This document outlines criteria for evaluating content, development, organization, and writing mechanics on a scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. For each category, it provides descriptors for performance at the unsatisfactory, needs improvement, satisfactory, and outstanding levels. Areas of evaluation include content completeness and persuasiveness, organization and structure, clarity of purpose and support, and use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Performance is scored on a scale of 0-20 across the four categories.
This document outlines criteria for evaluating content, development, organization, and writing mechanics on a scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. For each category, it provides descriptors for performance at the unsatisfactory, needs improvement, satisfactory, and outstanding levels. Areas of evaluation include content completeness and persuasiveness, organization and structure, clarity of purpose and support, and use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Performance is scored on a scale of 0-20 across the four categories.
This document outlines criteria for evaluating content, development, organization, and writing mechanics on a scale from unsatisfactory to outstanding. For each category, it provides descriptors for performance at the unsatisfactory, needs improvement, satisfactory, and outstanding levels. Areas of evaluation include content completeness and persuasiveness, organization and structure, clarity of purpose and support, and use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Performance is scored on a scale of 0-20 across the four categories.
Development Clarity of purpose - Content is incomplete. - Content is not - Content is accurate and - Content is comprehensive, Critical and original - Major points are not comprehensive and /or persuasive. accurate, and persuasive. thought clear. persuasive. - Major points are stated. - Major points are stated clearly and Use of relevant -Specific examples are - Major points are addressed, - Responses are adequate and are well supported. examples not used. but not well supported. address topic. - Responses are excellent, timely - Responses are inadequate or - Content is clear. and address topic. do not address topic. -Specific examples are used. - Content is clear. -Specific examples do not -Specific examples are used. support topic.
Structure - Organization and - Structure of the paper is not - Structure is mostly clear and -Structure of the paper is clear and structure detract from easy to follow. easy to follow. easy to follow. the message. - Transitions need - Transitions are present. - Transitions are logical and - Writing is disjointed and improvement. - Conclusion is logical. maintain the flow of thought lacks transition of - Conclusion is missing, or if throughout the paper. thoughts. provided, does not flow from - Conclusion is logical and flows the body of the paper. from the body of the paper.
Punctuation & - Paper contains - Paper contains few - Rules of grammar, usage, and - Rules of grammar, usage, and Spelling numerous grammatical, grammatical, punctuation and punctuation are followed with punctuation are followed; spelling is punctuation, and spelling spelling errors. minor errors. correct. errors. Spelling is correct.