Radionic Base 44 Rates

How to create and use a Base 44

Rate in Radionics?

In Radionics the most versatile way of expressing a corrective treatment or

remedy is by using a number or a series of digits.  They are far more easy to
use than card sets An independent and confident practitioner is also free to
create their own.  Using sets of cards/patterns can feel limiting.

There are different number formats for these Rates.  In this blog I will be
looking at the Base 10 and Base 44 systems.  I will be describing how they
are used within an analysis and treatment.

Early Radionic Instruments

Radionic instrumentation was built by the De La Warr laboratories in
Oxfordshire.  They typically had a series or banks of dials.  These were set
individually to represent the rate that was being ‘broadcast’ to the client or
target.  Dials were calibrated from 0 to 10
The numbers were called Base 10 rates.  In actual fact they are base 11.  A
number 10 never appears in a base 10 (decimal) number which is the
numerology that most of us work with in day to day life.  So much so that we
hardly think of it.

Base 44 Radionic Instrumentation

Malcom Rae developed a set of instrumentation where the dials were
calibrated from 0 to 10 and 0 to 44.  The dials could be set to represent a
Base 10 or a Base 44 number.  (Yes a Base 44 number is actually a Base 45) 
According to my teacher H. Lucie Bidie, Malcolm believed that these Rates
were for a different aspect of a Radionic treatment.  Not for treating
locations or conditions.  Lucie felt it was important for her to purchase one of
Malcolm’s instruments.  She soon started creating Base 44 Rates.  Here is
how she taught me to create a Base 44 Rate.

Video – Creating a Base 44 Radionic Rate

How to use the Base 44 Rates

In my Framework Dowsing system I refer to the Base 44 Rates as
the Planetary Rays and Forces.
They fall within the following 8 categories.

Formative Force
Release Force
Sub Ray
Cosmic Ray
Earth Ray
Sun Force
Lunar Force
Laser Ray

After creating and using Base 44 rates for nearly 30 years I read the book
’Cycles of Heaven’ Playfair and Hill.   I feel this book outlines some of the
breadth and scope of the Base 44 Rates when I use them for Radionic
treatments.
Another interesting books Cosmic Forces of Mu
https://archive.org/stream/CosmicForcesOfMu/cosmforcmu#page/n9/mode/2up

Base 44 rates are used to support and re-balance physiology of humans,

plants and animals and have also been indicated for treating places, spaces
and buildings.  They are rarely called upon for clearing toxins or treating
‘illnesses’.

In reality we could create rates with to any base number …..  100    
1000    3000000 …….

To me the using the base 44’s creates a compartment for a particular section
of my dowsing framework.

How do you use the Base 44 or Base 33 or Base ? rates?

Have the videos for creating Base 10 and Base 44 encouraged you to create
your own?

Radionic Rates Lists

Combining Radionic Rates Lists
for a Diverse Analysis
I am often asked which Radionic Rates lists are used during an analysis.
If I use Copen or De la Warr Radionic rates lists ……..  and ‘What is the
difference?’

I use a combination of Base 10 and Base 44 Radionic rates lists (Frameworks)

to complete a dowsing analysis.  Base 10 and Base 44 rates can be used with
the MultiTreat 7.0 Radionic Treatment software.  Actually you can use any
base system you want as long as the rate is no longer than 20 digits and
spaces.

It seems easiest to explain the different Frameworks that contain the various
rates / Numerical Identifications by going through the sections of the
Framework Dowsing Main Analysis Sheet.

The Main Radionic Dowsing Analysis Sheet is

divided into 4 sections

Each section contains a group of related items.

The first section BLUE – The Conditions

then moving anticlockwise –
PINK – The Locations
GREEN – The Cosmic and Planetary Forces
YELLOW – Remedies and Corrective Treatments

RADIONIC RATES – CONDITIONS

The backbone of the Condition rates were created by Mrs H Lucie Bidie.

They are all Base 10 rates.

They are ascertained by dowsing.
All are filed within a card index system.

