Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topik Khusus 5 ImplementasiITSMpadaOrganisasiKecil
Topik Khusus 5 ImplementasiITSMpadaOrganisasiKecil
Configuration Management
IT Staff/ Supervisor/ seorang staf TI secara minimal dpt ditugaskan
Change Management
Manager untuk memastikan proses telah berjalan
Release Management
Availability Management
IT service continuity IT Supervisor/ Manager Sudah jelas
management
Kesimpulan
• ITSM dan ITIL bukan hanya milik perusahaan
besar saja.
• Semua perusahaan dengan skala apapun dapat
mengambil hikmah dari penerapan ITIL ini.
• ITIL mentransformasi komponen2 organisasi TI
mjd bagian2 yg saling berinteraksi
– Tidak hanya vertikal (bos dan anak buah)
– Namun juga horizontal (tim software dan tim
hardware)
Practitioners comment
• IT Service Management should be a core competency for
all IT professionals, much like Risk Management or
Security should be.
• For the smallest of the small orgs, at least understanding
the basic concepts and the need for process can make a
world of difference.
• For example, if I know nothing about a car, it is hard to
effectively shop for one. If I at least know the
fundamentals about cars, I can make a better decision.
• Obviously, the more I know, the better off I am. But,
there is that trade off...cost/business value benefit.
Practitioners comment
(small size IT organization)
I think there is a huge amount of value in ITSM practices in small organizations (as
defined above). I have 5 staff in my IT organization, yes that is only 5 I did not
leave off a 0. We are working to implement ITIL practices. Will we implement
the entire ITIL structure? Probably not. However, I am implementing the things
that make sense for us and that support our outcomes and needs. I think if you
have more than two people on your IT staff you can find value in ITSM practices
and the methodologies that exist to implement it.
As a matter of fact I have submitted a proposal for a presentation at the Long
Beach conference to talk about that exact topic. I refer to it as Bite-sized ITIL (a
term we came up with in a discussion at the DC conference). The main point I
think it is important to remember about ITIL and Ivor has also stated this in this
forum, is that it can scale.
You don't have to have 18 different people performing the myriad of roles that ITIL
defines. Take what works and apply it to your environment. If you don't use a
particular part of the methodology then don't worry about it.
So I would say that I am an example that you don't have to have 50 people for ITIL
to be successful. I think that small organizations have even more ability to
benefit from these practices than large organizations. One reason is we can
move faster (in most cases) and our cost to implement is usually significantly
less. In addition, with small staffs any ability to improve process and establish
expectations is a huge value in an organization my size.
Practisioners comment
(human vs tools)
My last comment. Tools are an important aspect of implementing a
successful ITSM strategy, regardless if it is ITIL or MOF or Six Sigma.
However, I think the idea that you can completely automate and
remove the human element from service management is unrealistic. I
don't want to remove the human element from service management
nor do I think you can. Part of service management is customer and
user expectation management. An automated system does not deal
with expectation management.
Another part of ITSM is the constant improvement of processes. Most
tools do not have the ability to look at themselves and continually
evolve based on improvements in process. I think tools are good, but I
also think an organization that tries to automate out the human factor
in ITSM would be less successful than one that uses tools as a tool
rather than as the core of the process. As technologists, we often think
that technology is the answer to everything, but I happen to think that
technology is only the answer where it adds value to the desired
outcome.
Andy Atencio
Gambaran tahap Penelitian