., Sonne, S. and Verduin, M. (2006). Symptom Improvement in Co-
Occurring PTSD and Alcohol Dependence. The Journal of Nervous and Mental
Bebbington P., Ph.D., Cooper C., Ph.D., Minot S., M.Sc., Brugha T., M.D., Jenkins R.,
M.D., Meltzer H., Ph.D., and Dennis M., M.D., Suicide Attempts, Gender, and
Sexual Abuse: Data From the 2000 Birtish Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.
Benarous, X., Raffin, M., Bodeau, N. et al. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev (2017) 48: 248.
https://doi.org.10.1007/s10578-016-0637-4
44
Biederman J., Faraone SV, Wozniak J., Mick E., Kwon A., et. al., 2005. Clinical
Bienvenu OJ, Davydow DS, Kendler KS. Psychiatric “diseases” versus behavioral
Brady, K. T., & Sonne, S. C. (1995). The relationship between substance abuse and
Brown, G., McBride, L., Bauer, M. and Williford, W. (2005). Impact of childhood abuse
Brown, J., Burnette, M. L. and Cerulli, C. (2015) ‘Correlations Between Sexual Abuse
Carballo, J., Harkavy-Friedman, J., Burke, A., Sher, L., Baca-Garcia, E., Sullivan, G.,
109(1-2), pp.57-63.
Carlson, G.A., Kotov, R., Chang, S.-W., Ruggero, C., & Bromet, E.J. (2012). Early
Catani, C. & Sossalla, I.M. 2015, "Child abuse predicts adult PTSD symptoms among
6.
45
Cawson P., Wattam C., Brooker S., and Kelly G. (2000). Child maltreatment in the United
Kingdom: A study of the prevalence of child abuse and neglect, NSPCC, London
Conus P et al (2010) Pretreatment and outcome correlates of past sexual and physical
Curell, E. (2016). Childhood maltreatment and bipolar disorder. National Elf Service.
Danese, A., Moffitt, T., Harrington, H., Milne, B., Polanczyk, G., Pariante, C., Poulton,
R. and Caspi, A. (2009). 27. Adverse childhood experiences predict adult risk
De Sanctis, V.A., Nomura, Y., Newcorn, J.H. & Halperin, J.M. 2012, "Childhood
outcomes in ADHD youth", Child Abuse & Neglect, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 782-
789.
Dienes, KA., Hammen, C., Henry, R., Cohen, A. and Daley, S. (2006). The stress
Dilsaver, S.C., Benazzi, F., Akiskal, H.S., Akiskal, K.K., (2007). Posttraumatic stress
Docherty, M., Kubik, J., Herrera, C. and Boxer, P. (2018). Early maltreatment is
Downs WR, Harrison L. Childhood maltreatment and the risk of substance problems in
Etain, B., Mathieu, F., Henry, C., Raust, A., Roy, I., Germain, A., Leboyer, M. and
Fisher HL & Hosang GM (2010) Childhood maltreatment and bipolar disorder: a critical
Garno, J., Goldberg, J., Ramirez, P. and Ritzler, B. (2005). Impact of childhood abuse on
pp.121-125.
Geller, B., & DelBello, M. P. (Eds.). (2003). Bipolar disorder in childhood and early
Geller, B., Zimerman, B., Williams, M., Bolhofner, K. and Craney, J. (2001). Bipolar
Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. Manic-depressive Illness. New York, NY: Oxford University
Press, 1990.
47
Goldstein, B.I., Birmaher, B., Axelson, D.A., Goldstein, T.R., Esposito-Smythers, C.,
Strober, M.A., Hunt, J., Leonard, H., Gill, M.K., Iyengar, S., Grimm, C., Yang,
M., Ryan, N.D. & Keller, M.B. 2008, "Significance of Cigarette Smoking Among
Youths with Bipolar Disorder", American Journal on Addictions, vol. 17, no. 5,
pp. 364-371.
Grande, I., MD, Berk, M., MD, Birmaher, B., MD & Vieta, E., Dr 2016, "Bipolar
Green B, Kavanagh DJ, Young RmcD. Reasons for cannabis use in men with and without
Green, J., McLaughlin, K., Berglund, P., Gruber, M., Sampson, N., Zaslavsky, A. and
67(2), p.113.
Hadland, S., DeBeck, K., Dong, H., Marshall, B., Kerr, T., Montaner, J. and Wood, E.
S2.
Hammersley, P., Dias, A., Todd, G., Bowen-Jones, K., Reilly, B. and Bentall, R. (2003).
Harvard Medical School, 2007. National Comorbidity Survey (NSC). (2017, August 21).
Hee W., Young-Eun J., Chung S, Hong J., Kang N., Kim M., and Bahk W. (2017).
pp175-180
Hernandez, J., Cordova, M., Ruzek, J., Reiser, R., Gwizdowski, I., Suppes, T., &
450-455.