They have been extended and updated by Jane Radford.  Each condition is
identified by a Recognition rate.  It has a corresponding Treatment rate.

These sets of rates are unique to Framework Dowsing.

RADIONIC RATES –  LOCATIONS

In the example shown the Analysis Sheet is primarily for humans and animals.

All location rates are Base 10

All were ascertained by dowsing.

All are filed within a card index system.
 

Locations – physiological Human

De la Warr Updated and extended HL Bidie (HLB), JL Radford (JLR)
Hormones and Secretions HLB Updated and extended JLR
Enzymes  – including precursors, compounds and intinsic factors
HLB Updated and extended JLR

Note:  The Biochemistry option at the bottom of the list is used only as a link
to another category.   It is subdivided into :  Carbohydrate; Lipid; Amino acid
and Nucleic acid.

RADIONIC RATES – RAYS AND FORCES

The Cosmic and Planetary Rays and Forces are Base 44 rates.

These are individually created for each client or target.  They were
catalogued and filed until the late 1990’s  Example archive files are used
within Framework Dowsing workshops but otherwise the record of their use
remains within an individual’s Case History files.

They are created using the dowsing process

REMEDIES AND CORRECTIVE TREATMENTS

Remedies and Corrective treatments e.g. Homoeopathic, Starlights, Silicate
and non Silicate minerals, Plants etc
Created and extended by JLR, Chris Bacon, Barbara Garratt

These lists are a combination of

Rates that have been plotted using dowsing
and
Numerical IDentifications (NIDs)

NIDs are computer generated.  Some lists use the Category and Name of the
Corrective treatment as an influence on the NID configuration.

All are filed within the Master Card Index system and follow the Base 10
system.

Physiological Locations – Plants are computer generated NIDs

Note:
Locations – physiological Plant are NIDs.
C Bacon (CB), JLR, J M Alzamora

Base 10 Radionic Rates Lists

Remember that a rate is basically a Numerical IDentification (NID).  It is a
number which represents an item or concept to the practitioner.
NIDs are posted in real time on the Framework Dowsing Telegram
Channel https://telegram.me/frameworkdowsing
 The common factor amongst the Base 10 Radionic Rates that I use is that

I know they are not duplicated

I have a data base system.

I know that each item that is indicated for Radionic treatment has its own
unique number.
If a new Condition, Location or Remedy is indicated I can verify that it does
not already exist.

New Numerical IDs are logged and filed within the system set up by HL Bidie
in the 1940s. Lucie Bidie commenced her training with George de la Warr and
was therefor initially using his rates. Her system of analysis and treatment
developed and diverged from the standard School of Radionics although she
continued to teach with them for some time.

Bruce Copen

As I understand it, Bruce Copen developed his own instrumentation and sets
of rates according to his research. Barbara used one of his dialled
instruments before the development of MultiTreat
http://www.berkanapath.com/radionics/205/bruce-copen/
I used an early Malcolm Rae
instrument.  http://sueyounghistories.com/archives/2009/05/30/malcolm-rae-
1913-1979/

I think that practitioners should utilise whichever sets of rates they feel
comfortable with.  I need to know that a Numerical ID is not duplicated. This
can occur without a database/filing system.  Lucie found duplicates within
the de la Warr rates. She also discovered that combining some treatment and
location rates – directing the treatment to that location, caused the same
problem.    It was important for us both that we knew a Rate was specific and
unique.

This has a major impact of on the effectiveness of the Radionic Treatments

….. for me.

For other practitioners this may not be an issue.

The subconsious brain is the instigator of the Radionic Treatment

information.  The importance is that the practitioner is confident with the
Framework and the Rate being used.  For me this confidence comes partly
from knowing the uniqueness of each NID.

Please comment ……
or get in touch if you would like to know more.

This entry was posted in Radionic Analyses and tagged radionic rates, radionic rates list, radionic
treatments, radionics on 11/08/2017.
Analogue v Digital Radionics Instruments

Software, by definition, is a machine.   A finite

state machine. Even a physical electrical circuit is a form of finite state
machine, that has a kind of analogue logic to it.

In the old days we processed signals with analogue electrical circuits, as

computers got faster digital signal processing (DSP) became possible. So if
you like it was then possible to implement the mathematical “logic” of the
analogue world in the digital one, a bit like “software circuits” rather than a
bunch of components on a board.

Although the MultiTreat 7 (MT7) software does not do any DSP it does

implement a machine logic that is consistent with a physical Radionic
instrument, if that is even the right explanation.  At the end of the day
operator intention is the real instrument.

I’m afraid I don’t buy into all the Scalar Field devices that are out on the
Radionics market.  It is simply great sounding rubbish!  Scalar fields are very
much theoretical. They might be a very limited explanation of how Radionic
instrumentation, or better still, consciousness initiated action at a distance,
might function.  But devices that claim that they purturbate a scalar field by
some mechanism is pure rubbish.  If such devices could be made, then
conventional science and engineering would already be using them to solve
the many practical problems that we have in the world.

For us to progress in this field we need to accept that it is the operators mind

that is the prime mover in the situation, rather than trying to wrap things up
in a coating of pseudo-science that any scientist or engineer with see
straight through very quickly. Sure, science can give us a basis to work
from.  It helps us to formulate conceptual models, as a jumping off point.
As George Box once said “Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are
useful”.
The “rates” in Radionics are simple associative rules linking a
mental concept to a physical item/target. The whole mechanism is there to
get this information across the limin, and into the operators
subconscious mind, and from there the subconscious is able to “transmit”
this information, by some unknown mechanism, to an apparently,
distant target.  This is the whole basis for MT, there is no mysterious logic or
pseudo science hidden inside it.  I have always been very open about that
fact.  Think of the MT software as an “Operations protocol” to achieve such a
“transmission”.

I still like the old Radionics

instruments.  MT was my response to solving a practical day-to-day
Radionic practice capacity problem.  Even I was initially sceptical if it would
even function as a Radionic instrument, much to my surprise!  But being an
engineer I though I’d build a prototype and see what happened! Thats what
engineers do, don’t they!

It is unfortunate that MT is still a DOS program. My work with MTX

has stalled, and I very much doubt that it will ever become a user friendly
piece of software, I designed it to be a much more flexible software
instrument than MT and portable to modern computing platforms.  I use MTX
in the very small amount of Radionics work that I do these days, and it’s
development has now been tailored very much towards my own applications
and methods of operating, so really any general release of it is unlikely. 
The resistance to MTX is right in line to the initial responses that I had when
I developed MT way back in the early 1990’s by individuals using classic
Radionics instruments. Perhaps give it another 20 years and it will be ready!

For us to progress in this field we need to accept that it is the operators mind
that is the prime mover in the situation, rather than trying to wrap things up in
a coating of pseudo-science that any scientist or engineer with see straight
through very quickly.

It was partially this situation that held Radionics back in it’s earlier days. 
Many instrument manufacturers were more than concerned that a physics
savvy individual would open up an instrument to find meaningless circuitry.
This situation shrouded the subject in mystique and secrecy.   Of course, I
might be wrong, although if anyone can explain, in detail, exactly how such
circuitry does enable coupling between the operator and a distant target, I
really would love to know.  It can be pretty tricky transmitting a normal radio
signal a few miles, or even to the other side of the world, with intelligible
information contained upon it, let alone “Radionics signals”.
Chris Bacon

Radionic Technology of the Future

Leave a Reply

How will Radionic

Technology Change in the Future?
In 1988 I hardly felt my feet touching the pavement as I walked home. Such
was the effect of finding what was energising and exciting for me.  The
afternoon had been literally mind bulging.   I had started learning the
process of a Radionic analysis. New concepts, ideas and understandings were
fizzing.  I now knew where I wanted to go. In fact learning about this work is
still a source of euphoria to me.

However, the process of placing each target on the Radionic instrument for
‘broadcast’ of treatments became a long winded ritual as my client base
grew.  And yes I do believe it is a ritual – an important part of the treatment
process.