Hogarth L., Martin L.,, and Seedat S., (2019). Relationship between childhood abuse and
Jacobsen, L., Southwick, S. and Kosten, T. (2001). Substance Use Disorders in Patients
pp.1798-1809.
Joslyn, C., Hawes, D.J., Hunt, C., Mitchell, P.B., 2016. Is age of onset associated with
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W., Shanklin, S., Flint, K., Queen, B., Lowry, R., Chyen,
D., Whittle, L., Thornton, J., Lim, C., Bradford, D., Yamakawa, Y., Leon, M.,
Kraepelin E: Manic Depressive Insanity and Paranoia. London: E&S Livingstone, 1921
49
Kvitland, L., Ringen, P., Aminoff, S., Demmo, C., Hellvin, T., Lagerberg, T.,
Larsson, S., Aas, M., Klungsoyr, O., Agartz, I., Mork, E., Steen, N., Barrett, E.,
244X/13/97.
Leahy, R. (2007). Bipolar disorder: Causes, contexts, and treatments. Journal of Clinical
Leibenluft E. & Rich B., (2008). Peiatric Bipolar Disorder. Annual Review of Clinical
Leverich, G., McElroy, S., Suppes, T., Keck, P., Denicoff, K., Nolen, W., Altshuler, L.,
Rush, A., Kupka, R., Frye, M., Autio, K. and Post, R. (2002). Early physical and
Maguire C., Mccusker CG., Meenagh C., Mulholland C., Shannon C. Effects of trauma
Malhi, G., Bargh, D., Kuiper, S., Coulston, C. and Das, P. (2013). Modeling bipolar
Mallett, C., Stoddard Dare, P. and Seck, M. (2009). Predicting juvenile delinquency: The
Manchand, W. R., Wirth, L., & Simon, C. (2005). Adverse Life Events and Pediatric
Masi, G., Milone, A., Manfredi, A., Pari, C., Paziente, A. and Millepiedi, S. (2008).
and the genetic relationship to unipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;
childhood abuse and suicidality in adult bipolar disorder. Violence Vict 2008;
23:361-372.
McLaughlin, K., Green, J., Gruber, M., Sampson, N., Zaslavsky, A. and Kessler, R.
p.124.
Maniglio R. The role of child sexual abuse in the etiology of substance-related disorders.
Marangoni, C., Faedda, G., & Baldessarini, R. (2018). Clinical and Environmental Risk
May-Chahal, C., Cawson, P., 2005. Measuring child maltreatment in the United
Kingdom: a study of the prevalence of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl.
29, 969–984.
Merikangas, K., He, J., Burstein, M., Swanson, S., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., Benjet, C.,
Messer T., Latifi S., Lammer G., and Muller-Siecheneder F. (2017). Substance abuse in
National Institute of Mental Health (2000): Child and adolescent bipolar disorder: An
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/publicat/bipolarupdate.cfm.
Nock, M., Hwang, I., Sampson, N., Kessler, R., Angermeyer, M., Beautrais, A., Borges,
G., Bromet, E., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Florescu, S.,
Gureje, O., Haro, J., Hu, C., Huang, Y., Karam, E., Kawakami, N., Kovess,
V., Levinson, D., Posada-Villa, J., Sagar, R., Tomov, T., Viana, M. and Williams,
and Suicidal Behavior: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health
Olvera, R., Glahn, D., O'Donnell, L., Bearden, C., Soares, J., Winkler, A. and Pliszka, S.
Perroud, N., Cordera, P., Zimmermann, J., Michalopoulos, G., Bancila, V., Prada, P.,
Pinna, M., Visioli, C., Rago, C., Manchia, M., Tondo, L. and Baldessarini, R. (2019).
Perlis, R., Miyahara, S., Marangell, L., Wisniewski, S., Ostacher, M., DelBello, M.,
Bowden, C., Sachs, G., Nierenberg, A., Investigators, STEP-BD., 2004. Long-
term implications of early onset in bipolar disorder: data from the first 1000
Perugi, G., Ceraudo, G., Vannucchi, G., Rizzato, S., Toni, C. and Dell'Osso, L. (2013).
-434.
Plans L., Barrot C., Nieto E., Rios J., Schulze T., Papiol S., Mitjans M., Vieta E.,
242-111-122.
Sala, R., Goldstein, B., Wang, S. and Blanco, C. (2014). Childhood maltreatment and the
pp.34–42.
Soutullo, C., Chang, K., Diez-Suarez, A., Figueroa-Quintana, A., Escamilla-Canales, I.,
pp.385-393.
Taussig, H.N., Harpin, S.B. & Maguire, S.A. 2014, "Suicidality Among Preadolescent
Maltreated Children in Foster Care", Child Maltreatment, vol. 19, no. 1, pp.
Wozniak J., Bierderman J., Kwon A., Mick E., Faraone S. et. al., 2005. How cardinal are
Appendices