My Radionic instrument was similar to this one.

 
Each client’s hair sample or similar witness of a target was placed upon the
treatment plate. The dials were set to represent the ‘Rate’ or Numerical
IDentification (NID) of a treatment. The potency dial was set to represent the
physical or subtle level at which treatments were directed.

So we could be treating

 mucous membrane of the left Eustachian tube (994410. on treatment

dials)
 of a child (blotting paper soaked saliva sample on treatment plate)
 at the Etheric level (Calibrated potency dial 200x = Etheric)

and this would be a treatment for just over 3 minutes followed by any
remaining treatments for that client (Typically around 3 each) and everyone
else for that day…….

Eventually the time taken to complete these treatments had me awake until
the wee small hours of most nights.  It is nigh on impossible to achieve
anything ELSE in a 3 minute window.

My Radionic instrument was my pride and joy.  It took me years to find one.
They were like gold dust.  Expensive to make.  Nigh on impossible to buy.
Most were being exported to Europe…. for some reason.  Manufacturers and
users of Radionic instrumentation seemed to have become entangled in the
concept that the instrument “did the healing”.  That’s what I was initially
taught.  People like me, who were not part of a recognised school
struggled.   (Listen to our podcast for more information on 1980/90s
Radionics in the UK) https://archive.org/details/FWDPodcast1_201505

Roll on to 1999 and Chris and Barbara introducing me to the MultiTreat 6.1
Radionic Software.

If you didn’t know already we offer MultiTreat 7.0 as free Radionic

Technology.
MT 7.0 was and STILL IS the Radionic software that has saved me hours. 
Once initiated, Radionic treatments proceed through automatically whilst I
am at work (or play).
What is the future of Radionic Technology?
Radionic technology will change.  In 30 years time we will not be using the
Radionic software available now.  How will it change?  It could be quite
dramatically.  Especially as the Radionic instrument is a “tuning focus for the
mind”.  See Dimensions of Radionics by David V Tansley   Chris refers to
the employment of MultiTreat© as “using a physical stimulus to move the data
over to the sub-conscious mind, and out to the Matrix mind”.

One of the main reasons for starting the Framework Dowsing website was to
provide information and Radionic instrumentation which was so achingly
difficult for me.  I wanted practitioners to move forward with their work
unhampered from lack of resources or support.

Let’s get this clear.  I never meant to have a website.  Owning a computer
seemed out of my league back in the 1990’s.  It wasn’t part of my
initial ‘floating along the pavement plan’.  But by launching the Framework
Dowsing website in 2011, I created an outline of my journey forward. Both my
Radionic practice and the contact I have with many of you is part of that
journey.  The ‘living in the moment’.  Your questions and comments give
Framework Dowsing more specific directions.  We can all shape the future of
our understanding and involvement in Radionics.

New Radionic Software

So if we look a few years ahead.  Where do you want to be as a dowser or
practitioner in 5 years?  What do you want from your Radionic
instrumentation?  How are you going to be part of that development and
understanding of the process of Radionic analysis and Radionic treatment?
What are you going to learn and share with others?

And asking questions; your comments and observations; requests for our
points of view …. these all mould our way forward and ultimately the Radionic
technology of the future.

Chris Bacon of Framework Dowsing is moving Radionics software forward.  

MultiTreat X is tantalisingly close to beta testing.
Will you contribute to new concepts and ideas with this new Radionic
software?
My request was for a longer input field for the Base 44 rates.
So ……. open your email client jane@frameworkdowsing.co.uk
or leave your comments below
Be proactive.
Ask questions and share what features you wish were available in your
Radionic instrumentation.  These will help the development of your own
concepts and the future of Radionic Instrumentation.

What facilities would you like from your Radionic software?

Right.  I’m off to put together my Raspberry Pi !

Accurate Radionic Rates

 Do you have any lists
of accurate Radionic Rates?
One of the interesting and mind stretching questions received as a result
of making the MultiTreat 7.0 available as a free download from
the frameworkdowsing.co.uk website at the end of 2015
Well the concept of an accurate Radionic Rate is probably, for many
practitioners thought to be pretty obvious.        Taken for granted.

But are some Rates – or as we prefer to refer to them – Numerical

IDentifications (NIDs) more accurate than others?

In the Framework Dowser YouTube video, I show a way of creating a Radionic

Rate / NID using dowsing.  This is then checked against the Framework
Dowsing database and filed accordingly.

But is it only time that verifies a Radionic

Rate’s Accuracy?
OK     I have been using a set of Numerical IDs for 30+ years.  My teacher
had created and built these up over the previous 30+ years.  I felt instantly
comfortable and confident working with the Framework Dowsing
Conditions.  There was no problem with their efficacy within the treatment
analysis.  But ……. if an item was indicated that was within a new field …… 
it was a different matter.  Barbara introduced me to the Starlight Elixirs.  It
took a while to become ‘fluent’ and confident when they were isolated during
an analysis.  Frequently the reference material did not make sense in
relation to the target.  It can often take research, discussion with an open
minded colleague; considering the remedy from a different viewpoint or just
plain repetitive use and familiarisation to become more confident.

Is this the key to Accurate Radionic Rates?

I think it is.  It is not the actual numbers that make up a rate.  They are not
magical and mysterious codes.  I believe they are the link with the
practitioner’s subconscious.

29939 is my numerical representation for the circulatory system

I know that within my framework, this number only relates to the circulatory
system (as a whole).
If I enter 29939 into the MultiTreat Radionic Software
12 days treatments for 15 days – this action is also then linked to the
subconscious – every time the MultiTreat Radionic program is initiated.
I believe that the accuracy and effectiveness of a Radionic treatment rate
lies with the practitioner and their confidence and clarity of thoughts and
concepts.
You may be interested in the Framework Dowsing video Distance Healing
and Cakes for more information about Rates and Numerical IDs.

Jane Radford

Originally posted on frameworkdowsing.com 25.5.2016

Radionic Analyses
Radionic Analysis – The Inheritance Aspect

Last Friday saw the release of ground breaking epigenetic research in the
USA.  This then hit the UK media on the Monday.  Not only does it provide
information which is relevant to psychiatric practitioners but it backs up what
medical dowsers have been including in their treatment analyses for
decades.

biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article
theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/21/

This is the way that I was taught:

Once I had ascertained the condition or location to be treated the next step
was to find out the level at which to direct Radionic treatments.  This was
followed by finding the Aspect of that Level.
I have not talked about these Aspects before……. apart from
during workshops and one-to-one tuition sessions.  They are as follows:

1. Karmic
2. Inherited
3. Emotional
4. Aquired
5. Dharmic
6. Non Personal Interference

This research is linked with the 2nd Aspect.  The Inheritance pattern.
So if a condition or location is indicated for treatment at the 2nd Apsect this
means it is an inherited condition or ‘weakness’ of a physiological location
(N.B. can also be the general metabolism).

So the research team at New York’s Mount Sinai hospital is demonstrating

and providing some verification in humans that what our ancestors
experienced and emotionally and mentally attempted to process has an effect
upon the DNA picture gallery.   This has frequently been shown using
animals.  This is the first research that has been able to use people.

It is very exciting when the way that we work, or the tools that we use, or the
concepts that we employ are supported by scientific research.  Dowsing does
enable us to pinpoint specific information within such a complex set of
overlapping and intertwined negative effects upon the balance and vitality
associated with ‘health’.

I was also taught that a pattern in the inheritance pattern can go back up to 6
generations.  It may provide a more accurate meaning to Exodus 34 in the
Bible.

“…… visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s
children, to the third and the fourth generation.”

And here the definition of iniquity as ‘immoral or grossly unfair behaviour’

should be seen as also that which is also inflicted upon the fathers.
The concept of Karma has long been used to control the masses.  But
perhaps I should do another blog post about this 1st Aspect in the future!

Jane Radford
28 August 2015